Cited by 237Nutrition and Health in AgingMuscle metabolism and nutritionMuscle Physiology and Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A high whey protein-, leucine-, and vitamin D–enriched supplement preserves muscle mass during intentional weight loss in obese older adults: a double-blind randomized controlled trial

Open access
Verreijen, Amely M, Verlaan, Sjors, Engberink, Mariëlle F, Swinkels, Sophie, de Vogel-van den Bosch, Johan, Weijs, Peter JM·2015·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background Intentional weight loss in obese older adults is a risk factor for muscle loss and sarcopenia.Objective The objective was to examine the effect of a high whey protein-, leucine-, and vitamin D-enriched supplement on muscle mass preservation during intentional weight loss in obese older adults.Design We included 80 obese older adults in a double-blind randomized controlled trial. During a 13-wk weight loss program, all subjects followed a hypocaloric diet (-600 kcal/d) and performed resistance training 3×/wk. Subjects were randomly allocated to a high whey protein-, leucine-, and vitamin D-enriched supplement including a mix of other macro- and micronutrients (150 kcal, 21 g protein; 10×/wk, intervention group) or an isocaloric control. The primary outcome was change in appendicular muscle mass. The secondary outcomes were body composition, handgrip strength, and physical performance. Data were analyzed by using ANCOVA and mixed linear models with sex and baseline value as covariates.Results At baseline, mean ± SD age was 63 ± 5.6 y, and body mass index (in kg/m(2)) was 33 ± 4.4. During the trial, protein intake was 1.11 ± 0.28 g · kg body weight(-1) · d(-1) in the intervention group compared with 0.85 ± 0.24 g · kg body weight(-1) · d(-1) in the control group (P < 0.001). Both intervention and control groups decreased in body weight (-3.4 ± 3.6 kg and -2.8 ± 2.8 kg; both P < 0.001) and fat mass (-3.2 ± 3.1 kg and -2.5 ± 2.4 kg; both P < 0.001), with no differences between groups. The 13-wk change in appendicular muscle mass, however, was different in the intervention and control groups [+0.4 ± 1.2 kg and -0.5 ± 2.1 kg, respectively; β = 0.95 kg (95% CI: 0.09, 1.81); P = 0.03]. Muscle strength and function improved over time without significant differences between groups.Conclusion A high whey protein-, leucine-, and vitamin D-enriched supplement compared with isocaloric control preserves appendicular muscle mass in obese older adults during a hypocaloric diet and resistance exercise program and might therefore reduce the risk of sarcopenia. This trial was registered at the Dutch Trial Register (http://www.trialregister.nl) as NTR2751.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3945/ajcn.114.090290

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–105 of 105

Metadata

Authors
Verreijen, A. M., Verlaan, S., Engberink, M. F., Swinkels, S., de Vogel-van den Bosch, J., & Weijs, P. J.
Affiliations
Nutricia Research (Netherlands) (NL)
Corresponding author
Verreijen, Amely M
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-02
Volume
101
Issue
2
Pages
279-286
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2167583811
Cited by
237
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 20
FWCI
11.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Nutricia Research
  • Nutricia Advanced Medical Nutrition
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
Keywords
whey protein supplements, leucine, vitamin D, sarcopenia, muscle mass preservation, intentional weight loss, obesity, older adults, appendicular skeletal muscle mass, grip strength, physical performance, resistance training, hypocaloric diet, body composition, protein intake, fat loss, sarcopenic obesity
MeSH terms
Whey Proteins, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Body Composition, Body Weight, Energy Intake, Diet, Reducing, Dietary Proteins, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Leucine, Male, Middle Aged, Milk Proteins, Motor Activity, Obesity, Vitamin D, Weight Loss, Body Mass Index, Treatment Outcome, Muscle, Skeletal, Hand Strength, Dietary Supplements, Muscle Strength, Resistance Training, Sarcopenia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review