Cited by 20Consumer Attitudes and Food LabelingProbiotics and Fermented FoodsHealthcare Regulation

Health claim regulation of probiotics in the USA and the EU: Is there a middle way?

Hoffmann, D.E.·2013·Beneficial Microbes

Abstract

In both the USA and Europe, supermarkets and pharmacies are brimming with probiotics - products containing live micro-organisms claiming they improve health. The availability of these products corresponds to a growing consumer demand for foods that improve or maintain health and wellness. The most persuasive include claims that consumption may confer health benefits. While some of these claims may have merit, others have not been substantiated. For a number of products, claims are based on insufficient research, underpowered studies, or mixed research results, yet individual consumers find that the product is of benefit to them. In attempting to regulate health claims, as distinct from safety, government entities may take positions which represent opposite ends of a philosophical spectrum. On one end of the spectrum they may take a limited approach to regulation relying primarily on the marketplace that respects individual autonomy and assumes a sophisticated consumer and honest sellers; alternatively they may choose substantial regulation based on a belief that consumers need protection from profit-seeking manufacturers. The USA and the European Union have taken two different approaches on this regulatory spectrum.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3920/bm2012.0033

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoffmann, D. E.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
Corresponding author
Hoffmann, D.E.
Venue
Beneficial Microbes
Published
2013-03-01
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
109-115
ISSN
  • 1876-2883 (ISSN-L)
  • 1876-2891
OpenAlex
W2140499820
Cited by
19
References
10
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Beneficial Microbes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Regulation
Keywords
probiotics, health claims regulation, functional foods, United States regulation, European Union regulation, regulatory philosophy, consumer protection, individual autonomy, health claim substantiation
MeSH terms
European Union, Humans, United States, Drug Approval, Probiotics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review