PreprintCited by 14Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningAstronomical Observations and Instrumentation

Self-supervised similarity search for large scientific datasets

Open access
Stein, George, Harrington, Peter, Blaum, Jacqueline, Medan, Tomislav, Lukic, Zarija·2021·arXiv

Abstract

We present the use of self-supervised learning to explore and exploit large unlabeled datasets. Focusing on 42 million galaxy images from the latest data release of the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) Legacy Imaging Surveys, we first train a self-supervised model to distill low-dimensional representations that are robust to symmetries, uncertainties, and noise in each image. We then use the representations to construct and publicly release an interactive semantic similarity search tool. We demonstrate how our tool can be used to rapidly discover rare objects given only a single example, increase the speed of crowd-sourcing campaigns, and construct and improve training sets for supervised applications. While we focus on images from sky surveys, the technique is straightforward to apply to any scientific dataset of any dimensionality. The similarity search web app can be found at https://github.com/georgestein/galaxy_search

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2110.13151

Cites

14 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stein, G., Harrington, P., Blaum, J., Medan, T., & Lukic, Z.
Affiliations
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2021
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3210518412
Cited by
13
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DE‐ AC02‐06CH11357, -AC02-05CH11231, AC02‐06CH11357, 05CH11231, 06CH11357, DE-AC02-)
  • National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (DE–AC02–05CH11231, 05CH11231, DE-AC02-06CH11357, AC02-05CH11231)
  • Office of Science (AC02‐06CH11357, AC02-05CH11231, DE-AC02, 05CH11231, 06CH11357, DE-AC02-06CH11357)
  • Advanced Scientific Computing Research (DE-AC02-05CH11231, AC02-05CH11231, AC02-06CH11357, DE-AC02-06CH11357)
  • High Energy Physics (AC02-06CH11357, DEAC02--05CH11231, DE-AC02-06CH11357)
  • Argonne National Laboratory (DE-AC02, AC02–06CH11357, DE-AC02-05CH11231, 06CH11357)
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (AC02‐05CH11231, DE-AC02-06CH11357, 05CH11231)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation
Keywords
self-supervised learning, semantic similarity search, galaxy images, DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys, low-dimensional representation, crowdsourcing, training set construction, sky survey, interactive web tool

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review