Cited by 370COVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesLong-Term Effects of COVID-19SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research

Follow-up chest radiographic findings in patients with MERS-CoV after recovery

Open access
Das, Karuna M, Lee, Edward Y, Singh, Rajvir, Enani, Mushira A, Al Dossari, Khalid, Van Gorkom, Klaus, Larsson, Sven G, Langer, Ruth D·2017·Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the follow-up chest radiographic findings in patients with Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) who were discharged from the hospital following improved clinical symptoms. Materials and Methods: Thirty-six consecutive patients (9 men, 27 women; age range 21–73 years, mean ± SD 42.5 ± 14.5 years) with confirmed MERS-CoV underwent follow-up chest radiographs after recovery from MERS-CoV. The 36 chest radiographs were obtained at 32 to 230 days with a median follow-up of 43 days. The reviewers systemically evaluated the follow-up chest radiographs from 36 patients for lung parenchymal, airway, pleural, hilar and mediastinal abnormalities. Lung parenchyma and airways were assessed for consolidation, ground-glass opacity (GGO), nodular opacity and reticular opacity (i.e., fibrosis). Follow-up chest radiographs were also evaluated for pleural thickening, pleural effusion, pneumothorax and lymphadenopathy. Patients were categorized into two groups: group 1 (no evidence of lung fibrosis) and group 2 (chest radiographic evidence of lung fibrosis) for comparative analysis. Patient demographics, length of ventilations days, number of intensive care unit (ICU) admission days, chest radiographic score, chest radiographic deterioration pattern (Types 1-4) and peak lactate dehydrogenase level were compared between the two groups using the student t-test, Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher's exact test. Results: Follow-up chest radiographs were normal in 23 out of 36 (64%) patients. Among the patients with abnormal chest radiographs (13/36, 36%), the following were found: lung fibrosis in 12 (33%) patients GGO in 2 (5.5%) patients, and pleural thickening in 2 (5.5%) patients. Patients with lung fibrosis had significantly greater number of ICU admission days (19 ± 8.7 days; P value = 0.001), older age (50.6 ± 12.6 years; P value = 0.02), higher chest radiographic scores [10 (0-15.3); P value = 0.04] and higher peak lactate dehydrogenase levels (315-370 U/L; P value = 0.001) when compared to patients without lung fibrosis. Conclusion: Lung fibrosis may develop in a substantial number of patients who have recovered from Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV). Significantly greater number of ICU admission days, older age, higher chest radiographic scores, chest radiographic deterioration patterns and peak lactate dehydrogenase levels were noted in the patients with lung fibrosis on follow-up chest radiographs after recovery from MERS-CoV.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/ijri.ijri_469_16

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [18]Copley S Hansell DM Kanne JP Thoracic imaging 2014 CRC Press 158 9
  2. [19]Muller NL Silva CIS Muller NL Silva CIS Mediastinum Imaging of the chest 2008 Philadelphia, Pa Elsevier Saunders 1447 572

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Das, K. M., Lee, E. Y., Singh, R., Enani, M. A., Al Dossari, K., Van Gorkom, K., Larsson, S. G., & Langer, R. D.
Affiliations
  • United Arab Emirates University (AE)
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • Hamad Medical Corporation (QA)
  • King Fahd Medical City (SA)
  • Department of Medical Imaging, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, KSA
  • Department of Radiology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al-Ain, UAE
Corresponding author
Das, Karuna M
Venue
Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging
Published
2017-07
Volume
27
Issue
03
Pages
342-349
ISSN
  • 0970-2016 (ISSN-L)
  • 0971-3026
  • 1998-3808
OpenAlex
W2758783533
Cited by
370
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 83 · 2021: 127 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 1
FWCI
15.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Indian journal of radiology and imaging - new series/Indian journal of radiology and imaging/Indian Journal of Radiology & Imaging (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Keywords
MERS-CoV, post-discharge follow-up, chest X-ray abnormalities, pulmonary fibrosis, ground-glass opacities, pleural thickening, lactate dehydrogenase, intensive care unit admission, lung consolidation, reticular opacities, pneumothorax, lymphadenopathy, pleural effusion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review