Cited by 237Nutrition and Health in AgingMuscle metabolism and nutritionMuscle Physiology and Disorders

A high whey protein-, leucine-, and vitamin D–enriched supplement preserves muscle mass during intentional weight loss in obese older adults: a double-blind randomized controlled trial

Open access
Verreijen, Amely M, Verlaan, Sjors, Engberink, Mariëlle F, Swinkels, Sophie, de Vogel-van den Bosch, Johan, Weijs, Peter JM·2015·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background Intentional weight loss in obese older adults is a risk factor for muscle loss and sarcopenia.Objective The objective was to examine the effect of a high whey protein-, leucine-, and vitamin D-enriched supplement on muscle mass preservation during intentional weight loss in obese older adults.Design We included 80 obese older adults in a double-blind randomized controlled trial. During a 13-wk weight loss program, all subjects followed a hypocaloric diet (-600 kcal/d) and performed resistance training 3×/wk. Subjects were randomly allocated to a high whey protein-, leucine-, and vitamin D-enriched supplement including a mix of other macro- and micronutrients (150 kcal, 21 g protein; 10×/wk, intervention group) or an isocaloric control. The primary outcome was change in appendicular muscle mass. The secondary outcomes were body composition, handgrip strength, and physical performance. Data were analyzed by using ANCOVA and mixed linear models with sex and baseline value as covariates.Results At baseline, mean ± SD age was 63 ± 5.6 y, and body mass index (in kg/m(2)) was 33 ± 4.4. During the trial, protein intake was 1.11 ± 0.28 g · kg body weight(-1) · d(-1) in the intervention group compared with 0.85 ± 0.24 g · kg body weight(-1) · d(-1) in the control group (P < 0.001). Both intervention and control groups decreased in body weight (-3.4 ± 3.6 kg and -2.8 ± 2.8 kg; both P < 0.001) and fat mass (-3.2 ± 3.1 kg and -2.5 ± 2.4 kg; both P < 0.001), with no differences between groups. The 13-wk change in appendicular muscle mass, however, was different in the intervention and control groups [+0.4 ± 1.2 kg and -0.5 ± 2.1 kg, respectively; β = 0.95 kg (95% CI: 0.09, 1.81); P = 0.03]. Muscle strength and function improved over time without significant differences between groups.Conclusion A high whey protein-, leucine-, and vitamin D-enriched supplement compared with isocaloric control preserves appendicular muscle mass in obese older adults during a hypocaloric diet and resistance exercise program and might therefore reduce the risk of sarcopenia. This trial was registered at the Dutch Trial Register (http://www.trialregister.nl) as NTR2751.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3945/ajcn.114.090290

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • BIA has lower precision compared to DXA, the gold standard for body composition assessment.

    “BIA has lower precision compared to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), the gold standard for body composition assessment used in similar studies [58].”

    From The effects of a home-based resistance training programme on body composition and muscle function during weight loss in people living with overweight or obesity: a randomised controlled pilot trial (2025) · cites this paper as [58]

    The “Measurement of body composition, muscle strength, and physical performance” section (page not provided) confirms that this study used DXA to assess body composition. It does not compare DXA with BIA or describe DXA as the gold standard, so it does not support the precision comparison. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Diet-induced weight loss reduces muscle mass without adversely affecting muscle strength.

    “diet-induced weight loss reduces muscle mass without adversely affecting muscle strength”

    From Preserving Healthy Muscle during Weight Loss (2017) · cites this paper as [54]

    In “Muscle mass, muscle strength, and muscle function” (page not provided), the control group had a numerical decline in appendicular muscle mass, while muscle strength improved in both groups. The decline in muscle mass was not statistically significant within the control group, and all participants also performed resistance training. The findings therefore do not establish that diet-induced weight loss alone reduces muscle mass without adversely affecting strength. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Weight loss improves global physical function, most likely because of reduced fat mass.

    “weight loss improves global physical function, most likely because of reduced fat mass”

    From Preserving Healthy Muscle during Weight Loss (2017) · cites this paper as [54]

    The Results report that fat mass decreased and muscle function improved during the 13-week intervention; the Discussion says physical-performance measures improved in both groups. The paper does not establish that reduced fat mass was the likely reason, and it discusses both training and weight loss as possible contributors. It also reports specific performance measures rather than a measure of global physical function. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • High protein intake does not improve muscle strength during weight loss.

    “but does not improve muscle strength”

    From Preserving Healthy Muscle during Weight Loss (2017) · cites this paper as [54]

    The Results section (‘Muscle mass, muscle strength, and muscle function’; page not provided) reports that strength improved over 13 weeks in both groups, with no difference between them. This supports no additional strength benefit from the whey protein–, leucine–, and vitamin D–enriched supplement in obese older adults undergoing diet and resistance exercise, but not the broader claim that high protein intake does not improve strength during weight loss. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Whether increasing protein intake during weight loss can limit the weight-loss-induced loss of fat-free mass is unclear because of conflicting results reported in the literature.

    “Whether increasing protein intake during weight loss can limit the weight-loss-induced loss of fat-free mass is unclear because of conflicting results reported in the literature (54, 56, 96, 98, 101-108).”

    From Preserving Healthy Muscle during Weight Loss (2017) · cites this paper as [54]

    The Results (Muscle mass, muscle strength, and muscle function; page unavailable) report that the enriched-supplement group preserved appendicular muscle mass better than controls during weight loss. The Introduction says data in obese older adults are limited, but the paper does not report conflicting results in the literature or conclude that the effect of increasing protein intake is unclear. Its intervention also combined protein with leucine and vitamin D, rather than testing protein alone. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Verreijen, A. M., Verlaan, S., Engberink, M. F., Swinkels, S., de Vogel-van den Bosch, J., & Weijs, P. J.
Affiliations
Nutricia Research (Netherlands) (NL)
Corresponding author
Verreijen, Amely M
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-02
Volume
101
Issue
2
Pages
279-286
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2167583811
Cited by
237
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 1
FWCI
11.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Nutricia Research
  • Nutricia Advanced Medical Nutrition
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
Keywords
whey protein supplements, leucine, vitamin D, sarcopenia, muscle mass preservation, intentional weight loss, obesity, older adults, appendicular skeletal muscle mass, grip strength, physical performance, resistance training, hypocaloric diet, body composition, protein intake, fat loss, sarcopenic obesity
MeSH terms
Whey Proteins, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Body Composition, Body Weight, Energy Intake, Diet, Reducing, Dietary Proteins, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Leucine, Male, Middle Aged, Milk Proteins, Motor Activity, Obesity, Vitamin D, Weight Loss, Body Mass Index, Treatment Outcome, Muscle, Skeletal, Hand Strength, Dietary Supplements, Muscle Strength, Resistance Training, Sarcopenia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review