Cited by 110Probiotics and Fermented FoodsConsumer Attitudes and Food LabelingAgricultural safety and regulations

Regulatory categories of probiotics across the globe: A review representing existing and recommended categorization

Open access
Arora, M, Baldi, A·2015·Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology

Abstract

Probiotics are friendly live microorganisms (in most cases, bacteria) that are similar to beneficial micro-organisms found in the human gut, whenever consumed, have potential to confer benefit to the health of consumers by maintaining, or improving their intestinal microbial flora and are available to consumers mainly in the form of dietary supplements and foods. All-time high interest in the field of probiotics is due to emerging probiotic industry. Probiotics are available in foods and dietary supplements, even as pharmaceutical formulations (capsules, tablets and powders) and in some other forms as well, but their claims of health benefits may challenge the traditional border between food and medicine. A number of probiotic products have been already introduced into the international market as food supplements, dietary supplements, natural health products, functional foods and many more other categories; as a result, the position of regulatory system for probiotics within existing categories become vague and quite unclear. Common terminology for probiotic products has become a necessity to achieve adequate regulatory control for discussion of probiotic-related issues among government, producers and consumers. The lack of a consistent terminology across the globe leads to legal uncertainty and confusion instead of being a direct obstacle for development of a mature market. This article will explain differences in regulatory categorizations across the globe; discuss the terms like food and drugs with a close relationship to probiotics, the problems associated with unsatisfactorily approached categorization as well as suggestive consolidations for the new categorization which will demarcate probiotics into categories explaining their nutritive claims, health claims or both.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/0255-0857.150868

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Brazil, probiotics are considered functional foods, different from food, and legislation requires safety and efficacy demonstration, so all products must be registered and approved by ANVISA.

    “In Brazil, probiotics are considered as functional foods, and considered to be different from food. But legislation asks for safety and efficacy demonstration of food products and hence all these products must be registered and approved by a health authority called National Health Surveillance Agency Brazil (ANVISA) [230].”
  • Japan is viewed by many to be a global market leader given that probiotics are available as both foods and drugs, and was the first global jurisdiction to implement a regulatory system for functional foods and nutraceuticals in 1991.

    “Japan is viewed by many to be a global market leader given that probiotics are available as both foods and drugs [230], and was the first global jurisdiction to implement a regulatory system for functional foods and nutraceuticals in 1991.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Kumar M, Kumar R, Poovai PD, Kalaichelvan PT. Probiotics and multitude of health benefi ts. J Res Bio 2012;2:102-13.
  2. Arora M, Sharma S, Baldi A. Comparative insight of regulatory guidelines for probiotics in USA, India and Malaysia: A critical review. Int J Biotechnol Wellness Ind 2013;2:51-64.
  3. Narayanan R. Current legislations on probiotic products. J Agric Sci 2013;1:18-24.
  4. Kaushik D, Kaushik N. Functional food/Nutraceuticals regulation in India. Pharm Rev 2009;7. vol. 33, Supplement 1
  5. Aggarwal A, Nagori BP, Mathur V. Regulatory approval of probiotics in US, Japan and India: A comparative study. Int J Sci Pharm Edu Res 2012;2:78-86.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arora, M., & Baldi, A.
Affiliations
Indo Soviet Friendship College of Pharmacy (IN)
Corresponding author
Baldi, A
Venue
Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-02
Volume
33
Pages
S2-S10
ISSN
0255-0857 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2082400706
Cited by
110
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
FWCI
1.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of the Punjab
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural safety and regulations
Keywords
probiotics, probiotic regulation, probiotic products, functional foods, dietary supplements, natural health products, health claims
MeSH terms
Humans, Public Health, Global Health, Dietary Supplements, Probiotics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review