Cited by 176Urban Transport and AccessibilityUrban Green Space and HealthPhysical Activity and Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Attributes of Environments Supporting Walking

Abstract

Purpose.: This study established a framework to audit environments supporting walking in neighborhoods. Design.: Cross-sectional analysis using a telephone survey and 200 objective environmental variables. Setting.: Urbanized King County, WA. Subjects.: 608 randomly sampled adults. Measures.: Walking measures constructed from survey questions; objective environmental measures taken from parcel-level databases in Geographic Information Systems. Analysis.: Multinomial models estimated the odds of people engaging in moderate walking (< 149 min/wk) and in walking sufficiently to meet recommendations for health (150+min/wk), relative to not walking; and in walking sufficiently, relative to walking moderately. A base model consisted of survey variables, and final models incorporated both survey and environmental variables. Results.: Survey variables strongly associated with walking sufficiently to enhance health included household income, not having difficulty walking, using transit, perceiving social support for walking, walking outside of the neighborhood, and having a dog (p < .01). The models isolated 14 environmental variables associated with walking sufficiently (pseudo R 2 up to 0.46). Measures of distance to neighborhood destinations dominated the results: shorter distances to grocery stores/markets, restaurants, and retail stores, but longer distances to offices or mixed-use buildings (p < .01 or .05). The density of the respondent's parcel was also strongly associated with walking sufficiently (p < .01). Conclusions.: The study offered valid environmental measures of neighborhood walkability.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4278/0890-1171-21.5.448

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1996, Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General.
  2. 10.1016/S0091-7435(03)00137-3 · DOI
  3. 10.1006/pmed.2001.0912 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00150-2 · DOI
  5. 10.1123/japa.12.1.45 · DOI
  6. 10.1177/0885412204267680 · DOI
  7. 10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1583 · DOI
  8. 10.1207/S15324796ABM2502_03 · DOI
  9. 10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1552 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.4278/0890-1171-18.1.21 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00498-1 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00163-6 · DOI
  13. 10.1123/jpah.1.3.191 · DOI
  14. 10.2105/AJPH.94.3.473 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.09.017 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.09.018 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.annepidem.2005.03.003 · DOI
  18. 10.1080/01944360008976105 · DOI
  19. 10.3141/1818-15 · DOI
  20. American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR), 2004, Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys.
  21. Schwartz WL, 1999, Guidebook on Methods to Estimate Non-Motorized Ttravel: Overview of Methods.
  22. 10.1016/j.trd.2006.02.003 · DOI
  23. 1996, ArcView [computer program]. Version 3.2
  24. 10.1177/0361198196153800103 · DOI
  25. 10.4278/0890-1171-18.1.74 · DOI
  26. Sallis JF, 1990, Pub Health Rep., 105, 179
  27. 10.3141/1674-02 · DOI
  28. 10.1177/002224379803500204 · DOI
  29. 10.1509/jmkr.42.1.109.56884 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00434-8 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.3141/1780-10 · DOI
  32. 10.1037/0278-6133.19.4.354 · DOI
  33. Eyler AA, 2002, Women Health., 36, 123
  34. 10.1001/jama.296.6.643 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.06.010 · DOI
  36. 10.4278/0890-1171-18.1.58 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.11.001 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.023 · DOI
  39. 10.1249/01.mss.0000210189.64458.f3 · DOI
  40. 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2001.tb06983.x · DOI
  41. 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2001.tb06981.x · DOI
  42. 10.1136/jech.2003.011031 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.09.035 · DOI
  44. 10.2105/AJPH.2004.058040 · DOI
  45. 10.1177/0739456X04264890 · DOI
  46. 10.1080/10511482.2003.9521469 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.018 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.024 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.027 · DOI
  50. 10.1123/jpah.3.s1.s77 · DOI
  51. 10.1123/jpah.3.s1.s99 · DOI
  52. 10.3141/1773-10 · DOI
  53. Bureau of Transportation Statistics, 2004, National Household Travel Survey
  54. 10.1016/S1440-2440(04)80282-2 · DOI
  55. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2004, 2004 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Summary Data Quality Report.
  56. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.01.019 · DOI
  57. Stage D, 2006, An assessment of parcel data in the United States

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Moudon, A. V., Lee, C., Cheadle, A. D., Garvin, C., Johnson, D. B., Schmid, T. L., & Weathers, R. D.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
American Journal of Health Promotion
Published
2007-05
Volume
21
Issue
5
Pages
448-459
ISSN
  • 0890-1171 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-6602
OpenAlex
W2124844793
Cited by
176
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 14
FWCI
29.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Health Promotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Washington
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (1-U48/CCU209663)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Green Space and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
walking, neighborhood walkability, built environment, physical activity, distance to destination, mixed-use development, household income, transit use, dog ownership, grocery store access, King County, Washington
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Environment Design, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Residence Characteristics, Socioeconomic Factors, Urban Health, Washington, Logistic Models, Walking, Geographic Information Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review