The DOI matches its DataCite record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings
Open accessAbstract
The blind application of machine learning runs the risk of amplifying biases present in data. Such a danger is facing us with word embedding, a popular framework to represent text data as vectors which has been used in many machine learning and natural language processing tasks. We show that even word embeddings trained on Google News articles exhibit female/male gender stereotypes to a disturbing extent. This raises concerns because their widespread use, as we describe, often tends to amplify these biases. Geometrically, gender bias is first shown to be captured by a direction in the word embedding. Second, gender neutral words are shown to be linearly separable from gender definition words in the word embedding. Using these properties, we provide a methodology for modifying an embedding to remove gender stereotypes, such as the association between between the words receptionist and female, while maintaining desired associations such as between the words queen and female. We define metrics to quantify both direct and indirect gender biases in embeddings, and develop algorithms to "debias" the embedding. Using crowd-worker evaluation as well as standard benchmarks, we empirically demonstrate that our algorithms significantly reduce gender bias in embeddings while preserving the its useful properties such as the ability to cluster related concepts and to solve analogy tasks. The resulting embeddings can be used in applications without amplifying gender bias.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“'Clean' text additionally has been misrepresented as being 'unbiased' against any community-a notion that has been strongly contested [22, 73, 130].”
From Data Governance in the Age of Large-Scale Data-Driven Language Technology (2022) · cites this paper as [22]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“temporality has been flagged as a potential source of difficulty in textual data, where models trained on historical text corpora, such as Google News articles, have been found to reproduce past social stereotypes (e.g. the word”
From A Survey of Data Quality Requirements That Matter in ML Development Pipelines (2023) · cites this paper as [14]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Generative AI outputs tend to reproduce normative views and mirror societal biases for marginalized groups [15, 21, 36, 41, 42, 45, 53, 66, 72, 91], including PwD [10, 12, 39, 48, 54, 62, 77, 113].”
From Engaging Communities Meaningfully in Defining Disability Representation for AI Image Generation (2026) · cites this paper as [15]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“natural language processing (NLP) algorithms for textual analysis can display recurrent gender biases (Bolukbasi et al. 2016), for instance, associating the word “doctor” with “father” and “nurse” with “mother””
From Accountable Artificial Intelligence: Holding Algorithms to Account (2021) · cites this paper as Bolukbasi et al. 2016
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Some solutions even allow for the dataset to remain unchanged while the ML algorithm is tuned to produce more robust or socially equitable outcomes [14,29].”
From A Survey of Data Quality Requirements That Matter in ML Development Pipelines (2023) · cites this paper as [14]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The seminal works of Bolukbasi et al. (2016) and Caliskan et al. (2017) show that word embeddings such as word2vec (Mikolov et al., 2013) and GloVe (Pennington et al., 2014) contain stereotypical biases using diagnostic methods like word analogies and association tests.”
From StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language models (2021) · cites this paper as Bolukbasi et al. (2016)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Glove: Global Vectors for Word Representation
Pennington, J., Socher, R., & Manning, C. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1162 · Cited by 34,071
Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space
Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1301.3781 · Cited by 26,568
Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality
Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1310.4546 · Cited by 24,533
Kilgarriff, A. (2000) · Language · doi:10.2307/417141 · Cited by 11,529
Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464 · Cited by 9,210
Dwork, C., Hardt, M., Pitassi, T., Reingold, O., & Zemel, R. (2012) · Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference · doi:10.1145/2090236.2090255 · Cited by 3,501
Barocas, S., & Selbst, A. D. (2014) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2477899 · Cited by 3,048
Linguistic Regularities in Continuous Space Word Representations
Mikolov, T., Yih, W.-T., & Zweig, G. (2013) · Cited by 2,913
Torralba, A., & Efros, A. A. (2011) · CVPR 2011 · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2011.5995347 · Cited by 2,440
Certifying and Removing Disparate Impact
Feldman, M., Friedler, S. A., Moeller, J., Scheidegger, C., & Venkatasubramanian, S. (2015) · Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2783258.2783311 · Cited by 1,827
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- [5][5] A. J. Cuddy, E. B. Wolf, P. Glick, S. Crotty, J. Chong, and M. I. Norton. Men as cultural ideals: Cultural values moderate gender stereotype content. Journal of personality and social psychology , 109(4):622, 2015. -
- [6][6] A. Datta, M. C. Tschantz, and A. Datta. Automated experiments on ad privacy settings. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies , 2015. -
- [11][11] C. Fellbaum, editor. Wordnet: An Electronic Lexical Database . The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998. -
- [13][13] P. Glick and S. T. Fiske. The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of personality and social psychology , 70(3):491, 1996. -
- [16][16] C. Hansen, M. Tosik, G. Goossen, C. Li, L. Bayeva, F. Berbain, and M. Rotaru. How to get the best word vectors for resume parsing. In SNN Adaptive Intelligence / Symposium: Machine Learning 2015, Nijmegen. -
- [20][20] J. T. Jost and A. C. Kay. Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of personality and social psychology , 88(3):498, 2005. -
- [35][35] J. P. Stanley. Paradigmatic woman: The prostitute. Papers in language variation , pages 303-321, 1977. -
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 1,022
Debiasing Gender biased Hindi Words with Word-embedding
Pujari, A. K., Mittal, A., Padhi, A., Jain, A., Jadon, M. K., & Kumar, V. (2019) · International Conference on Algorithms, Computing and Artificial Intelligence (ACAI) · doi:10.1145/3377713.3377792 · Cited by 19
AraWEAT: Multidimensional Analysis of Biases in Arabic Word Embeddings
Lauscher, A., Takieddin, R., Ponzetto, S. P., & Glavaš, G. (2020) · MADOC (University of Mannheim) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.01575 · Cited by 19
Shin, S., Song, K., Jang, J., Kim, H., Joo, W., & Moon, I. (2020) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.280 · Cited by 19
Fair Representation: Guaranteeing Approximate Multiple Group Fairness for Unknown Tasks
Shen, X., Wong, Y., & Kankanhalli, M. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2022.3148905 · Cited by 20
Attention Aware Debiasing for Unbiased Model Prediction
Majumdar, P., Singh, R., & Mayank Vatsa, A. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops · doi:10.1109/iccvw54120.2021.00459 · Cited by 19
Artificial Intelligence and the Ethics of Self-Learning Robots
Vallor, S., & Bekey, G. A. (2017) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190652951.003.0022 · Cited by 21
An Intersectional Definition of FairnessPreprint
Foulds, J. R., Islam, R., Keya, K. N., & Pan, S. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.13016/m2pv6bb0c · Cited by 53
Rényi Fair InferencePreprint
Baharlouei, S., Nouiehed, M., Beirami, A., & Razaviyayn, M. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.12005 · Cited by 19
Exposing and Correcting the Gender Bias in Image Captioning Datasets and ModelsPreprint
Bhargava, S., & Forsyth, D. A. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.00578 · Cited by 49
Machine Learning and Human Capital: Experimental Evidence on Productivity ComplementaritiesPreprint
Choudhury, P., Starr, E. P., & Agarwal, R. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3185022 · Cited by 19
Symbolic Behaviour in Artificial IntelligencePreprint
Santoro, A., Lampinen, A. K., Mathewson, K. W., Lillicrap, T., & Raposo, D. C. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.03406 · Cited by 64
Spagnuolo, F., Casciello, R., Martino, I., & Meucci, F. (2024) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.3047 · Cited by 18
AI as a Team Member: Redefining Collaboration
Tummala, V., Burris-Melville, T. S., & Eskridge, T. C. (2025) · Journal of Leadership Studies · doi:10.1002/jls.70003 · Cited by 25
Computational Measures of Deceptive Language: Prospects and Issues
Tomas, F., Dodier, O., & Demarchi, S. (2022) · Frontiers in Communication · doi:10.3389/fcomm.2022.792378 · Cited by 21
Automated Patient Note Grading: Examining Scoring Reliability and Feasibility
Bond, W. F., Zhou, J., Bhat, S., Park, Y. S., Ebert-Allen, R. A., Ruger, R. L., & Yudkowsky, R. (2023) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000005357 · Cited by 18
No genericity in sight: An exploration of the semantics of masculine generics in German
Schmitz, D., Schneider, V., & Esser, J. (2023) · Glossa Psycholinguistics · doi:10.5070/g6011192 · Cited by 20
Navigating Ethical Complexities Through Epistemological Analysis of ChatGPT
Chavanayarn, S. (2023) · Bulletin of Science Technology & Society · doi:10.1177/02704676231216355 · Cited by 18
Achieving explainability for plant disease classification with disentangled variational autoencoders
Habaragamuwa, H., Oishi, Y., & Tanaka, K. (2024) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2024.107982 · Cited by 18
Tell me a story: a framework for critically investigating AI language models
Munn, L., & Henrickson, L. (2024) · Learning Media and Technology · doi:10.1080/17439884.2024.2327024 · Cited by 24
The Origins of Generative AI in Transcription and Machine Translation, and Why That Matters
Stone, M., Goodlad, L. M. E., & Sammons, M. (2024) · Critical AI · doi:10.1215/2834703x-11256853 · Cited by 21
Balestri, R. (2025) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2025.1558696 · Cited by 25
Word Embeddings (Also) Encode Human Personality Stereotypes
Agarwal, O., Durupınar, F., Badler, N. I., & Nenkova, A. (2019) · Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics · doi:10.18653/v1/s19-1023 · Cited by 18
Social centralization and semantic collapse: Hyperbolic embeddings of networks and text
Li, L., Wu, L., & Evans, J. (2020) · Poetics · doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2019.101428 · Cited by 23
Masking Actor Information Leads to Fairer Political Claims Detection
Dayanık, E., & Padó, S. (2020) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.404 · Cited by 17
Explaining Sentiment Classification with Synthetic Exemplars and Counter-Exemplars
Lampridis, O., Guidotti, R., & Ruggieri, S. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-61527-7_24 · Cited by 20
Towards Socially Responsible AI: Cognitive Bias-Aware Multi-Objective Learning
Sen, P., & Ganguly, D. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v34i03.5654 · Cited by 18
On conditional parity as a notion of non-discrimination in machine learningPreprint
Ritov, Y., Sun, Y., & Zhao, R. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.08519 · Cited by 18
Dulhanty, C., & Wong, A. M. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.01347 · Cited by 40
Beyond "Fairness:" Structural (In)justice Lenses on AI for EducationPreprint
Madaio, M., Blodgett, S. L., Mayfield, E., & Dixon‐Román, E. J. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.08847 · Cited by 39
Seganti, A., Sobol, H., Orlova, I., Kim, H., Staniszewski, J., Krumholc, T., & Koziel, K. (2019) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/s19-2126 · Cited by 20
Fairness-Aware Neural Rényi Minimization for Continuous Features
Grari, V., Lamprier, S., & Detyniecki, M. (2020) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2020/313 · Cited by 17
Evaluating Gender Bias in Hindi-English Machine Translation
Ramesh, K., Gupta, G., & Singh, S. (2021) · Workshop on Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing (GeBNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.gebnlp-1.3 · Cited by 20
shinyReCoR: A Shiny Application for Automatically Coding Text Responses Using R
Andersen, N., & Zehner, F. (2021) · Psych · doi:10.3390/psych3030030 · Cited by 20
Implicit Stereotypes in Pre-Trained Classifiers
Dehouche, N. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3136898 · Cited by 21
Cain, C. C., Buskey, C. D., & Washington, G. J. (2023) · Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society · doi:10.1108/jices-02-2023-0019 · Cited by 16
Ethical Guidelines on the Use of AI in Education
Paschal, M. J., & Melly, I. K. (2023) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-0205-7.ch013 · Cited by 17
Fair-VPT: Fair Visual Prompt Tuning for Image Classification
Park, S., & Byun, H. (2024) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.01166 · Cited by 18
Benchmark suites instead of leaderboards for evaluating AI fairness
Wang, A., Hertzmann, A., & Russakovsky, O. (2024) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2024.101080 · Cited by 19
Ética y transparencia para la detección de sesgos algorítmicos de género
Eyzaguirre, L. B. (2019) · Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico · doi:10.5209/esmp.66989 · Cited by 17
Curry, A. C., Robertson, J., & Rieser, V. (2020) · Cited by 17
Li, C., Xing, W., & Leite, W. L. (2021) · International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) · doi:10.1145/3448139.3448200 · Cited by 17
Uncovering Implicit Gender Bias in Narratives through Commonsense Inference
Huang, T., Brahman, F., Shwartz, V., & Chaturvedi, S. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.326 · Cited by 24
van Loon, A., Giorgi, S., Willer, R., & Eichstaedt, J. C. (2022) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v16i1.19399 · Cited by 21
What are the biases in my word embedding?Preprint
Swinger, N., De‐Arteaga, M., Heffernan, N. T., Leiserson, M. D. M., & Kalai, A. T. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1812.08769 · Cited by 17
Self-citationFairness and Robustness in Invariant Learning: A Case Study in Toxicity ClassificationPreprint
Adragna, R., Creager, E., Madras, D., & Zemel, R. S. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.06485 · Cited by 42
What's in the Box? A Preliminary Analysis of Undesirable Content in the Common Crawl Corpus
Luccioni, A. S., & Viviano, J. D. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.02732 · Cited by 17
Rettberg, J. W., & Wigers, H. (2025) · Open Research Europe · doi:10.12688/openreseurope.20576.1 · Cited by 25
Vindication, virtue, and vitriol
Farrell, T., Gorrell, G., & Bontcheva, K. (2020) · Journal of Computational Social Science · doi:10.1007/s42001-020-00090-9 · Cited by 22
Controlled Analyses of Social Biases in Wikipedia Bios
Field, A., Park, C. Y., Lin, K., & Tsvetkov, Y. (2022) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3485447.3512134 · Cited by 22
Search results diversification for effective fair ranking in academic search
McDonald, G., Macdonald, C., & Ounis, I. (2021) · Information Retrieval · doi:10.1007/s10791-021-09399-z · Cited by 18
Learning to Ask: Conversational Product Search via Representation Learning
Zou, J., Huang, J. X., Ren, Z., & Kanoulas, E. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3555371 · Cited by 18
Self-citationRevealing Media Bias in News Articles
Hamborg, F. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-17693-7 · Cited by 21
Languré, A. D. L., & Zareei, M. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3331323 · Cited by 20
Sexist textbooks: Automated analysis of gender bias in 1,255 books from 34 countries
Crawfurd, L., Saintis-Miller, C., & Todd, R. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0310366 · Cited by 33
Epistemic Therapy for Bias in Automated Decision-Making
Gilbert, T. K., & Mintz, Y. D. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3306618.3314294 · Cited by 16
The Role of Protected Class Word Lists in Bias Identification of Contextualized Word Representations
Sedoc, J., & Ungar, L. (2019) · Workshop on Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing (GeBNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/w19-3808 · Cited by 19
Conceptual Organization is Revealed by Consumer Activity Patterns
Hornsby, A., Evans, T., Riefer, P., Prior, R., & Love, B. (2019) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 16
Mine the Gap: Augmenting Foresight Methodologies with Data Analytics
Boysen, A. (2020) · World Futures Review · doi:10.1177/1946756720905639 · Cited by 16
Williams, A., Cotterell, R., Wolf-Sonkin, L., Blasi, D. E., & Wallach, H. (2021) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00355 · Cited by 16
Analyzing Gender Bias within Narrative Tropes
Gala, D., Khursheed, M. O., Lerner, H., O’Connor, B., & Iyyer, M. (2020) · Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Computational Social Science (NLP+CSS) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.nlpcss-1.23 · Cited by 16
First the Worst: Finding Better Gender Translations During Beam Search
Saunders, D., Sallis, R., & Byrne, B. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-acl.301 · Cited by 18
Fair Clustering with Fair Correspondence Distribution
Lee, W., Ko, H., Byun, J., Yoon, T., & Lee, J. (2021) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2021.09.010 · Cited by 16
Automatic Misogyny Detection in Social Media Platforms using Attention-based Bidirectional-LSTM
Rahali, A., Akhloufi, M. A., Therien-Daniel, A.-M., & Brassard-Gourdeau, É. (2021) · Conference proceedings/Conference proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/smc52423.2021.9659158 · Cited by 16
Balancing Gender Bias in Job Advertisements With Text-Level Bias Mitigation
Hu, S., Al-Ani, J. A., Hughes, K. D., Denier, N., Konnikov, A., Ding, L., Xie, J., Hu, Y., Tarafdar, M., Jiang, B., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2022.805713 · Cited by 26
Gender bias in legal corpora and debiasing it
Sevim, N., Şahi̇nuç, F., & Koç, A. (2022) · Natural Language Engineering · doi:10.1017/s1351324922000122 · Cited by 22
Metamorphic Testing of a Deep Learning Based Forecaster
Dwarakanath, A., Ahuja, M., Podder, S., Vinu, S., Naskar, A., & Koushik, M. R. S. (2019) · IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Metamorphic Testing (MET) · doi:10.1109/met.2019.00014 · Cited by 16
BERT has a Moral Compass: Improvements of ethical and moral values of machinesPreprint
Schramowski, P., Turan, C., Jentzsch, S. F., Rothkopf, C. A., & Kersting, K. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.05238 · Cited by 39
On the Morality of Artificial IntelligencePreprint
Luccioni, A. S., & Bengio, Y. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.11945 · Cited by 16
No computation without representation: Avoiding data and algorithm biases through diversityPreprint
Kuhlman, C., Jackson, L., & Chunara, R. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2002.11836 · Cited by 16
How to Dissect a Muppet: The Structure of Transformer Embedding Spaces
Mickus, T., Paperno, D., & Constant, M. (2022) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00501 · Cited by 19
Eagle, T., Mehrotra, A., Sharma, A., Zuniga, A., & Whittaker, S. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3555155 · Cited by 16
The Ethics of Computational Social Science
Leslie, D. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-16624-2_4 · Cited by 18
A comparative study on the impact of model compression techniques on fairness in language models
Ramesh, K., Chavan, A., Pandit, S., & Sitaram, S. (2023) · Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.878 · Cited by 15
Analyzing the direct role of governmental organizations in artificial intelligence innovation
Park, J. (2023) · The Journal of Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/s10961-023-10048-4 · Cited by 16
SOAR: Scene-debiasing Open-set Action Recognition
Zhai, Y., Liu, Z., Wu, Z., Wu, Y., Zhou, C., Doermann, D., Yuan, J., & Hua, G. (2023) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.00940 · Cited by 15
Li, Y., Du, M., Song, R., Wang, X., Sun, M., & Wang, Y. (2024) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2024.104143 · Cited by 16
Unsupervised Discovery of Gendered Language through Latent-Variable Modeling
Hoyle, A., Wolf-Sonkin, L., Wallach, H., Augenstein, I., & Cotterell, R. (2019) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1167 · Cited by 15
Quantifying Social Biases in Contextual Word Representations
Kurita, K., Vyas, N., Pareek, A., Black, A. W., & Tsvetkov, Y. (2019) · Cited by 16
Bias in Knowledge Graph Embeddings
Bourli, S., & Pitoura, E. (2020) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) · doi:10.1109/asonam49781.2020.9381459 · Cited by 15
How does scientific progress affect cultural changes? A digital text analysis
Giorcelli, M., Lacetera, N., & Marinoni, A. (2022) · Journal of Economic Growth · doi:10.1007/s10887-022-09204-6 · Cited by 18
Tracing Antisemitic Language Through Diachronic Embedding Projections: France 1789-1914
Tripodi, R., Warglien, M., Sullam, S. L., & Paci, D. (2019) · Workshop on Computational Approaches to Historical Language Change (LChange) · doi:10.18653/v1/w19-4715 · Cited by 15
Coreference Resolution: Toward End-to-End and Cross-Lingual Systems
Cruz, A. F., Rocha, G., & Cardoso, H. L. (2020) · Information · doi:10.3390/info11020074 · Cited by 17
Detecting inter-sectional accuracy differences indriver drowsiness detection algorithms.
Ngxande, M., Tapamo, J., & Burke, M. (2020) · Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) · doi:10.1109/saupec/robmech/prasa48453.2020.9041105 · Cited by 15
The Ethics of Data-Driven Personas
Salminen, J. O., Froneman, W., Jung, S., Chowdhury, S. A., & Jansen, B. J. J. (2020) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3334480.3382790 · Cited by 15
Learning credible DNNs via incorporating prior knowledge and model local explanation
Du, M., Liu, N., Yang, F., & Hu, X. (2020) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-020-01517-5 · Cited by 17
Exploring Text Specific and Blackbox Fairness Algorithms in Multimodal Clinical NLP
Chen, J., Berlot-Attwell, I., Wang, X., Hossain, S., & Rudzicz, F. (2020) · Clinical Natural Language Processing Workshop (ClinicalNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.clinicalnlp-1.33 · Cited by 20
The Hitchhiker’s Guide to Computational Linguistics in Suicide Prevention
Ophir, Y., Tikochinski, R., Klomek, A. B., & Reichart, R. (2021) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/21677026211022013 · Cited by 16
Examining the Presence of Gender Bias in Customer Reviews Using Word EmbeddingPreprint
Mishra, A., Mishra, H., & Rathee, S. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3327404 · Cited by 16
Choenni, R., Shutova, E., & van Rooij, R. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.111 · Cited by 20
Participatory Detection of Language Barriers towards Multilingual Sustainability(ies) in Africa
Litre, G., Hirsch, F., Caron, P., Andrason, A., Bonnardel, N., Fointiat, V., Nekoto, W., Abbott, J., Dobre, C., Rocha, J. D., et al. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14138133 · Cited by 19
In-Group Bias in Deep Learning-Based Face Recognition Models Due to Ethnicity and Age
Nagpal, S., Singh, M., Singh, R., Mayank Vatsa, A., & Ratha, N. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society · doi:10.1109/tts.2023.3241010 · Cited by 17
Sosyal Bilimlerde Büyük Veri Analitiği, Yapay Zeka ve Makine Öğreniminin Kullanımı
Mevlüt Hürol, M. E. T. E. (2023) · Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi · doi:10.18037/ausbd.1272565 · Cited by 16
Understanding and evaluating harms of AI-generated image captions in political images
Sarhan, H., & Hegelich, S. (2023) · Frontiers in Political Science · doi:10.3389/fpos.2023.1245684 · Cited by 16
Weber, M., Grunow, D., Chen, Y., & Eger, S. (2023) · European Societies · doi:10.1080/14616696.2023.2275604 · Cited by 16
The Rise of Thinking Machines: A Review of Artificial Intelligence in Contemporary Communication
Gholami, M. J., & Abdwani, T. A. R. A. (2024) · Journal of Business Communication & Technology · doi:10.56632/bct.2024.3103 · Cited by 19
Recommendation Systems and Content Personalization
Venice, J. A., Arivazhagan, D., Suman, N., Shanthi, H. J., & Swadhi, R. (2024) · Advances in wireless technologies and telecommunication book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-6552-6.ch015 · Cited by 40
Female perspectives on algorithmic bias: implications for AI researchers and practitioners
Fraile-Rojas, B., De‐Pablos‐Heredero, C., & Méndez-Suárez, M. (2025) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-04-2024-0884 · Cited by 27
Gendered Ambiguous Pronoun (GAP) Shared Task at the Gender Bias in NLP Workshop 2019
Webster, K., Costa‐jussà, M. R., Hardmeier, C., & Radford, W. (2019) · Workshop on Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing (GeBNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/w19-3801 · Cited by 21
Deep Learning for Political Science
Chatsiou, K., & Mikhaylov, S. (2020) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781526486387.n58 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Bolukbasi, T., Chang, K.-W., Zou, J., Saligrama, V., & Kalai, A.
- Affiliations
- Boston University (US)
- Microsoft Research New England (United States) (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2016
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1607.06520
- OpenAlex
- W2483215953
- Cited by
- 1,615
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 136 · 2024: 201 · 2023: 240 · 2022: 154 · 2021: 313 · 2020: 253 · 2019: 204 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- OpenBU (Boston University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Keywords
- gender bias, word embeddings, bias mitigation, gender stereotypes, gender neutrality, analogy tasks, concept clustering, Google News, crowdsourced evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
