The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Attentive Turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants
Open accessAbstract
Participant attentiveness is a concern for many researchers using Amazon's Mechanical Turk (MTurk). Although studies comparing the attentiveness of participants on MTurk versus traditional subject pool samples have provided mixed support for this concern, attention check questions and other methods of ensuring participant attention have become prolific in MTurk studies. Because MTurk is a population that learns, we hypothesized that MTurkers would be more attentive to instructions than are traditional subject pool samples. In three online studies, participants from MTurk and collegiate populations participated in a task that included a measure of attentiveness to instructions (an instructional manipulation check: IMC). In all studies, MTurkers were more attentive to the instructions than were college students, even on novel IMCs (Studies 2 and 3), and MTurkers showed larger effects in response to a minute text manipulation. These results have implications for the sustainable use of MTurk samples for social science research and for the conclusions drawn from research with MTurk and college subject pool samples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In crowd-sourced settings such as MTurk, respondents are often incentivized to respond as attentively, compliantly, and quickly as possible to both open higher-paying opportunities and prevent being rejected from future employment [90, 100].”
From Not so terrifying after all? A set of failed replications of the mortality salience effects of Terror Management Theory (2023) · cites this paper as [100]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Comparable attention checks have been shown to improve the quality of data obtained through web-based surveys above that of classic paper and pencil questionnaires [57].”
From Dispositional factors in the explanation of symptoms of depression, anxiety, health anxiety and COVID-19 Phobia (2024) · cites this paper as [57]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/bf03193146 · Cited by 65,971
Advances In Experimental Social Psychology
(2022) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(22)x0002-6 · Cited by 22,559
Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice
Thaler, R. (1985) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.4.3.199 · Cited by 4,885
Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk
Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., & Lenz, G. S. (2012) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpr057 · Cited by 4,008
Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk
Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500002205 · Cited by 3,767
Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power
Oppenheimer, D. M., Meyvis, T., & Davidenko, N. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009 · Cited by 3,493
Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice
Thaler, R. H. (2008) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1070.0330 · Cited by 3,477
Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk
Mason, W., & Suri, S. (2012) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0124-6 · Cited by 3,172
Data collection in a flat world: the strengths and weaknesses of Mechanical Turk samples
Goodman, J. K., Cryder, C. E., & Cheema, A. (2013) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.1753 · Cited by 2,242
Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a Participant Pool
Paolacci, G., & Chandler, J. (2014) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721414531598 · Cited by 2,136
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Kapelner, A., & Chandler, D. (2010). Preventing satisficing in online surveys: A “kapcha” to ensure higher data quality. In Proceedings of CrowdConf 2010. Available at www.academia.edu/2788541/Preventing_Satisficing_in_Online_Surveys
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder
Anwyl-Irvine, A. L., Massonnié, J., Flitton, A., Kirkham, N. Z., & Evershed, J. K. (2019) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-019-01237-x · Cited by 2,087
Do Investors Value Sustainability? A Natural Experiment Examining Ranking and Fund Flows
HARTZMARK, S. M., & SUSSMAN, A. B. (2019) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/jofi.12841 · Cited by 1,711
Methods for the detection of carelessly invalid responses in survey data
Curran, P. G. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2015.07.006 · Cited by 1,356
Conducting Clinical Research Using Crowdsourced Convenience Samples
Chandler, J., & Shapiro, D. (2016) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093623 · Cited by 1,072
Brysbaert, M. (2019) · Journal of Cognition · doi:10.5334/joc.72 · Cited by 996
Kees, J., Berry, C., Burton, S., & Sheehan, K. (2017) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2016.1269304 · Cited by 902
An Evaluation of Amazon’s Mechanical Turk, Its Rapid Rise, and Its Effective Use
Buhrmester, M. D., Talaifar, S., & Gosling, S. D. (2018) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691617706516 · Cited by 815
Are samples drawn from Mechanical Turk valid for research on political ideology?
Clifford, S., Jewell, R., & Waggoner, P. (2015) · Research & Politics · doi:10.1177/2053168015622072 · Cited by 714
Online panels in social science research: Expanding sampling methods beyond Mechanical Turk
Chandler, J., Rosenzweig, C., Moss, A. J., Robinson, J., & Litman, L. (2019) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-019-01273-7 · Cited by 668
Validity and Mechanical Turk: An assessment of exclusion methods and interactive experiments
Thomas, K. A., & Clifford, S. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.038 · Cited by 625
People are averse to machines making moral decisions.
Bigman, Y. E., & Gray, K. (2018) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.08.003 · Cited by 738
Crowdsourcing Consumer Research
Goodman, J. K., & Paolacci, G. (2017) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucx047 · Cited by 597
Measuring and Bounding Experimenter Demand
de Quidt, J., Haushofer, J., & Roth, C. (2018) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20171330 · Cited by 577
Abbey, J. D., & Meloy, M. G. (2017) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2017.06.001 · Cited by 522
“Participant” Perceptions of Twitter Research Ethics
Fiesler, C. L., & Proferes, N. (2018) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305118763366 · Cited by 545
The shape of and solutions to the MTurk quality crisis
Kennedy, R., Clifford, S., Burleigh, T., Waggoner, P. D., Jewell, R., & Winter, N. J. G. (2020) · Political Science Research and Methods · doi:10.1017/psrm.2020.6 · Cited by 506
Why the COVID-19 pandemic is a traumatic stressor
Bridgland, V. M. E., Moeck, E. K., Green, D. M., Swain, T. L., Nayda, D. M., Matson, L. A., Hutchison, N. P., & Takarangi, M. K. T. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0240146 · Cited by 501
Are Manipulation Checks Necessary?
Hauser, D., Ellsworth, P. C., & Gonzalez, R. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00998 · Cited by 562
Self-citationAmazon mechanical Turk in organizational psychology: an evaluation and practical recommendations
Cheung, J. H., Burns, D. K., Sinclair, R. R., & Sliter, M. (2017) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-016-9458-5 · Cited by 474
Zhou, H., & Ayelet Fishbach, B. (2016) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000056 · Cited by 462
Enhancing user engagement: The role of gamification in mobile apps
Bitrián, P., Buil, I., & Catalán, S. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.028 · Cited by 442
Crowdsourcing research: Data collection with Amazon’s Mechanical Turk
Sheehan, K. B. (2018) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637751.2017.1342043 · Cited by 408
Does Counter-Attitudinal Information Cause Backlash? Results from Three Large Survey Experiments
Guess, A., & Coppock, A. (2020) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123418000327 · Cited by 372
Marketing AI recruitment: The next phase in job application and selection
van Esch, P., Black, J. S., & Ferolie, J. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.009 · Cited by 391
Are Attention Check Questions a Threat to Scale Validity?
Kung, F. Y. H., Kwok, N., & Brown, D. J. (2017) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/apps.12108 · Cited by 392
Empathy is hard work: People choose to avoid empathy because of its cognitive costs.
Cameron, C. D., Hutcherson, C. A. C., Ferguson, A. M., Scheffer, J. A., Hadjiandreou, E., & Inzlicht, M. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000595 · Cited by 418
Shin, Y. H., Im, J., Jung, S. E., & Severt, K. (2018) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2017.10.011 · Cited by 358
The Development and Validation of the Compassion Scale
Pommier, E., Neff, K. D., & Tóth-Király, I. (2020) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191119874108 · Cited by 345
The Use of Online Panel Data in Management Research: A Review and Recommendations
Porter, C. O. L. H., Outlaw, R., Gale, J., & Cho, T. S. (2018) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206318811569 · Cited by 368
Do travelers trust intelligent service robots?
Tussyadiah, I. P., Zach, F., & Wang, J. (2020) · Annals of Tourism Research · doi:10.1016/j.annals.2020.102886 · Cited by 373
The average laboratory samples a population of 7,300 Amazon Mechanical Turk workers
Stewart, N., Ungemach, C., Harris, A. J. L., Bartels, D. M., Newell, B. R., Paolacci, G., & Chandler, J. (2015) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500005611 · Cited by 304
Conducting perception research over the internet: A tutorial review
Woods, A. T., Velasco, C., Levitan, C. A., Wan, X., & Spence, C. (2015) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.1058 · Cited by 301
Data Collection via Online Platforms: Challenges and Recommendations for Future Research
Newman, A., Bavik, Y. L., Mount, M. P., & Shao, B. (2020) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/apps.12302 · Cited by 360
MTurk Character Misrepresentation: Assessment and Solutions
Sharpe Wessling, K., Huber, J., & Netzer, O. (2017) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucx053 · Cited by 330
A Note on Dropping Experimental Subjects who Fail a Manipulation Check
Aronow, P. M., Baron, J., & Pinson, L. E. (2019) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1017/pan.2019.5 · Cited by 280
No Harm in Checking: Using Factual Manipulation Checks to Assess Attentiveness in Experiments
Kane, J., & Barabas, J. (2018) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12396 · Cited by 276
Evaluating CloudResearch’s Approved Group as a solution for problematic data quality on MTurk
Hauser, D., Moss, A. J., Rosenzweig, C., Jaffe, S. N., Robinson, J., & Litman, L. (2022) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-022-01999-x · Cited by 299
Self-citationFostering Intrinsic Motivation through Avatar Identification in Digital Games
Birk, M. V., Atkins, C., Bowey, J. T., & Mandryk, R. L. (2016) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2858036.2858062 · Cited by 301
How psychological and contextual factors contribute to travelers’ propensity to choose green hotels?
Yadav, R., Balaji, M. S., & Jebarajakirthy, C. (2018) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.08.002 · Cited by 262
Does information change attitudes toward immigrants?
Grigorieff, A., Roth, C., & Ubfal, D. (2020) · Demography · doi:10.1007/s13524-020-00882-8 · Cited by 254
The use of crowdsourcing in addiction science research: Amazon Mechanical Turk.
Strickland, J. C., & Stoops, W. W. (2018) · Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1037/pha0000235 · Cited by 258
Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview—Revised: Development, reliability, and validity.
Fox, K. R., Harris, J. A., Wang, S. B., Millner, A. J., Deming, C. A., & Nock, M. K. (2020) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000819 · Cited by 270
Who Are the Turkers? A Characterization of MTurk Workers Using the Personality Assessment Inventory
McCredie, M. N., & Morey, L. C. (2018) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191118760709 · Cited by 232
Molyneux, L. (2017) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2017.1334567 · Cited by 256
Crowdsourcing Samples in Cognitive Science
Stewart, N., Chandler, J., & Paolacci, G. (2017) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2017.06.007 · Cited by 233
Franklin, J. C., Fox, K. R., Franklin, C. R., Kleiman, E. M., Ribeiro, J. D., Jaroszewski, A. C., Hooley, J. M., & Nock, M. K. (2016) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/ccp0000093 · Cited by 217
Robinson, J., Rosenzweig, C., Moss, A. J., & Litman, L. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0226394 · Cited by 203
Harris, L. M., Huang, X., Linthicum, K. P., Bryen, C. P., & Ribeiro, J. D. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-70866-6 · Cited by 216
The effect of credit card versus mobile payment on convenience and consumers’ willingness to pay
Boden, J., Maier, E., & Wilken, R. (2019) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101910 · Cited by 204
Reh, S., Tröster, C., & Quaquebeke, N. V. (2017) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000281 · Cited by 184
Brands as Rivals: Consumer Pursuit of Distinctiveness and the Role of Brand Anthropomorphism
Puzakova, M., & Aggarwal, P. (2018) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucy035 · Cited by 208
Validating Machine Learning Algorithms for Twitter Data Against Established Measures of Suicidality
Braithwaite, S., Giraud-Carrier, C. G., West, J. H., Barnes, M. D., & Hanson, C. L. (2016) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/mental.4822 · Cited by 200
The Role of MTurk in Education Research: Advantages, Issues, and Future Directions
Follmer, D. J., Sperling, R. A., & Suen, H. K. (2017) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x17725519 · Cited by 184
Miller, J. D., Crowe, M., Weiss, B., Maples-Keller, J. L., & Lynam, D. R. (2017) · Personality Disorders Theory Research and Treatment · doi:10.1037/per0000191 · Cited by 179
Self-Compassion: A Potential Path to Adolescent Resilience and Positive Exploration
Bluth, K., Mullarkey, M. C., & Lathren, C. (2018) · Journal of Child and Family Studies · doi:10.1007/s10826-018-1125-1 · Cited by 231
Eckerd, S., DuHadway, S., Bendoly, E., Carter, C. R., & Kaufmann, L. (2020) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1002/joom.1128 · Cited by 172
It’s a Trap! Instructional Manipulation Checks Prompt Systematic Thinking on “Tricky” Tasks
Hauser, D., & Schwarz, N. (2015) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/2158244015584617 · Cited by 173
Self-citationThe critical role of second-order normative beliefs in predicting energy conservation
Jachimowicz, J., Hauser, O., O’Brien, J. D., Sherman, E., & Galinsky, A. D. (2018) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-018-0434-0 · Cited by 169
Brühlmann, F., Petralito, S., Aeschbach, L. F., & Opwis, K. (2020) · Methods in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.metip.2020.100022 · Cited by 168
Building, Hosting and Recruiting: A Brief Introduction to Running Behavioral Experiments Online
Sauter, M., Draschkow, D., & Mack, W. (2020) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci10040251 · Cited by 164
Mechanical Turk data collection in addiction research: utility, concerns and best practices
Mellis, A. M., & Bickel, W. K. (2020) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.15032 · Cited by 175
Zickar, M. J., & Keith, M. G. (2022) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-052946 · Cited by 231
Living “in the zone”: hyperfocus in adult ADHD
Hupfeld, K. E., Abagis, T. R., & Shah, P. (2019) · ADHD Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders · doi:10.1007/s12402-018-0272-y · Cited by 157
Designing crowdsourced delivery systems: The effect of driver disclosure and ethnic similarity
Ta, H., Esper, T. L., & Hofer, A. R. (2018) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2018.06.001 · Cited by 159
Robots should be seen and not heard…sometimes: Anthropomorphism and AI service robot interactions
Letheren, K., Jetten, J., Roberts, J. M., & Donovan, J. W. (2021) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21575 · Cited by 164
Common Concerns with MTurk as a Participant Pool: Evidence and SolutionsPreprint
Hauser, D., Paolacci, G., & Chandler, J. (2018) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/uq45c · Cited by 162
Self-citationReconsidering the voice effect when learning from a virtual human
Craig, S. D., & Schroeder, N. L. (2017) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.003 · Cited by 151
The racially diverse affective expression (RADIATE) face stimulus set
Conley, M. I., Dellarco, D. V., Rubien-Thomas, E., Cohen, A. O., Cervera, A., Tottenham, N., & Casey, B. J. (2018) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2018.04.066 · Cited by 174
Gratz, K. L., Tull, M. T., Richmond, J. R., Edmonds, K. A., Scamaldo, K. M., & Rose, J. P. (2020) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1111/sltb.12654 · Cited by 159
Yun, H. S., & Bickmore, T. (2025) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/68560 · Cited by 151
New rules of social media shopping: Personality differences of U.S. Gen Z versus Gen X market mavens
Goldring, D., & Azab, C. (2020) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.1893 · Cited by 165
Boyraz, G., Legros, D. N., & Tigershtrom, A. (2020) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102307 · Cited by 142
A linguistic signature of psychological distancing in emotion regulation.
Nook, E. C., Schleider, J. L., & Somerville, L. H. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000263 · Cited by 145
Partisanship, Political Knowledge, and the Dunning‐Kruger Effect
Anson, I. G. (2018) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12490 · Cited by 155
Aesthetic Pleasure versus Aesthetic Interest: The Two Routes to Aesthetic Liking
Graf, L. K. M., & Landwehr, J. R. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00015 · Cited by 143
Kwapil, T. R., Gross, G. M., Silvia, P. J., Raulin, M. L., & Neus Barrantes-vidal, A. (2017) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2017.07.001 · Cited by 152
Plass, J. L., Homer, B. D., MacNamara, A. P., Ober, T. M., Rose, M. C., Pawar, S. S., Hovey, C., & Olsen, A. F. (2019) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.01.005 · Cited by 163
When Victims Help Their Abusive Supervisors: The Role of LMX, Self-Blame, and Guilt
Tröster, C., & Quaquebeke, N. V. (2020) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2019.0559 · Cited by 143
Formalizing Neurath’s ship: approximate algorithms for online causal learning.
Bramley, N. R., Dayan, P., Griffiths, T. L., & Lagnado, D. A. (2017) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000061 · Cited by 136
Using MTurk to Distribute a Survey or Experiment: Methodological Considerations
Hunt, N. C., & Scheetz, A. M. (2018) · Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.2308/isys-52021 · Cited by 141
Distinct Effects of Pride and Gratitude Appeals on Sustainable Luxury Brands
Septianto, F., Seo, Y., & Errmann, A. (2020) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-020-04484-7 · Cited by 144
Mooijman, M., Meindl, P., Oyserman, D., Monterosso, J. R., Dehghani, M., Doris, J. M., & Graham, J. (2017) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000149 · Cited by 137
Supply chain transparency: Consumer reactions to incongruent signals
Mollenkopf, D. A., Peinkofer, S. T., & Chu, Y. (2022) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1002/joom.1180 · Cited by 139
Studying the Digital: Directions and Challenges for Digital Methods
Hampton, K. N. (2017) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053505 · Cited by 139
Sigurðsson, V., Larsen, N. M., Pálsdóttir, R. G., Folwarczny, M., Menon, R. G. V., & Fagerstrøm, A. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.052 · Cited by 143
The MTurkification of Social and Personality Psychology
Anderson, C. A., Allen, J. J., Plante, C. N., Quigley‐McBride, A., Lovett, A., & Rokkum, J. N. (2018) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167218798821 · Cited by 138
Barends, A. J., & de Vries, R. E. (2019) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2019.02.015 · Cited by 124
Can gamification improve financial behavior? The moderating role of app expertise
Bayuk, J. B., & Nasco, S. A. (2019) · International Journal of Bank Marketing · doi:10.1108/ijbm-04-2018-0086 · Cited by 131
Beyond the Breaking Point? Survey Satisficing in Conjoint Experiments
Bansak, K. C., Hainmueller, J., Hopkins, D. J., & Yamamoto, T. (2017) · Political Science Research and Methods · doi:10.1017/psrm.2019.13 · Cited by 135
Running Behavioral Operations Experiments Using Amazon's Mechanical Turk
Lee, Y. S., Seo, Y. W., & Siemsen, E. (2018) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/poms.12841 · Cited by 128
Linking decent work with physical and mental health: A psychology of working perspective
Duffy, R. D., Kim, H. J., Gensmer, N. P., Raque‐Bogdan, T. L., Douglass, R. P., England, J. W., & Büyükgöze‐Kavas, A. (2019) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2019.05.002 · Cited by 129
Loss of group memberships predicts depression in postpartum mothers
Seymour‐Smith, M., Cruwys, T., Haslam, S. A., & Brodribb, W. E. (2016) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s00127-016-1315-3 · Cited by 144
Two signals of social rank: Prestige and dominance are associated with distinct nonverbal displays.
Witkower, Z., Tracy, J. L., Cheng, J. T., & Henrich, J. (2019) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000181 · Cited by 137
Deep learning for post‐hurricane aerial damage assessment of buildings
Cheng, C., Behzadan, A. H., & Noshadravan, A. (2021) · Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering · doi:10.1111/mice.12658 · Cited by 135
LIONESS Lab – A Free Web-Based Platform for Conducting Interactive Experiments Online
Giamattei, M., Yahosseini, K. S., Gächter, S., & Molleman, L. (2019) · Journal of the Economic Science Association · doi:10.1007/s40881-020-00087-0 · Cited by 129
An international survey on the incidence and modulating factors of carsickness
Schmidt, E. A., Kuiper, O. X., Wolter, S. C., Diels, C., & Bos, J. E. (2020) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2020.03.012 · Cited by 126
Kavanaugh, C. M., & Jong, J. (2020) · Journal for the Study of Religion Nature and Culture · doi:10.1558/jsrnc.39187 · Cited by 128
Amatulli, C., Angelis, M. D., & Stoppani, A. (2020) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2020.104228 · Cited by 149
Ettinger, J., Walton, P., Painter, J., & DiBlasi, T. (2021) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-021-02975-8 · Cited by 146
Cohodes, E. M., McCauley, S., & Gee, D. G. (2021) · Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology · doi:10.1007/s10802-020-00732-6 · Cited by 133
Metadata
- Authors
- Hauser, D. J., & Schwarz, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- University of Southern California (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hauser, David J.
- Venue
- Behavior Research Methods
- Published
- 2015-03-12
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 400-407
- ISSN
- 1554-351X (ISSN-L)
- 1554-3528
- OpenAlex
- W2076387137
- Cited by
- 1,739
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 60 · 2025: 104 · 2024: 145 · 2023: 180 · 2022: 209 · 2021: 249 · 2020: 248 · 2019: 176 · 2018: 160 · 2017: 122 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 19
- FWCI
- 184.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Behavior Research Methods (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- Amazon Mechanical Turk, university students
- MeSH terms
- Attention, Data Collection, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Sciences, Internet
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
