The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Attentive Turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants
Open accessAbstract
Participant attentiveness is a concern for many researchers using Amazon's Mechanical Turk (MTurk). Although studies comparing the attentiveness of participants on MTurk versus traditional subject pool samples have provided mixed support for this concern, attention check questions and other methods of ensuring participant attention have become prolific in MTurk studies. Because MTurk is a population that learns, we hypothesized that MTurkers would be more attentive to instructions than are traditional subject pool samples. In three online studies, participants from MTurk and collegiate populations participated in a task that included a measure of attentiveness to instructions (an instructional manipulation check: IMC). In all studies, MTurkers were more attentive to the instructions than were college students, even on novel IMCs (Studies 2 and 3), and MTurkers showed larger effects in response to a minute text manipulation. These results have implications for the sustainable use of MTurk samples for social science research and for the conclusions drawn from research with MTurk and college subject pool samples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In crowd-sourced settings such as MTurk, respondents are often incentivized to respond as attentively, compliantly, and quickly as possible to both open higher-paying opportunities and prevent being rejected from future employment [90, 100].”
From Not so terrifying after all? A set of failed replications of the mortality salience effects of Terror Management Theory (2023) · cites this paper as [100]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Comparable attention checks have been shown to improve the quality of data obtained through web-based surveys above that of classic paper and pencil questionnaires [57].”
From Dispositional factors in the explanation of symptoms of depression, anxiety, health anxiety and COVID-19 Phobia (2024) · cites this paper as [57]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/bf03193146 · Cited by 65,971
Advances In Experimental Social Psychology
(2022) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(22)x0002-6 · Cited by 22,559
Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice
Thaler, R. (1985) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.4.3.199 · Cited by 4,885
Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk
Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., & Lenz, G. S. (2012) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpr057 · Cited by 4,008
Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk
Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500002205 · Cited by 3,767
Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power
Oppenheimer, D. M., Meyvis, T., & Davidenko, N. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009 · Cited by 3,493
Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice
Thaler, R. H. (2008) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1070.0330 · Cited by 3,477
Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk
Mason, W., & Suri, S. (2012) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0124-6 · Cited by 3,172
Data collection in a flat world: the strengths and weaknesses of Mechanical Turk samples
Goodman, J. K., Cryder, C. E., & Cheema, A. (2013) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.1753 · Cited by 2,242
Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a Participant Pool
Paolacci, G., & Chandler, J. (2014) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721414531598 · Cited by 2,136
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Kapelner, A., & Chandler, D. (2010). Preventing satisficing in online surveys: A “kapcha” to ensure higher data quality. In Proceedings of CrowdConf 2010. Available at www.academia.edu/2788541/Preventing_Satisficing_in_Online_Surveys
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–900 of 1,003
Abstract Thinking Increases Support for Affirmative Action
Fleischmann, A., & Burgmer, P. (2019) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-019-01068-2 · Cited by 14
Tompkins, M. L., Woods, A. T., & Davies, A. M. A. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00950 · Cited by 13
Lydecker, J. A., & Grilo, C. M. (2017) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.10.009 · Cited by 12
Exaggerated and Questioning Clickbait Headlines and Their Influence on Media Learning
Carcioppolo, N., Lun, D., & McFarlane, S. J. (2021) · Journal of Media Psychology Theories Methods and Applications · doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000298 · Cited by 12
Relational and health correlates of excessive affection
Hesse, C., & Mikkelson, A. C. (2021) · Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01463373.2021.1951792 · Cited by 12
Dictators’ facial characteristics and foreign direct investment
François, A., Panel, S., & Weill, L. (2022) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2022.101644 · Cited by 12
Johnson, N., & Reimer, T. O. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences · doi:10.1007/s13412-023-00850-9 · Cited by 15
Kavanagh, M., Brett, C., & Brignell, C. M. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.108051 · Cited by 14
Effects of Scanning Health News Headlines on Trust in Science: An Emotional Framing Perspective
Nabi, R. L., Dobmeier, C. M., Robbins, C. L., Torres, D. P., & Walter, N. (2024) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2024.2321404 · Cited by 12
Modliba, R., Fischer, S. B., Treffers, T., & Welpe, I. M. (2024) · Creativity and Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/caim.12613 · Cited by 17
The psychometrics of rating facial attractiveness using different response scales
Kramer, R. S. S., Ritchie, K. L., Flack, T. R., Mireku, M. O., & Jones, A. L. (2024) · Perception · doi:10.1177/03010066241256221 · Cited by 14
Mitchell, R. J., von Stieglitz, S., Gu, J., Boyle, B., & Ocampo, A. C. (2024) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/apps.12568 · Cited by 20
Helm, S., Kemper, J. A., White, S., & Dean, D. (2024) · Environmental Sociology · doi:10.1080/23251042.2024.2408779 · Cited by 12
Social identity and drinking: Dissecting social networks and implications for novel interventions
Neighbors, C., Krieger, H., Rodriguez, L. M., Rinker, D. V., & Lembo, J. (2019) · Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community · doi:10.1080/10852352.2019.1603676 · Cited by 12
Alonso, O. (2019) · Synthesis lectures on information concepts, retrieval, and services · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-02318-7 · Cited by 12
Common Method Variance in International Business Research: A Commentary
Doty, D. H., & Astakhova, M. N. (2019) · JIBS special collections · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-22113-3_21 · Cited by 12
Lace, J. W., & Merz, Z. C. (2020) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113529 · Cited by 13
An exploration of thriving over time in recovery
Gutiérrez, D., Goshorn, J. R., & Dorais, S. (2021) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108612 · Cited by 12
Semantic Context Search in Creative Idea Generation
Johnson, D. R., & Hass, R. W. (2022) · The Journal of Creative Behavior · doi:10.1002/jocb.534 · Cited by 14
Perceptions of Substance Use Disorder and Associated Sanctions: A Factorial Vignette Experiment
Kuettel, B. T. (2022) · Criminal Justice Review · doi:10.1177/07340168221105002 · Cited by 12
Improved Mutual Fund Investment Choice Architecture
Newall, P. W. S., & Parker, K. N. (2018) · Journal of Behavioral Finance · doi:10.1080/15427560.2018.1464455 · Cited by 13
Situational Use of Child Restraint Systems and Carpooling Behaviors in Parents and Caregivers
McDonald, C. C., Kennedy, E. E., Fleisher, L. G., & Zonfrillo, M. R. (2018) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph15081788 · Cited by 12
Implicit Approach Biases for Physically Active Lifestyle Cues
Moffitt, R. L., Kemps, E., Hannan, T., Neumann, D., Stopar, S. P., & Anderson, C. (2020) · International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1080/1612197x.2019.1581829 · Cited by 8
Timming, A., Baumann, C., & Gollan, P. (2020) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-06-2018-0365 · Cited by 9
Nai, A., & Otto, L. (2020) · Journal of Media Psychology Theories Methods and Applications · doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000283 · Cited by 12
A measure of adaptive performance and the DLOQ
Kim, K. (2020) · The Learning Organization · doi:10.1108/tlo-03-2020-0047 · Cited by 14
Emotion Musical Prosody for Robotic Groups and Entitativity
Savery, R. J., Rogel, A., & Weinberg, G. (2021) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/ro-man50785.2021.9515314 · Cited by 12
Equalitarianism: A Source of Liberal BiasPreprint
Winegard, B., Clark, C., & Hasty, C. R. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3175680 · Cited by 12
Gender Bias in Pediatric Pain AssessmentPreprint
Earp, B. D., Monrad, J. T., LaFrance, M., Bargh, J. A., Cohen, L. L., & Richeson, J. A. (2018) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/pqg3a · Cited by 12
Gaddis, S. M., & Ghoshal, R. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3022208 · Cited by 12
Imperato, C., & Mancini, T. (2021) · Societies · doi:10.3390/soc11030084 · Cited by 11
Online Engagement with Memes and Comments about Climate Change
Kovacheva, A., Wiener, H. J. D., Kareklas, I., & Muehling, D. D. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14148900 · Cited by 15
“I alone can fix it”: is social courage a bright side of narcissism?
Howard, M. C., Forde, W., Whitmore, J., & Lambert, E. V. Z. (2022) · Journal of Organizational Effectiveness People and Performance · doi:10.1108/joepp-01-2021-0011 · Cited by 11
Anxious activism: The role of behavioral inhibition system in the radicalization process
McGarry, P., & Shortland, N. D. (2022) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107550 · Cited by 11
Resilience against radicalization and extremism in schools: Development of a psychometric scale
Eldor, D. S., Lindholm, K., Chavez, M. H., Vassanyi, S., Badiane, M. O. I., Yaldizli, K., Frøysa, P., Haugestad, C. A. P., & Kunst, J. R. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.980180 · Cited by 11
Cultural differences in ethics and values during conflict resolution: A disentangling approach
Somaraju, A. V. (2023) · International Journal of Cross Cultural Management · doi:10.1177/14705958231155014 · Cited by 11
School absenteeism and impairment associated with weight bullying
Lydecker, J. A., Winschel, J., Gilbert, K., & Cotter, E. W. (2023) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1002/jad.12220 · Cited by 16
Digital Facilitation of Group Work to Gain Predictable Performance
Gimpel, H., Lahmer, S., Wöhl, M., & Graf‐Drasch, V. (2023) · Group Decision and Negotiation · doi:10.1007/s10726-023-09856-8 · Cited by 16
Brühlmann, F., Memeti, Z., Aeschbach, L. F., Perrig, S. A. C., & Opwis, K. (2024) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-023-02321-z · Cited by 11
The voice quality of pedagogical agent impacts learning and agent perceptions
Siegle, R. F., & Craig, S. D. (2024) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.13027 · Cited by 11
Animal welfare information frames US public perceptions of precision technology use on dairy farms
Kelly, B. L., Proudfoot, K. L., da Silva, T. É., Costa, J. H. C., & Ventura, B. A. (2025) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2024-25603 · Cited by 13
Evaluation of the Autism Spectrum Rating Scales in a Diverse, Nonclinical Sample
McClain, M. B., Harris, B., Schwartz, S., & Golson, M. E. (2019) · Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment · doi:10.1177/0734282919880051 · Cited by 11
INTEGRATING SOCIAL COMPARISON INTO THE UNDERSTANDING OF EMOTION REGULATION IN BORDERLINE PERSONALITY
Gratz, K. L., Richmond, J. R., Edmonds, K. A., Rose, J. P., & Tull, M. T. (2020) · Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1521/jscp.2020.39.8.727 · Cited by 13
Reinforcer pathology of internet-related behaviors among college students: Data from six countries.
Acuff, S. F., Pilatti, A., Collins, M., Hides, L. M., Thingujam, N. S., Chai, W. J., Yap, W. M., Shuai, R., Hogarth, L., Bravo, A. J., et al. (2021) · Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1037/pha0000459 · Cited by 15
Implications of tax audit risk, consequences, aggressive behavior and ethics for compliance
Chan, S. H., & Song, Q. (2021) · International Journal of Accounting and Information Management · doi:10.1108/ijaim-09-2021-0183 · Cited by 11
Aberman, Y., & Plaks, J. E. (2022) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2022.105980 · Cited by 9
Yeo, S. K., Becker, A. B., Cacciatore, M. A., Anderson, A. A., & Patel, K. (2022) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/10755470221132278 · Cited by 11
Modelling dataset bias in machine-learned theories of economic decision-making
Thomas, T., Straub, D., Tatai, F., Shene, M., Tosik, T., Kersting, K., & Rothkopf, C. A. (2024) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-023-01784-6 · Cited by 12
Ego depletion increases regulatory success in educational digital media environments
Vanco, B. M., & Christensen, J. L. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.031 · Cited by 12
Ratner, K., Burrow, A. L., & Thoemmes, F. J. (2016) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.160431 · Cited by 10
Herzog, S., DePierro, J. M., & D'Andrea, W. M. (2018) · European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation · doi:10.1016/j.ejtd.2018.03.001 · Cited by 11
Verzijl, C. L., Ahlich, E. M., Lang, B., & Rancourt, D. (2018) · Eating Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.eatbeh.2018.06.008 · Cited by 11
Qualitative Assessment of Key Beliefs in Regards to Consumers’ Food Truck Visits
Shin, Y. H., Im, J., & Severt, K. (2019) · Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism · doi:10.1080/1528008x.2019.1627271 · Cited by 11
An item response approach to calibration of confidence judgments.
Attali, Y., Budescu, D. V., & Arieli‐Attali, M. (2019) · Decision · doi:10.1037/dec0000111 · Cited by 11
Digital signatures: a tool to prevent and predict dishonesty?
Koning, L., Junger, M., & van Hoof, J. J. (2020) · Mind & Society · doi:10.1007/s11299-020-00237-1 · Cited by 10
Logan, T., & Lynch, K. R. (2021) · Violence and Gender · doi:10.1089/vio.2020.0104 · Cited by 11
Did the COVID-19 pandemic help or hurt Donald Trump’s political fortunes?
Hart, J. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0247664 · Cited by 11
Physical and Mental Health Characteristics of 2,962 Adults With Subjective Cognitive Complaints
Patten, R. V., Nguyen, T. T., Mahmood, Z., Lee, E., Daly, R. E., Palmer, B. W., Wu, T., Tu, X. M., Jeste, D. V., & Twamley, E. W. (2021) · The International Journal of Aging and Human Development · doi:10.1177/00914150211026548 · Cited by 15
Edmonds, K. A., Rose, J. P., Aspiras, O. G., & Kumar, M. (2021) · Psychology and Health · doi:10.1080/08870446.2021.1952585 · Cited by 11
Vaccine Videos and Information Sharing: The Effects of Framing, Evidence Type, and Speaker Expertise
Kirkpatrick, A. W., Park, M., Domgaard, S., Zhao, W., Steinberg, C., & Hsu, Y. (2021) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730.2021.1983892 · Cited by 11
Category Clustering and Morphological Learning
Mansfield, J., Saldana, C., Hurst, P., Nordlinger, R., Stoll, S., Bickel, B., & Perfors, A. (2022) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.13107 · Cited by 11
Pressgrove, G., Barra, C., & Kim, C. (2022) · Public Relations Review · doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102177 · Cited by 11
Haner, M., Sloan, M. M., Graham, A., Pickett, J. T., & Cullen, F. T. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-022-09515-z · Cited by 11
Empathy is a Choice: People are Empathy Misers Because They are Cognitive MisersPreprint
Cameron, D., Hutcherson, C. A. C., Ferguson, A. M., Scheffer, J. A., & Inzlicht, M. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2887903 · Cited by 12
A study of dynamic information display and decision-making in abstract trust games
Schaffer, J., O’Donovan, J., Marusich, L., Yu, M., Gonzalez, C., & Höllerer, T. (2018) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.01.002 · Cited by 10
Carson, J. E., & Westerman, J. W. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15021167 · Cited by 11
Li, Y., Shan, Z., Raković, M., Guan, Q., Gašević, D., & Chen, G. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13741-z · Cited by 14
Brewster, Z. W., Gourlay, K., & Nowak, G. R. (2021) · Cornell Hospitality Quarterly · doi:10.1177/19389655211036652 · Cited by 10
An empirical investigation into the effectiveness of cost transparency: Evidence from apparel brands
Tong, X., & Su, J. (2022) · Journal of Marketing Communications · doi:10.1080/13527266.2022.2086285 · Cited by 10
Stephens, S., McPhail, I. V., Heasman, A., & Gerritsen, C. J. (2023) · Journal of Sexual Aggression · doi:10.1080/13552600.2023.2192241 · Cited by 14
Kuo, C., Koralesky, K. E., von Keyserlingk, M., & Weary, D. (2024) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/09636625241227091 · Cited by 11
On the Selection of Item Scores or Composite Scores for Clinical Prediction
McClure, K. E., Ammerman, B. A., & Jacobucci, R. (2024) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2023.2292598 · Cited by 19
ChatTL;DR – You Really Ought to Check What the LLM Said on Your Behalf
Gould, S. J. J., Brumby, D. P., & Cox, A. L. (2024) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3613905.3644062 · Cited by 10
Stitch incoming: political engagement and aggression on TikTok
McLaughlin, B., Cloudy, J., Hunter, J. A., & Potter, B. (2024) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2024.2354436 · Cited by 12
Enhancing auditors’ professional skepticism through nudges: an eye-tracking experiment
Gajewski, J., Heimann, M., Léger, P., & Teye, P. (2024) · Accounting and Business Research · doi:10.1080/00014788.2024.2364215 · Cited by 10
Is Virtual Reality Lonely? The VR–Isolation Stereotype and Its Impact on VR Adoption
Slivkin, N., Elgaaïed‐Gambier, L., & Hamdi‐Kidar, L. (2024) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.22167 · Cited by 11
Assessing the quality and reliability of the Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) data in 2024
Shimoni, H., & Axelrod, V. (2025) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.250361 · Cited by 10
Septianto, F., Khan, S. R., Seo, Y., & Shi, L. (2020) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-06-2019-0546 · Cited by 10
Development of an Empathy Rating Scale for Young Children
Kimonis, E. R., Jain, N., Neo, B., Fleming, G. E., & Briggs, N. (2021) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/10731911211038629 · Cited by 10
Flores, R. T., Rodriguez, N., Arroyo, D., Delgado, N., & Martinez, M. R. (2022) · International Journal of Intercultural Relations · doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2022.03.008 · Cited by 14
Dadaboyev, S. M. U., Choi, S., & Paek, S. (2022) · Baltic Journal of Management · doi:10.1108/bjm-02-2022-0071 · Cited by 10
Situational Strength as a Lens to Understand the Strain Implications of Extra-Normative Work
Calderwood, C. C., Meyer, R. D., & Minnen, M. E. (2022) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-022-09846-8 · Cited by 11
Cohodes, E. M., McCauley, S., Preece, D. A., Gross, J. J., & Gee, D. G. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374416.2022.2140431 · Cited by 12
Teah, K., Sung, B., & Phau, I. (2023) · Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management · doi:10.1108/jfmm-03-2022-0066 · Cited by 11
Graça, S. S., & Khare, V. P. (2023) · Baltic Journal of Management · doi:10.1108/bjm-10-2022-0377 · Cited by 10
Decoding demarketing advertising effects through the IMC lens: the role of earned and paid media
Yoon, H. J., Lee, Y., & Sun, S. (2024) · International Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/02650487.2024.2312751 · Cited by 10
Mahmoudzadeh, M. (2019) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/poms.13104 · Cited by 10
Haug, M. C. (2017) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-017-0374-z · Cited by 10
Age-related differential item functioning in tests of face and car recognition ability
Sunday, M. A., Lee, W., & Gauthier, L. (2018) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/18.1.2 · Cited by 10
Taggart, T. C., Eaton, N. R., Keyes, K. M., Hammett, J. F., & Ulloa, E. C. (2018) · Neurology Psychiatry and Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.npbr.2018.10.004 · Cited by 10
Self-found, spellbound: The sense of own discovery shapes customer bonds with service venues
Kokkoris, M. D., Hoelzl, E., & Kamleitner, B. (2019) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.045 · Cited by 10
Discounting of delayed monetary and cannabis rewards in a crowdsourced sample of adults.
Patel, H., Naish, K. R., & Amlung, M. T. (2019) · Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1037/pha0000327 · Cited by 10
Schilling, M., Roulin, N., Obschonka, M., & König, C. J. (2020) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-019-09664-5 · Cited by 12
Validation of the ASKSG with a Parent Sample in the United States
Benallie, K. J., McClain, M. B., Harris, B., & Schwartz, S. (2020) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-020-04480-w · Cited by 12
The Influence of Cost Information on Treatment Choice: A Mixed-Methods Study
Zhuang, T., Kortlever, J. T. P., Shapiro, L. M., Baker, L. C., Harris, A. H. S., & Kamal, R. N. (2020) · The Journal Of Hand Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.05.019 · Cited by 10
Emophilia and other predictors of attraction to individuals with Dark Triad traits
Lechuga, J., & Jones, D. N. (2020) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.110318 · Cited by 10
Wolff, M. B., O’Connor, P. J., Wilson, M. G., & Gay, J. L. (2021) · Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1097/jom.0000000000002134 · Cited by 10
Assessing the validity of white-collar crime definitions using experimental survey data
Galvin, M. A., Logan, M. W., & Snook, D. W. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-020-09455-6 · Cited by 10
An Empirical Study on Type Annotations
Ore, J., Detweiler, C., & Elbaum, S. G. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3439775 · Cited by 10
Characterizing low effort responding among young African adults recruited via Facebook advertising
Olamijuwon, E. O. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0250303 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Hauser, D. J., & Schwarz, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- University of Southern California (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hauser, David J.
- Venue
- Behavior Research Methods
- Published
- 2015-03-12
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 400-407
- ISSN
- 1554-351X (ISSN-L)
- 1554-3528
- OpenAlex
- W2076387137
- Cited by
- 1,739
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 60 · 2025: 104 · 2024: 145 · 2023: 180 · 2022: 209 · 2021: 249 · 2020: 248 · 2019: 176 · 2018: 160 · 2017: 122 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 19
- FWCI
- 184.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Behavior Research Methods (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- Amazon Mechanical Turk, university students
- MeSH terms
- Attention, Data Collection, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Sciences, Internet
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review