Cited by 26Medicinal Plants and NeuroprotectionAntioxidants, Aging, Portulaca oleraceaAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Effect of Jyotiṣmatī seed oil on spatial and fear memory using scopolamine induced amnesia in mice

Open access
Jadhav, KshitijS, Raut, SanketB, Parekar, ReshmaR, Marathe, PadmajaA, Rege, NirmalaN·2015·Ancient Science of Life

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatment of memory impairment associated with dementia such as Alzheimer's disease is still inadequate and requires development of new drugs. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate the memory enhancing effect of Celastrus paniculatus seed oil. MATERIALS AND METHODS: C. paniculatus seed oil was mixed with equal amount of pure ghee and administered orally to mice in the dose of 200 mg/kg/day. Piracetam was used as a standard nootropic. Elevated plus maze and passive avoidance tests were used as a models to test spatial and fear memory respectively. Scopolamine (3 mg/kg, i.p.), was used as an amnestic agent. RESULTS: Mice receiving C. paniculatus showed significant memory enhancement as compared to scopolamine group. The effect of C. paniculatus and combination of C. paniculatus with piracetam was comparable to that with piracetam alone. CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrates that C. paniculatus seed oil has memory enhancing effect and hence can be developed as a potential drug in the treatment of dementia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/0257-7941.157149

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [7]Vogel GH Vogel G Drug effects on learning and memory Drug Discovery and Evaluation of Pharmacological Assay 2002 2nd ed New York Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jadhav, K., Raut, S., Parekar, R., Marathe, P., & Rege, N.
Affiliations
King Edward Memorial Hospital and Seth G.S. Medical College (IN)
Venue
Ancient Science of Life
Published
2015
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
130
ISSN
0257-7941 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1571591883
Cited by
26
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
2.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Ancient Science of Life (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Medicinal Plants and Neuroprotection
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Antioxidants, Aging, Portulaca oleracea
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
Celastrus paniculatus, seed oil, memory enhancement, spatial memory, fear memory, scopolamine-induced amnesia, piracetam, nootropic drugs, dementia, Alzheimer's disease, elevated plus maze, passive avoidance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review