Does Confidence Use a Common Currency Across Two Visual Tasks?
Abstract
International audience
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
An aggregate measure of metacognitive sensitivity can be computed as the difference in slope between psychometric functions constructed from high and low confidence trials.
“An alternative approach is to compute an aggregate measure of metacognitive sensitivity as the difference in slope between psychometric functions constructed from high and low confidence trials (e.g., De Martino et al., 2013; de Gardelle and Mamassian, 2014).”
From How to measure metacognition (2014) · cites this paper as de Gardelle and Mamassian, 2014
Cites
(1966) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,293 · see citing works
Signal detection theory and psychophysics
Ingleby, D. (1967) · Journal of Sound and Vibration · doi:10.1016/0022-460x(67)90197-6 · Cited by 8,616 · see citing works
A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing
Masson, M. E. J. (2011) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-010-0049-5 · Cited by 752 · see citing works
Two-stage dynamic signal detection: A theory of choice, decision time, and confidence.
Pleskac, T. J., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2010) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0019737 · Cited by 722 · see citing works
Zhang, H., & Maloney, L. T. (2012) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2012.00001 · Cited by 679 · see citing works
Metacognition in human decision-making: confidence and error monitoring
Yeung, N., & Summerfield, C. (2012) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0416 · Cited by 667 · see citing works
Combining Sensory Information: Mandatory Fusion Within, but Not Between, Senses
Hillis, J. M., Ernst, M. O., Banks, M. S., & Landy, M. S. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1075396 · Cited by 486 · see citing works
Metacognition: computation, biology and function
Fleming, S. M., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2012) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0021 · Cited by 344 · see citing works
The calibration and resolution of confidence in perceptual judgments
Baranski, J. V., & Petrusic, W. (1994) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03205299 · Cited by 315 · see citing works
The construction of confidence in a perceptual decision
Zylberberg, A., Barttfeld, P., & Sigman, M. (2012) · Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnint.2012.00079 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
Memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences
(1885) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/274024 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Evaluation of Objective Uncertainty in the Visual System
Barthelmé, S., & Mamassian, P. (2009) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000504 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Self-citationFlexible mechanisms underlie the evaluation of visual confidence
Barthelmé, S., & Mamassian, P. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1007704107 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fleming, S. M., & Lau, H. C. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00443 · Cited by 1,386 · see citing works
“An alternative approach is to compute an aggregate measure of metacognitive sensitivity as the difference in slope between psychometric functions constructed from high and low confidence trials (e.g., De Martino et al., 2013; de Gardelle and Mamassian, 2014).”
MethodWhat is consciousness, and could machines have it?
Dehaene, S., Lau, H., & Kouider, S. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aan8871 · Cited by 855 · see citing works
Confidence and certainty: Distinct probabilistic quantities for different goals
Pouget, A., Drugowitsch, J., & Kepecs, A. (2016) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4240 · Cited by 528 · see citing works
Confidence as Bayesian probability: From neural origins to behavior
Meyniel, F., Sigman, M., & Mainen, Z. F. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.039 · Cited by 349 · see citing works
The Sense of Confidence during Probabilistic Learning: A Normative Account
Meyniel, F., Schlunegger, D., & Dehaene, S. (2015) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004305 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Human Metacognition Across Domains: Insights from Individual Differences and Neuroimaging
Rouault, M., McWilliams, A., Allen, M. G., & Fleming, S. M. (2018) · Personality Neuroscience · doi:10.1017/pen.2018.16 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Domain-general enhancements of metacognitive ability through adaptive training.
Carpenter, J., Sherman, M. T., Kievit, R. A., Seth, A. K., Lau, H., & Fleming, S. M. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/xge0000505 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Behavioral, Modeling, and Electrophysiological Evidence for Supramodality in Human Metacognition
Faivre, N., Filevich, E., Solovey, G., Kühn, S., & Blanke, O. (2018) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0322-17.2017 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Confidence as a Common Currency between Vision and Audition
de Gardelle, V., Le Corre, F., & Mamassian, P. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0147901 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Self-citationModeling perceptual confidence and the confidence forced-choice paradigm.
Mamassian, P., & de Gardelle, V. (2022) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000312 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Self-citationConsensus Goals in the Field of Visual Metacognition
Rahnev, D., Balsdon, T., Charles, L., de Gardelle, V., Denison, R., Desender, K., Faivre, N., Filevich, E., Fleming, S. M., Jehee, J., et al. (2022) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916221075615 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Self-citationCalibration in consciousness science
Michel, M. (2023) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-021-00383-z · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Private–public mappings in human prefrontal cortex
Bang, D., Ershadmanesh, S., Nili, H., & Fleming, S. M. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.56477 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Lee, A. L. F., de Gardelle, V., & Mamassian, P. (2021) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-020-01869-7 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- de Gardelle, V., & Mamassian, P.
- Affiliations
- Centre d’Économie de la Sorbonne, CNRS UMR 8174
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- ORCID
- Mamassian, Pascal
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-04-03
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1286-1288
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2051463757
- Cited by
- 131
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 5.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Keywords
- confidence, metacognition, visual perception, cross-task generalization, metacognitive judgments
- MeSH terms
- Cognition, Emotions, Humans, Mental Processes, Perception, Psychometrics, Reaction Time, Self Concept
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
