Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 497

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

T Cell Responses to Whole SARS Coronavirus in Humans

Open access
Li, Chris Ka-fai, Wu, Hao, Yan, Huiping, Ma, Shiwu, Wang, Lili, Zhang, Mingxia, Tang, Xiaoping, Temperton, Nigel J, Weiss, Robin A, Brenchley, Jason M, Douek, Daniel C, Mongkolsapaya, Juthathip, Tran, Bac-Hai, Lin, Chen-lung Steve, Screaton, Gavin R, Hou, Jin-lin, McMichael, Andrew J, Xu, Xiao-Ning·2008·The Journal of Immunology

Abstract

Effective vaccines should confer long-term protection against future outbreaks of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) caused by a novel zoonotic coronavirus (SARS-CoV) with unknown animal reservoirs. We conducted a cohort study examining multiple parameters of immune responses to SARS-CoV infection, aiming to identify the immune correlates of protection. We used a matrix of overlapping peptides spanning whole SARS-CoV proteome to determine T cell responses from 128 SARS convalescent samples by ex vivo IFN-γ ELISPOT assays. Approximately 50% of convalescent SARS patients were positive for T cell responses, and 90% possessed strongly neutralizing Abs. Fifty-five novel T cell epitopes were identified, with spike protein dominating total T cell responses. CD8+ T cell responses were more frequent and of a greater magnitude than CD4+ T cell responses (p < 0.001). Polychromatic cytometry analysis indicated that the virus-specific T cells from the severe group tended to be a central memory phenotype (CD27+/CD45RO+) with a significantly higher frequency of polyfunctional CD4+ T cells producing IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-2, and CD8+ T cells producing IFN-γ, TNF-α, and CD107a (degranulation), as compared with the mild-moderate group. Strong T cell responses correlated significantly (p < 0.05) with higher neutralizing Ab. The serum cytokine profile during acute infection indicated a significant elevation of innate immune responses. Increased Th2 cytokines were observed in patients with fatal infection. Our study provides a roadmap for the immunogenicity of SARS-CoV and types of immune responses that may be responsible for the virus clearance, and should serve as a benchmark for SARS-CoV vaccine design and evaluation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4049/jimmunol.181.8.5490

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 497

Metadata

Authors
Li, C. K.-F., Wu, H., Yan, H., Ma, S., Wang, L., Zhang, M., Tang, X., Temperton, N. J., Weiss, R. A., Brenchley, J. M., Douek, D. C., Mongkolsapaya, J., Tran, B.-H., Lin, C.-L. S., Screaton, G. R., Hou, J.-L., McMichael, A. J., & Xu, X.-N.
Venue
The Journal of Immunology
Published
2008-10
Volume
181
Issue
8
Pages
5490-5500
ISSN
  • 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-6606
OpenAlex
W2116101651
Cited by
497
References
6
FWCI
4.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: T Cell Responses to Whole SARS Coronavirus in Humans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4049/jimmunol.181.8.5490
The paper
Li, C. K.-F., Wu, H., Yan, H., Ma, S., Wang, L., Zhang, M., Tang, X., Temperton, N. J., Weiss, R. A., Brenchley, J. M., Douek, D. C., Mongkolsapaya, J., Tran, B.-H., Lin, C.-L. S., Screaton, G. R., Hou, J.-L., McMichael, A. J., & Xu, X.-N. (2008). T Cell Responses to Whole SARS Coronavirus in Humans. The Journal of Immunology. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.181.8.5490

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.