Cited by 401Social and Intergroup PsychologySocial Power and Status DynamicsDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

Improving Intergroup Relations

Stephan, Walter, Stephan, Cookie·2001·Sage eBooks

Abstract

This book is intended both as supplementary reading for courses and as a practical guidebook for individuals and programmes interested in reducing prejudice and improving intergroup relations. It provides the only comprehensive review and compilation of techniques for roving intergroup relations

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4135/9781452229225

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stephan, W., & Stephan, C.
Affiliations
New Mexico State University (US)
Venue
Sage eBooks
Published
2001
OpenAlex
W561451879
Cited by
401
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 19
FWCI
17.62
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Sage eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
intergroup relations, prejudice reduction, intergroup contact, group psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review