Cited by 44Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentTreatment of Major DepressionSleep and related disorders

Meta-analysis of sleep deprivation in the acute treatment of bipolar depression

Open access
Gottlieb, John F., Goel, Namni, Chen, Shenghao, Young, Michael A.·2021·Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sleep deprivation (SD) is an antidepressant intervention with multiple administration formats that has been investigated primarily with uncontrolled clinical trials and qualitative reviews of the literature. The validity and applicability of these findings to the treatment of bipolar depression (BPD) is uncertain. METHODS: A PRISMA-based systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis were conducted to determine the efficacy of SD in the treatment of BPD and to identify moderator variables that influence response rate. RESULTS: From a sample of 15 studies covering 384 patients, the overall, mean response rate to SD was 47.6% (CI 36.0%, 59.5%). This response rate compared post-SD to pre-SD depression scores, and not to a placebo control condition. Of several potential moderating variables examined, the use of adjunctive pharmacotherapy achieved statistical significance with response rates of 59.4% [CI 48.5, 69.5] for patients using adjunctive medication vs 27.4% [CI 17.8, 39.8] for patients not using adjunctive medication. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis of SD in the treatment of BPD found an overall, response rate of almost 50%, reinforcing earlier estimates of efficacy. The use of adjunctive pharmacotherapy had a statistically significant moderating effect on SD response suggesting that clinical practice should routinely pair these interventions. These findings provide a higher level of evidence supporting the use of SD, especially when used with medication, and should inform future management guidelines for the treatment of BPD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/acps.13255

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Meta-analyses on TSD have shown divergent conclusions on its efficacy, primarily explained by differences in inclusion criteria.

    “Meta-analyses on TSD have shown divergent conclusions on its efficacy, primarily explained by differences in inclusion criteria (10–12, 45–47).”

    From Total Sleep Deprivation Followed by Bright Light Therapy as Rapid Relief for Depression: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial (2021) · cites this paper as [47]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) describes discrepant efficacy findings and says that two earlier meta-analyses used different, restrictive inclusion criteria. It does not say that differences in inclusion criteria primarily explain divergent conclusions among meta-analyses; the discrepant findings it identifies are between earlier reports and one meta-analysis. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gottlieb, J. F., Goel, N., Chen, S., & Young, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
  • Florida State University (US)
  • Illinois Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Gottlieb, John F.
Venue
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-12-26
Volume
143
Issue
4
Pages
319-327
ISSN
  • 0001-690X (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0447
OpenAlex
W3104210870
Cited by
44
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4
FWCI
0.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (80NSSC20K0243, NNX14AN49G)
  • Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (NIH R01DK117488)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
sleep deprivation, bipolar depression, antidepressant treatment, adjunctive pharmacotherapy, treatment response rate, treatment moderators, bipolar disorder
MeSH terms
Antidepressive Agents, Bipolar Disorder, Humans, Phototherapy, Sleep Deprivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review