Cited by 183Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchCircadian rhythm and melatoninSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

Adenosine, caffeine, and sleep–wake regulation: state of the science and perspectives

Open access
Reichert, Carolin Franziska, Deboer, Tom, Landolt, Hans‐Peter·2022·Journal of Sleep Research

Abstract

For hundreds of years, mankind has been influencing its sleep and waking state through the adenosinergic system. For ~100 years now, systematic research has been performed, first started by testing the effects of different dosages of caffeine on sleep and waking behaviour. About 70 years ago, adenosine itself entered the picture as a possible ligand of the receptors where caffeine hooks on as an antagonist to reduce sleepiness. Since the scientific demonstration that this is indeed the case, progress has been fast. Today, adenosine is widely accepted as an endogenous sleep-regulatory substance. In this review, we discuss the current state of the science in model organisms and humans on the working mechanisms of adenosine and caffeine on sleep. We critically investigate the evidence for a direct involvement in sleep homeostatic mechanisms and whether the effects of caffeine on sleep differ between acute intake and chronic consumption. In addition, we review the more recent evidence that adenosine levels may also influence the functioning of the circadian clock and address the question of whether sleep homeostasis and the circadian clock may interact through adenosinergic signalling. In the final section, we discuss the perspectives of possible clinical applications of the accumulated knowledge over the last century that may improve sleep-related disorders. We conclude our review by highlighting some open questions that need to be answered, to better understand how adenosine and caffeine exactly regulate and influence sleep.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jsr.13597

Cites

216 of 216 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The kinetics of adenosine formation and breakdown appear to occur at a faster rate than diurnal changes in NREM sleep EEG slow wave activity.

    “However, it has recently been highlighted that the kinetics of adenosine formation and breakdown appear to occur at a faster rate than diurnal changes in NREM sleep EEG slow wave activity [62].”
  • The deleterious effect of caffeine on subsequent sleep may be lessened in habitual consumers due to a potential tolerance to the substance.

    “The deleterious effect of caffeine on subsequent sleep may be lessened in habitual consumers due to a potential tolerance to the substance [62].”
  • With numerous days of caffeine consumption, there is the potential for habituation to the dose being administered, which may reduce the acute effects of caffeine.

    “With numerous days of consumption, there is the potential for habituation to the dose being administered [62], which may reduce the acute effects of caffeine.”
  • The impairments to sleep reported in this analysis may be reduced with repeated caffeine consumption.

    “Even though tolerance has not been clearly established in humans [62], it is important to consider that the impairments to sleep reported in this analysis may be reduced with repeated caffeine consumption.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 217 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reichert, C. F., Deboer, T., & Landolt, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Basel (CH)
  • Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Reichert, Carolin Franziska
Venue
Journal of Sleep Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-05-16
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
e13597-e13597
ISSN
  • 0962-1105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2869
OpenAlex
W4280493025
Cited by
183
References
217
Citations by year
2026: 51 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 7
FWCI
4.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Sleep Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
adenosine, caffeine, sleep-wake regulation, adenosine receptors, sleep homeostasis, circadian clock, sleep-related disorders, model organisms
MeSH terms
Adenosine, Caffeine, Circadian Rhythm, Humans, Sleep, Sleep Deprivation, Wakefulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review