The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Update on NHANES Dietary Data: Focus on Collection, Release, Analytical Considerations, and Uses to Inform Public Policy
Open accessAbstract
NHANES is the cornerstone for national nutrition monitoring to inform nutrition and health policy. Nutritional assessment in NHANES is described with a focus on dietary data collection, analysis, and uses in nutrition monitoring. NHANES has been collecting thorough data on diet, nutritional status, and chronic disease in cross-sectional surveys with nationally representative samples since the early 1970s. Continuous data collection began in 1999 with public data release in 2-y cycles on ∼10,000 participants. In 2002, the Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals and the NHANES dietary component were merged, forming a consolidated dietary data collection known as What We Eat in America; since then, 24-h recalls have been collected on 2 d using the USDA's Automated Multiple-Pass Method. Detailed and targeted food-frequency questionnaires have been collected in some NHANES cycles. Dietary supplement use data have been collected (in detail since 2007) so that total nutrient intakes can be described for the population. The continuous NHANES can adapt its content to address emerging public health needs and reflect federal priorities. Changes in data collection methods are made after expert input and validation/crossover studies. NHANES dietary data are used to describe intake of foods, nutrients, food groups, and dietary patterns by the US population and large sociodemographic groups to plan and evaluate nutrition programs and policies. Usual dietary intake distributions can be estimated after adjusting for day-to-day variation. NHANES remains open and flexible to incorporate improvements while maintaining data quality and providing timely data to track the nation's nutrition and health status. In summary, NHANES collects dietary data in the context of its broad, multipurpose goals; the strengths and limitations of these data are also discussed in this review.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Willett, W. C. (1998) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195122978.001.0001 · Cited by 4,541
Principles Of Nutritional Assessment
Gibson, R. S. (2005) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195171693.001.0001 · Cited by 1,887
The Effect of Social Desirability and Social Approval on Self-Reports of Physical Activity
Adams, S. A. (2005) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwi054 · Cited by 1,160 · cited 1×
“Overall, there is always some error associated with selfreported dietary intakes, as is the case for self-reported data on any variable (44).”
BackgroundPresent Knowledge in Nutrition
(2012) · doi:10.1002/9781119946045 · Cited by 907
Freedman, L. S., Commins, J. M., Moler, J. E., Arab, L., Baer, D. J., Kipnis, V., Midthune, D., Moshfegh, A. J., Neuhouser, M. L., Prentice, R. L., et al. (2014) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwu116 · Cited by 528
Self-citation
Cited by
EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on nutrition in chronic liver disease
Merli, M., Berzigotti, A., Zelber-Sagi, S., Dasarathy, S., Montagnese, S., Genton, L., Plauth, M., & Parés, A. (2019) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2018.06.024 · Cited by 1,130
Dietary Supplements: Regulatory Challenges and Research Resources
Dwyer, J., Coates, P., & Smith, M. (2018) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu10010041 · Cited by 494
Self-citationSugary drink consumption and risk of cancer: results from NutriNet-Santé prospective cohort
Chazelas, E., Srour, B., Desmetz, E., Kesse-Guyot, E., Julia, C., Deschamps, V., Druesne-Pecollo, N., Galan, P., Hercberg, S., Latino-Martel, P., et al. (2019) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.l2408 · Cited by 225
The Development and Evaluation of a Literature-Based Dietary Index for Gut Microbiota
Kase, B. E., Liese, A. D., Zhang, J., Murphy, E. A., Zhao, L., & Steck, S. E. (2024) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu16071045 · Cited by 221
Sun, Y., Liu, B., Rong, S., Du, Y., Xu, G., Snetselaar, L. G., Wallace, R. B., & Bao, W. (2020) · Journal of the American Heart Association · doi:10.1161/jaha.119.014629 · Cited by 210
Metadata
- Authors
- Ahluwalia, N., Dwyer, J., Terry, A., Moshfegh, A., & Johnson, C.
- Venue
- Advances in Nutrition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 121-134
- ISSN
- 2156-5376 (ISSN-L)
- 2161-8313
- OpenAlex
- W2269476273
- Cited by
- 1,055
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 42.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.