CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 1,615Ethics and Social Impacts of AITopic ModelingHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings

Open access
Bolukbasi, Tolga, Chang, Kai-Wei, Zou, James, Saligrama, Venkatesh, Kalai, Adam·2016·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1607.06520arXiv 1607.06520
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The blind application of machine learning runs the risk of amplifying biases present in data. Such a danger is facing us with word embedding, a popular framework to represent text data as vectors which has been used in many machine learning and natural language processing tasks. We show that even word embeddings trained on Google News articles exhibit female/male gender stereotypes to a disturbing extent. This raises concerns because their widespread use, as we describe, often tends to amplify these biases. Geometrically, gender bias is first shown to be captured by a direction in the word embedding. Second, gender neutral words are shown to be linearly separable from gender definition words in the word embedding. Using these properties, we provide a methodology for modifying an embedding to remove gender stereotypes, such as the association between between the words receptionist and female, while maintaining desired associations such as between the words queen and female. We define metrics to quantify both direct and indirect gender biases in embeddings, and develop algorithms to "debias" the embedding. Using crowd-worker evaluation as well as standard benchmarks, we empirically demonstrate that our algorithms significantly reduce gender bias in embeddings while preserving the its useful properties such as the ability to cluster related concepts and to solve analogy tasks. The resulting embeddings can be used in applications without amplifying gender bias.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1607.06520

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [5][5] A. J. Cuddy, E. B. Wolf, P. Glick, S. Crotty, J. Chong, and M. I. Norton. Men as cultural ideals: Cultural values moderate gender stereotype content. Journal of personality and social psychology , 109(4):622, 2015. -
  2. [6][6] A. Datta, M. C. Tschantz, and A. Datta. Automated experiments on ad privacy settings. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies , 2015. -
  3. [11][11] C. Fellbaum, editor. Wordnet: An Electronic Lexical Database . The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998. -
  4. [13][13] P. Glick and S. T. Fiske. The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of personality and social psychology , 70(3):491, 1996. -
  5. [16][16] C. Hansen, M. Tosik, G. Goossen, C. Li, L. Bayeva, F. Berbain, and M. Rotaru. How to get the best word vectors for resume parsing. In SNN Adaptive Intelligence / Symposium: Machine Learning 2015, Nijmegen. -
  6. [20][20] J. T. Jost and A. C. Kay. Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of personality and social psychology , 88(3):498, 2005. -
  7. [35][35] J. P. Stanley. Paradigmatic woman: The prostitute. Papers in language variation , pages 303-321, 1977. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 701–800 of 1,022

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Bolukbasi, T., Chang, K.-W., Zou, J., Saligrama, V., & Kalai, A.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • Microsoft Research New England (United States) (US)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2016
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1607.06520
arXiv
1607.06520
OpenAlex
W2483215953
Cited by
1,615
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 136 · 2024: 201 · 2023: 240 · 2022: 154 · 2021: 313 · 2020: 253 · 2019: 204 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • OpenBU (Boston University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Keywords
gender bias, word embeddings, bias mitigation, gender stereotypes, gender neutrality, analogy tasks, concept clustering, Google News, crowdsourced evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review