The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Taxonomy of Metacognition
Abstract
Metacognition is a complex construct which is fundamental to learning. Its complex, fuzzy and multifaceted nature has often led to its colloquial application in research, resulting in studies that fail to identify its theoretical foundation or elements. In response to this, the research community continues to call for a comprehensive understanding of the construct of metacognition. This book is a response to this call for clarity. Pina Tarricone provides a theoretical study of the construct of metacognition in terms of psychological theory. The first part of the book analyses the relationship between reflection and metacognition, and the second part goes on to analyse the construct of metamemory as the foundation of metacognition. The third and final part of the book analyses the construct of metacognition to present the final conceptual framework of metacognition and the taxonomy of metacognition. This framework builds a picture and a nexus of the construct through visual links to the related concepts that contribute to what is known as metacognition. The Taxonomy of Metacognition provides a comprehensive representation and categorisation of all of the terms, concepts, categories, supercategories, subcategories and elements of metacognition. It clarifies the construct so that researchers and teachers can develop a better understanding of it. This important and broad ranging contribution can be applied to many related areas, by researchers, psychologists, teachers and any pro…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, explanations that map each aspect of an output to aspects of the prompt (e.g., using attention visualization [179]), and compare this to examples of effective prompts [25,85], can help users disentangle issues with their prompt from those stemming from model performance, thereby supporting confidence adjustment for prompting ability.”
From The Metacognitive Demands and Opportunities of Generative AI (2024) · cites this paper as [179]
Citations
Cites
Bergman, P., & Wahlén, T. (1952) · PubMed · Cited by 11
[Policystic ovaries with hirsutism].
Burger, K., & DUBRAUSZKY, V. (1953) · PubMed · Cited by 6
[Studies on the luteotropic effect of large doses of choriogonadotropins in women].
Rauscher, H. (1955) · PubMed · Cited by 6
[Case of adrenogenital syndrome with large polycystic ovaries and partial vaginal atresia].
Philipp, E., & Hh, S. (1954) · PubMed · Cited by 6
[Anovulatory cycle and hormone treatment].
Föllmer, W., & Bernhard, E. (1954) · PubMed · Cited by 5
HEIZER, H. (1953) · PubMed · Cited by 5
[Chemical methods of determination of urine steroids].
Zimmermann, W. (1951) · PubMed · Cited by 4
[Amenorrhea test suitable for general practice].
Schrank, P. (1952) · PubMed · Cited by 3
[Febrile forms of sclerocystic ovary].
Netter, A., Mazingarbe, A., Lambert, A., et al. (1951) · PubMed · Cited by 2
Rockenschaub, A. (1954) · PubMed · Cited by 2
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Metacognitive Demands and Opportunities of Generative AI
Tankelevitch, L., Kewenig, V., Simkute, A., Scott, A. E., Sarkar, A., Sellen, A., & Rintel, S. (2024) · Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642902 · Cited by 493
“From education [106] to management [90], health-care [36], and even sports [111], many research disciplines have carved out their own approach to metacognition, producing multiple inconsistent terminologies and frameworks (for reviews see [131, 181]).”
BackgroundInfluentialToward the development of a metacognition construct for communities of inquiry
Garrison, D. R., & Akyol, Z. (2012) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.11.005 · Cited by 234
Azevedo, R., Bouchet, F., Duffy, M. C., Harley, J. M., Taub, M., Trevors, G., Cloude, E. B., Dever, D. A., Wiedbusch, M. D., Wortha, F., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.813632 · Cited by 293
“…to current theoretical models of SRL, methodological approaches to studying SRL, and analyses of SRL processes underlying self-regulation during complex learning (Tarricone, 2011; Veenman, 2011; Greene et al., 2015; Järvelä and Bannert, 2019; Winne, 2019; Azevedo, 2020; Lajoie et al., in press).”
BackgroundA Model of Critical Thinking in Higher Education
Davies, M. (2014) · Higher education · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-12835-1_2 · Cited by 259
Toward the development of a metacognition construct for communities of inquiry
Garrison, D. R., & Akyol, Z. (2015) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.10.001 · Cited by 196
Metadata
- Authors
- Tarricone, P.
- Affiliations
- Edith Cowan University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Tarricone, Pina
- ORCID
- Tarricone, Pina
- Venue
- Psychology Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Psychology Press
- Published
- 2011-02-28
- OpenAlex
- W13373333
- Semantic Scholar
- b1f9ffc006ff2eaca7dcba05273d39154f2a16a6
- Cited by
- 371
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 11.47
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychology Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Keywords
- metacognition, metamemory, reflection, conceptual framework, construct definition, learning process
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
