The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The z ∼ 6 Luminosity Function Fainter than −15 mag from the Hubble Frontier Fields: The Impact of Magnification Uncertainties
Open accessAbstract
We use the largest sample of galaxies to date from the first four Hubble Frontier Fields clusters to set constraints on the shape of the luminosity functions (LFs) to fainter than mag. We quantify, for the first time, the impact of magnification uncertainties on LF results and thus provide more realistic constraints than other recent work. Our simulations reveal that, for the highly magnified sources, the systematic uncertainties can become extremely large fainter than −14 mag, reaching several orders of magnitude at 95% confidence at approximately −12 mag. Our new forward-modeling formalism incorporates the impact of magnification uncertainties into the LF results by exploiting the availability of many independent magnification models for the same cluster. One public magnification model is used to construct a mock high-redshift galaxy sample that is then analyzed using the other magnification models to construct an LF. Large systematic errors occur at high magnifications ( ) because of differences between the models. The volume densities we derive for faint (≳−17 mag) sources are ∼3–4× lower than one recent report and give a faint-end slope , which is 3.0–3.5 σ shallower (including or not including the size uncertainties, respectively). We introduce a new curvature parameter δ to model the faint end of the LF and demonstrate that the observations permit (at 68% confidence) a turn-over at in the range of −15.3 to −14.2 mag, depending on the assumed lensing model. The present consideration of magnification errors and new size determinations raise doubts about previous reports regarding the form of the LF at . We discuss the implications of our turn-over constraints in the context of recent theoretical predictions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters
Planck Collaboration, Ade, P. A. R., Aghanim, N., Arnaud, M., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Banday, A. J., Barreiro, R. B., Bartlett, J. G., et al. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1502.01589 · Cited by 10,720
A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering
Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (1997) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/304888 · Cited by 9,917
The cosmological simulation code gadget-2
Springel, V. (2005) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09655.x · Cited by 6,368
Starburst99: Synthesis Models for Galaxies with Active Star Formation
Leitherer, C., Schaerer, D., Goldader, J. D., Delgado, R. M. G., Robert, C., Kune, D. F., de Mello, D. F., Devost, D., & Heckman, T. M. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/313233 · Cited by 4,126
FOCUSING COSMIC TELESCOPES: EXPLORING REDSHIFT z∼ 5-6 GALAXIES WITH THE BULLET CLUSTER 1E0657 – 56
Bradač, M., Treu, T., Applegate, D., Gonzalez, A. H., Clowe, D., Forman, W., Jones, C., Marshall, P., Schneider, P., & Zaritsky, D. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/706/2/1201 · Cited by 128
Cited by
Greene, J. E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A. D., Furtak, L. J., Chemerynska, I., Kokorev, V., Dayal, P., Volonteri, M., Williams, C. C., Wang 王, B. 冰., et al. (2024) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad1e5f · Cited by 429
Self-citationBouwens, R. J., Oesch, P. A., Stefanon, M., Illingworth, G., Labbé, I., Reddy, N., Atek, H., Montes, M., Naidu, R., Nanayakkara, T., et al. (2021) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abf83e · Cited by 406
Self-citationEarly galaxy formation and its large-scale effects
Dayal, P., & Ferrara, A. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2018.10.002 · Cited by 403
Conditions for Reionizing the Universe with a Low Galaxy Ionizing Photon Escape Fraction
Finkelstein, S. L., D’Aloisio, A., Paardekooper, J.-P., Ryan, R., Jr., Behroozi, P., Finlator, K., Livermore, R., Sanderbeck, P. R. U., Vecchia, C. D., & Khochfar, S. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab1ea8 · Cited by 348
The bolometric quasar luminosity function at z = 0–7
Shen, X., Hopkins, P. F., Faucher-Giguère, C.-A., Alexander, D. M., Richards, G. T., Ross, N. P., & Hickox, R. C. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1381 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Bouwens, R. J., Oesch, P. A., Illingworth, G. D., Ellis, R. S., & Stefanon, M.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2017-07-10
- Volume
- 843
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 129
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2528108681
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 17.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The z ∼ 6 Luminosity Function Fainter than −15 mag from the Hubble Frontier Fields: The Impact of Magnification Uncertainties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3847/1538-4357/aa70a4
- The paper
- Bouwens, R. J., Oesch, P. A., Illingworth, G. D., Ellis, R. S., & Stefanon, M. (2017). The z ∼ 6 Luminosity Function Fainter than −15 mag from the Hubble Frontier Fields: The Impact of Magnification Uncertainties. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa70a4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.