Cited by 52Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patientsDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and Management

Hospital insulin protocol aims for glucose control in glucocorticoid-induced hyperglycemia

Grommesh, Bethany, Lausch, Mamie J., Vannelli, Anna J., Mullen, Deborah M., Bergenstal, Rich M., Richter, Sara A., Fish, Lisa H.·2016·Endocrine Practice

Abstract

Objective To compare the effectiveness of 2 insulin protocols to treat glucocorticoid-induced hyperglycemia in the nonintensive care hospital setting.Methods A randomized, open-label, parallel-arm study was conducted comparing standard recommended care of complete insulin orders (CIO) (i.e., 3-part insulin regimen of long-acting basal [background], rapid-acting bolus [mealtime], and rapid-acting correction factor) to an experimental group following a regimen of Neutral Protamine Hagedorn (NPH) plus CIO (NPH-CIO). The primary outcome was mean blood glucose (BG), and the secondary outcome was percent of BG in target range of 70 to 180 mg/dL. Hypoglycemia was also evaluated.Results Sixty-one patients completed 2 to 5 consecutive inpatient days (31 CIO; 30 NPH-CIO). Baseline mean BG results were 237.2 ± 50.2 and 221.9 ± 35.8 mg/dL (P = .30) in the CIO and NPH-CIO groups, respectively. No significant difference in overall mean BG between the 2 groups was detected; however, a significant difference arose on day 3: mean BG 181.8 ± 32.6 mg/dL (CIO) versus 157.2 ± 6.1 mg/dL (NPH-CIO) (P = .03). Moreover, the total daily doses (TDDs) of insulin did not differ: 34.8 ± 43.0 units (CIO) versus 35.8 ± 25.0 units (NPH-CIO) (P = .13). Percent of BG in target was 54.6% (CIO) and 62% (NPH-CIO) (P = .24). Incidence of severe hypoglycemia (<50 mg/dL) was the same in both groups (0.1%).Conclusion NPH added to 3-part insulin regimen (CIO) may be an effective way to a combat glucocorticoid-induced hyperglycemia, though further research is needed in a larger population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4158/ep15818.or

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grommesh, B., Lausch, M. J., Vannelli, A. J., Mullen, D. M., Bergenstal, R. M., Richter, S. A., & Fish, L. H.
Affiliations
  • Park Nicollet Methodist Hospital (US)
  • Hennepin County Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Lausch, Mamie J.
Venue
Endocrine Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-02
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
180-189
ISSN
1530-891X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2176972491
Cited by
52
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5
FWCI
4.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Endocrine Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
glucocorticoid-induced hyperglycemia, insulin therapy, NPH insulin, multiple daily insulin injections, glycemic control, hypoglycemia, total daily insulin dose
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Algorithms, Blood Glucose, Female, Glucocorticoids, Hospitalization, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Care Planning, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review