Cited by 234Urban Transport and AccessibilityUrban Green Space and HealthPhysical Activity and Health

Effects of the Built Environment on Physical Activity of Adults Living in Rural Settings

Frost, Stephanie S., Goins, R. Turner, Hunter, Rebecca H., Hooker, Steven P., Bryant, Lucinda L., Kruger, Judy, Pluto, Delores·2010·American Journal of Health Promotion

Abstract

Objective.: To conduct a systematic review of the literature to examine the influence of the built environment (BE) on the physical activity (PA) of adults in rural settings. Data Source.: Key word searches of Academic Search Premier, PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Sport Discus were conducted. Study Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria.: Studies published prior to June 2008 were included if they assessed one or more elements of the BE, examined relationships between the BE and PA, and focused on rural locales. Studies only reporting descriptive statistics or assessing the reliability of measures were excluded. Data Extraction.: Objective(s), sample size, sampling technique, geographic location, and definition of rural were extracted from each study. Methods of assessment and outcomes were extracted from the quantitative literature, and overarching themes were identified from the qualitative literature. Data Synthesis.: Key characteristics and findings from the data are summarized in Tables 1 through 3. Results.: Twenty studies met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Positive associations were found among pleasant aesthetics, trails, safety/crime, parks, and walkable destinations. Conclusions.: Research in this area is limited. Associations among elements of the BE and PA among adults appear to differ between rural and urban areas. Considerations for future studies include identifying parameters used to define rural, longitudinal research, and more diverse geographic sampling. Development and refinement of BE assessment tools specific to rural locations are also warranted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4278/ajhp.08040532

Cites

129 of 129 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frost, S. S., Goins, R. T., Hunter, R. H., Hooker, S. P., Bryant, L. L., Kruger, J., & Pluto, D.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
American Journal of Health Promotion
Published
2010-03
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
267-283
ISSN
  • 0890-1171 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-6602
OpenAlex
W2129983949
Cited by
234
References
128
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 7
FWCI
23.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Health Promotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (U48-DP-000052)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Urban Green Space and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
built environment, physical activity, rural adults, urban-rural differences, trail access, parks, crime and safety, walkability, aesthetic environment
MeSH terms
Environment Design, Health Promotion, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Motor Activity, Rural Population, Social Perception, United States, Health Behavior, Walking, Social Marketing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review