Cited by 23Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDigital Mental Health InterventionsInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

Development and Usability Evaluation of a Healthy Lifestyle Coaching Chatbot Using a Habit Formation Model

Open access
Piao, Meihua, Kim, Jeongeun, Ryu, Hyeongju, Lee, Hyeongsuk·2020·Healthcare Informatics Research

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: It is crucial to find ways to fit regular exercise into the daily lives of office workers. Non-exercise activity thermogenesis has been introduced as an effective form of daily exercise. This study aimed to develop a healthy lifestyle coaching program for office workers, to be delivered using a messenger application. METHODS: The interface was developed using KakaoTalk and Plus Friend. Performance feedback was developed using the IBM Watson conversation program. Twenty office workers used the application for three weeks. Afterward, a survey was conducted to assess the usability of and participants' satisfaction with the application. RESULTS: The application delivered customized push alarms, provided information related to habit formation, allowed for one-on-one chats, and delivered rewards. The satisfaction measurement results for the application showed that extrinsic reward factors contributed the most to the performance of the activity, followed by reminders and intrinsic rewards. Regarding the usability test, the perceived usefulness of the Healthy Lifestyle Coaching Chatbot was highest, followed by the usage intent and the perceived ease of use. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that coaching programs using chatbots can improve the effectiveness of performing simple, repetitive exercises.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4258/hir.2020.26.4.255

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nursing research has been predominantly focusing on the utilization of chatbots in areas such as mental health, weight management, antenatal education, and electronic fetal monitoring.

    “Nursing research has been predominantly focusing on the utilization of chatbots in areas such as mental health [18, 19], weight management [20, 21], antenatal education [22], and electronic fetal monitoring [16].”

    From Development and effects of a chatbot education program for self-directed learning in nursing students (2025) · cites this paper as [21]

    The Introduction describes the chatbot as an exercise and healthy-lifestyle intervention for office workers and links its activities to preventing further weight gain. The Discussion says the program helped users make walking and stair-climbing habitual. This makes it a related example, but the paper does not describe the chatbot as a weight-management intervention or report weight-management outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [20]Eyal N Hooked: how to build habit-forming products London, UK Penguin 2014

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Piao, M., Kim, J., Ryu, H., & Lee, H.
Affiliations
  • Seoul National University Hospital (KR)
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • Gachon University (KR)
Corresponding author
Lee, Hyeongsuk
Venue
Healthcare Informatics Research
Published
2020-10-31
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
255-264
ISSN
  • 2093-3681 (ISSN-L)
  • 2093-369X
OpenAlex
W3100468535
Cited by
23
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3
FWCI
2.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Healthcare Informatics Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
chatbots, habit formation, office workers, non-exercise activity thermogenesis, messaging apps, usability evaluation, extrinsic rewards, reminders, IBM Watson, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review