Cited by 57Family Dynamics and RelationshipsReproductive Health and ContraceptionDemographic Trends and Gender Preferences

Fécondité envisagée, fécondité réalisée : un lien complexe

Open access
Toulemon, Laurent, Testa, Maria Rita·2005·Population & Sociétés

Abstract

Article disponible en ligne à l'adresse https://www.cairn.info/revue-population

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3917/popsoc.415.0001

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Among women who intended to have children, those with one child were the most likely to make parity progression.

    “Moreover, among women who intended to have children, those with one child were the most likely to make parity progression, as was found in Europe (Berrington 2004; Toulemon and Testa 2005) and the United States (Schoen et al. 1999).”

    From Division of domestic labour and lowest-low fertility in South Korea (2017) · cites this paper as Toulemon and Testa 2005

    In “Pas d'écart entre cohabitants et mariés” (p. 4), the paper says people with one child had higher observed fertility than those with none. But after accounting for demographic characteristics and fertility intentions, the two groups had equal chances of having a child. The analysis covers men and women together and does not establish that women intending children who had one child were the most likely to progress. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Toulemon, L., & Testa, M. R.
Affiliations
  • Institut national d'études démographiques (FR)
  • Vienna Institute of Demography (AT)
Venue
Population & Sociétés
Publisher
CAIRN
Published
2005-09-01
Volume
N° 415
Issue
8
Pages
1-4
ISSN
0184-7783 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2478430044
Cited by
57
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.83
Type
journal article
Language
fr
Open access
Locations
  • Population & Sociétés (publishedVersion)
  • Archined (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Cairn.info (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS - Institutional Research Information System (Libera Università Internazionale degli Studi Sociali Guido Carli) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • WU Research (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
Keywords
fertility, fertility intentions, fertility behavior, reproductive decision-making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review