The DOI matches its DataCite record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings
Open accessAbstract
The blind application of machine learning runs the risk of amplifying biases present in data. Such a danger is facing us with word embedding, a popular framework to represent text data as vectors which has been used in many machine learning and natural language processing tasks. We show that even word embeddings trained on Google News articles exhibit female/male gender stereotypes to a disturbing extent. This raises concerns because their widespread use, as we describe, often tends to amplify these biases. Geometrically, gender bias is first shown to be captured by a direction in the word embedding. Second, gender neutral words are shown to be linearly separable from gender definition words in the word embedding. Using these properties, we provide a methodology for modifying an embedding to remove gender stereotypes, such as the association between between the words receptionist and female, while maintaining desired associations such as between the words queen and female. We define metrics to quantify both direct and indirect gender biases in embeddings, and develop algorithms to "debias" the embedding. Using crowd-worker evaluation as well as standard benchmarks, we empirically demonstrate that our algorithms significantly reduce gender bias in embeddings while preserving the its useful properties such as the ability to cluster related concepts and to solve analogy tasks. The resulting embeddings can be used in applications without amplifying gender bias.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“'Clean' text additionally has been misrepresented as being 'unbiased' against any community-a notion that has been strongly contested [22, 73, 130].”
From Data Governance in the Age of Large-Scale Data-Driven Language Technology (2022) · cites this paper as [22]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“temporality has been flagged as a potential source of difficulty in textual data, where models trained on historical text corpora, such as Google News articles, have been found to reproduce past social stereotypes (e.g. the word”
From A Survey of Data Quality Requirements That Matter in ML Development Pipelines (2023) · cites this paper as [14]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Generative AI outputs tend to reproduce normative views and mirror societal biases for marginalized groups [15, 21, 36, 41, 42, 45, 53, 66, 72, 91], including PwD [10, 12, 39, 48, 54, 62, 77, 113].”
From Engaging Communities Meaningfully in Defining Disability Representation for AI Image Generation (2026) · cites this paper as [15]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“natural language processing (NLP) algorithms for textual analysis can display recurrent gender biases (Bolukbasi et al. 2016), for instance, associating the word “doctor” with “father” and “nurse” with “mother””
From Accountable Artificial Intelligence: Holding Algorithms to Account (2021) · cites this paper as Bolukbasi et al. 2016
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Some solutions even allow for the dataset to remain unchanged while the ML algorithm is tuned to produce more robust or socially equitable outcomes [14,29].”
From A Survey of Data Quality Requirements That Matter in ML Development Pipelines (2023) · cites this paper as [14]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The seminal works of Bolukbasi et al. (2016) and Caliskan et al. (2017) show that word embeddings such as word2vec (Mikolov et al., 2013) and GloVe (Pennington et al., 2014) contain stereotypical biases using diagnostic methods like word analogies and association tests.”
From StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language models (2021) · cites this paper as Bolukbasi et al. (2016)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Glove: Global Vectors for Word Representation
Pennington, J., Socher, R., & Manning, C. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1162 · Cited by 34,071
Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space
Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1301.3781 · Cited by 26,568
Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality
Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1310.4546 · Cited by 24,533
Kilgarriff, A. (2000) · Language · doi:10.2307/417141 · Cited by 11,529
Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464 · Cited by 9,210
Dwork, C., Hardt, M., Pitassi, T., Reingold, O., & Zemel, R. (2012) · Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference · doi:10.1145/2090236.2090255 · Cited by 3,501
Barocas, S., & Selbst, A. D. (2014) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2477899 · Cited by 3,048
Linguistic Regularities in Continuous Space Word Representations
Mikolov, T., Yih, W.-T., & Zweig, G. (2013) · Cited by 2,913
Torralba, A., & Efros, A. A. (2011) · CVPR 2011 · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2011.5995347 · Cited by 2,440
Certifying and Removing Disparate Impact
Feldman, M., Friedler, S. A., Moeller, J., Scheidegger, C., & Venkatasubramanian, S. (2015) · Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2783258.2783311 · Cited by 1,827
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- [5][5] A. J. Cuddy, E. B. Wolf, P. Glick, S. Crotty, J. Chong, and M. I. Norton. Men as cultural ideals: Cultural values moderate gender stereotype content. Journal of personality and social psychology , 109(4):622, 2015. -
- [6][6] A. Datta, M. C. Tschantz, and A. Datta. Automated experiments on ad privacy settings. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies , 2015. -
- [11][11] C. Fellbaum, editor. Wordnet: An Electronic Lexical Database . The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998. -
- [13][13] P. Glick and S. T. Fiske. The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of personality and social psychology , 70(3):491, 1996. -
- [16][16] C. Hansen, M. Tosik, G. Goossen, C. Li, L. Bayeva, F. Berbain, and M. Rotaru. How to get the best word vectors for resume parsing. In SNN Adaptive Intelligence / Symposium: Machine Learning 2015, Nijmegen. -
- [20][20] J. T. Jost and A. C. Kay. Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of personality and social psychology , 88(3):498, 2005. -
- [35][35] J. P. Stanley. Paradigmatic woman: The prostitute. Papers in language variation , pages 303-321, 1977. -
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,022 of 1,022
Church, K. (2025) · International Journal of Lexicography · doi:10.1093/ijl/ecaf007 · Cited by 5
Huang, G. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-3658-0_8 · Cited by 6
Moderating Harm: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Cyberbullying Detection in YouTube Comments
Muminovic, A. (2025) · International Journal of Computer Applications · doi:10.5120/ijca2025925403 · Cited by 6
Gender Stereotypes Differ between Male and Female Writings
Qian, Y. (2019) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Student Research Workshop (ACL SRW) · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-2007 · Cited by 5
Using Copies to Remove Sensitive Data: A Case Study on Fair Superhero Alignment Prediction
Unceta, I., Nin, J., & Pujol, O. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-31332-6_16 · Cited by 5
Stereotype and Categorical Bias Evaluation via Differential Cosine Bias Measure
Sayenju, S., Aygün, R. S., Franks, B., Johnston, S., Lee, G., & Modgil, G. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata55660.2022.10020924 · Cited by 5
Compensatory Debiasing For Gender Imbalances In Language Models
Woo, T.-J., Nam, W.-J., Ju, Y.-J., & Lee, S. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp49357.2023.10095658 · Cited by 6
Creating a Chinese gender lexicon for detecting gendered wording in job advertisements
Jiang, T., Li, Y., Fu, S., & Chen, Y. (2023) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103424 · Cited by 5
Erasure of Unaligned Attributes from Neural Representations
Shao, S., Ziser, Y., & Cohen, S. B. (2023) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00558 · Cited by 5
Online Algorithms for Matchings with Proportional Fairness Constraints and Diversity Constraints
Louis, A., Nasre, M., Nimbhorkar, P., & Sankar, G. S. (2023) · Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications · doi:10.3233/faia230442 · Cited by 5
NLPositionality: Characterizing Design Biases of Datasets and Models
Santy, S., Liang, J. T., Bras, R. L., Reinecke, K., & Sap, M. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.01943 · Cited by 31
“‘Gender bias’ in computing systems means that the system does not perform well for some genders; “man is to doctor as woman is to nurse” (Bolukbasi et al., 2016) is a social bias, while captioning systems that fail to understand women’s voices (Tatman, 2017) is a design bias.”
BackgroundEngaging Communities Meaningfully in Defining Disability Representation for AI Image Generation
Thieme, A., Faia Marques, R., Grayson, M., Balachandar, S., Tyler Cassidy, C., Choksi, M. Z., Longden, C., Huda, R. S., Ileve Kalovwe, N., Mallon, C., et al. (2026) · Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3790768 · Cited by 1
AxBench: Steering LLMs? Even Simple Baselines Outperform Sparse Autoencoders
Wu, Z., Arora, A., Geiger, A., Wang, Z., Huang, J., Jurafsky, D., Manning, C. D., & Potts, C. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.17148
“…assumption in much of this work is the linear representation hypothesis , which claims that linear subspaces of representations in neural networks encode concepts (Mikolov et al., 2013b; Pennington et al., 2014; Bolukbasi et al., 2016; Elhage et al., 2022; Park et al., 2023; Nanda et al., 2023).”
On Epistemic Diversity in Large Language Models
Kirsten, E., Krämer, N., & Zafar, M. B. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.04835
“The representational lens asks whether all groups are given proportional representation without misrepresentations such as negative stereotypes (Schw¨obel et al., 2023; Mehrabi et al., 2021; Abid et al., 2021; Bolukbasi et al., 2016; Guo & Caliskan, 2021).”
Kusner, M. J., Loftus, J. R., Russell, C., & Silva, R. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.06856 · Cited by 995
The Dataset Nutrition Label: A Framework To Drive Higher Data Quality Standards
Holland, S., Hosny, A., Newman, S., Joseph, J., & Chmielinski, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1805.03677 · Cited by 175
Identifying and Correcting Label Bias in Machine Learning
Jiang, H., & Nachum, O. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.04966 · Cited by 152
Age and gender bias in pedestrian detection algorithms
Brandao, M. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.10490 · Cited by 32
Disembodied Machine Learning: On the Illusion of Objectivity in NLP
Waseem, Z., Lulz, S., Bingel, J., & Augenstein, I. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2101.11974 · Cited by 34
Counterfactual Data Augmentation using Locally Factored Dynamics
Pitis, S., Creager, E., & Garg, A. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.02863 · Cited by 26
End-To-End Bias Mitigation: Removing Gender Bias in Deep Learning
Feldman, T., & Peake, A. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.02532 · Cited by 19
Venkit, P. N., & Wilson, S. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.13259 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Bolukbasi, T., Chang, K.-W., Zou, J., Saligrama, V., & Kalai, A.
- Affiliations
- Boston University (US)
- Microsoft Research New England (United States) (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2016
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1607.06520
- OpenAlex
- W2483215953
- Cited by
- 1,615
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 136 · 2024: 201 · 2023: 240 · 2022: 154 · 2021: 313 · 2020: 253 · 2019: 204 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- OpenBU (Boston University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Keywords
- gender bias, word embeddings, bias mitigation, gender stereotypes, gender neutrality, analogy tasks, concept clustering, Google News, crowdsourced evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
