Phonology and Reading Disability: Solving the Reading Puzzle

·1989·University of Michigan Press eBooks

DOI 10.3998/mpub.12236

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3998/mpub.12236

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Phonological recoding and self-teaching: sine qua non of reading acquisition
Share, D. L. (1995) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2 · Cited by 2,352
On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography.
Share, D. L. (2008) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584 · Cited by 1,022
Longitudinal Studies of Phonological Processing and Reading
Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1994) · Journal of Learning Disabilities · doi:10.1177/002221949402700503 · Cited by 932
Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models.
Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1999) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.106.3.491 · Cited by 927
The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading failure in at-risk children.
Foorman, B. R., Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., Schatschneider, C., & Mehta, P. (1998) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-0663.90.1.37 · Cited by 895
The Prevention of Reading Difficulties
Torgesen, J. K. (2002) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0022-4405(01)00092-9 · Cited by 580
Neurobiological studies of reading and reading disability
Pugh, K. R., Mencl, W. E., Jenner, A. R., Katz, L., Frost, S. J., Lee, J. R., Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2001) · Journal of Communication Disorders · doi:10.1016/s0021-9924(01)00060-0 · Cited by 508
Beginning to read in Turkish: A phonologically transparent orthography
Öney, B., & Durgunoğlu, A. Y. (1997) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s014271640000984x · Cited by 210
The metalinguistic benefits of limited contact with a second language
Yelland, G. W., Pollard, J., & Mercuri, A. (1993) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716400010687 · Cited by 125
Phonological processing in relation to reading: an fMRI study in deaf readers
Aparicio, M., Gounot, D., Demont, E., & Metz-Lutz, M.-N. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.12.046 · Cited by 75
The effects of multisensory structured language instruction on native language and foreign language aptitude skills of at-risk high school foreign language learners
Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., Pohlman, J., Skinner, S., & Artzer, M. (1992) · Annals of Dyslexia · doi:10.1007/bf02654937 · Cited by 51
Phonetic discrimination mediates the relationship between auditory brainstem response stability and syntactic performance
Tecoulesco, L., Skoe, E., & Naigles, L. R. (2020) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2020.104810 · Cited by 16

Venue: University of Michigan Press eBooks
Publisher: University of Michigan Press
Published: 1989
DOI: 10.3998/mpub.12236
OpenAlex: W600528129
Cited by: 317
References: 0
FWCI: 7.96
Type: book
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review