Cited by 4Geriatric Care and Nursing HomesDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchPain Management and Opioid Use

Biobehavioral measures as outcomes: A cautionary Tale

Open access
Kovach, Christine R., Woods, Diana Lynn, Devine, Elizabeth C., Logan, Brent R., Raff, Hershel·2014·Research in Gerontological Nursing

Abstract

This article discusses the use of biobehavioral measures as outcomes for health care intervention studies. Effect size (ES) values for salivary cortisol and observation-based measures of pain and agitation were examined. Effects pre to post treatment were assessed separately for nursing home residents with and without acute psychotic symptoms. This study revealed large positive effects on both pain and agitation measures in the group with acute psychotic symptoms and small-to-medium positive effects on these same measures in the group without acute psychotic symptoms. In both of these groups, the ES values were not consistently positive on the cortisol measures. Prior to determining whether a measure can be used to estimate minimum clinically important differences, it is essential to consider if the biomarker will be responsive to therapy in the populations and contexts being studied. [[Res Gerontol Nurs. 2014; 7(2):56–65.]

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3928/19404921-20131018-01

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Concerns have been raised about the salivary cortisol biomarker's long-term stability over spans exceeding one month and its short-term reliability in the context of day-to-day state effects, non-compliance, and other factors.

    “Moreover, concerns have been raised about the biomarker’s long-term stability over spans exceeding one month and its short-term reliability in the context of day-to-day state effects, non-compliance, and other factors [33,34,35,36].”

    From The Role of Cortisol in Chronic Stress, Neurodegenerative Diseases, and Psychological Disorders (2023) · cites this paper as [36]

    Methods > Measures and Procedures (page unavailable) identifies acute stress, incorrect sampling time, and improper sample handling as factors that can add variability to salivary cortisol measurements. The copy does not establish concerns about the biomarker’s stability over periods exceeding one month or specifically discuss day-to-day reliability or non-compliance; a background passage concerns sample storage for up to two weeks, not long-term biomarker stability. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kovach, C. R., Woods, D. L., Devine, E. C., Logan, B. R., & Raff, H.
Affiliations
Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
Venue
Research in Gerontological Nursing
Publisher
SLACK, Inc.
Published
2014-03
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
56-65
ISSN
  • 1938-2464 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-4921
OpenAlex
W2058546066
Cited by
4
References
69
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Research in Gerontological Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (5R01NR07765, R01NR007765, P20NR010674)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
outcome measures, salivary cortisol, pain, agitation, nursing home residents, effect size, minimal clinically important difference
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Dementia, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Nursing Homes, Pain Measurement, Psychomotor Agitation, Biomarkers, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Observation, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review