The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Attentive Turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants
Open accessAbstract
Participant attentiveness is a concern for many researchers using Amazon's Mechanical Turk (MTurk). Although studies comparing the attentiveness of participants on MTurk versus traditional subject pool samples have provided mixed support for this concern, attention check questions and other methods of ensuring participant attention have become prolific in MTurk studies. Because MTurk is a population that learns, we hypothesized that MTurkers would be more attentive to instructions than are traditional subject pool samples. In three online studies, participants from MTurk and collegiate populations participated in a task that included a measure of attentiveness to instructions (an instructional manipulation check: IMC). In all studies, MTurkers were more attentive to the instructions than were college students, even on novel IMCs (Studies 2 and 3), and MTurkers showed larger effects in response to a minute text manipulation. These results have implications for the sustainable use of MTurk samples for social science research and for the conclusions drawn from research with MTurk and college subject pool samples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In crowd-sourced settings such as MTurk, respondents are often incentivized to respond as attentively, compliantly, and quickly as possible to both open higher-paying opportunities and prevent being rejected from future employment [90, 100].”
From Not so terrifying after all? A set of failed replications of the mortality salience effects of Terror Management Theory (2023) · cites this paper as [100]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Comparable attention checks have been shown to improve the quality of data obtained through web-based surveys above that of classic paper and pencil questionnaires [57].”
From Dispositional factors in the explanation of symptoms of depression, anxiety, health anxiety and COVID-19 Phobia (2024) · cites this paper as [57]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/bf03193146 · Cited by 65,971
Advances In Experimental Social Psychology
(2022) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(22)x0002-6 · Cited by 22,559
Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice
Thaler, R. (1985) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.4.3.199 · Cited by 4,885
Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk
Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., & Lenz, G. S. (2012) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpr057 · Cited by 4,008
Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk
Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500002205 · Cited by 3,767
Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power
Oppenheimer, D. M., Meyvis, T., & Davidenko, N. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009 · Cited by 3,493
Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice
Thaler, R. H. (2008) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1070.0330 · Cited by 3,477
Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk
Mason, W., & Suri, S. (2012) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0124-6 · Cited by 3,172
Data collection in a flat world: the strengths and weaknesses of Mechanical Turk samples
Goodman, J. K., Cryder, C. E., & Cheema, A. (2013) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.1753 · Cited by 2,242
Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a Participant Pool
Paolacci, G., & Chandler, J. (2014) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721414531598 · Cited by 2,136
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Kapelner, A., & Chandler, D. (2010). Preventing satisficing in online surveys: A “kapcha” to ensure higher data quality. In Proceedings of CrowdConf 2010. Available at www.academia.edu/2788541/Preventing_Satisficing_in_Online_Surveys
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 1,003
Social mindfulness: Prosocial the active way
Doesum, N. J. V., de Vries, R. E., BLOKLAND, A. A. J., Hill, J. M., Kuhlman, D. M., Stivers, A. W., Tybur, J. M., & Lange, P. A. M. V. (2019) · The Journal of Positive Psychology · doi:10.1080/17439760.2019.1579352 · Cited by 65
Learning more from feedback: Elaborating feedback with examples enhances concept learning
Finn, B., Thomas, R. C., & Rawson, K. A. (2017) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.08.007 · Cited by 79
Consumer attitudes towards bloggers and paid blog advertisements: what’s new?
van Esch, P., Arli, D. I., Castner, J., Talukdar, N., & Northey, G. (2018) · Marketing Intelligence & Planning · doi:10.1108/mip-01-2018-0027 · Cited by 70
Septianto, F., Seo, Y., Sung, B., & Fang, Z. (2020) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-10-2018-0690 · Cited by 61
O’Connell, K., Berluti, K., Rhoads, S. A., & Marsh, A. A. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0244974 · Cited by 60
Simulated nature walks improve psychological well-being along a natural to urban continuum
Brancato, G., Hedger, K. V., Berman, M. G., & Hedger, S. C. V. (2022) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101779 · Cited by 62
Sanford, B. T., Ciarrochi, J., Hofmann, S. G., Chin, F. T., Gates, K. M., & Hayes, S. C. (2022) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2022.05.006 · Cited by 62
Gagné, N., & Franzen, L. (2023) · Swiss Psychology Open · doi:10.5334/spo.34 · Cited by 74
Lumsden, J., Skinner, A., Woods, A. T., Lawrence, N., & Munafo, M. R. (2016) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.2184 · Cited by 61
Behavioral complexity of British gambling advertising
Newall, P. W. S. (2017) · Addiction Research & Theory · doi:10.1080/16066359.2017.1287901 · Cited by 60
Distinction without a difference? An assessment of MTurk Worker types
Loepp, E. D., & Kelly, J. T. (2020) · Research & Politics · doi:10.1177/2053168019901185 · Cited by 60
A Note on Dropping Experimental Subjects Who Fail a Manipulation CheckPreprint
Aronow, P. M., Baron, J., & Pinson, L. E. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2683588 · Cited by 60
Beyond Bot Detection: Combating Fraudulent Online Survey Takers✱
Zhang, Z., Zhu, S., Mink, J., Xiong, A., Song, L., & Wang, G. (2022) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3485447.3512230 · Cited by 59
When leaders ask questions: Can humility premiums buffer the effects of competence penalties?
Cojuharenco, I., & Karelaia, N. (2019) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.12.001 · Cited by 60
Condoms and bananas: Shock advertising explained through congruence theory
Lee, M., Septianto, F., Frethey‐Bentham, C., & Gao, E. (2020) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102228 · Cited by 59
Greenfield, P. M. (2017) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691617707314 · Cited by 60
Righting a wrong: Retaliation on a voodoo doll symbolizing an abusive supervisor restores justice
Liang, L. H., Brown, D. J., Lian, H., Hanig, S., Ferris, D. L., & Keeping, L. M. (2018) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.01.004 · Cited by 65
Kan, I. P., & Drummey, A. B. (2018) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.005 · Cited by 62
Bunford, N., Dawson, A. E., Evans, S. W., Ray, A., Langberg, J. M., Owens, J. S., DuPaul, G. J., & Allan, D. M. (2018) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191118792307 · Cited by 59
Even arbitrary norms influence moral decision-making
Pryor, C., Perfors, A., & Howe, P. D. L. (2018) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-018-0489-y · Cited by 65
The effects of inner packaging color on the desirability of food
van Esch, P., Heller, J., & Northey, G. (2019) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.05.003 · Cited by 67
Development and psychometric evaluation of the Pornography Purchase Task
Mulhauser, K. R. W., Short, E. M., & Weinstock, J. (2018) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.04.016 · Cited by 59
Chan, E. Y., & Northey, G. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.031 · Cited by 50
Optimizing the economic and environmental benefits of ride‐hailing and pooling
Naumov, S., & Keith, D. R. (2022) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/poms.13905 · Cited by 57
Analyze the attentive and bypass bias: mock vignette checks in survey experiments
Kane, J., Velez, Y. R., & Barabas, J. (2023) · Political Science Research and Methods · doi:10.1017/psrm.2023.3 · Cited by 57
Priming and context effects in citizen satisfaction surveys
Hjortskov, M. (2017) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12346 · Cited by 62
Rogers, A. H., van Dyk, I. S., Haines, N., Hahn, H. A., Aldao, A., & Ahn, W. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01881 · Cited by 59
Zombies in the Loop? Humans Trust Untrustworthy AI-Advisors for Ethical Decisions
Krügel, S., Ostermaier, A., & Uhl, M. (2022) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-022-00511-9 · Cited by 76
Amazon’s Mechanical Turk as a Viable Source for Organizational and Occupational Health Research
Michel, J. S., O’Neill, S. K., Hartman, P., & Lorys, A. (2017) · Occupational Health Science · doi:10.1007/s41542-017-0009-x · Cited by 65
The perils of self‐brand connections: Consumer response to changes in brand meaning
Gaustad, T. B., Samuelsen, B. M., Warlop, L., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2018) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21137 · Cited by 58
Do Individual Investors Trade on Investment-Related Internet Postings?
Ammann, M. J., & Schaub, N. (2020) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2020.3733 · Cited by 59
Ghosted?: Navigating strategies for reducing uncertainty and implications surrounding ambiguous loss
LeFebvre, L. E., & Fan, X. (2020) · Personal Relationships · doi:10.1111/pere.12322 · Cited by 55
Conflict and cooperation in paranoia: a large-scale behavioural experiment
Raihani, N., & Bell, V. (2017) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291717003075 · Cited by 52
van Esch, P., & Mente, M. (2018) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.06.016 · Cited by 56
Personalized incentives for promoting sustainable travel behaviors
Zhu, X., Wang, F., Chen, C., & Reed, D. D. (2020) · Transportation Research Part C Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2019.05.015 · Cited by 53
Tsai, J.-Y., Phua, J., Pan, S., & Yang, C. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/22767 · Cited by 55
Guo, Y., Souders, D. J., Labi, S., Peeta, S., Benedyk, I. V., & Li, Y. (2021) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2021.10.018 · Cited by 55
Effects of performance feedback valence on perceptions of invested mental effort
Raaijmakers, S. F., Baars, M., Schaap, L., PAAS, F. G. W. C., & van Gog, T. (2016) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.12.002 · Cited by 67
Fox, K. R., Wang, S. B., Boccagno, C. E., Haynos, A. F., Kleiman, E. M., & Hooley, J. M. (2019) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.23041 · Cited by 64
Social courage fosters both voice and silence in the workplace
Howard, M. C., & Holmes, P. E. (2019) · Journal of Organizational Effectiveness People and Performance · doi:10.1108/joepp-04-2019-0034 · Cited by 63
Kim, N. L., Kim, G., & Rothenberg, L. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12176800 · Cited by 74
Can anyone be objective about Donald Trump? Assessing the personality of political figures
Nai, A., & Maier, J. (2019) · Journal of Elections Public Opinion and Parties · doi:10.1080/17457289.2019.1632318 · Cited by 56
Faking to fit in: Applicants’ response strategies to match organizational culture.
Roulin, N., & Krings, F. (2019) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000431 · Cited by 53
Persona Transparency: Analyzing the Impact of Explanations on Perceptions of Data-Driven Personas
Salminen, J. O., Santos, J. M., Jung, S., Eslami, M., & Jansen, B. J. J. (2019) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2019.1688946 · Cited by 59
Crowdsourcing for Online Samples in Counseling Research
Mullen, P. R., Fox, J., Goshorn, J. R., & Warraich, L. K. (2021) · Journal of Counseling & Development · doi:10.1002/jcad.12369 · Cited by 56
Who Are Virtual Reality Headset Owners? A Survey and Comparison of Headset Owners and Non-Owners
Kelly, J. W., Cherep, L. A., Lim, A., Doty, T. A., & Gilbert, S. B. (2021) · IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR) · doi:10.1109/vr50410.2021.00095 · Cited by 55
Moilanen, K. L., & Lynn Manuel, M. (2019) · Journal of Child and Family Studies · doi:10.1007/s10826-019-01433-5 · Cited by 52
Learning to recommend similar items from human judgments
Trattner, C., & Jannach, D. (2019) · User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1007/s11257-019-09245-4 · Cited by 52
Sestino, A. (2023) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103488 · Cited by 52
Bridgland, V. M. E., Green, D. M., Oulton, J. M., & Takarangi, M. K. T. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/xap0000215 · Cited by 52
Min, H., Pavisic, I., Howald, N., Highhouse, S., & Zickar, M. J. (2019) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2019.103862 · Cited by 57
Predicting intention to recycle on the basis of the theory of planned behaviour
Arli, D. I., Badejo, A., Carlini, J., France, C., Jebarajakirthy, C., Knox, K., Pentecost, R. D., Perkins, H., Thaichon, P., Sarker, T., et al. (2019) · International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing · doi:10.1002/nvsm.1653 · Cited by 63
Xiong, A., Wang, T., Li, N., & Jha, S. (2020) · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P) · doi:10.1109/sp40000.2020.00088 · Cited by 63
Yu, N., Pan, S., Yang, C., & Tsai, J.-Y. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/21684 · Cited by 51
Attention checks and how to use them: Review and practical recommendations
Muszyński, M. A. (2023) · Ask Research and Methods · doi:10.18061/ask.v32i1.0001 · Cited by 68
Aelenei, C., Lewis, N. A., & Oyserman, D. (2016) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.08.004 · Cited by 48
Are any samples representative or unbiased? reply to Pickering and Blaszczynski
Russell, A. M. T., Browne, M., Hing, N., Rockloff, M., & Newall, P. W. S. (2021) · International Gambling Studies · doi:10.1080/14459795.2021.1973535 · Cited by 50
Jeste, D. V., Thomas, M. L., Liu, J., Daly, R. E., Tu, X. M., Treichler, E. B. H., Palmer, B. W., & Lee, E. E. (2021) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.09.033 · Cited by 50
Public attitudes toward allocating scarce resources in the COVID-19 pandemic
Buckwalter, W., & Peterson, A. H. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0240651 · Cited by 50
The effect of political ideology and message frame on donation intent during the COVID-19 pandemic
van Esch, P., Cui, Y. G., & Jain, S. P. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.040 · Cited by 53
Jiang, L., Gao, H., & Shi, L. H. (2021) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1080/0267257x.2021.1913214 · Cited by 50
Imundo, M. N., & Rapp, D. N. (2021) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2021.10.002 · Cited by 49
Techno‐eustress creators: Conceptualization and empirical validation
Tarafdar, M., Stich, J., Maier, C., & Laumer, S. (2024) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12515 · Cited by 71
Affect toward the self and self-injury stimuli as potential risk factors for nonsuicidal self-injury
Fox, K. R., Ribeiro, J. D., Kleiman, E. M., Hooley, J. M., Nock, M. K., & Franklin, J. C. (2017) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2017.11.083 · Cited by 54
Taking the time? Explaining effortful participation among low-cost online survey participants
Anson, I. G. (2018) · Research & Politics · doi:10.1177/2053168018785483 · Cited by 50
Hoogendoorn, G., Sütterlin, B., & Siegrist, M. (2020) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2020.1749114 · Cited by 55
Employee accountability: development of a multidimensional scale
Han, Y., & Perry, J. L. (2019) · International Public Management Journal · doi:10.1080/10967494.2019.1690606 · Cited by 57
Weigold, A., & Weigold, I. K. (2021) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/08944393211006847 · Cited by 49
Conducting Online Behavioral Research Using Crowdsourcing Services in Japan
Majima, Y., Nishiyama, K., Nishihara, A., & Hata, R. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00378 · Cited by 51
Time in causal structure learning.
Bramley, N. R., Gerstenberg, T., Mayrhofer, R., & Lagnado, D. A. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000548 · Cited by 52
Text-to-Speech Software and Learning: Investigating the Relevancy of the Voice Effect
Craig, S. D., & Schroeder, N. L. (2018) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633118802877 · Cited by 54
A smile – the key to everybody’s heart?
Pham, C., & Septianto, F. (2019) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-01-2019-0019 · Cited by 49
Poon, K., & Jiang, Y. (2020) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-020-01313-w · Cited by 57
Huang, X., Ribeiro, J. D., & Franklin, J. C. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00239 · Cited by 54
Jensen‐Doss, A., Patel, Z. S., Casline, E. P., Ringle, V. A. M., & Timpano, K. R. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374416.2020.1815205 · Cited by 50
Khan, R., Murtaza, G., Neveu, J., & Newman, A. (2021) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/apps.12316 · Cited by 53
The impact of place and legacy framing on climate action: A lifespan approach
Wickersham, R. H., Zaval, L., Pachana, N. A., & Smyer, M. A. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0228963 · Cited by 46
Higgins, W. C., Ross, R. M., Langdon, R. A., & Polito, V. (2022) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/10731911221124342 · Cited by 56
Alsaad, A. K., Alam, M. M., & Lutfi, A. (2023) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102201 · Cited by 59
Briones, E. M., & Benham, G. (2017) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-016-0710-8 · Cited by 48
Disgust Associated With Culture Mixing
Cheon, B. K., Christopoulos, G. I., & Hong, Y. (2016) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022116667845 · Cited by 48
Assessing the validity of inferences from scores on the cognitive reflection test
Blacksmith, N., Yang, Y., Behrend, T. S., & Ruark, G. A. (2019) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.2133 · Cited by 54
The contagious impact of playing violent video games on aggression: Longitudinal evidence
Greitemeyer, T. (2019) · Aggressive Behavior · doi:10.1002/ab.21857 · Cited by 50
Response invalidity in empirical research: Causes, detection, and remedies
Edwards, J. R. (2019) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2018.12.002 · Cited by 50
Hai, S., Wu, K., Park, I., Li, Y., Chang, Q., & Tang, Y. (2020) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/jmp-03-2019-0139 · Cited by 47
Kim, E.-H., Yoo, D., & Doh, S.-J. (2021) · Journal of Brand Management · doi:10.1057/s41262-020-00211-9 · Cited by 49
Masorgo, N., Mir, S., & Hofer, A. R. (2023) · Journal of Business Logistics · doi:10.1111/jbl.12356 · Cited by 49
Siegel, J. T., Navarro, M. A., & Thomson, A. L. (2015) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.08.020 · Cited by 46
Investigating the mediating effect of Uber's sexual harassment case on its brand: Does it matter?
Griffith, D. A., van Esch, P., & Trittenbach, M. (2018) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.03.007 · Cited by 49
A thousand studies for the price of one: Accelerating psychological science with Pushkin
Hartshorne, J. K., de Leeuw, J. R., Goodman, N. D., Jennings, M. V., & O’Donnell, T. J. (2019) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-018-1155-z · Cited by 44
Refutation Texts: A New Approach to Changing Public Misconceptions About Education Policy
Aguilar, S. J., Polikoff, M. S., & Sinatra, G. M. (2019) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x19849416 · Cited by 46
Examining broad intellectual abilities obtained within an mTurk internet sample
Merz, Z. C., Lace, J. W., & Eisenstein, A. M. (2020) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-020-00741-0 · Cited by 52
Graeber, T. W. (2020) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1093/jeea/jvac052 · Cited by 45
Using Mechanical Turk for research on cancer survivors
Arch, J. J., & Carr, A. L. (2016) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.4173 · Cited by 45
Pietraszkiewicz, A., Soppe, B., & Formanowicz, M. (2017) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000319 · Cited by 46
Confusing the Crowd: Task Instruction Quality on Amazon Mechanical Turk
Wu, M., & Quinn, A. J. (2017) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing · doi:10.1609/hcomp.v5i1.13317 · Cited by 45
Lim, M. S. M., Cheung, F. Y.-L., Kho, J. M., & Tang, C. S. (2019) · Addiction Research & Theory · doi:10.1080/16066359.2019.1594203 · Cited by 46
Derfler-Rozin, R. R., Moore, C., & Staats, B. R. (2016) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2016.1094 · Cited by 44
Korman, J. V., Quaquebeke, N. V., & Tröster, C. (2021) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-021-09733-8 · Cited by 56
How impressions of public employees’ warmth and competence influence trust in government
Hansen, F. G. (2021) · International Public Management Journal · doi:10.1080/10967494.2021.1963361 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Hauser, D. J., & Schwarz, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- University of Southern California (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hauser, David J.
- Venue
- Behavior Research Methods
- Published
- 2015-03-12
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 400-407
- ISSN
- 1554-351X (ISSN-L)
- 1554-3528
- OpenAlex
- W2076387137
- Cited by
- 1,739
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 60 · 2025: 104 · 2024: 145 · 2023: 180 · 2022: 209 · 2021: 249 · 2020: 248 · 2019: 176 · 2018: 160 · 2017: 122 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 19
- FWCI
- 184.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Behavior Research Methods (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- Amazon Mechanical Turk, university students
- MeSH terms
- Attention, Data Collection, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Sciences, Internet
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review