Cited by 230Machine Learning in Materials ScienceAdvanced Physical and Chemical Molecular InteractionsAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies

TorchMD: A Deep Learning Framework for Molecular Simulations

Open access
Doerr, Stefan, Majewski, Maciej, Pérez, Adrià, Krämer, Andreas, Clementi, Cecilia, Noe, Frank, Giorgino, Toni, De Fabritiis, Gianni·2021·Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

Abstract

Molecular dynamics simulations provide a mechanistic description of molecules by relying on empirical potentials. The quality and transferability of such potentials can be improved leveraging data-driven models derived with machine learning approaches. Here, we present TorchMD, a framework for molecular simulations with mixed classical and machine learning potentials. All force computations including bond, angle, dihedral, Lennard-Jones, and Coulomb interactions are expressed as PyTorch arrays and operations. Moreover, TorchMD enables learning and simulating neural network potentials. We validate it using standard Amber all-atom simulations, learning an ab initio potential, performing an end-to-end training, and finally learning and simulating a coarse-grained model for protein folding. We believe that TorchMD provides a useful tool set to support molecular simulations of machine learning potentials. Code and data are freely available at github.com/torchmd.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01343

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The innovation in development and integration of MD simulations with deep learning can reproduce, interpret, predict, and generate data relating to the behavior of biological macromolecules.

    “The innovation in the development and integration of MD simulations with deep learning can reproduce, interpret, predict, and generate data relating to the behavior of biological macromolecules.”

    From AlphaFold, Artificial Intelligence (AI), and Allostery (2022) · cites this paper as [188]

  • A deep learning framework with mixed classical and machine learning potentials (TorchMD) has been developed for molecular simulations.

    “In another example, a deep learning framework with mixed classical and machine learning potentials (TorchMD) has been developed for molecular simulations.188”

    From AlphaFold, Artificial Intelligence (AI), and Allostery (2022) · cites this paper as [188]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Paszke A.; Gross S.; Massa F.; Lerer A.; Bradbury J.; Chanan G.; Killeen T.; Lin Z.; Gimelshein N.; Antiga L.; Desmaison A.; Kopf A.; Yang E.; DeVito Z.; Raison M.; Tejani A.; Chilamkurthy S.; Steiner B.; Fang L.; Bai J.; Chintala S. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32; Wallach H., Larochelle H., Beygelzimer A., d’Alché-Buc F., Fox E., Garnett R., Eds.; Curran Associates, Inc.: 2019; pp 8024– 8035.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Doerr, S., Majewski, M., Pérez, A., Krämer, A., Clementi, C., Noe, F., Giorgino, T., & De Fabritiis, G.
Affiliations
  • Acellera (Spain) (ES)
  • Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES)
  • Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
  • Rice University (US)
  • Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Freie Universität, 14195 Berlin, Germany
  • Biophysics Institute, National Research Council (CNR-IBF), 20133 Milano, Italy
  • Acellera, 08005 Barcelona, Spain
Venue
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Published
2021-03-17
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
2355-2363
ISSN
  • 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-9626
OpenAlex
W3113616921
Cited by
230
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 12
FWCI
11.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Repositori digital de la UPF (Universitat Pompeu Fabra) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Chan Zuckerberg Initiative
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (823712)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
Keywords
molecular dynamics, machine learning interatomic potentials, neural network potentials, Lennard-Jones interactions, electrostatic interactions, ab initio potentials, protein folding, coarse-grained models, PyTorch

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review