Development and evaluation of the Flourish Diabetes Programme
Open accessAbstract
Background: Adolescents with type 1 diabetes face unique challenges in adapting to closed-loop technology. Positive psychology interventions may aid in promoting psychological adjustment, enhancing well-being and supporting the effective use of this technology. Aim: This study describes the development, content and evaluation of a positive psychology intervention, the Flourish Diabetes Programme, to facilitate adjustment to closed-loop technology among adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Setting: The Flourish Diabetes Programme is an online, interactive intervention aimed at adolescents living with type 1 diabetes who use closed-loop technology. Methods: The development of the programme was informed by qualitative research with adolescents, qualitative document analysis and the design and development model. The Delphi method was used to evaluate the intervention, where 11 experts provided feedback to refine and enhance the programme. Results: Feedback from the Delphi panel informed the refinement and finalisation of the Flourish Diabetes Programme, contributing to an evidence-based and user-centred intervention. Conclusion: The Flourish Diabetes Programme is a tailored online resource designed to support adolescents in adapting to closed-loop technology. Insights from the Delphi panel helped shape the programme into a practical tool for promoting positive adjustment. Contribution: This intervention is the first step in developing effective, evidence-based resources to help adolescents with type 1 diabetes manage new medical technologies, specifically closed-loop systems, using positive psychological principles.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This paper describes the development and expert evaluation of the Flourish Diabetes Programme, an online 7-week positive psychology intervention for adolescents aged 15–18 with type 1 diabetes using closed-loop technology. A two-round modified Delphi with 11 diabetes professionals produced seven themes that refined the programme’s content and structure, though the programme has not yet been pilot tested.
Key findings
- Eleven diabetes professionals joined Delphi Round 1 and 10 continued in Round 2; their experience ranged from 6 to 35 years, and they included endocrinologists, general practitioners, diabetes educators, dietitians and psychologists.
- Seven themes emerged and were incorporated into the final programme: helpful content for adjustment, caregiver and peer involvement, weekly feedback, identifying barriers at onset, technical feedback, recommendations regarding content, and duration of the programme.
- The final Flourish Diabetes Programme is an online, interactive website for adolescents aged 15–18 using closed-loop technology; it runs for 7 weeks, includes three online facilitation sessions, weekly caregiver activities, a forum, badges as incentives, and PAID-T screening before and after the programme.
- Expert feedback led to specific changes such as replacing “parent” with “caregiver,” changing “task” to “activity,” using mmol/L for the South African context, adding general diabetes guidelines and video content, and replacing collage making with social media-based activities.
Methods
- Intervention development used Thomas and Rothman’s six-phase design and development model, informed by prior phenomenological research with adolescents using closed-loop technology, a qualitative document analysis, the PERMA model and the UTAUT.
- A modified online Delphi technique was conducted over two rounds with 11 purposively and snowball-sampled diabetes professionals who had at least 2 years’ experience, worked with adolescents and were professionally registered.
- Delphi data were analysed using Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis; trustworthiness was supported by referencing raw data, verbatim extracts, a reflective journal, a co-coder and the lead researcher’s psychology training.
Limitations
- The paper states that the programme has not been pilot tested and recommends pilot testing to assess uptake, feasibility and effectiveness.
- The paper states that only one mental health expert participated in the Delphi study and recommends obtaining further feedback from mental health experts.
- The paper states that adolescent motivation should be considered and that some participants may not complete the full 7 weeks; evident from the text, the evaluation relies on expert consensus rather than adolescent user testing or quantitative outcomes such as time in range or HbA1c.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 43 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingreasoning
The perspectives of the professionals assisted the researchers in refining the intervention programme.
“The perspectives of the professionals assisted the researchers in refining the intervention programme.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Experts found the Flourish Diabetes Programme valuable for adolescent adjustment to closed-loop technology and diabetes identity.
“Experts found the intervention valuable for adolescent adjustment to closed-loop technology and diabetes identity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
All experts viewed support from caregivers, peer group, and weekly feedback as beneficial.
“All the experts viewed the support from caregivers, the support from the peer group and the weekly feedback as beneficial.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Insights from the Delphi panel helped shape the programme into a practical tool for promoting positive adjustment.
“Insights from the Delphi panel helped shape the programme into a practical tool for promoting positive adjustment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: No positive psychology intervention has specifically focused on adolescents with type 1 diabetes adjusting to closed-loop technology.
- Premisecitation
There is a notable inconsistency in the adoption and utilisation of diabetes technology among adolescents compared to younger children and adults.
“yet there exists a notable inconsistency in the adoption and utilisation of diabetes technology within this age group when compared to younger children and adults.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pals et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Psychological factors are an important consideration in the use of closed-loop systems because ultimate success depends on the engagement of the person using the technology.
“As the closed-loop system only automates parts of diabetes care, psychological factors are an important consideration in the use of such a system, because ultimate success with the system depends on the engagement of the person using the technology (Adams et al. 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Adams et al. 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Adolescents with type 1 diabetes face unique challenges in adapting to closed-loop technology.
“Adolescents with type 1 diabetes face unique challenges in adapting to closed-loop technology.”
- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
“Despite advancements, adolescents need targeted support to adopt diabetes technology, tailored specifically to the unique challenges faced by adolescents in utilising diabetes technology (Jaser et al. 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jaser et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
- Premisecitation
Diabetes management during adolescence is especially challenging.
“Diabetes management during adolescence is especially challenging (Hilliard et al. 2017)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hilliard et al. 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Numerous psychological barriers exist that may limit the benefits of closed-loop technology despite improved glucose control.
“Despite improved glucose control, numerous psychological barriers exist that may limit the benefits of closed-loop technology (Forlenza et al. 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Forlenza et al. 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Most adolescents do not meet the recommended treatment targets despite increased use of diabetes technology.
“despite the increased use of diabetes technology, most adolescents do not meet the recommended treatment targets (Jaser et al. 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jaser et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Negative emotions linked to diabetes self-management are related to poor glucose control.
“On a psychological level, negative emotions linked to diabetes self-management are related to poor glucose control (Shapiro et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shapiro et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Positive affect can have a positive influence in conditions such as diabetes where behavioural factors play a role.
“It is suggested that positive affect can have a positive influence in conditions, such as diabetes, where behavioural factors play a role (Pressman & Cohen 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pressman & Cohen 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The authors' previous phenomenological study and qualitative document analysis provided the basis for the proposed intervention programme.
“The authors have previously conducted a phenomenological study with adolescents using closed-loop technology and a qualitative document analysis (Kruger et al. 2023, 2024). These studies provided the basis for the proposed intervention programme.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kruger et al. 2023, 2024
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductnone given
The Delphi method was used to evaluate the proposed intervention programme by utilising a panel of experts to refine the programme in terms of its content and structure.
“The Delphi method was used to evaluate the proposed intervention programme by utilising a panel of experts to refine the programme in terms of its content and structure.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Previous positive psychology interventions usually last 4 to 8 weeks.
“The duration of the programme is 7 weeks, in line with previous positive psychology interventions, which usually last 4 to 8 weeks (Bolier et al. 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bolier et al. 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductnone given
The proposed intervention programme has been evaluated by a panel of experts.
“Although the proposed intervention programme is grounded in empirical data – a literature review – and the principles of positive psychology and has been evaluated by a panel of experts, the programme has not been pilot tested.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
Only one mental health expert agreed to participate in the current Delphi study.
“as only one mental health expert agreed to participate in the current Delphi study.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Support is a crucial construct of living positively with diabetes.
“As support was identified as a crucial construct of living positively with diabetes (Ingersgaard et al. 2019; Montali et al. 2022), caregivers will be involved during parts of the programme.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Ingersgaard et al. 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Montali et al. 2022
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
There is a substantial amount of evidence corroborating the beneficial impacts of peer support.
“This is in line with the substantial amount of evidence corroborating the beneficial impacts of peer support (Pienaar & Reid 2021; Qi et al. 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Pienaar & Reid 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Qi et al. 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The feedback received from the experts indicates that the Flourish Diabetes Programme has the potential to benefit adolescents in their adjustment to closed-loop technology.
“The feedback received from the experts indicates that the Flourish Diabetes Programme has the potential to benefit adolescents in their adjustment to closed-loop technology.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The programme has not been pilot tested.
“Although the proposed intervention programme is grounded in empirical data – a literature review – and the principles of positive psychology and has been evaluated by a panel of experts, the programme has not been pilot tested.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 26
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 48
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenFeedback from the Delphi panel informed the refinement and finalisation of the Flourish Diabetes Programme, contributing to an evidence-based and user-centred intervention.
“Feedback from the Delphi panel informed the refinement and finalisation of the Flourish Diabetes Programme, contributing to an evidence-based and user-centred intervention.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: No positive psychology intervention has specifically focused on adolescents with type 1 diabetes adjusting to closed-loop technology.
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe Flourish Diabetes Programme is an online, interactive, tailored resource for adolescents with type 1 diabetes who use closed-loop technology, designed to support their adaptation to the technology.
“The Flourish Diabetes Programme is an online, interactive intervention aimed at adolescents living with type 1 diabetes who use closed-loop technology.”
- Also stated in: § Conclusion · plain
“The Flourish Diabetes Programme is a tailored online resource designed to support adolescents in adapting to closed-loop technology.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: No positive psychology intervention has specifically focused on adolescents with type 1 diabetes adjusting to closed-loop technology.
- Also stated in: § Conclusion · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataSeven themes emerged from the Delphi panel and were incorporated into refining the intervention programme.
“Seven themes emerged and were incorporated into refining the intervention programme.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataExperts recommended the inclusion of video content.
“Regarding the content, the experts recommended the inclusion of more general information on diabetes, as well as video content, to make the programme more suitable for the developmental level of adolescents and to ensure that the amount of time needed to engage in the programme on a weekly basis was not too much.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningConsidering adolescents' developmental needs, during this phase there is an increased need for independence, with some parental support.
“It was highlighted that, considering adolescents’ developmental needs, during this phase, there is an increased need for independence, with some parental support.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataSophy suggested that adolescents should attend the programme with adolescents using the same diabetes technology.
“Sophy (registered nurse and diabetes educator) also suggested that adolescents should attend the programme with adolescents who are using the same diabetes technology in order for the adolescents to relate to one another and avoid confusion.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataMost experts found the programme duration adequate.
“Most experts found the programme duration adequate, though Jack (paediatric endocrinologist) worried it might be too time intensive.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingown dataExperts identified a gap in emotional support in diabetes training.
“Mia and Emma noted a gap in emotional support in diabetes training, with trust, motivation and positive goal setting identified as key for adjustment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataExperts recommended the inclusion of more general information on diabetes.
“Regarding the content, the experts recommended the inclusion of more general information on diabetes, as well as video content, to make the programme more suitable for the developmental level of adolescents and to ensure that the amount of time needed to engage in the programme on a weekly basis was not too much.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAll experts viewed weekly feedback as beneficial and a means of maintaining engagement.
“All the experts viewed the weekly feedback as beneficial and a means of maintaining engagement with the intervention.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingown dataExperts identified gaps in the educational content.
“Experts identified gaps in the educational content.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataExperts recommended technical adjustments and using language in a sensitive manner.
“Recommended adjustments included technical aspects and using language in a sensitive manner.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataExperts agreed the intervention would benefit a wider diabetes population.
“Emma and Hannah agreed the intervention would benefit a wider diabetes population.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Findingown dataTrust, motivation and positive goal setting are key for adjustment.
“Mia and Emma noted a gap in emotional support in diabetes training, with trust, motivation and positive goal setting identified as key for adjustment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataJack worried the programme might be too time intensive.
“Most experts found the programme duration adequate, though Jack (paediatric endocrinologist) worried it might be too time intensive.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAll experts were of the opinion that the amount of caregiver involvement was adequate and would give adolescents a sense of autonomy.
“All the experts were of the opinion that the amount of involvement from caregivers within the intervention was adequate and would give the adolescents a sense of autonomy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataHannah noted the tasks were concise and manageable.
“Hannah (dietitian) noted the tasks were concise and manageable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe weekly feedback was appropriate in terms of the amount of time required by adolescents to provide feedback.
“It was emphasised that the weekly feedback was appropriate in terms of the amount of time required by the adolescents to provide feedback.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe experts were of the opinion that the proposed intervention programme would assist adolescents in their adjustment to closed-loop technology.
“The experts were of the opinion that the proposed intervention programme would assist adolescents in their adjustment to closed-loop technology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataSamuel identified diabetes distress as a potential barrier to engagement and suggested including a screening tool prior to participation.
“Samuel (psychologist) identified diabetes distress as a potential barrier to engagement with the intervention and suggested including a screening tool prior to participation in order to address any potential barriers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataExperts emphasised the importance of engaging with other adolescents to have a sense of connection and support.
“The experts emphasised the importance of engaging with other adolescents to have a sense of connection and support and possibly providing practical support to one another.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationPositive psychology interventions may aid in promoting psychological adjustment, enhancing well-being and supporting the effective use of closed-loop technology.
“Positive psychology interventions may aid in promoting psychological adjustment, enhancing well-being and supporting the effective use of this technology.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Hilliard, Powell and Anderson 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Pressman & Cohen 2005
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationClosed-loop technology automates some aspects of diabetes management, but meal boluses still require manual administration.
“While the system automates some aspects of diabetes management, meal boluses still require manual administration (Forlenza, Buckingham & Maahs 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Forlenza, Buckingham & Maahs 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThis intervention is the first step in developing effective, evidence-based resources to help adolescents with type 1 diabetes manage new medical technologies, specifically closed-loop systems, using positive psychological principles.
“This intervention is the first step in developing effective, evidence-based resources to help adolescents with type 1 diabetes manage new medical technologies, specifically closed-loop systems, using positive psychological principles.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: No positive psychology intervention has specifically focused on adolescents with type 1 diabetes adjusting to closed-loop technology.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
PremisecitationIt is crucial that psychosocial factors are addressed and improved to increase the acceptance of closed-loop systems.
“When psychological barriers are considered, it is crucial that psychosocial factors are addressed and improved to increase the acceptance of closed-loop systems (Barnard et al. 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Barnard et al. 2015
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationClosed-loop systems can improve HbA1c and reduce hyperglycaemia.
“Medically, closed-loop systems can improve one’s HbA1c (haemoglobin A1c) and reduce hyperglycaemia (Beato-Víbora et al. 2021; Tauschmann et al. 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Beato-Víbora et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Tauschmann et al. 2019
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationEmotional well-being improves with the amount of time spent in the target blood glucose range.
“it has been found that emotional well-being improves with the amount of time spent in the target blood glucose range (time in range) (Rabbone et al. 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rabbone et al. 2022
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationUtilising diabetes technology to its full potential requires education on the closed-loop system.
“Utilising diabetes technology to its full potential also requires education on the closed-loop system (Rabbone et al. 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rabbone et al. 2022
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationImprovement in diabetes-specific emotional distress is associated with the use of diabetes technology.
“improvement in diabetes-specific emotional distress is associated with the use of diabetes technology (Vesco et al. 2018)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Vesco et al. 2018
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationManaging diabetes as an adolescent involves a complex interaction of medical, behavioural and social changes, where psychological functioning is a crucial component.
“Managing diabetes as an adolescent involves a complex interaction of medical, behavioural and social changes, where psychological functioning is a crucial component (Gonzalez, Tanenbaum & Commissariat 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gonzalez, Tanenbaum & Commissariat 2016
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLimited studies have investigated the psychological impact of diabetes technology, and little is known about the psychological factors that improve the usage of diabetes technology.
“Limited studies have investigated the psychological impact of diabetes technology, for example the impact thereof on people’s well-being or quality of life (Weissberg-Benchell, Antisdel-Lomaglio & Seshadri 2003), and little is known about the psychological factors that improve the usage of diabetes technology (Borges & Kubiak 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Weissberg-Benchell, Antisdel-Lomaglio & Seshadri 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Borges & Kubiak 2016
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe study included a diverse group of experts - endocrinologists, general practitioners, diabetes educators, dietitians and psychologists - ensuring heterogeneity.
“This study included a diverse group of experts – endocrinologists, general practitioners, diabetes educators, dietitians and psychologists – ensuring heterogeneity (Keeney et al. 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Keeney et al. 2011
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataEleven experts joined Round 1, and 10 continued in Round 2 because of one expert's withdrawal.
“Eleven experts joined Round 1, and 10 continued in Round 2 because of one expert’s withdrawal.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe thematic analysis continued until the research question had been answered and no new themes emerged.
“The thematic analysis continued until the research question had been answered and no new themes emerged (Willig 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Willig 2013
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe study adhered to the Protection of Personal Information Act (POPIA) to ensure confidentiality and secure handling of participant data.
“This study adhered to the Protection of Personal Information Act (POPIA) to ensure confidentiality and secure handling of participant data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe researchers ensured theme validity by continuously referencing raw data, using verbatim extracts and maintaining a reflective journal to minimise bias.
“The researchers ensured theme validity by continuously referencing raw data, using verbatim extracts and maintaining a reflective journal to minimise bias.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAnonymity was ensured to encourage open and diverse opinions.
“Anonymity was ensured to encourage open and diverse opinions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenA co-coder verified interpretations, and verbatim quotations supported findings.
“A co-coder verified interpretations, and verbatim quotations supported findings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationIn optimal human functioning and fulfilment, flourishing is achieved as a result of the components of the PERMA model.
“Seligman (2011) argues that in optimal human functioning and fulfilment, and as a result of the components of the PERMA model, flourishing is achieved.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Seligman 2011
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationThe number of Delphi rounds depended on achieving consensus.
“The number of rounds depended on achieving consensus (Hsu & Sandford 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hsu & Sandford 2007
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationUTAUT is relevant in the context of adjustment to closed-loop technology and emphasises the important role of individual beliefs, attitudes and perceptions in making decisions in healthcare and using technology.
“This theory is relevant in the context of adjustment to closed-loop technology and emphasises the important role of the individual’s beliefs, attitudes and perceptions in making decisions in healthcare and using technology (Venkatesh & Davis 2000).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Venkatesh & Davis 2000
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationPositive psychology interventions in type 1 diabetes can be beneficial by focusing on the strengths of adolescents and their families to promote resilience.
“Hilliard, Powell and Anderson (2016) argue that an emphasis on positive psychology interventions in type 1 diabetes (e.g. Jaser et al. 2014) can be beneficial, as such interventions would focus on the strengths of the adolescents and their families to promote resilience.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hilliard, Powell and Anderson 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe study was approved by the Health Research Ethics Committee (HREC) of the North-West University, South Africa (reference no.: NWU-00266-21-A1).
“The study was approved by the Health Research Ethics Committee (HREC) of the North-West University, South Africa (reference no.: NWU-00266-21-A1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe lead researcher, a trained psychologist, ensured accurate analysis.
“The lead researcher, a trained psychologist, ensured accurate analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationIn Round 2, experts received a summary of anonymised responses to encourage honest input.
“In Round 2, experts received a summary of anonymised responses to encourage honest input (Keeney et al. 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Keeney et al. 2011
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe Delphi method is useful in health care, especially in the development of guidelines and the identification of key constructs of interventions.
“The Delphi method is a consensus technique (Trevelyan & Robinson 2015) that is useful in the context of health care (Keeney, Hasson & Mckenna 2011), especially in the development of guidelines and the identification of key constructs of interventions (Lai et al. 2015; Ward et al. 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Keeney, Hasson & Mckenna 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Lai et al. 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ward et al. 2014
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThemes identified in the authors' prior phenomenological study and qualitative document analysis were the importance of knowledge and diabetes education, the process of positive adjustment to closed-loop technology, a positive outlook and building a relationship with diabetes.
“The identified themes were the importance of knowledge and diabetes education, the process of positive adjustment to closed-loop technology, a positive outlook and building a relationship with diabetes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kruger et al. 2023, 2024
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationAccording to the UTAUT model, effort expectancy, performance expectancy, social influence and facilitating conditions are the most important factors of behavioural intention.
“According to the UTAUT model, effort expectancy, performance expectancy, social influence and facilitating conditions are the most important factors of behavioural intention (Venkatesh et al. 2003).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Venkatesh et al. 2003
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenInformed consent was obtained both verbally and in writing from all participants.
“Informed consent was obtained both verbally and in writing from all participants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe Delphi method is a consensus technique.
“The Delphi method is a consensus technique (Trevelyan & Robinson 2015)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Trevelyan & Robinson 2015
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenParticipants were required to have at least 2 years' experience, work with adolescents and be professionally registered.
“Participants needed at least 2 years’ experience, work with adolescents and be professionally registered.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningThe different fields of diabetes in which the experts work assisted the researchers in gaining a broad understanding of adolescents' adjustment to closed-loop technology and refining the programme to provide a holistic programme for adolescents.
“The different fields of diabetes in which the experts work assisted the researchers in gaining a broad understanding of adolescents’ adjustment to closed-loop technology and refining the programme to provide a holistic programme for adolescents.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Circle of Control activity shifts focus to controllable factors and avoids fixation on external challenges.
“Participants also complete the Circle of Control activity (Covey 2020) to shift focus to controllable factors, avoiding fixation on external challenges.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Covey 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSMART goal setting promotes autonomy and accountability.
“Week 3 focusses on positive goal setting using SMART goals (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant and time-bound) to promote autonomy and accountability (Nguyen-Vaselaar & Lappe 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nguyen-Vaselaar & Lappe 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationAdolescence is a critical developmental stage.
“aligning with the critical developmental stage of adolescence (Chiang et al. 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chiang et al. 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningWithin the intervention, it will be beneficial for adolescents of the same age group to learn from one another.
“Consequently, within the intervention, it will be beneficial for adolescents of the same age group to learn from one another.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Adolescents of different ages navigate different challenges, developmental tasks and changes on their journey with diabetes.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningObtaining feedback from experts in various fields of diabetes was beneficial for refining the intervention programme in a holistic manner.
“Obtaining feedback from experts in various fields of diabetes was beneficial, as the researchers could draw from their diverse opinions and backgrounds. Thus, it assisted with the refinement of the intervention programme in a holistic manner.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe proposed intervention programme is grounded in empirical data - a literature review - and the principles of positive psychology.
“Although the proposed intervention programme is grounded in empirical data – a literature review – and the principles of positive psychology and has been evaluated by a panel of experts, the programme has not been pilot tested.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningDelivering the intervention through a free website makes it more accessible to participants.
“Technological advances are leveraged in this programme as the intervention content will be delivered through a free website, making it more accessible to participants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe 'best possible self' activity helps envision a positive future.
“Participants engage in a ‘best possible self’ activity (Sheldon & Lyubomirsky 2006) to envision a positive future, setting health behaviour goals and identifying steps towards achieving them.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sheldon & Lyubomirsky 2006
Not checked in the free run.
The paper relies on this without support.
No positive psychology intervention has specifically focused on adolescents with type 1 diabetes adjusting to closed-loop technology.
“With regard to adolescents living with type 1 diabetes, no positive psychology intervention has specifically focussed on their adjustment to closed-loop technology although various research studies have explored interventions in the context of health and positive psychology (i.e. Charlson et al. 2007; Jaser et al. 2020; Ogedegbe et al. 2012; Peterson et al. 2012).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Achieving expert consensus on the key components of the intervention improves engagement with the technology.
“It was used to achieve expert consensus on the key components of the intervention in order to improve engagement with the technology.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The themes identified in the authors' prior studies are essential constructs for the intervention programme.
“In the phenomenological study and the qualitative document analysis, themes were identified to identify essential constructs of the intervention programme.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Adolescents of different ages navigate different challenges, developmental tasks and changes on their journey with diabetes.
“This age group was chosen because adolescents of different ages navigate different challenges, developmental tasks and changes on their journey with diabetes.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Psychological barriers, including diabetes-related stigma, anxiety about technology dependence and concerns over device visibility, significantly impact engagement with closed-loop systems.
“Psychological barriers, including diabetes-related stigma, anxiety about technology dependence and concerns over device visibility, significantly impact engagement with closed-loop systems.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Gratitude journaling reflections foster emotional resilience and build a habit of noticing the good amidst the difficulties of managing type 1 diabetes.
“These reflections foster emotional resilience and build a habit of noticing the good amidst the difficulties of managing type 1 diabetes.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Reading about interpreting glucose data fosters a constructive mindset towards diabetes management.
“This reading fosters a constructive mindset towards diabetes management.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Sharing one new fact about type 1 diabetes daily promotes shared learning, empathy, and stronger communication within families.
“In addition, adolescents and their caregivers are invited to share one new fact about type 1 diabetes with each other daily, promoting shared learning, empathy, and stronger communication within families.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Current approaches to studying T2DM behaviors include quantitative surveys, qualitative interviews, and emerging digital health technologies, each with distinct advantages and limitations.
“Current approaches include quantitative surveys, qualitative interviews, and emerging digital health technologies, each offering distinct advantages and limitations [5].”
From Methodological Approaches in Studying Type-2 Diabetes-Related Health Behaviors—A Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [5]
The Introduction discusses benefits and barriers of diabetes technology, and Research methods and design describes interviews and an open-ended questionnaire. But these passages concern adolescents with type 1 diabetes and the development of an intervention; they do not present a comparison of approaches to studying type 2 diabetes behaviours or the distinct advantages and limitations of surveys, interviews, and digital health technologies. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Cites
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035 · see citing works
A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 · Cited by 23,066 · see citing works
Positive psychology: An introduction.
Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.5 · Cited by 11,351 · see citing works
One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238 · Cited by 9,727 · see citing works
The Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consensus
Hsu, C.-C., & Sandford, B. A. (2007) · University of Massachusetts Amherst · doi:10.7275/pdz9-th90 · Cited by 4,500 · see citing works
Does positive affect influence health?
Pressman, S. D., & Cohen, S. (2005) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.925 · Cited by 2,087 · see citing works
Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies
Bolier, L., Haverman, M., Westerhof, G. J., Riper, H., Smit, F., & Bohlmeijer, E. (2013) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-119 · Cited by 1,996 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The duration of the programme is 7 weeks, in line with previous positive psychology interventions, which usually last 4 to 8 weeks (Bolier et al. 2013).”
The Delphi Technique in Nursing and Health Research
Keeney, S., Hasson, F., & McKenna, H. (2011) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781444392029 · Cited by 1,568 · see citing works
Type 1 Diabetes Through the Life Span: A Position Statement of the American Diabetes Association
Chiang, J. L., Kirkman, M. S., Laffel, L. M., Peters, A. L., & Authors, O. B. O. T. T. 1. D. S. (2014) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc14-1140 · Cited by 976 · see citing works
Sheldon, K. M., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2006) · The Journal of Positive Psychology · doi:10.1080/17439760500510676 · Cited by 925 · see citing works
Delphi methodology in health research: how to do it?
Trevelyan, E., & Robinson, N. (2015) · European Journal of Integrative Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.eujim.2015.07.002 · Cited by 747 · see citing works
Time trends in the incidence of type 1 diabetes in Finnish children: a cohort study
Harjutsalo, V., Sjöberg, L., & Tuomilehto, J. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60765-5 · Cited by 666 · see citing works
Weissberg-Benchell, J. A., Antisdel, J. E., & SESHADRI, R. M. (2003) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.26.4.1079 · Cited by 549 · see citing works
Gonzalez, J. S., Tanenbaum, M. L., & Commissariat, P. V. (2016) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0040388 · Cited by 354 · see citing works
The use of language in diabetes care and education
Dickinson, J. K., Guzman, S. J., Maryniuk, M. D., O’Brian, C. A., Kadohiro, J. K., Jackson, R. A., D’Hondt, N., Montgomery, B., Close, K. L., & Funnell, M. M. (2017) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dci17-0041 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Ogedegbe, G. O. (2012) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.1307 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
An online positive affect skills intervention reduces depression in adults with type 2 diabetes
Cohn, M. A., Pietrucha, M. E., Saslow, L. R., Hult, J. R., & Moskowitz, J. T. (2014) · The Journal of Positive Psychology · doi:10.1080/17439760.2014.920410 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Peterson, J. C. (2012) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.1311 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Hilliard, M. E., Powell, P. W., & Anderson, B. J. (2016) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0040359 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Psychometric Properties of the Problem Areas in Diabetes: Teen and Parent of Teen Versions
Shapiro, J. B., Vesco, A. T., Weil, L. E. G., Evans, M. A., Hood, K. K., & Weissberg-Benchell, J. A. (2017) · Journal of Pediatric Psychology · doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsx146 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Li, Q., Liu, Q., Qi, X., Wu, N., Tang, W., & Xiong, H. (2015) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1798-y · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Messer, L. H., Tanenbaum, M. L., Cook, P. F., Wong, J. J., Hanes, S. J., Driscoll, K. A., & Hood, K. K. (2020) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2019.0509 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Optimal use of diabetes devices: clinician perspectives on barriers and adherence to device use
Tanenbaum, M. L., Adams, R. N., Hanes, S. J., Barley, R. C., Miller, K. M., Mulvaney, S. A., & Hood, K. K. (2017) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/1932296816688010 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Barnard, K. D., Wysocki, T., Thabit, H., Evans, M. L., Amiel, S. A., Heller, S. R., Young, A. J., & Hovorka, R. (2015) · Diabetic Medicine · doi:10.1111/dme.12706 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Charlson, M. E., Boutin‐Foster, C., Mancuso, C. A., Peterson, J. C., Ogedegbe, G. G., Briggs, W. M., Robbins, L. P., Isen, A. M., & Allegrante, J. P. (2007) · Contemporary Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2007.03.002 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Psychology, technology, and diabetes management.
Gonder-Frederick, L. A., Shepard, J. A., Grabman, J. H., & Ritterband, L. M. (2016) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0040383 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Establishing key components of yoga interventions for musculoskeletal conditions: a Delphi survey
Ward, L., Stebbings, S. M., Sherman, K. J., Cherkin, D. C., & Baxter, D. G. (2014) · BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine · doi:10.1186/1472-6882-14-196 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Vesco, A. T., Jedraszko, A. M., Garza, K. P., & Weissberg-Benchell, J. A. (2018) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/1932296818766381 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Forlenza, G. P., Buckingham, B. A., & Maahs, D. M. (2015) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.10.015 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
O’Connor, M. R., Carlin, K. E., Coker, T. R., Zierler, B. K., & Pihoker, C. (2018) · Journal of Pediatric Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.pedn.2018.10.005 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Beato-Víbora, P. I., Gallego-Gamero, F., Ambrojo-López, A., Gil-Poch, E., Martín-Romo, I., & Arroyo-Díez, F. J. (2021) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2021.108986 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Type 1 Diabetes
Borges, U., & Kubiak, T. (2016) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/1932296816634736 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Barriers and facilitators of type 1 diabetes self-care in adolescents and young adults
Montali, L., Zulato, E., Cornara, M., Ausili, D., & Luciani, M. (2021) · Journal of Pediatric Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.pedn.2021.09.014 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
DuBois, C. M., Millstein, R. A., Celano, C. M., Wexler, D. J., & Huffman, J. C. (2016) · The Primary Care Companion For CNS Disorders · doi:10.4088/pcc.15m01902 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Psychosocial aspects of diabetes technology
Kubiak, T., Priesterroth, L., & Barnard-Kelly, K. D. (2020) · Diabetic Medicine · doi:10.1111/dme.14234 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Adams, R. N., Tanenbaum, M. L., Hanes, S. J., Ambrosino, J. M., Ly, T. T., Maahs, D. M., Naranjo, D. M., Walders‐Abramson, N., WEINZIMER, S. A., Buckingham, B. A., et al. (2018) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2018.0174 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Forlenza, G. P., Messer, L. H., Berget, C., Wadwa, R. P., & Driscoll, K. A. (2018) · Current Diabetes Reports · doi:10.1007/s11892-018-1078-1 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Hilliard, M. E., Hagger, V. L., Hendrieckx, C., Anderson, B. J., Trawley, S. L., Jack, M., Pouwer, F., Skinner, T. C., & Speight, J. (2017) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc16-2688 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Jaser, S. S., Datye, K. A., Morrow, T., Sinisterra, M., LeStourgeon, L. M., Abadula, F., Bell, G. E., & Streisand, R. M. (2020) · Contemporary Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2020.106086 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Jaser, S. S., Patel, N. J., Linsky, R., & Whittemore, R. (2014) · Journal of Pediatric Health Care · doi:10.1016/j.pedhc.2014.02.008 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
A pilot randomized controlled trial of a gratitude intervention for adolescents with Type 1 diabetes
Schache, K. R., Hofman, P. L., & Serlachius, A. S. (2020) · Diabetic Medicine · doi:10.1111/dme.14078 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Ingersgaard, M. V., Hoeeg, D., Willaing, I., & Grabowski, D. (2019) · Chronic Illness · doi:10.1177/1742395319886487 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Lai, L. Y. W., Flower, A., Moore, M. V., & Lewith, G. T. (2015) · Complementary Therapies in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.003 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Tauschmann, M., Thabit, H., Allen, J. M., Hartnell, S., Wilinska, M. E., Ruan, Y., Sibayan, J., Kollman, C., Cheng, P., Beck, R. W., et al. (2019) · Yearbook of pediatric endocrinology · doi:10.1530/ey.16.10.2 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Rabbone, I., Savastio, S., Pigniatiello, C., Carducci, C., Berioli, M. G., Cherubini, V., Presti, D. L., Maltoni, G., Mameli, C., Marigliano, M., et al. (2022) · Acta Diabetologica · doi:10.1007/s00592-022-01878-z · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Demanding devices – Living with diabetes devices as a pre-teen
Pals, R. A. S., Hviid, P., Cleal, B. R., & Grabowski, D. (2021) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114279 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Loseby, P., Schache, K., Cavadino, A., Young, S., Hofman, P. L., & Serlachius, A. S. (2021) · Pediatric Diabetes · doi:10.1111/pedi.13306 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Closed‐loop technology: a practical guide
Hartnell, S., Fuchs, J., Boughton, C. K., & Hovorka, R. (2021) · Practical Diabetes · doi:10.1002/pdi.2350 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
A diabetes peer support intervention: Patient experiences using the Mmogo-method®
Pienaar, M. A., & Reid, M. (2021) · Health SA Gesondheid · doi:10.4102/hsag.v26i0.1512 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Kruger, S., Deacon, E., van Rensburg, E., & Segal, D. G. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1273586 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citationGoal-Setting Behavior for Physical Activity in Adults With Diabetes: A Pilot Project
NGUYEN-VASELAAR, H. T., & Lappe, J. M. (2021) · The Journal for Nurse Practitioners · doi:10.1016/j.nurpra.2021.08.015 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Predictors of continuous glucose monitoring use in adolescents with type 1 diabetes
Messer, L. H. (2019) · doi:10.25677/h037-ak54 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Kruger, S., Deacon, E., van Rensburg, E., & Segal, D. G. (2024) · Frontiers in Clinical Diabetes and Healthcare · doi:10.3389/fcdhc.2024.1445972 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- De Vos, A.S. & Strydom, H., 2011, ‘Intervention research’, in A.S. de Vos, H. Strydom, C.B. Fouche & C.S.L. Delport (eds.), Research at grass roots for social science and human service professions, 4th edn., pp. 473–489, Van Schaik, Pretoria.
- Thomas, E.J. & Rothman, J., 1994, Intervention research: Design and development for human service, Haworth Press, New York, NY.
- Willig, C., 2013, Introducing qualitative research in psychology, McGraw-Hill, Maidenhead.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Methodological Approaches in Studying Type-2 Diabetes-Related Health Behaviors—A Systematic Review
Khandoker, F., & Grigsby, T. J. (2025) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app151910567 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kruger, S., Deacon, E., van Rensburg, E., & Segal, D.
- Affiliations
- North-West University (ZA)
- North-West University
- Corresponding author
- Kruger, Sylvia
- Venue
- Health SA Gesondheid
- Publisher
- AOSIS
- Published
- 2025-04-04
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 0
- Pages
- 2923-2923
- ISSN
- 1025-9848 (ISSN-L)
- 2071-9736
- PMC
- PMC12067628
- OpenAlex
- W4409172884
- Semantic Scholar
- 994d0bf5e6f870a3fb09bb198990f07cbac844f5
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 0.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Health SA Gesondheid (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- North-West University
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Keywords
- type 1 diabetes, adolescents, insulin pump, positive psychology interventions, online intervention, psychological adjustment, well-being, Delphi panel
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review