Cited by 23Malaria Research and ControlBiosensors and Analytical DetectionVector-borne infectious diseases

Performance of a Histidine-Rich Protein 2 Rapid Diagnostic Test, Paracheck Pf®, for Detection of Malaria Infections in Ugandan Pregnant Women

Open access
Dhorda, Mehul, Piola, Patrice, Nyehangane, Dan, Tumwebaze, Benon, Nalusaji, Aisha, Nabasumba, Carolyn, Turyakira, Eleanor, McGready, Rose +3 more·2012·The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

Abstract

Improved laboratory diagnosis is critical to reduce the burden of malaria in pregnancy. Peripheral blood smears appear less sensitive than Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein 2–based rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for placental malaria infections in studies conducted at delivery. In this study, 81 women in Uganda in the second or third trimester of pregnancy were followed-up until delivery. At each visit, peripheral blood was tested by blood smear, RDT, and nested species-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Sensitivity and specificity of the tests was calculated with PCR, which detected 22 infections of P. falciparum, as the gold standard. The sensitivity and specificity of blood smears were 36.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 18.0–59.2%) and 99.6% (95% CI = 97.7–100%), respectively. The corresponding values for RDT were 31.8% (95% CI = 14.7–54.9%) and 100% (95% CI = 98.3–100%). The RDTs could replace blood smears for diagnosis of malaria in pregnancy by virtue of their relative ease of use. Field-based sensitive tests for malaria in pregnancy are urgently needed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.10-0631

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The sensitivity of RDT-HRP2 using peripheral blood is much lower when compared with PCR detection of parasite nucleic acids in peripheral or placental blood.

    “The sensitivity of RDT-HRP2 using peripheral blood samples was much lower when compared with PCR detection of parasite nucleic acids in peripheral or placental blood (Table 1)[15–17].”

    From Diagnosing malaria in pregnancy: An update (2012) · cites this paper as [17]

  • Compared to PCR performed on placental or peripheral blood, the sensitivity of RDT tests was low in two of three pregnancy malaria diagnostics studies.

    “Compared to PCR performed on placental or peripheral blood [14,15,17], the sensitivity of RDT tests was low in two of three PM diagnostics studies.”

    From Diagnosing malaria in pregnancy: An update (2012) · cites this paper as [17]

  • RDT kits used during pregnancy in Uganda had low sensitivity (31.8%) but full specificity (100%) when PCR was used as the gold standard.

    “Recently low sensitivity (31.8%) but full specificity (100%) was reported for RDT kits used during pregnancy in Uganda, where PCR was used as the gold standard [13].”
  • There are few published data on the performance of RDT for diagnosing malaria during pregnancy, especially in areas of unstable malaria transmission.

    “While RDT have been extensively evaluated in malaria among the non-pregnant population, there are few published data on the performance of RDT for diagnosing malaria during pregnancy, especially in areas of unstable malaria transmission [12-17].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Snounou G , Singh B , 2002 . Nested polymerase chain reaction anal- ysis of Plasmodium Parasites . Doolan D , ed. Methods in Molecular Medicine, Malaria Methods and Protocols . Totowa, NJ : Humana Press , 189 -203 .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dhorda, M., Piola, P., Nyehangane, D., Tumwebaze, B., Nalusaji, A., Nabasumba, C., Turyakira, E., McGready, R., Ashley, E., Guerin, P. J., & Snounou, G.
Affiliations
Epicentre Uganda (UG)
Corresponding author
Dhorda, Mehul
Venue
The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Published
2012-01-01
Volume
86
Issue
1
Pages
93-95
ISSN
  • 0002-9637 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-1645
OpenAlex
W2142444201
Cited by
23
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Medecins Sans Frontieres Field Research (Medecins Sans Frontieres) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Oxford
  • European Commission
  • Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale
  • Université Pierre et Marie Curie
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biosensors and Analytical Detection
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Vector-borne infectious diseases
Keywords
malaria in pregnancy, Plasmodium falciparum, HRP-2, rapid diagnostic tests, peripheral blood smear, sensitivity and specificity, nested PCR, placental malaria
MeSH terms
Artemether, Lumefantrine Drug Combination, Antigens, Protozoan, Antimalarials, Diagnostic Tests, Routine, Drug Combinations, Ethanolamines, Female, Fluorenes, Humans, Plasmodium falciparum, Pregnancy, Quinine, Sensitivity and Specificity, Species Specificity, Uganda, Pregnancy Complications, Parasitic, Protozoan Proteins, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Malaria, Falciparum, Treatment Outcome, Artemisinins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review