Cited by 132Treatment of Major DepressionSleep and related disordersTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies

Meta-analysis of the antidepressant effects of acute sleep deprivation

Boland, Elaine M., Rao, Hengyi, Dinges, David F., Smith, Rachel V., Goel, Namni, Detre, John A., Basner, Mathias, Sheline, Yvette I. +2 more·2017·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide a quantitative meta-analysis of the antidepressant effects of sleep deprivation to complement qualitative reviews addressing response rates. DATA SOURCES: English-language studies from 1974 to 2016 using the keywords sleep deprivation and depression searched through PubMed and PsycINFO databases. STUDY SELECTION: A total of 66 independent studies met criteria for inclusion: conducted experimental sleep deprivation, reported the percentage of the sample that responded to sleep deprivation, provided a priori definition of antidepressant response, and did not seamlessly combine sleep deprivation with other therapies (eg, chronotherapeutics, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation). DATA EXTRACTION: Data extracted included percentage of responders, type of sample (eg, bipolar, unipolar), type of sleep deprivation (eg, total, partial), demographics, medication use, type of outcome measure used, and definition of response (eg, 30% reduction in depression ratings). Data were analyzed with meta-analysis of proportions and a Poisson mixed-effects regression model. RESULTS: The overall response rate to sleep deprivation was 45% among studies that utilized a randomized control group and 50% among studies that did not. The response to sleep deprivation was not affected significantly by the type of sleep deprivation performed, the nature of the clinical sample, medication status, the definition of response used, or age and gender of the sample. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support a significant effect of sleep deprivation and suggest the need for future studies on the phenotypic nature of the antidepressant response to sleep deprivation, on the neurobiological mechanisms of action, and on moderators of the sleep deprivation treatment response in depression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.16r11332

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boland, E. M., Rao, H., Dinges, D. F., Smith, R. V., Goel, N., Detre, J. A., Basner, M., Sheline, Y. I., Thase, M. E., & Gehrman, P. R.
Affiliations
  • Philadelphia VA Medical Center (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2017-10-25
Volume
78
Issue
8
Pages
e1020-e1034
ISSN
0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2754688243
Cited by
132
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 9
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Keywords
sleep deprivation, antidepressant effects, depression, major depressive disorder, bipolar depression, total sleep deprivation, sleep restriction, treatment moderators
MeSH terms
Antidepressive Agents, Depression, Humans, Phototherapy, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychological Techniques, Sleep Deprivation, Treatment Outcome, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review