The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Attentive Turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants
Open accessAbstract
Participant attentiveness is a concern for many researchers using Amazon's Mechanical Turk (MTurk). Although studies comparing the attentiveness of participants on MTurk versus traditional subject pool samples have provided mixed support for this concern, attention check questions and other methods of ensuring participant attention have become prolific in MTurk studies. Because MTurk is a population that learns, we hypothesized that MTurkers would be more attentive to instructions than are traditional subject pool samples. In three online studies, participants from MTurk and collegiate populations participated in a task that included a measure of attentiveness to instructions (an instructional manipulation check: IMC). In all studies, MTurkers were more attentive to the instructions than were college students, even on novel IMCs (Studies 2 and 3), and MTurkers showed larger effects in response to a minute text manipulation. These results have implications for the sustainable use of MTurk samples for social science research and for the conclusions drawn from research with MTurk and college subject pool samples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In crowd-sourced settings such as MTurk, respondents are often incentivized to respond as attentively, compliantly, and quickly as possible to both open higher-paying opportunities and prevent being rejected from future employment [90, 100].”
From Not so terrifying after all? A set of failed replications of the mortality salience effects of Terror Management Theory (2023) · cites this paper as [100]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Comparable attention checks have been shown to improve the quality of data obtained through web-based surveys above that of classic paper and pencil questionnaires [57].”
From Dispositional factors in the explanation of symptoms of depression, anxiety, health anxiety and COVID-19 Phobia (2024) · cites this paper as [57]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/bf03193146 · Cited by 65,971
Advances In Experimental Social Psychology
(2022) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(22)x0002-6 · Cited by 22,559
Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice
Thaler, R. (1985) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.4.3.199 · Cited by 4,885
Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk
Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., & Lenz, G. S. (2012) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpr057 · Cited by 4,008
Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk
Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500002205 · Cited by 3,767
Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power
Oppenheimer, D. M., Meyvis, T., & Davidenko, N. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009 · Cited by 3,493
Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice
Thaler, R. H. (2008) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1070.0330 · Cited by 3,477
Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk
Mason, W., & Suri, S. (2012) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0124-6 · Cited by 3,172
Data collection in a flat world: the strengths and weaknesses of Mechanical Turk samples
Goodman, J. K., Cryder, C. E., & Cheema, A. (2013) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.1753 · Cited by 2,242
Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a Participant Pool
Paolacci, G., & Chandler, J. (2014) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721414531598 · Cited by 2,136
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Kapelner, A., & Chandler, D. (2010). Preventing satisficing in online surveys: A “kapcha” to ensure higher data quality. In Proceedings of CrowdConf 2010. Available at www.academia.edu/2788541/Preventing_Satisficing_in_Online_Surveys
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 1,003
Aggregation, Clickbait and Their Effect on Perceptions of Journalistic Credibility and Quality
Molyneux, L., & Coddington, M. (2019) · Journalism Practice · doi:10.1080/17512786.2019.1628658 · Cited by 122
The micro-task market for lemons: data quality on Amazon's Mechanical Turk
Ahler, D. J., Roush, C. E., & Sood, G. (2021) · Political Science Research and Methods · doi:10.1017/psrm.2021.57 · Cited by 121
What the DAAM: Interpreting Stable Diffusion Using Cross Attention
Tang, R., Liu, L., Pandey, A., Jiang, Z., Yang, G., Kumar, K., Stenetorp, P., Lin, J., & Türe, F. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.310 · Cited by 226
Predicting satisfaction and intentions to use online food delivery: What really makes a difference?
Annaraud, K., & Berezina, K. (2020) · Journal of Foodservice Business Research · doi:10.1080/15378020.2020.1768039 · Cited by 139
Viewing sports online together? Psychological consequences on social live streaming service usage
Kim, H. S., & Kim, M. (2020) · Sport Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.smr.2019.12.007 · Cited by 120
Public values: citizens’ perspective
Bozeman, B. L. (2018) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2018.1529878 · Cited by 131
Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., & Chadwick, M. (2020) · Cognitive Research Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-020-00241-6 · Cited by 131
Pornography Consumption, Modality and Function in a Large Internet Sample
Solano, I., Eaton, N. R., & O’Leary, K. D. (2018) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499.2018.1532488 · Cited by 114
Lovett, M., Bajaba, S. M., Lovett, M., & Simmering, M. J. (2017) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/apps.12124 · Cited by 125
How Disgust Influences Health Purity Attitudes
Clifford, S., & Wendell, D. G. (2015) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-015-9310-z · Cited by 109
A Technical Guide to Using Amazon's Mechanical Turk in Behavioral Accounting Research
Buchheit, S., Doxey, M. M., Pollard, T., & Stinson, S. R. (2017) · Behavioral Research in Accounting · doi:10.2308/bria-51977 · Cited by 115
Human–robot similarity and willingness to work with a robotic co-worker
You, S., & Robert Jr., L. P. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3171221.3171281 · Cited by 118
Privacy Norms for Smart Home Personal Assistants
Abdi, N., Zhan, X., Ramokapane, K. M., & Such, J. M. (2021) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445122 · Cited by 111
Moss, A. J., Rosenzweig, C., Robinson, J., Jaffe, S. N., & Litman, L. (2023) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-022-02005-0 · Cited by 129
Ferrer, R. A., Klein, W. M. P., Avishai, A., Jones, K., Villegas, M. E., & Sheeran, P. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0191994 · Cited by 108
Le, T. V., & Ukkusuri, S. V. (2019) · Travel Behaviour and Society · doi:10.1016/j.tbs.2019.02.001 · Cited by 108
Cooper, S. R., Gonthier, C., Barch, D. M., & Braver, T. S. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01482 · Cited by 112
Schneider-Mayerson, M., Gustafson, A., Leiserowitz, A., Goldberg, M. H., Rosenthal, S., & Ballew, M. T. (2020) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2020.1814377 · Cited by 103
A Note on Increases in Inattentive Online Survey-Takers Since 2020
Ternovski, J., Orr, L., Kalla, J., & Aronow, P. M. (2022) · Journal of Quantitative Description Digital Media · doi:10.51685/jqd.2022.002 · Cited by 103
Vieira, V. A., Rafael, D., & Agnihotri, R. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.06.030 · Cited by 121
Becker, A. B., & Bode, L. (2017) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2017.1301517 · Cited by 102
Togawa, T., Park, J., Ishii, H., & Deng, X. (2019) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2019.11.001 · Cited by 117
Tull, M. T., Barbano, A. C., Scamaldo, K. M., Richmond, J. R., Edmonds, K. A., Rose, J. P., & Gratz, K. L. (2020) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102290 · Cited by 98
Time spent online: Latent profile analyses of emerging adults' social media use
Scott, C. F., Bay‐Cheng, L. Y., Prince, M. A., Nochajski, T. H., & Collins, R. L. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.026 · Cited by 108
A Comparison of Three Online Recruitment Strategies for Engaging Parents
Dworkin, J., Hessel, H. M., Gliske, K., & Rudi, J. H. (2016) · Family Relations · doi:10.1111/fare.12206 · Cited by 99
AI Suggestions Homogenize Writing Toward Western Styles and Diminish Cultural Nuances
Agarwal, D., Naaman, M., & Vashistha, A. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713564 · Cited by 214
The Shape of and Solutions to the MTurk Quality CrisisPreprint
Kennedy, R., Clifford, S., Burleigh, T. J., Jewell, R., & Waggoner, P. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3272468 · Cited by 99
AI Suggestions Homogenize Writing Toward Western Styles and Diminish Cultural Nuances
Agarwal, D., Naaman, M., & Vashistha, A. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.11360 · Cited by 99
Methods of Detecting Insufficient Effort Responding: Comparisons and Practical Recommendations
Hong, M. R., Steedle, J. T., & Cheng, Y. (2019) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164419865316 · Cited by 103
Research on climate change in social psychology publications: A systematic review
Tam, K., Leung, A. K. ‐., & Clayton, S. (2021) · Asian Journal Of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/ajsp.12477 · Cited by 105
Evaluating SoJump.com as a tool for online behavioral research in China
Ponte, A. D., Li, L., Ang, L., Lim, N., & Seow, W. J. (2024) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbef.2024.100905 · Cited by 105
Inattentive responding can induce spurious associations between task behaviour and symptom measures
Zorowitz, S., Solis, J., Niv, Y., & Bennett, D. (2023) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-023-01640-7 · Cited by 107
Rodd, J. M. (2023) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2023.104472 · Cited by 117
Gender-Inclusive Bathrooms Signal Fairness Across Identity Dimensions
Chaney, K. E., & Sanchez, D. T. (2017) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550617737601 · Cited by 100
Majeed, S., Kim, W. G., & Kim, T. (2023) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2023.103502 · Cited by 96
Comparing human-made and AI-generated teaching videos: An experimental study on learning effects
Netland, T. H., von Dzengelevski, O., Tesch, K., & Kwasnitschka, D. (2024) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105164 · Cited by 141
Improving Data Quality Using Amazon Mechanical Turk Through Platform Setup
Lu, L., Neale, N., Line, N. D., & Bonn, M. (2022) · Cornell Hospitality Quarterly · doi:10.1177/19389655211025475 · Cited by 94
Explaining Public Support for Counterproductive Homelessness Policy: The Role of Disgust
Clifford, S., & Piston, S. (2016) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-016-9366-4 · Cited by 101
Gleibs, I. H. (2016) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-016-0789-y · Cited by 93
Urban, J., Bahník, Š., & Kohlová, M. B. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.01.011 · Cited by 94
Class impressions: Higher social class elicits lower prosociality
Doesum, N. J. V., Tybur, J. M., & Lange, P. A. M. V. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2016.06.001 · Cited by 97
Savela, N., Kaakinen, M., Ellonen, N., & Oksanen, A. (2020) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106585 · Cited by 96
Developing and Validating Clinical Questionnaires
Rosellini, A. J., & Brown, T. A. (2021) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081219-115343 · Cited by 115
Zhang, X., Jeong, E., Olson, E. D., & Evans, G. (2020) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102589 · Cited by 90
How serious is the ‘carelessness’ problem on Mechanical Turk?
Aruguete, M. S., Huynh, H. P., Browne, B. L., Jurs, B. S., Flint, E., & McCutcheon, L. E. (2019) · International Journal of Social Research Methodology · doi:10.1080/13645579.2018.1563966 · Cited by 89
Cheating on Political Knowledge Questions in Online Surveys
Clifford, S., & Jerit, J. (2016) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfw030 · Cited by 89
Online disinhibition: conceptualization, measurement, and implications for online deviant behavior
Cheung, C. M. K., Wong, R. Y. M., & Chan, T. K. H. (2020) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/imds-08-2020-0509 · Cited by 89
Out of control or right on the money? Funder self-efficacy and crowd bias in equity crowdfunding
Stevenson, R. M., Ciuchta, M. P., Letwin, C. R., Dinger, J. M., & Vancouver, J. B. (2018) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.05.006 · Cited by 95
How we trust, perceive, and learn from virtual humans: The influence of voice quality
Chiou, E. K., Schroeder, N. L., & Craig, S. D. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103756 · Cited by 107
Zinko, R., Stolk, P., Furner, Z. Z., & Almond, B. A. (2019) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-019-00345-y · Cited by 89
Individual Differences in Learning Social and Non-Social Network Structures
Tompson, S., Kahn, A. E., Falk, E., Vettel, J., & Bassett, D. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000580 · Cited by 67
The uncertain state of work in the U.S.: Profiles of decent work and precarious work
Blustein, D. L., Perera, H. N., Diamonti, A. J., Gutowski, E. R., Meerkins, T. M., Davila, A., Erby, W. J., & Konowitz, L. S. (2020) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103481 · Cited by 85
Masur, P. K., DiFranzo, D. J., & Bazarova, N. N. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0254670 · Cited by 112
Davids, C. M., Watson, L. B., & Gere, M. P. (2018) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-018-0940-6 · Cited by 85
Instructional Manipulation Checks: A longitudinal analysis with implications for MTurk
Paas, L. J., Dolničar, S., & Karlsson, L. (2018) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2018.01.003 · Cited by 85
Nai, A., & Maier, J. (2020) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x20965548 · Cited by 84
The Brief Aggression Questionnaire: Structure, Validity, Reliability, and Generalizability
Webster, G. D., DeWall, C. N., Pond, R. S., Deckman, T., Jonason, P. K., Le, B. M., Nichols, A., Schember, T. O., Crysel, L. C., Crosier, B. S., et al. (2015) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2015.1044093 · Cited by 82
Predicting imminent suicidal thoughts and nonfatal attempts: The role of complexity
Ribeiro, J. D., Huang, X., Fox, K. R., Walsh, C. G., & Linthicum, K. P. (2019) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2167702619838464 · Cited by 75
The role of craving in emotional and uncontrolled eating
Verzijl, C. L., Ahlich, E., Schlauch, R. C., & Rancourt, D. (2018) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2017.12.014 · Cited by 79
Reanalysing the factor structure of the moral foundations questionnaire
Harper, C. A., & Rhodes, D. (2021) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12452 · Cited by 87
Le Mau, T., Hoemann, K., Lyons, S. H., Fugate, J. M. B., Brown, E. N., Gendron, M., & Barrett, L. F. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-25352-6 · Cited by 74
Behavioural and experimental public administration: Emerging contributions and new directions
James, O., Jilke, S., & Ryzin, G. G. V. (2017) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12363 · Cited by 86
Ulitzsch, E., Pohl, S., Khorramdel, L., Kroehne, U., & von Davier, M. (2021) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/s11336-021-09817-7 · Cited by 78
Need depriving effects of financial insecurity: Implications for well-being and financial behaviors.
Weinstein, N., & Stone, D. N. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000436 · Cited by 83
Religiosity and special food consumption: The explanatory effects of moral priorities
Minton, E. A., Johnson, K. A., & Liu, R. L. (2019) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.041 · Cited by 88
Millroth, P., & Frey, R. (2021) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2021.102454 · Cited by 88
A New Test of Risk Factor Relevance
CHINCO, A., HARTZMARK, S. M., & SUSSMAN, A. B. (2022) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/jofi.13135 · Cited by 75
Shin, Y. H., Im, J., Jung, S. E., & Severt, K. (2017) · Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management · doi:10.1080/19368623.2017.1263821 · Cited by 74
A panel for lemons? Positivity bias, reputation systems and data quality on MTurk
Matherly, T. (2019) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-07-2017-0491 · Cited by 79
Featured Article: Gender Bias in Pediatric Pain Assessment
Earp, B. D., Monrad, J. T., LaFrance, M., Bargh, J. A., Cohen, L. L., & Richeson, J. A. (2018) · Journal of Pediatric Psychology · doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsy104 · Cited by 74
How Do Older Adults Recruited Using MTurk Differ From Those in a National Probability Sample?
Ogletree, A. M., & Katz, B. (2020) · The International Journal of Aging and Human Development · doi:10.1177/0091415020940197 · Cited by 72
Rating Working Conditions on Digital Labor Platforms
Harmon, E., & Silberman, M. ‘. (2018) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/s10606-018-9313-5 · Cited by 73
Motivational effects on empathic choices
Ferguson, A. M., Cameron, C. D., & Inzlicht, M. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104010 · Cited by 80
Uittenhove, K. L., Jeanneret, S., & Vergauwe, E. (2023) · Journal of Cognition · doi:10.5334/joc.259 · Cited by 73
Job candidates’ reactions to AI-enabled job application processes
van Esch, P., Black, J. S., & Arli, D. (2021) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-020-00025-0 · Cited by 72
Kim, N., & Wojcieszak, M. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.013 · Cited by 82
Source market perceptions: How risky is Jordan to travel to?
Liu-Lastres, B., Schroeder, A., Pennington-Gray, L. A., & Farajat, S. A. D. (2016) · Journal of Destination Marketing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.jdmm.2016.08.005 · Cited by 72
Observer reactions to other customer incivility
Kim, Y. S., & Baker, M. A. (2019) · International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management · doi:10.1108/ijchm-03-2018-0262 · Cited by 76
Not All AI are Equal: Exploring the Accessibility of AI-Mediated Communication Technology
Goldenthal, E., Park, J., Liu, S. X., Mieczkowski, H., & Hancock, J. T. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.106975 · Cited by 79
Arli, D. I., Septianto, F., & Chowdhury, R. M. M. I. (2020) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04414-2 · Cited by 72
Wang, Z., & Jiang, F. (2023) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2023.103860 · Cited by 69
Validation of the Narcissistic Grandiosity Scale and creation of reduced item variants.
Crowe, M. L., Carter, N. T., Campbell, W. K., & Miller, J. D. (2016) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000281 · Cited by 75
Too many destinations to visit: Tourists’ dilemma?
Thai, N. T., & Yüksel, Ü. (2016) · Annals of Tourism Research · doi:10.1016/j.annals.2016.11.004 · Cited by 75
Beymer, M. R., Holloway, I. W., & Grov, C. (2017) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-016-0932-y · Cited by 69
Associations of parents' self, child, and other “fat talk” with child eating behaviors and weight
Lydecker, J. A., Riley, K. E., & Grilo, C. M. (2018) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.22858 · Cited by 67
Bragging and humblebragging in online reviews
Chen, F., Liu, S. Q., & Mattila, A. S. (2019) · Annals of Tourism Research · doi:10.1016/j.annals.2019.102849 · Cited by 68
The COVID-19 Vaccine Is Here—Now Who Is Willing to Get It?
Killgore, W. D. S., Cloonan, S., Taylor, E. C., & Dailey, N. S. (2021) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines9040339 · Cited by 73
Pandemic emotions: the extent, correlates, and mental health consequences of fear of COVID-19
Sloan, M. M., Haner, M., Graham, A., Cullen, F. T., Pickett, J. T., & Jonson, C. (2021) · Sociological spectrum · doi:10.1080/02732173.2021.1926380 · Cited by 53
Improving the Nutritional Impact of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program:
Leung, C. W., Musicus, A. A., Willett, W. C., & Rimm, E. B. (2017) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2016.07.024 · Cited by 68
Fusion with political leaders predicts willingness to persecute immigrants and political opponents
Kunst, J. R., Dovidio, J. F., & Thomsen, L. (2019) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0708-1 · Cited by 71
Gorilla in our Midst: An online behavioral experiment builderPreprint
Anwyl-Irvine, A., Massonnié, J., Flitton, A., Kirkham, N. Z., & Evershed, J. (2018) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/438242 · Cited by 68
Using Eco-Guilt to Motivate Environmental Behavior Change
Moore, M. M., & Yang, J. (2020) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2019.1692889 · Cited by 60
Weight and Gender in Service Jobs
Smith, N. A., Martinez, L. R., & Sabat, I. E. (2015) · Cornell Hospitality Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1938965515622564 · Cited by 69
How Short Is Too Short? Implications of Length and Framing on the Effectiveness of Privacy Notices
Gluck, J., Schaub, F., Friedman, A. L., Habib, H., Sadeh, N., Cranor, L. F., & Agarwal, Y. (2016) · Symposium On Usable Privacy and Security · Cited by 66
The effects of time frames on self-report
Walentynowicz, M., Schneider, S., & Stone, A. A. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0201655 · Cited by 80
Perception of Learning Versus Performance as Outcome Measures of Educational Research
Persky, A. M., Lee, E., & Schlesselman, L. S. (2020) · American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education · doi:10.5688/ajpe7782 · Cited by 66
Sigerson, L., Li, A. Y.-L., Cheung, M. W. ‐., & Cheng, C. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.041 · Cited by 74
Frank, D., & Otterbring, T. (2023) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122345 · Cited by 69
Dainer‐Best, J., Lee, H. Y., Shumake, J., Yeager, D. S., & Beevers, C. G. (2018) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000602 · Cited by 62
Association between Dog Owner Demographics and Decision to Seek Veterinary Care
Park, R. M., Gruen, M. E., & Royal, K. D. (2021) · Veterinary Sciences · doi:10.3390/vetsci8010007 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Hauser, D. J., & Schwarz, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- University of Southern California (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hauser, David J.
- Venue
- Behavior Research Methods
- Published
- 2015-03-12
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 400-407
- ISSN
- 1554-351X (ISSN-L)
- 1554-3528
- OpenAlex
- W2076387137
- Cited by
- 1,739
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 60 · 2025: 104 · 2024: 145 · 2023: 180 · 2022: 209 · 2021: 249 · 2020: 248 · 2019: 176 · 2018: 160 · 2017: 122 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 19
- FWCI
- 184.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Behavior Research Methods (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- Amazon Mechanical Turk, university students
- MeSH terms
- Attention, Data Collection, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Sciences, Internet
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review