Cited by 133Medicinal Plants and NeuroprotectionMedicinal Plant ResearchMedicinal Plant Extracts Effects

Antioxidant property of Celastrus paniculatus Willd.: A possible mechanism in enhancing cognition

Kumar, M.H.V., Gupta, Y.K.·2002·Phytomedicine

Abstract

In the present study aqueous, methanolic, chloroform and petroleum ether extracts of seeds of Celastrus paniculatus were investigated for their effect on cognitive functions in rats. Male Wistar rats weighing 200-250 g each were used to study effect on learning and memory through use of the shuttle-box, step-through, step-down and elevated plus maze paradigms. Only the aqueous seed extract (200 mg/kg body wt. for 14 days) showed an improvement in learning and memory in both the shuttle-box and step-through paradigms. Therefore, further experiments were conducted using the aqueous extract at 100, 200 and 300 mg/kg body wt. doses in different paradigms of cognition. All three doses of the aqueous extract increased the number of avoidances in the shuttle-box and step-through latency the in step-through apparatus, but no significant difference was observed between the doses tested. In the step-down apparatus, the 200- and 300-mg/kg body wt. doses of aqueous extract showed a significant increase in step-down latency, whereas no significant difference was observed in the elevated-plus-maze paradigm between drug-treated and vehicle-treated groups. Since the behavioral impairments are associated with oxidative stress, we investigated the effect of the aqueous extract on oxidative stress parameters. Among the three doses tested, only 200 and 300 mg/kg body wt. stimulated a significant decrease in the brain levels of malondialdehyde, with simultaneous significant increases in levels of glutathione and catalase. The present findings indicate that the aqueous extract of Celastrus paniculatus seed has cognitive-enhancing properties and an antioxidant effect might be involved.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1078/0944-7113-00136

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kumar, M. H. V., & Gupta, Y. K.
Affiliations
All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Venue
Phytomedicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-01
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
302-311
ISSN
0944-7113 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2088735154
Cited by
133
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Phytomedicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Medicinal Plants and Neuroprotection
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Medicinal Plant Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Medicinal Plant Extracts Effects
Keywords
Celastrus paniculatus, seed extract, antioxidant activity, cognitive enhancement, learning and memory, oxidative stress, malondialdehyde, glutathione, catalase, aqueous extract, neuroprotection
MeSH terms
Animals, Antioxidants, Behavior, Animal, Brain, Catalase, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Glutathione, Male, Malondialdehyde, Phytotherapy, Plant Extracts, Seeds, Superoxide Dismutase, Rats, Wistar, Maze Learning, Celastrus, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review