Cited by 10Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionWorkplace Violence and BullyingEducation for Peace and Conflict Resolution

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 80 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Integrating multi-disciplinary social science theories and perspectives to understand school bullying and victimisation

Hong, Jun Sung, Espelage, Dorothy L., Hunter, Simon C., Allen-Meares, Paula·2018·The Routledge International Handbook of Human Aggression

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of multiple social science theories and perspectives in explaining bullying. It is divided into theories and perspectives represented by four major branches of social science: psychology, sociology, anthropology, and political-economics. Scholars have therefore come to realise the importance of integrating psychological theories with social environmental perspectives. The chapter also provides a trans-disciplinary analysis, as well as a singular analysis, of theories and perspectives that move the research beyond a psychologically dominated explanation of bullying. Theories and frameworks that underpin psychological perspectives are attachment theory, social learning theory, social-ecological framework, and theory of stress and coping. Attachment theory is a widely accepted developmental theory that explains the nature of an affectual bond between child and primary caregiver. The possible explanation for the development of school bullying comes from social learning theory, which suggests that “most human behaviour is learned observationally through modeling: from observing others. Anthropology is a discipline with potential to inform research on victimisation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781315618777-9

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hong, J. S., Espelage, D. L., Hunter, S. C., & Allen-Meares, P.
Affiliations
  • Wayne State University (US)
  • Florida State University (US)
Venue
The Routledge International Handbook of Human Aggression
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2018-01-03
Pages
109-120
OpenAlex
W2790840247
Cited by
10
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
5.26
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Workplace Violence and Bullying
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Education for Peace and Conflict Resolution
Keywords
school bullying, bullying victimization, social science theory, attachment theory, social learning theory, socio-ecological framework, stress and coping theory, victimization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review