The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
EBV-Specific CD8+ T Cell Memory: Relationships Between Epitope Specificity, Cell Phenotype, and Immediate Effector Function
Abstract
EBV infection in humans induces CD8+ T cell memory to viral epitopes derived from both lytic and latent cycle Ags. We have analyzed the relationship between the phenotype and function of the memory pool of T cells specific for these Ags. Lytic epitope-specific populations were heterogeneous in terms of CD45RO/RA and CD28 expression, whereas latent epitope-specific populations were uniformly CD45RO+ and CD28+, consistent with the higher antigenic challenge from lytic epitopes driving some memory cells toward a CD45RA+, CD28− phenotype. However, both types of memory population showed immediate epitope-specific cytotoxicity and type 1 cytokine production in ex vivo assays. Cytotoxic function was not associated with preactivated T cells, as EBV-specific populations were negative for activation markers such as CD69 or CD38, nor could cytotoxic function be ascribed to CD27− or CD56+ subsets, as such cells were not detected in EBV-specific memory. Furthermore, cytotoxicity was not limited to CD45RA+ and/or CD28− fractions, but also was observed in CD45RO+, CD28+ populations in lytic and latent epitope-specific memory. Cytokine (IFN-γ, TNF-α) responses, measured by intracytoplasmic staining after peptide stimulation, also were detectable in CD45RO+ and RA+ subsets as well as CD28+ and CD28− subsets. Of other markers that were heterogeneous in both lytic and latent epitope populations, CCR7 gave the best discrimination of functionality; thus, CCR7+ cells consistently failed to give an IFN-γ or TNF-α response, whereas many CCR7− cells were responsive. Our data are consistent with effector functions having a broad distribution among phenotypically distinct subsets of “effector memory” cells that have lost the CCR7 marker.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Two subsets of memory T lymphocytes with distinct homing potentials and effector functions
Sallusto, F., Lenig, D., Förster, R., Lipp, M., & Lanzavecchia, A. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/44385 · Cited by 5,846
Phenotypic Analysis of Antigen-Specific T Lymphocytes
Altman, J. D., Moss, P. A. H., Goulder, P. J. R., Barouch, D. H., McHeyzer-Williams, M. G., Bell, J. I., McMichael, A. J., & Davis, M. M. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.274.5284.94 · Cited by 3,544 · cited 2×
“I/peptide tetramers (15) and on peptide-induced cytokine release”
BackgroundMethodImmunological memory and protective immunity: understanding their relation
Ahmed, R., & Gray, D. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.272.5258.54 · Cited by 1,775 · cited 1×
“Once the infection is brought under control, many of these effectors die by apoptosis, but a small proportion of the primed CD8 T cell population survive to generate a long-lived memory cell pool (1, 2).”
BackgroundCallan, M. F. C., Tan, L., Annels, N., Ogg, G. S., Wilson, J. D. K., O'Callaghan, C. A., Steven, N., McMichael, A. J., & Rickinson, A. B. (1998) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.187.9.1395 · Cited by 892
Self-citationHIV-specific CD8(+) T cells produce antiviral cytokines but are impaired in cytolytic function
Appay, V., Nixon, D. F., Donahoe, S. M., Gillespie, G. M. A., Dong, T., King, A., Ogg, G. S., Spiegel, H. M. L., Conlon, C., Spina, C. A., et al. (2000) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.192.1.63 · Cited by 871
Posnett, D. N., Edinger, J. W., Manavalan, J. S., Irwin, C., & Marodon, G. (1999) · International Immunology · doi:10.1093/intimm/11.2.229 · Cited by 202
Cited by
Lineage relationship and protective immunity of memory CD8 T cell subsets
Wherry, E. J., Teichgräber, V., Becker, T. C., Masopust, D., Kaech, S. M., Antia, R., von Andrian, U. H., & Ahmed, R. (2003) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni889 · Cited by 1,864
Insulin needs after CD3-antibody therapy in new-onset type 1 diabetes
Keymeulen, B., Vandemeulebroucke, E., Ziegler, A. G., Mathieu, C., Kaufman, L., Hale, G., Gorus, F., Goldman, M., Walter, M., Candon, S., et al. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa043980 · Cited by 1,099
Cellular responses to viral infection in humans: lessons from Epstein–Barr virus
Hislop, A. D., Taylor, G. S., Sauce, D., & Rickinson, A. B. (2007) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.25.022106.141553 · Cited by 766
Self-citationGamadia, L. E., Remmerswaal, E. B. M., Weel, J. F., Bemelman, F., van Lier, R. A. W., & Ten Berge, I. J. M. (2003) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2002-08-2502 · Cited by 422
Four functionally distinct populations of human effector-memory CD8+ T lymphocytes
Romero, P., Zippelius, A., Kurth, I., Pittet, M. J., Touvrey, C., Iancu, E. M., Corthesy, P., Devevre, E., Speiser, D. E., & Rufer, N. (2007) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.178.7.4112 · Cited by 405
Metadata
- Authors
- Hislop, A. D., Gudgeon, N. H., Callan, M. F. C., Fazou, C., Hasegawa, H., Salmon, M., & Rickinson, A. B.
- Venue
- The Journal of Immunology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-08
- Volume
- 167
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2019-2029
- ISSN
- 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-6606
- OpenAlex
- W2102107932
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 8.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.