Cited by 75Treatment of Major DepressionBipolar Disorder and TreatmentSleep and related disorders

Sleep deprivation as treatment for depression: systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Ioannou, Michael, Wartenberg, Constanze, Greenbrook, Josephine T. V., Larson, Tomas, Magnusson, Kajsa, Schmitz, Linnea, Sjögren, Petteri, Stadig, Ida +2 more·2021·Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review evidence on the efficacy and safety of sleep deprivation (SD) as a treatment option for patients with unipolar or bipolar depression. METHODS: A systematic review according to PRISMA guidelines was conducted. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. Controlled trials were included in efficacy analysis, case series for evaluating complications and qualitative studies for patients' experiences. RESULTS: Eight controlled studies (368 patients), one qualitative study and seven case series (825 patients) were included. One week after treatment start, SD combined with standard treatment did not reduce depressive symptoms compared with standard treatment (standardized mean difference, SMD = -0.29, [95% confidence interval, CI: -0.84 to 0.25], p = 0.29). When excluding a study in elderly patients in a post hoc analysis, the difference was statistically significant (SMD = -0.54 ([95% CI: -0.86 to -0.22], p < 0.001)) but it diminished two weeks after treatment start. No superiority of SD was found compared with antidepressants, but SD may be superior to exercise in certain settings. It is uncertain whether SD affects quality of sleep, quality of life, everyday functioning or length of stay. Apart from switch to mania (ranging between 2.7% and 10.7%), no other serious complications were reported. CONCLUSION: Sleep deprivation has been studied in a wide range of settings resulting in divergent results for the short-term efficacy on depressive symptoms. Post hoc analyses indicated that there may be a significant but transient effect in certain populations. Further studies should focus on identifying subgroups of responders as well as examining feasibility in routine clinical care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/acps.13253

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Suicidality and self-harm are commonly exclusion criteria in controlled trials on chronotherapy, affecting external validity.

    “Moreover, suicidality and self-harm are commonly exclusion criteria in controlled trials on chronotherapy, affecting external validity (10).”

    From Total Sleep Deprivation Followed by Bright Light Therapy as Rapid Relief for Depression: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial (2021) · cites this paper as [10]

    The Discussion > Limitations section says all but two included studies listed suicidality as an exclusion criterion, supporting that part of the claim. It does not say self-harm was commonly an exclusion criterion or explicitly assess the effect on external validity; the Results > Mortality (including suicide) and self-harm section says only that no included study reported self-harm data. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Meta-analyses on TSD have shown divergent conclusions on its efficacy, primarily explained by differences in inclusion criteria.

    “Meta-analyses on TSD have shown divergent conclusions on its efficacy, primarily explained by differences in inclusion criteria (10–12, 45–47).”

    From Total Sleep Deprivation Followed by Bright Light Therapy as Rapid Relief for Depression: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial (2021) · cites this paper as [10]

    The Discussion reports differing conclusions on sleep deprivation’s efficacy and notes that this review used stricter inclusion criteria than another meta-analysis. It does not establish inclusion criteria as the primary explanation: it also identifies different comparators and statistical approaches, and attributes one difference in conclusions to different baseline time points. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Several studies have reported a rapid but transient alleviation of depressive symptoms directly after total sleep deprivation.

    “Several studies have reported a rapid but transient alleviation of depressive symptoms directly after TSD (10).”
  • Only a handful randomized controlled trials of total sleep deprivation as an antidepressant treatment have been conducted, with diverse protocols and results, leading to uncertainty over its efficacy.

    “Although TSD has been investigated as an antidepressant treatment in four decades, only a handful RCTs (with diverse protocols and results) have been conducted leading to uncertainty over the efficacy of the treatment (10, 13, 14).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [10]Wirz‐Justice A, Benedetti F, Terman M. Chronotherapeutics for Affective Disorders: A Clinician’s Manual for Light and Wake Therapy. 2nd revised ed Basel, New York: S. Karger; 2013: 124 p.
  2. [34]Rudolf GA, Tölle R. The course of the night with total sleep deprivation as antidepressant therapy. Waking Sleeping. 1978; 2(2): 83‐ 91.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ioannou, M., Wartenberg, C., Greenbrook, J. T. V., Larson, T., Magnusson, K., Schmitz, L., Sjögren, P., Stadig, I., Szabó, Z., & Steingrimsson, S.
Affiliations
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
  • Region Västra Götaland (SE)
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
  • Region Västra Götaland Psykiatri Affektiva Department of Psychiatry Sahlgrenska University Hospital Gothenburg Sweden
Venue
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-12-27
Volume
143
Issue
1
Pages
22-35
ISSN
  • 0001-690X (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0447
OpenAlex
W3095442690
Cited by
75
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
sleep deprivation, depression, bipolar depression, major depressive disorder, antidepressant efficacy, treatment safety, depressive symptoms, elderly patients, exercise comparison, quality of life
MeSH terms
Aged, Antidepressive Agents, Depression, Humans, Quality of Life, Sleep Deprivation, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review