Cited by 2Historical Studies in Central AmericaAmazonian Archaeology and EthnohistoryArchaeology and ancient environmental studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 20 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Tumaco - La Tolita: Un Litoral de Intercambio en el Período Prehispánico

Open access
Bouchard, J.F.·1998·El área septentrional andina

Abstract

Desde los años 70, se ha ido recopilando una serie de datos crono-culturales que han permitido integrar la arqueología del litoral Tumaco-La Tolita dentro de la prehistoria del área andina ecuatorial. En esta ponencia, se analizan los datos recientes que pueden apoyar la tesis de intercambio en el litoral, antes, durante y después de la famosa hegemonía de Tumaco-La Tolita. Luego, se enfoca este mismo tema por medio de los últimos resultados de excavación en el sitio El Morro (Tumaco, Nariño...

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Bouchard synthesizes two decades of archaeological work on the Tumaco–La Tolita littoral (Esmeraldas, Ecuador to Buenaventura, Colombia) and argues that this coast was a zone of active maritime and inland exchange, not an isolated backwater, before, during, and after the hegemony of the Tumaco–La Tolita culture. New excavations at El Morro (Tumaco, Nariño) in 1978 and 1996 document two prehispanic occupations and support the thesis of a port site tied to gold-bearing alluvial plains.

Key findings

  • The older thesis of migrations from Mesoamerica was replaced by one of an "Andean equatorial" origin appearing from the end of the Late Formative; the Tachina style is the base reference, and around 500 BC a mutation produced the phase commonly called "Tumaco–La Tolita."
  • El Morro yielded two prehispanic occupations: a lower level identified ceramically as Tumaco–La Tolita (proposed 500 BC–300 AD, no C14 dates), and an upper "Morro" phase midden with radiocarbon dates of 430 AD (1979) and 1470 ± 95 BP, i.e. 405 AD cal (Gif 10808) — both after La Tolita's hegemony.
  • Exchange evidence includes obsidian at nearly all coastal sites (sources only in high volcanic flows), two obsidian flakes in the Morro level, Tumaco–La Tolita figurines far inland (Jardín del Este near Quito; La Cadena, Quevedo region), and two gold figurines at El Angel (Carchi) and Frias (Peru).
  • The dense concentration of sites near Monte Alto, Bucheli-Inguapi and Dos Quebradas is attributed mainly to nearby rich alluvial gold deposits in the Mira and Rosario basins, which Bouchard proposes as the principal motive for dense prehispanic colonization; El Morro is interpreted as a maritime terminal controlling the southern entrance to Tumaco bay.
  • After ~300 AD, La Tolita shows no later occupation; most of the littoral shows a cultural void or sparse phases (Morro in Tumaco, Guadual in the middle Santiago), with a drastic ceramic change from multiple supports to a single flaring pedestal ("compotera"), also seen in the Muchique complex in northern Manabí.

Methods

  • Synthesis of roughly a decade of regional archaeological programs plus presentation of new excavation results; the paper is a conference contribution ("ponencia") in a symposium volume.
  • Excavations at El Morro–C.C.C.P. (Isla del Morro, Tumaco) conducted in 1978 (test pits) and October 1996 under ICAN authorization, on the sheltered bay side of the island.
  • Ceramic typological classification and comparison with regional corpora (Inguapi 1, Tumaco–La Tolita, Morro, Guadual, Muchique), plus two radiocarbon dates for the Morro level; ethnohistoric sources (Cabello de Balboa 1583; Alcina 1979) and a geological prospection map of the Mira and Rosario basins.

Limitations

  • Stated: only a minimal part of the prehispanic site was observed; the site was largely destroyed by construction of the modern dock in the 1940s–50s, and its southern end was affected after the 1979 tsunami by modern invasion neighborhoods, with good preservation only on C.C.C.P. grounds and some private parcels.
  • Stated: no radiocarbon dates are associated with the Tumaco–La Tolita occupation at El Morro, so its 500 BC–300 AD date is based on ceramic traits; there is no consensus on the post-Tumaco–La Tolita phases, and it remains unclear whether Morro/Guadual represent evolution from or replacement of that culture.
  • Stated: no metal remains of goldworking are known for the Morro phase (only a nose ornament depicted on a vessel neck suggests it); the Spondylus trade role of Esmeraldas–Atacames is asserted as plausible but the paper notes insufficient data to confirm it as an extraction zone.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4000/books.ifea.3360

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 20 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data
    § La ocupación Tumaco La Tolita

    A geological prospection map in the Mira and Rosario basins shows that the alluvial plain closest to Tumaco has many gold deposits very close to the coast and mangroves.

    “Pudimos comprobar en un mapa de prospección geológica en las cuencas del Mira y Rosario que la llanura aluvial más cerca a Tumaco presenta muchas deposiciones auríferas a muy poca distancia de la costa y de los manglares.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingreasoning
    § INTERCAMBIOS Y TRAFICOS EN EL MARCO GEOGRAFICO Y CRONOCULTURAL

    Obsidian is present in almost all sites of the coast.

    “la presencia de obsidiana en casi todos los sitios de la costa”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § La ocupación Tumaco La Tolita

    Late Formative characteristics such as horizontal incisions below the lips stand out.

    “Se destacan características del Formativo tardío como las incisiones horizontales debajo de los labios.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § El Morro en el contexto de trafico e intercambios

    The oldest occupation was found at an average depth of 0.5 m.

    “La ocupación más antigua se encontró a una profundidad de 0.5 m en promedio.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingreasoning
    § El Morro en el contexto de trafico e intercambios

    Only in the C.C.C.P. grounds and some private plots are the prehispanic levels of this port settlement well preserved.

    “Sólo en los terrenos del C.C.C.P. y en algunas parcelas privadas quedan bien conservados los niveles prehispanicos de este asentamiento portuario.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 26
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 6
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data
    § INTERCAMBIOS Y TRAFICOS EN EL MARCO GEOGRAFICO Y CRONOCULTURAL

    Figurines found at archaeological sites frequently represent canoes and rowers, evidencing maritime navigation.

    “Esto se evidencia en el arte de figurinas encontradas en los sitios arqueológicos a través de la representación frecuente de canoas y de remeros .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data
    § La ocupación Tumaco La Tolita

    There are also figurine fragments or particular elements of vessels that are typical.

    “También hay fragmentos de figurilla o elementos particulares de recipientes que son típicos.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingcitation
    § El Morro en el contexto de trafico e intercambios

    A radiocarbon analysis of the Morro phase gave a date of 430 A.D. (1979) and another more recent dating gave 1470 ± 95 BP, or 405 AD (cal) (Gif 10808).

    “A esta fase corresponde un análisis con radiocarbónico de 430 A.D. realizado en 1979 Se obtuvó otro fechamiento más reciente dando una fecha de 1470 +- 95 BP, o sea 405 AD (cal) (Gif 10808).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gif 10808

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data
    § El Morro en el contexto de trafico e intercambios

    Below the second occupation, no other levels appeared and only a small quantity of sherds belonging to the same cultural level was found.

    “Debajo, no aparecieron otros niveles y se encontró solamente una pequeña cantidad de tiestos pertenecientes al mismo nivel cultural.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingcitation
    § La ocupación de El Morro

    In the ceramics of the Morro phase, forms considered diagnostic according to previous classification are recognized, especially cups with a flared pedestal, identified by the upper part (simple or composite silhouette) or by the lower part (the flared pedestal).

    “En la cerámica, perteneciente a este nivel se reconocen formas que consideramos diagnósticas según nuestra clasificación previa (Bouchard, 1982-1983), sobre todo las etapas con un pedestal acampanado, identificadas por la parte superior (de silueta sencilla o compuesta) o por la parte inferior (el pedestal acampanado).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bouchard, 1982-1983

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data
    § La ocupación de El Morro

    If the forms of the containers considered key for El Morro ceramics do not appear to derive from the typical forms of Tumaco-La Tolita, neither do the typological classifications carried out allow proposing such a hypothesis: the paste and decoration of the 2 corpora present rather great differences.

    “Si las formas de los recipientes que considero clave para la cerámica El Morro no parecen derivarse de las formas típicas de Tumaco-La Tolita, tampoco las clasificaciones tipológicas que hemos realizado permiten proponer semejante hipótesis: la pasta y la decoración de los 2 corpus presentan más bien grandes diferencias.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingreasoning
    § 371 fragmento de asa maciza cilíndrica

    Two obsidian flakes from this level clearly indicate that in the El Morro phase traffic or exchange between the Coast and the Sierra persists, since the known sources of obsidian are located in the Sierra.

    “dos esquirlas de obsidiana de este nivel indican claramente que en la fase El Morro persiste el tráfico o intercambio entre la Costa y la Sierra, puesto que las fuentes conocidas de obsidiana se ubican en la Sierra.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Obsidian is found only in high volcanic flows, and the known sources of obsidian are located in the Sierra.
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § INTERCAMBIOS Y TRAFICOS EN EL MARCO GEOGRAFICO Y CRONOCULTURAL

    The location of Ciscalá is unknown, but there are indications it was on this north equatorial coast, possibly in the Tumaco-La Tolita area.

    “Se desconoce la localización de Ciscalá, pero hay indicios que estaba en esta costa norecuatorial, posiblemente en el área Tumaco-La Tolita. (Alcina, 1979).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Alcina, 1979

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationcitation
    § INTERCAMBIOS Y TRAFICOS EN EL MARCO GEOGRAFICO Y CRONOCULTURAL

    The demand for Spondylus was so important that fishermen and traders of Spondylus should not have ignored the Esmeraldas-Atacames source.

    “la demanda de esta preciada concha era tan importante que los pescadores y traficantes de Spondylus no debían ignorar esta fuente.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Marcos

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • Rests on an assumption: Esmeraldas-Atacames is a zone of major natural production of Spondylus, one of the most prized objects of pre-Columbian commerce.
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given
    § El Morro en el contexto de trafico e intercambios

    To the south, toward the current airport and Tumaco island, there existed a wide zone of mangroves and swamps, not suitable for human settlement.

    “Hacia el sur, en dirección al actual aeropuerto y de la isla de Tumaco, existía una amplia zona de manglares y pantanos, no-aptos para un asentamiento humano.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § INTERCAMBIOS Y TRAFICOS EN EL MARCO GEOGRAFICO Y CRONOCULTURAL

    At the time of the Pre-Tolita occupation, La Tolita was not the focus of diffusion nor the powerful center it became some centuries later.

    “Tiendo a pensar que en este entonces, La Tolita no era el foco de difusión ni el centro poderoso que llegó a ser algunos siglos después”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § La ocupación Tumaco La Tolita

    El Morro, which controls the southern entrance of Tumaco inlet, could have been a kind of maritime terminal (as it is today) that formed the gateway to this rich alluvial region, being more easily accessible by sea than by land from the north coast of Ecuador.

    “El sitio El Morro, que controla la entrada sur de la ensenada de Tumaco, pudó ser una especie de terminal marítimo (tal como lo es actualmente) que formaba la puerta de entrada a esta rica región aluvial, siendo ella más facilmente accesible por mar que por tierra desde la costa norte del Ecuador.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § El Morro en el contexto de trafico e intercambios

    The two prehispanic occupations were made directly on the littoral terrain that presents the greatest protection on the island, because it is on the coast sheltered from ocean waves and currents, by its location in the same Tumaco roadstead and not on the maritime facade of the island.

    “son evidencias de dos ocupaciones prehispánicas hechas directamente en el terreno litoral que presenta la mayor protección en la isla, puesto que se encuentra en la costa abrigada del oleaje y de las corrientes marinas del océano, por su localización en la misma rada de Tumaco y no en la fachada marítima de la isla.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § INTERCAMBIOS Y TRAFICOS EN EL MARCO GEOGRAFICO Y CRONOCULTURAL

    It is very probable that Cabello de Balboa refers to La Tolita and relates that at the time of the Conquest a kind of ritual (possibly funerary) survived among indigenous groups, despite more than a millennium after the end of Tumaco-La Tolita culture.

    “Parece muy probable que Cabello de Balboa se refiere a La Tolita y que nos relata que en la época de la Conquista sobrevivía entre los grupos indígenas una especie de ritual (posiblemente funerario), a pesar de haber pasado más de un milenio después del final de la cultura Tumaco La Tolita.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cabello de Balboa, 1583

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § INTERCAMBIOS Y TRAFICOS EN EL MARCO GEOGRAFICO Y CRONOCULTURAL

    La Tolita was the main seat and hegemonic center of that system, functioning as metropolis and necropolis for the most important individuals of the culture.

    “Este tuvo su sede principal funcionando como centro hegemónico en La Tolita, isla de la desembocadura del río Santiago con el papel de metrópoli y de necrópolis para los individuos más importantes de esta cultura (Bouchard, 1989).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bouchard, 1989

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data
    § El Morro en el contexto de trafico e intercambios

    The two dates indicate that the site was occupied after the cultural hegemony of La Tolita, confirmed by analysis of the material from this archaeological level.

    “Las dos fechas indican por lo tanto que se trata de una ocupación del sitio después de la hegemonía cultural de La Tolita, lo que se confirma a través del análisis del material de este nivel arqueológico.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § INTERCAMBIOS Y TRAFICOS EN EL MARCO GEOGRAFICO Y CRONOCULTURAL

    There was important traffic along the coast and also toward the interior during these times.

    “hubo un tráfico importante a lo largo de la costa y también hacia el interior, como lo muestra el trabajo reciente de DeBoer en la región del medio Santiago-Cayapas (De Boer, 1996).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites De Boer, 1996
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § INTERCAMBIOS Y TRAFICOS EN EL MARCO GEOGRAFICO Y CRONOCULTURAL

    Maintaining a garrison of more than 100 people and coming to pour gold dust as offerings means that for them the site was still an object of traffic for highly cultural purposes.

    “Mantener una guarnición de más de 100 personas y venir a derramar oro en polvo como ofrendas significa que para ellos el sitio era todavía motivo de tráfico con fines altamente culturales.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § La ocupación Tumaco La Tolita

    There are no associated carbon-14 dates, but based on various ceramic traits a date between 500 BC and 300 AD can be proposed for the Tumaco-La Tolita occupation at El Morro.

    “No hay feçhas de carbono 14 asociadas pero, basándose en diversos rasgos de la cerámica podemos proponer una fecha entre 500 AC - 300 AD.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § INTERCAMBIOS Y TRAFICOS EN EL MARCO GEOGRAFICO Y CRONOCULTURAL

    The diffusion of the Chorreroide comes from the south (Esmeraldas region) and reaches probably much farther north than the Mataje River.

    “la difusión viene desde más al sur (región de Esmeraldas) y llega probablement mucho más al norte del río Mataje.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 371 fragmento de asa maciza cilíndrica

    It would be premature to equate them, but at least it gives the impression that ceramic evolution goes in the same direction.

    “Sería prematuro equipararlas pero por lo menos nos da la impresión que la evolución de la cerámica va en la misma dirección.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 371 fragmento de asa maciza cilíndrica

    This may mean that upon the disappearance of the strong influence of Tumaco-La Tolita culture, free field opened for ideas or other foreign influences to arrive.

    “Esto puede significar que al haber desaparecido la fuerte influencia de la cultura Tumaco-La Tolita, se abrió campo libre para que puedan llegar ideas u otras influencias foráneas.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § La ocupación de El Morro

    Almost simultaneously on the north coast of Ecuador, in the middle Cayapas-Santiago region not far from La Tolita, the Guadual phase also presents the same change from multiple supports to single flared supports, when it replaces the Selva Alegre phase which can be equated with the Tumaco-La Tolita phase.

    “de manera casi simultánea en la costa norte del Ecuador, en la región del medio Cayapas-Santiago no muy alejada de La Tolita, la fase Guadual también presenta el mismo cambio de soportes múltiples a soportes únicos acampanados, cuando esta reemplaza a la fase Selva Alegre que podemos equipararla con fase Tumaco-La Tolita (DeBoer, 1995).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites DeBoer, 1995

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § La ocupación Tumaco La Tolita

    The same characteristics that favored the development of the current port must have been used by pre-Columbian sailors to establish a base there from which they could continue navigating to the rivers that empty into the bay and also northward to the Guapi and Buenaventura region, where other settlements of this phase have been found.

    “Las mismas características que favorecieron el desarrollo del actual puerto debieron ser aprovechadas por los marineros precolombinos para establecer allí una base a partir de la cual podían seguir navegando hacía los ríos que desembocan en la bahía y también, hacia el norte rumbo a la región de Guapi y de Buenaventura, donde se han encontrado otros asentamientos de esta fase (Patiño Castaño, 1988”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Patiño Castaño, 1988, 1993

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Salgado y Stemper, 1991, 1995

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data
    § 371 fragmento de asa maciza cilíndrica

    However, the human face decorating a vessel neck presents a nose ring, which may be an indication of its existence.

    “la cara humana que decora un cuello de vasija presenta una nariguera, lo que puede ser indicio de su existencia.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 371 fragmento de asa maciza cilíndrica

    The Guadual and Muchique phases are the closest to El Morro both in chronology and space.

    “Estas fases Guadual y Muchique son las más cercanas a El Morro tanto en la cronología como en el espacio.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § La ocupación Tumaco La Tolita

    In addition to professional discoveries, several site findings have been reported by travelers in this zone, which confirms a probably greater occupation.

    “Además de estos descubrimientos hechos por profesionales, se han reportado varios hallazgos de sitios por parte de viajeros en esta zona, lo que confirma una ocupación probablemente mayor.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 371 fragmento de asa maciza cilíndrica

    This would indicate that they were no longer cultivated at the time of the El Morro phase, signifying an important technological loss.

    “Esto indicaría que ya no se cultivaban en el momento de la fase El Morro, significando una importante pérdida tecnológica.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 371 fragmento de asa maciza cilíndrica

    This is one of the greatest changes brought by modern archaeological projects that replace the obsolete concepts that existed before about this region.

    “Esto es uno de los mayores cambios aportados por los proyectos arqueológicos modernos que reemplazan los obsoletos conceptos que existían antes sobre esta región.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 371 fragmento de asa maciza cilíndrica

    The style of the nose ring appears late and distinct from the classic Tumaco-La Tolita goldwork style, which may indicate a new goldsmith tradition, just as the morphological changes in ceramics seem to indicate a new pottery tradition.

    “El estilo de la nariguera parece tardío y distinto al clásico estilo de la orfebrería Tumaco-La Tolita, lo que nos puede indicar una nueva tradición orfebre, al igual que los cambios morfológicos de la cerámica parecen indicar una nueva tradición alfarera.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
30 of 30
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Obsidian is found only in high volcanic flows, and the known sources of obsidian are located in the Sierra.

    “sabemos que ésta se encuentra solo en flujos volcánicos de altura”
    “las fuentes conocidas de obsidiana se ubican en la Sierra”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Esmeraldas-Atacames is a zone of major natural production of Spondylus, one of the most prized objects of pre-Columbian commerce.

    “Esmeraldas-Atacames es una zona de mayor producción natural de uno de los más preciados objetos de comercio precolombino: el Spondylus.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The coast from Tumaco to Buenaventura has many river basins with rich alluvial gold deposits.

    “También se sabe que la costa desde Tumaco hasta Buenaventura tiene muchas cuencas fluviales con ricas disposiciones aluviales auríferas.”
3 of 3

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Cubillos citation year conflicts with bibliography

    Minor

    The text cites Cubillos as a 1955 source, but the bibliography lists the Cubillos work under 1995. The cited year and the listed year do not match.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 7 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. BOUCHARD, J. F.1989. Evidencias de relaciones interculturales en la región norte (sur de Colombia y norte del Ecuador). Relaciones interculturales en el área ecuatorial del Pacífico durante la época precolombina, editado por J. F. Bouchard y M. , Guinea, pp 29-44. B.A.R. International series Oxford.
  2. BUYS, J. DOMINGUEZ V.1989. Arqueología de Cumbaya. en: Relaciones interculturales en el área ecuatorial del Pacífico durante la época precolombina, editado por J. F. Bouchard y M. , Guinea, pp 75-95. B.A.R. International series 503, Oxford.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bouchard, J. F.
Venue
El área septentrional andina
Published
1998
Pages
29-41
OpenAlex
W2600819359
Cited by
1
References
7
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
es
Open access
Locations
  • Institut français d’études andines eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • OpenEdition (OpenEdition) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical Studies in Central America
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory
  • Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Keywords
pre-Hispanic archaeology, Tumaco, Andean prehistory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review