The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spacing enhances the learning of natural concepts: an investigation of mechanisms, metacognition, and aging
Open accessAbstract
In two experiments, we examined spacing effects on the learning of bird families and metacognitive assessments of such learning. Results revealed that spacing enhanced learning beyond massed study. These effects were increased by presenting birds in pairs so as to highlight differences among families during study (Experiment 1). Self-allocated study time provided evidence that more attention was paid during spaced than during massed study and resulted in no age differences in learning (Experiment 2). Metacognitive measures revealed sensitivity to the processing advantage of spaced study and to differences in classification difficulty across categories. No difference occurred in monitoring accuracy for young versus older adults. These findings provide evidence for discrimination- and attention-based accounts of the spacing effect in natural concept learning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Importantly, however, even when interleaving is beneficial, it may seem counterproductive: The great majority of the participants in the present study, as well as those in prior studies (Kornell & Bjork, 2008;Kornell et al., 2010;Wahlheim et al., 2011;Zulkiply et al., 2012), judged that they had learned more effectively with blocked than with interleaved study.”
From Why interleaving enhances inductive learning: The roles of discrimination and retrieval (2013) · cites this paper as Wahlheim et al., 2011
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Interleaving effect found; simultaneous presentation of examples did not have an effect.”
From A systematic review of interleaving as a concept learning strategy (2021) · cites this paper as Wahlheim et al. (2011)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Participants were better able to recognise different bird species in pairs.”
From Spacing and Interleaving Effects Require Distinct Theoretical Bases: a Systematic Review Testing the Cognitive Load and Discriminative-Contrast Hypotheses (2021) · cites this paper as Wahlheim et al. (2011a, b)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Wahlheim et al. (2011) also found benefits of simultaneous presentation of different categories for inductive learning.”
From Why interleaving enhances inductive learning: The roles of discrimination and retrieval (2013) · cites this paper as Wahlheim et al. (2011)
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The results were consistent with prior studies (Kang & Pashler, 2012;Wahlheim et al., 2011) in supporting the discriminative-contrast hypothesis: Interrupting discrimination processing, which was accomplished in the present experiment by inserting trivia questions between interleaved exemplars, impaired inductive learning, whereas interleaved order, the bottom row depicts four Fieldfare exemplars.”
From Why interleaving enhances inductive learning: The roles of discrimination and retrieval (2013) · cites this paper as Wahlheim et al., 2011
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“there was some evidence of reduced attention being paid to later items in the blocked conditions.”
From A systematic review of interleaving as a concept learning strategy (2021) · cites this paper as Wahlheim et al. (2011)
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The attention-attenuation hypothesis (Wahlheim, Dunlosky, and Jacoby, 2011) suggests that blocking is inferior because attention dwindles when learners see repeated examples of the same type”
From A systematic review of interleaving as a concept learning strategy (2021) · cites this paper as Wahlheim, Dunlosky, and Jacoby, 2011
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Self-paced version of Expt 1, showed evidence of reduced attention on later trials.”
From A systematic review of interleaving as a concept learning strategy (2021) · cites this paper as Wahlheim et al. (2011)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition
Salthouse, T. A. (1996) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.103.3.403 · Cited by 5,902 · cited 2×
“Older adults typically show slower processing speed, as compared with young adults (e.g., Salthouse, 1996 ), and there are typically no age differences in metacognitive monitoring.”
Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis.
Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354 · Cited by 1,888 · cited 2×
“This pattern of results was confirmed by a significant study × position interaction, F(5, 230) = 3.”
A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions
Nelson, T. O. (1984) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.95.1.109 · Cited by 976
Learning Concepts and Categories: Is Spacing the “Enemy of Induction”?
Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A. (2008) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02127.x · Cited by 602
The Psychology of Learning and Motivation
(2009) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-01769-3 · Cited by 341
Allocation of self-paced study time and the "labor-in-vain effect."
Nelson, T. O., & Leonesio, R. J. (1988) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.14.4.676 · Cited by 332
Memory for grocery prices in younger and older adults: The role of schematic support.
Castel, A. D. (2005) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.20.4.718 · Cited by 291
Distributing and Managing the Conditions of Encoding and Practice
Dempster, F. N. (1996) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012102570-0/50011-2 · Cited by 244
Dunlosky, J. T., & Hertzog, C. K. (2001) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03194918 · Cited by 215
Self-citationCastel, A. D. (2007) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(07)48006-9 · Cited by 192
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100612453266 · Cited by 3,138
Self-citationSelf-Regulated Learning: Beliefs, Techniques, and Illusions
Bjork, R. A., Dunlosky, J., & Kornell, N. (2013) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143823 · Cited by 1,468
Self-citationWhy interleaving enhances inductive learning: The roles of discrimination and retrieval
Birnbaum, M. S., Kornell, N., Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2013) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-012-0272-7 · Cited by 278
Interleaving Helps Students Distinguish among Similar Concepts
Rohrer, D. (2012) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-012-9201-3 · Cited by 237
The science of effective learning with spacing and retrieval practice
Carpenter, S. K., Pan, S. C., & Butler, A. C. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-022-00089-1 · Cited by 184
Carvalho, P. F., & Goldstone, R. L. (2014) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-013-0371-0 · Cited by 175
Yan, V. X., Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000177 · Cited by 152
Kirk-Johnson, A., Galla, B. M., & Fraundorf, S. H. (2019) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2019.101237 · Cited by 175
Five Popular Study Strategies: Their Pitfalls and Optimal Implementations
Miyatsu, T., Nguyen, K., & McDaniel, M. A. (2018) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691617710510 · Cited by 152
Why Forget? On the Adaptive Value of Memory Loss
Nørby, S. (2015) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691615596787 · Cited by 156
Carvalho, P. F., & Goldstone, R. L. (2014) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0676-4 · Cited by 127
Rohrer, D., Dedrick, R. F., & Burgess, K. (2014) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0588-3 · Cited by 122
Toppino, T. C., & Gerbier, É. (2013) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-800090-8.00004-4 · Cited by 122
The effects of interleaving versus blocking on foreign language pronunciation learning
Carpenter, S. K., & Mueller, F. E. (2013) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-012-0291-4 · Cited by 103
Kapler, I. V., Weston, T., & Wiseheart, M. (2015) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.11.001 · Cited by 101
Zulkiply, N., & Burt, J. S. (2013) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-012-0238-9 · Cited by 92
Evidence‐based teaching: Tools and techniques that promote learning in the psychology classroom
Dunn, D. S., Saville, B. K., Baker, S. C., & Marek, P. (2013) · Australian Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/ajpy.12004 · Cited by 78
Spacing and induction: Application to exemplars presented as auditory and visual text
Zulkiply, N. B., McLean, J. P., Burt, J. S., & Bath, D. M. (2011) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.11.002 · Cited by 70
Task repetition for language learning
DEKEYSER, R. M. (2018) · Task-based language teaching · doi:10.1075/tblt.11.01dek · Cited by 70
Foster, N. L., Mueller, M. L., Was, C., Rawson, K. A., & Dunlosky, J. (2019) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-019-00918-4 · Cited by 67
Self-citationCarvalho, P. F., & Goldstone, R. L. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00505 · Cited by 78
Self-regulated learning of a natural category: Do people interleave or block exemplars during study?
Tauber, S. K., Dunlosky, J. T., Rawson, K. A., Wahlheim, C. N., & Jacoby, L. L. (2012) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0319-6 · Cited by 69
Self-citationVlach, H. A. (2014) · Child Development Perspectives · doi:10.1111/cdep.12079 · Cited by 66
A systematic review of interleaving as a concept learning strategy
Firth, J., Rivers, I., & Boyle, J. (2021) · Review of Education · doi:10.1002/rev3.3266 · Cited by 65
Chen, O., Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2021) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-021-09613-w · Cited by 62
“Generally, research has shown that interleaved practice is superior to blocked practice (e.g., Kang & Pashler, 2012; Kornell & Bjork, 2008; Taylor & Rohrer, 2010; Rohrer & Taylor, 2007; Shea &Morgan, 1979; Wahlheim et al., 2011a, b).”
BackgroundRichler, J. J., & Palmeri, T. J. (2013) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.1268 · Cited by 73
A comparison of adaptive and fixed schedules of practice.
Mettler, E. W., Massey, C. M., & Kellman, P. J. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000170 · Cited by 67
People mind wander more during massed than spaced inductive learning.
Metcalfe, J., & Xu, J. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000216 · Cited by 62
Interleaved presentation benefits science category learning.
Eglington, L. G., & Kang, S. H. K. (2017) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.005 · Cited by 72
Spacing Simultaneously Promotes Multiple Forms of Learning in Children's Science Curriculum
Gluckman, M., Vlach, H. A., & Sandhofer, C. M. (2014) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.2997 · Cited by 57
Interleaved practice enhances memory and problem-solving ability in undergraduate physics
Samani, J., & Pan, S. C. (2021) · npj Science of Learning · doi:10.1038/s41539-021-00110-x · Cited by 64
Wahlheim, C. N., Finn, B., & Jacoby, L. L. (2012) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-011-0180-2 · Cited by 53
Self-citationDignam, J. K., Rodriguez, A. D., & Copland, D. A. (2015) · PM&R · doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.06.010 · Cited by 59
Effects of interleaved and blocked study on delayed test of category learning generalization
Carvalho, P. F., & Goldstone, R. L. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00936 · Cited by 61
Does Strategy Training Reduce Age-Related Deficits in Working Memory?
Bailey, H. R., Dunlosky, J., & Hertzog, C. (2014) · Gerontology · doi:10.1159/000356699 · Cited by 49
Self-citationKoval, N. G. (2019) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716419000158 · Cited by 52
Optimal sequencing during category learning: Testing a dual-learning systems perspective
Noh, S. M., Yan, V. X., Bjork, R. A., & Maddox, W. T. (2016) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.06.007 · Cited by 48
“Sharon M. Noh a,⇑, Veronica X. Yan b, Robert A. Bjork b, W. Todd Maddox a aUniversity of Texas, Austin, United States bUniversity of California, Los Angeles, United States a r t i c l e i n f o Article history: Received 11 May 2015 Revised 10 June 2016 Accepted 14 June 2016 Available online 22 June 2016 Keywords: Cate…”
BackgroundAdaptive response-time-based category sequencing in perceptual learning
Mettler, E. W., & Kellman, P. J. (2014) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2013.12.009 · Cited by 46
Spacing Effects on Learning and Memory ☆
Carpenter, S. K. (2017) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-809324-5.21054-7 · Cited by 52
Category learning judgments in the classroom: Can students judge how well they know course topics?
Hartwig, M. K., & Dunlosky, J. T. (2016) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.12.002 · Cited by 44
Self-citationTesting prepares students to learn better: The forward effect of testing in category learning.
Lee, H. S., & Ahn, D. (2017) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000211 · Cited by 45
Kirchoff, B. K., Delaney, P. F., Horton, M., & Dellinger-Johnston, R. (2014) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.13-11-0224 · Cited by 40
When Does Interleaving Practice Improve Learning?
Carvalho, P. F., & Goldstone, R. L. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108235631.017 · Cited by 35
Mixing topics while studying does not enhance learning.
Hausman, H., & Kornell, N. (2014) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.03.003 · Cited by 33
Diminished But Not Forgotten: Effects of Aging on Magnitude of Spacing Effect Benefits
Simone, P. M., Bell, M. C., & Cepeda, N. J. (2012) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B · doi:10.1093/geronb/gbs096 · Cited by 31
Macaluso, J. A., Beuford, R. R., & Fraundorf, S. H. (2022) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence10040083 · Cited by 35
Equal spacing and expanding schedules in children’s categorization and generalization
Vlach, H. A., Sandhofer, C. M., & Bjork, R. A. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2014.01.004 · Cited by 29
An In Vivo Study of Self-Regulated Study Sequencing in Introductory Psychology Courses
Carvalho, P. F., Braithwaite, D. W., de Leeuw, J. R., Motz, B. A., & Goldstone, R. L. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0152115 · Cited by 32
Effects of inductive learning and gamification on news veracity discernment.
Modirrousta-Galian, A., Higham, P. A., & Seabrooke, T. (2023) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/xap0000458 · Cited by 36
The advantage of mixing examples in inductive learning: a comparison of three hypotheses
Guzman-Munoz, F. J. (2017) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2015.1127331 · Cited by 22
“Their results however failed to show this interaction in marked contrast to those of Wahlheim et al. (2011).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialThe acquisition of Boolean concepts
Goodwin, G. P., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2013) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.01.007 · Cited by 23
Do students think that difficult or valuable materials should be restudied sooner rather than later?
Cohen, M. S., Yan, V. X., Halamish, V., & Bjork, R. A. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0032425 · Cited by 25
Anderson, S., Jamniczky, H. A., Krigolson, O. E., Coderre, S., & Hecker, K. G. (2019) · npj Science of Learning · doi:10.1038/s41539-019-0050-4 · Cited by 23
A Review of the Application of Distributed Practice Principles to Naming Treatment in Aphasia
Middleton, E. L., Schuchard, J., & Rawson, K. A. (2020) · Topics in Language Disorders · doi:10.1097/tld.0000000000000202 · Cited by 23
The easy-to-hard training advantage with real-world medical images
Roads, B. D., Xu, B., Robinson, J. K., & Tanaka, J. W. (2018) · Cognitive Research Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-018-0131-6 · Cited by 22
The role of attentional fluctuation during study in recollecting episodic changes at test
Garlitch, S. M., & Wahlheim, C. N. (2020) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-020-01018-4 · Cited by 23
Self-citationExploring the necessary conditions for observing interleaved practice benefits in math learning
Mielicki, M. K., & Wiley, J. (2022) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101583 · Cited by 28
Enhancing Cognitive Fitness in Adults
Hartman-Stein, P. E., & Rue, A. L. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-0636-6 · Cited by 43
Blocking as a friend of induction in verbal category learning
Sorensen, L. J., & Woltz, D. J. (2016) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-016-0615-x · Cited by 20
The contribution of classroom exams to formative evaluation of concept-level knowledge
Rivers, M. L., Dunlosky, J. T., & Joynes, R. L. (2019) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101806 · Cited by 24
Self-citationDo people use category-learning judgments to regulate their learning of natural categories?
Morehead, K., Dunlosky, J. T., & Foster, N. L. (2017) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-017-0729-9 · Cited by 21
Self-citationAnderson, S. Y. C., Ong, W. S. Y., & Momsen, J. L. (2020) · Chemistry Education Research and Practice · doi:10.1039/c9rp00252a · Cited by 20
Temporal dynamics of categorization: forgetting as the basis of abstraction and generalization
Vlach, H. A., & Kalish, C. W. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01021 · Cited by 21
Memory Enhancement Strategies: What Works Best for Obtaining Memory Goals?
Dunlosky, J. T., Bailey, H. R., & Hertzog, C. K. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-0636-6_1 · Cited by 17
Self-citationDiurnal oscillation of vocal development associated with clustered singing by juvenile songbirds
Ohgushi, E., Mori, C., & Wada, K. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.115105 · Cited by 16
Learning Object Names at Different Hierarchical Levels Using Cross‐Situational Statistics
Chen, C., Zhang, Y., & Yu, C. (2017) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12516 · Cited by 16
Learning relational concepts from within- versus between-category comparisons.
Corral, D., Kurtz, K. J., & Jones, M. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000517 · Cited by 20
A Computational Model of Context‐Dependent Encodings During Category Learning
Carvalho, P. F., & Goldstone, R. L. (2022) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.13128 · Cited by 19
Category structure modulates interleaving and blocking advantage in inductive category acquisition
Carvalho, P. F., & Goldstone, R. L. (2012) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 14
Visual category learning: Navigating the intersection of rules and similarity
Hughes, G. I., & Thomas, A. K. (2021) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-020-01838-0 · Cited by 17
Is Concept Appraisal Modulated by Procedural or Declarative Manipulations?
Thorne, S. R., Smortchkova, J., Quilty‐Dunn, J., Shea, N. J., & Hampton, J. A. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.774629 · Cited by 14
Learning to avoid biased reasoning: effects of interleaved practice and worked examples
van Peppen, L. M., Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L., Kolenbrander, S. V., Heijltjes, A. E. G., Janssen, E. M., & van Gog, T. (2021) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2021.1890092 · Cited by 17
Motz, B. A., Fyfe, E. R., & Guba, T.-P. (2022) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/mac0000053 · Cited by 19
Category similarity affects study choices in self-regulated learning
Lu, X., Penney, T. B., & Kang, S. H. K. (2020) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-020-01074-w · Cited by 17
Metacognitive monitoring during category learning: how success affects future behaviour
Doyle, M. E., & Hourihan, K. L. (2015) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2015.1086805 · Cited by 14
Thomas, R. C., Finn, B., & Jacoby, L. L. (2015) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-015-9144-4 · Cited by 16
Self-citationUsing Interleaving to Promote Inductive Learning in Educational Contexts
Richter, T., Nemeth, L., Berger, R., Ferri, R. B., Hänze, M., & Lipowsky, F. (2022) · Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie · doi:10.1026/0049-8637/a000260 · Cited by 16
Millikan’s consistency testers and the cultural evolution of concepts
Shea, N. J. (2023) · Evolutionary Linguistic Theory · doi:10.1075/elt.00048.she · Cited by 13
Learning melodic musical intervals: To block or to interleave?
Wong, S. S. H., Chen, S., & Lim, S. W. H. (2020) · Psychology of Music · doi:10.1177/0305735620922595 · Cited by 15
Not just stimuli structure: Sequencing effects in category learning vary by task demands.
Yan, V. X., & Schuetze, B. A. (2021) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2021.09.004 · Cited by 15
Study preferences for exemplar variability in self-regulated category learning
Wahlheim, C. N., & DeSoto, K. A. (2016) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2016.1152378 · Cited by 14
Self-citationInductive learning: Does interleaving exemplars affect long‐term retention?
Zulkiply, N., & Burt, J. S. (2013) · Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction · doi:10.32890/mjli.10.2013.7655 · Cited by 11
Yan, T., & Zhou, D. (2023) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2023.103049 · Cited by 14
Training of rock classifications: The use of computer images versus physical rock samples
Meagher, B. J., Cataldo, K., Douglas, B. J., McDaniel, M. A., & Nosofsky, R. M. (2018) · Journal of Geoscience Education · doi:10.1080/10899995.2018.1465756 · Cited by 11
The Influence of Presentation Order on Category Transfer
Mathy, F., & Feldman, J. (2016) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000312 · Cited by 11
The impact of training sequence and between-category similarity on unsupervised induction
Clapper, J. P. (2014) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2014.981553 · Cited by 10
Tauber, S. K., & Dunlosky, J. T. (2014) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.11.011 · Cited by 10
Self-citationThe benefit of interleaved presentation in category learning is independent of working memory
Wang, J., Liu, Z., Xing, Q., & Seger, C. A. (2020) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2019.1705490 · Cited by 10
Pan, S. C., Flores, S. R., Kaku, M. E., & Lai, W. H. E. (2024) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.102045 · Cited by 11
Boser, J., Scherer, S., Kuchta, K., Wenzel, S. F. C., & Horz, H. (2016) · Psychology Learning & Teaching · doi:10.1177/1475725716686452 · Cited by 9
A Systematic Review of Interleaving as a Concept Learning Strategy
Firth, J., Rivers, I., & Boyle, J. (2019) · Social Science Protocols · doi:10.7565/ssp.2019.2650 · Cited by 8
Pan, S. C., Yu, L., Hong, Y., Wong, M. J., Selvarajan, G., & Kaku, M. E. (2024) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102603 · Cited by 8
Chong, C.-H., & Yeo, K. J. (2015) · Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences · doi:10.5901/mjss.2016.v7n1p517 · Cited by 9
Tullis, J. G., & Goldstone, R. L. (2016) · Cognitive Research Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-016-0028-1 · Cited by 8
The Complexities of Learning Categories Through Comparisons
Higgins, E. J. (2016) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/bs.plm.2016.11.002 · Cited by 7
Zulkiply, N. B. (2013) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.228 · Cited by 7
Metacognitive Illusion in Category Learning: Contributions of Processing Fluency and Beliefs
Wang, J., & Xing, Q. (2019) · Advances in Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.5709/acp-0260-3 · Cited by 9
Michal, A. L., Fansher, M., Sun, X., Zhang, H., & Shah, P. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199841332.013.7 · Cited by 7
The relationship between interleaving and variability effects: a cognitive load theory perspective
Chen, O., Retnowati, E., Castro-Alonso, J. C., Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2023) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci13111138 · Cited by 11
Concurrent Dynamics of Category Learning and Metacognitive Judgments
Žauhar, V., Bajšanski, I., & Domijan, D. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01473 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Wahlheim, C. N., Dunlosky, J., & Jacoby, L. L.
- Affiliations
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Kent State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wahlheim, Christopher N.
- Venue
- Memory & Cognition
- Published
- 2011-01-07
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 750-763
- ISSN
- 0090-502X (ISSN-L)
- 1532-5946
- PMC
- PMC3085105
- OpenAlex
- W2159313072
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 6.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Memory & Cognition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- NC Digital Online Collection of Knowledge and Scholarship (The University of North Carolina at Greensboro) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- James S. McDonnell Foundation
- National Institute on Aging (T32AG000030)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- spacing effect, bird families, metacognition, aging, attention, discrimination learning, monitoring accuracy
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aging, Animals, Association Learning, Attention, Concept Formation, Discrimination Learning, Female, Humans, Judgment, Male, Middle Aged, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Practice, Psychological, Mental Recall, Passeriformes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
