The DOI matches its DataCite record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings
Open accessAbstract
The blind application of machine learning runs the risk of amplifying biases present in data. Such a danger is facing us with word embedding, a popular framework to represent text data as vectors which has been used in many machine learning and natural language processing tasks. We show that even word embeddings trained on Google News articles exhibit female/male gender stereotypes to a disturbing extent. This raises concerns because their widespread use, as we describe, often tends to amplify these biases. Geometrically, gender bias is first shown to be captured by a direction in the word embedding. Second, gender neutral words are shown to be linearly separable from gender definition words in the word embedding. Using these properties, we provide a methodology for modifying an embedding to remove gender stereotypes, such as the association between between the words receptionist and female, while maintaining desired associations such as between the words queen and female. We define metrics to quantify both direct and indirect gender biases in embeddings, and develop algorithms to "debias" the embedding. Using crowd-worker evaluation as well as standard benchmarks, we empirically demonstrate that our algorithms significantly reduce gender bias in embeddings while preserving the its useful properties such as the ability to cluster related concepts and to solve analogy tasks. The resulting embeddings can be used in applications without amplifying gender bias.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“'Clean' text additionally has been misrepresented as being 'unbiased' against any community-a notion that has been strongly contested [22, 73, 130].”
From Data Governance in the Age of Large-Scale Data-Driven Language Technology (2022) · cites this paper as [22]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“temporality has been flagged as a potential source of difficulty in textual data, where models trained on historical text corpora, such as Google News articles, have been found to reproduce past social stereotypes (e.g. the word”
From A Survey of Data Quality Requirements That Matter in ML Development Pipelines (2023) · cites this paper as [14]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Generative AI outputs tend to reproduce normative views and mirror societal biases for marginalized groups [15, 21, 36, 41, 42, 45, 53, 66, 72, 91], including PwD [10, 12, 39, 48, 54, 62, 77, 113].”
From Engaging Communities Meaningfully in Defining Disability Representation for AI Image Generation (2026) · cites this paper as [15]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“natural language processing (NLP) algorithms for textual analysis can display recurrent gender biases (Bolukbasi et al. 2016), for instance, associating the word “doctor” with “father” and “nurse” with “mother””
From Accountable Artificial Intelligence: Holding Algorithms to Account (2021) · cites this paper as Bolukbasi et al. 2016
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Some solutions even allow for the dataset to remain unchanged while the ML algorithm is tuned to produce more robust or socially equitable outcomes [14,29].”
From A Survey of Data Quality Requirements That Matter in ML Development Pipelines (2023) · cites this paper as [14]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The seminal works of Bolukbasi et al. (2016) and Caliskan et al. (2017) show that word embeddings such as word2vec (Mikolov et al., 2013) and GloVe (Pennington et al., 2014) contain stereotypical biases using diagnostic methods like word analogies and association tests.”
From StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language models (2021) · cites this paper as Bolukbasi et al. (2016)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Glove: Global Vectors for Word Representation
Pennington, J., Socher, R., & Manning, C. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1162 · Cited by 34,071
Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space
Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1301.3781 · Cited by 26,568
Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality
Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1310.4546 · Cited by 24,533
Kilgarriff, A. (2000) · Language · doi:10.2307/417141 · Cited by 11,529
Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464 · Cited by 9,210
Dwork, C., Hardt, M., Pitassi, T., Reingold, O., & Zemel, R. (2012) · Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference · doi:10.1145/2090236.2090255 · Cited by 3,501
Barocas, S., & Selbst, A. D. (2014) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2477899 · Cited by 3,048
Linguistic Regularities in Continuous Space Word Representations
Mikolov, T., Yih, W.-T., & Zweig, G. (2013) · Cited by 2,913
Torralba, A., & Efros, A. A. (2011) · CVPR 2011 · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2011.5995347 · Cited by 2,440
Certifying and Removing Disparate Impact
Feldman, M., Friedler, S. A., Moeller, J., Scheidegger, C., & Venkatasubramanian, S. (2015) · Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2783258.2783311 · Cited by 1,827
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- [5][5] A. J. Cuddy, E. B. Wolf, P. Glick, S. Crotty, J. Chong, and M. I. Norton. Men as cultural ideals: Cultural values moderate gender stereotype content. Journal of personality and social psychology , 109(4):622, 2015. -
- [6][6] A. Datta, M. C. Tschantz, and A. Datta. Automated experiments on ad privacy settings. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies , 2015. -
- [11][11] C. Fellbaum, editor. Wordnet: An Electronic Lexical Database . The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998. -
- [13][13] P. Glick and S. T. Fiske. The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of personality and social psychology , 70(3):491, 1996. -
- [16][16] C. Hansen, M. Tosik, G. Goossen, C. Li, L. Bayeva, F. Berbain, and M. Rotaru. How to get the best word vectors for resume parsing. In SNN Adaptive Intelligence / Symposium: Machine Learning 2015, Nijmegen. -
- [20][20] J. T. Jost and A. C. Kay. Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of personality and social psychology , 88(3):498, 2005. -
- [35][35] J. P. Stanley. Paradigmatic woman: The prostitute. Papers in language variation , pages 303-321, 1977. -
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,022
Maas, M. M. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1145/3278721.3278766 · Cited by 37
Zimmermann, A., & Lee‐Stronach, C. (2021) · Canadian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1017/can.2021.17 · Cited by 46
Scaling Monosemanticity: Extracting Interpretable Features from Claude 3 Sonnet
Templeton, A., Conerly, T., Marcus, J., Lindsey, J., Bricken, T., Chen, B., Pearce, A., Citro, C., Ameisen, E., Jones, A., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.29358 · Cited by 36
Reinforcement Learning for Fair Dynamic Pricing
Maestre, R., Duque, J., Rubio, A., & Arevalo, J. (2019) · Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01054-6_8 · Cited by 37
OpenBias: Open-Set Bias Detection in Text-to-Image Generative Models
Moreno D’Incà, Peruzzo, E., Mancini, M., Xu, D., Goe, V., Xu, X., Wang, Z., Shi, H., & Sebe, N. (2024) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.01162 · Cited by 54
Operational framework and training standard requirements for AI‐empowered robotic surgery
O’Sullivan, S., Léonard, S., Holzinger, A., Allen, C., Battaglia, F., Nevejans, N., van Leeuwen, F. W. B., Sajid, M. I., Friebe, M., Ashrafian, H., et al. (2019) · International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery · doi:10.1002/rcs.2020 · Cited by 35
Automatic Gender Identification and Reinflection in Arabic
Habash, N. Y., Bouamor, H., & Chung, C. (2019) · Workshop on Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing (GeBNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/w19-3822 · Cited by 35
Gender De-Biasing in Speech Emotion Recognition
Gorrostieta, C., Lotfian, R., Taylor, K. M., Brutti, R. A., & Kane, J. (2019) · Interspeech (USB) · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2019-1708 · Cited by 35
A Causal Inference Method for Reducing Gender Bias in Word Embedding Relations
Yang, Z., & Feng, J. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v34i05.6486 · Cited by 35
Exploring Social Bias in Chatbots using Stereotype Knowledge
Lee, N., Madotto, A., & Fung, P. (2019) · Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) · Cited by 35
Removing Spurious Features can Hurt Accuracy and Affect Groups Disproportionately
Khani, F., & Liang, P. (2021) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445883 · Cited by 45
Chinese University Students’ Attitudes and Perceptions in Learning English Using ChatGPT
Liu, B. (2023) · International Journal of Education and Humanities · doi:10.58557/(ijeh).v3i2.145 · Cited by 53
Hunt, R. L., & McKelvey, F. R. (2019) · Journal of Information Policy · doi:10.5325/jinfopoli.9.2019.0307 · Cited by 49
Learning Credible Deep Neural Networks with Rationale Regularization
Du, M., Liu, N., Yang, F., & Hu, X. (2019) · Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icdm.2019.00025 · Cited by 39
Sánchez-Junquera, J., Chulvi, B., Rosso, P., & Ponzetto, S. P. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app11083610 · Cited by 39
Personal Bias in Prediction of Emotions Elicited by Textual Opinions
Miłkowski, P., Gruza, M., Kanclerz, K., Kazienko, P., Grimling, D., & Kocoń, J. (2021) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-srw.26 · Cited by 34
Hassan, S., Huenerfauth, M., & Alm, C. O. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.267 · Cited by 54
Investigations of Performance and Bias in Human-AI Teamwork in Hiring
Peng, A., Nushi, B., Kıcıman, E., Inkpen, K. M., & Kamar, E. S. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i11.21468 · Cited by 51
What's in a Name? Reducing Bias in Bios without Access to Protected AttributesPreprint
Romanov, A., De‐Arteaga, M., Wallach, H., Chayes, J., Borgs, C., Chouldechova, A., Geyik, S. C., Kenthapadi, K., Rumshisky, A., & Kalai, A. T. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1904.05233 · Cited by 34
Self-citationMitigating Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing: Literature ReviewPreprint
Sun, T., Gaut, A., Tang, S., Huang, Y., ElSherief, M., Zhao, J., Mirza, D., Belding, E., Chang, K.-W., & Wang, W. Y. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.08976 · Cited by 109
Self-citationInvestigating Sports Commentator Bias within a Large Corpus of American Football Broadcasts
Merullo, J., Yeh, L., Handler, A., Grissom, A., O’Connor, B., & Iyyer, M. (2019) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1666 · Cited by 35
Evaluating the Potential of LLMs and ChatGPT on Medical Diagnosis and Treatment
Panagoulias, D. P., Palamidas, F. A., Virvou, M. K., & Tsihrintzis, G. A. (2023) · International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems & Applications (IISA) · doi:10.1109/iisa59645.2023.10345968 · Cited by 37
Gender bias in transformers: A comprehensive review of detection and mitigation strategies
Nemani, P., Joel, Y. D., Vijay, P., & Liza, F. F. (2023) · Natural Language Processing Journal · doi:10.1016/j.nlp.2023.100047 · Cited by 55
Costa, A., Crupi, A., Césaroni, F., & Abbate, T. (2025) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103335 · Cited by 42
OSCaR: Orthogonal Subspace Correction and Rectification of Biases in Word Embeddings
Dev, S., Li, T., Phillips, J. M., & Srikumar, V. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.411 · Cited by 49
Automatic Detection of Sexist Statements Commonly Used at the Workplace
Grosz, D., & Conde-Céspedes, P. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-60470-7_11 · Cited by 33
ASTRAEA: Grammar-based Fairness Testing
Soremekun, E., Udeshi, S., & Chattopadhyay, S. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2022.3141758 · Cited by 41
Lawyers are Dishonest? Quantifying Representational Harms in Commonsense Knowledge Resources
Mehrabi, N., Zhou, P., Morstatter, F., Pujara, J., Ren, X., & Galstyan, A. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.410 · Cited by 35
Fair Representation Learning for Heterogeneous Information Networks
Zeng, Z., Islam, R., Keya, K. N., Foulds, J. R., Song, Y., & Pan, S. (2021) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v15i1.18111 · Cited by 33
Gender Bias and Under-Representation in Natural Language Processing Across Human Languages
Chen, Y., Mahoney, C., Grasso, I., Wali, E., Matthews, A., Middleton, T., Njie, M., & Matthews, J. N. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3461702.3462530 · Cited by 38
Lalor, J. P., Abbasi, A., Oketch, K., Yang, Y., & Forsgren, N. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3641276 · Cited by 40
Gender Bias in Contextualized Word EmbeddingsPreprint
Zhao, J., Wang, T., Yatskar, M., Cotterell, R., Ordóñez, V., & Chang, K.-W. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1904.03310 · Cited by 109
Self-citationIntrinsic bias metrics do not correlate with application bias
Goldfarb-Tarrant, S., Marchant, R., Muñoz Sánchez, R., Pandya, M., & Lopez, A. (2021) · Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.150 · Cited by 33
Ethical layering in AI-driven polygenic risk scores—New complexities, new challenges
Fritzsche, M.-C., Akyüz, K., Abadía, M. C., McLennan, S., Marttinen, P., Mayrhofer, M. T., & Buyx, A. (2023) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2023.1098439 · Cited by 41
Stereotypes in ChatGPT: an empirical study
Busker, T., Choenni, S., & Bargh, M. S. (2023) · International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance · doi:10.1145/3614321.3614325 · Cited by 40
Shortcut Learning Explanations for Deep Natural Language Processing: A Survey on Dataset Biases
Dogra, V., Verma, S., Kavita, K., Woźniak, M., Shafi, J., & Ijaz, M. F. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3360306 · Cited by 36
Adhering, Steering, and Queering: Treatment of Gender in Natural Language Generation
Strengers, Y., Qu, L., Xu, Q., & Knibbe, J. (2020) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376315 · Cited by 34
Worst of Both Worlds: Biases Compound in Pre-trained Vision-and-Language Models
Srinivasan, T., & Bisk, Y. (2022) · Workshop on Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing (GeBNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.gebnlp-1.10 · Cited by 53
Garimella, A., Amarnath, A., KUMAR, K. T. K., Yalla, A. P., Natarajan, A., Chhaya, N., & Srinivasan, B. V. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-acl.397 · Cited by 37
Automatic Fairness Testing of Neural Classifiers Through Adversarial Sampling
Zhang, P., Wang, J., Sun, J., Wang, X., Dong, G., Wang, X., Dai, T., & Dong, J. S. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2021.3101478 · Cited by 33
Stock, P., & Cissé, M. (2017) · Cited by 34
Schramowski, P., Turan, C., Jentzsch, S. F., Rothkopf, C. A., & Kersting, K. (2020) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2020.00036 · Cited by 33
A Survey of Automatic Personality Detection from Texts
Štajner, S., & Yenikent, S. (2020) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.553 · Cited by 38
Schiebinger, L. L. (2021) · Tapuya Latin American Science Technology and Society · doi:10.1080/25729861.2020.1867420 · Cited by 42
Racial and Ethnic Biases in Computational Approaches to Psychopathology
Hitczenko, K., Cowan, H. R., Goldrick, M., & Mittal, V. A. (2021) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbab131 · Cited by 32
An Automated Toxicity Classification on Social Media Using LSTM and Word Embedding
Alsharef, A., Aggarwal, K., Sonia, S., Koundal, D., Alyami, H., & Ameyed, D. (2022) · Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience · doi:10.1155/2022/8467349 · Cited by 32
RetractedDirect Feedback Alignment Scales to Modern Deep Learning Tasks and ArchitecturesPreprint
Launay, J., Poli, I., Boniface, F., & Krząkała, F. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.12878 · Cited by 37
Facts as Experts: Adaptable and Interpretable Neural Memory over Symbolic KnowledgePreprint
Verga, P., Sun, H., Soares, L. B., & Cohen, W. W. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.00849 · Cited by 53
Data, Power and Bias in Artificial IntelligencePreprint
Leavy, S., O’Sullivan, B., & Σιαπέρα, Ε. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.07341 · Cited by 97
Stoltz, D. S., & Taylor, M. A. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197756874.001.0001 · Cited by 31
Eğitimde Yapay Zekâ Kullanımı: ChatGPT’nin KEFE ve PEST Analizi
Kutlucan, E., & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2024) · Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi · doi:10.37217/tebd.1368821 · Cited by 34
Towards Fair AI: Mitigating Bias in Credit Decisions—A Systematic Literature Review
Vieira, J. R. D. C., Barboza, F., Cajueiro, D. O., & Kimura, H. (2025) · Journal of risk and financial management · doi:10.3390/jrfm18050228 · Cited by 60
Adversarial Training for Satire Detection: Controlling for Confounding Variables
McHardy, R., Adel, H., & Klinger, R. (2019) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1069 · Cited by 33
Dictionary-based Debiasing of Pre-trained Word Embeddings
Kaneko, M., & Bollegala, D. (2021) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.16 · Cited by 36
Foltz, P. W., Chandler, C., Diaz-Asper, C. M., Cohen, A. S., Rodriguez, Z. B., Holmlund, T. B., & Elvevåg, B. (2022) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2022.07.011 · Cited by 33
Directional Bias Amplification
Wang, A., & Russakovsky, O. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.12594 · Cited by 30
Assessing Racial and Ethnic Bias in Text Generation for Healthcare-Related Tasks by ChatGPT 1
Hanna, J. J., Wakene, A. D., Lehmann, C. U., & Medford, R. J. (2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.08.28.23294730 · Cited by 28
Sentiment Bias in Predictive Text Recommendations Results in Biased Writing
Arnold, K., Chauncey, K., & Gajos, K. (2018) · Canadian Human-Computer Communications Society / Société canadienne du dialogue humain-machine · doi:10.20380/gi2018.07 · Cited by 31
Conceptor Debiasing of Word Representations Evaluated on WEAT
Karve, S., Ungar, L., & Sedoc, J. (2019) · Workshop on Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing (GeBNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/w19-3806 · Cited by 29
Semantic and relational spaces in science of science: deep learning models for article vectorisation
Kozlowski, D., Dusdal, J., Pang, J., & Zilian, A. (2021) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-021-03984-1 · Cited by 37
Misztal-Radecka, J., & Indurkhya, B. (2021) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102519 · Cited by 29
Viewpoint: AI as Author – Bridging the Gap Between Machine Learning and Literary Theory
Van Heerden, I., & Bas, A. (2021) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.12593 · Cited by 29
Learning Bias-Invariant Representation by Cross-Sample Mutual Information Minimization
Zhu, W., Zheng, H., Liao, H., Li, W., & Luo, J. (2021) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.01473 · Cited by 29
Lu, M., Zhao, Q., Zhang, J., Pohl, K. M., Fei-Fei, L., Niebles, J. C., & Adeli, E. (2021) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.01077 · Cited by 30
Word Embeddings via Causal Inference: Gender Bias Reducing and Semantic Information Preserving
Ding, L., Yu, D., Xie, J., Guo, W., Hu, S., Liu, M., Kong, L., Dai, H., Bao, Y., & Jiang, B. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i11.21443 · Cited by 29
ADEPT: A DEbiasing PrompT Framework
Yang, K., Yu, C., Fung, Y. R., Li, M., & Ji, H. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i9.26279 · Cited by 34
Large Language Models for Conducting Advanced Text Analytics Information Systems Research
Ampel, B., Yang, C.-H., Hu, J. L., & Chen, H. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3682069 · Cited by 34
The cultural stereotype and cultural bias of ChatGPT
Yuan, H., Che, Z., Zhang, Y., Shao, L. H., Yuan, X., Huang, L., Hu, X., Peng, K., & Luo, S. (2025) · Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology · doi:10.1177/18344909251355673 · Cited by 31
Learning Fair Classifiers: A Regularization-Inspired Approach.
Bechavod, Y., & Ligett, K. (2017) · Cited by 31
The Mediating Role of Cognitive Flexibility in the Influence of Counter-Stereotypes on Creativity
Zuo, B., Wen, F., Wang, M., & Wang, Y. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00105 · Cited by 31
Concept Class Analysis: A Method for Identifying Cultural Schemas in Texts
Taylor, M. A., & Stoltz, D. S. (2020) · Sociological Science · doi:10.15195/v7.a23 · Cited by 28
Requirements Engineering in Machine Learning Projects
Gjorgjevikj, A., Mishev, K., Antovski, L., & Trajanov, D. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3294840 · Cited by 33
Sheth, S., Baker, H. P., Prescher, H., & Strelzow, J. (2024) · Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons · doi:10.5435/jaaos-d-23-00787 · Cited by 29
A university map of course knowledge
Pardos, Z. A., & Nam, A. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0233207 · Cited by 30
Deconfounded Image Captioning: A Causal RetrospectPreprint
Yang, X., Zhang, H., & Cai, J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2003.03923 · Cited by 43
Differential Fairness: An Intersectional Framework for Fair AI
Islam, R., Keya, K. N., Pan, S., Sarwate, A. D., & Foulds, J. R. (2023) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e25040660 · Cited by 35
Entity-Centric Contextual Affective Analysis
Field, A., & Tsvetkov, Y. (2019) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1243 · Cited by 32
Adversarial learning for counterfactual fairness
Grari, V., Lamprier, S., & Detyniecki, M. (2022) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-022-06206-8 · Cited by 31
Hell Hath No Fury? Correcting Bias in the NRC Emotion Lexicon
Zad, S., Jimenez, J., & Finlayson, M. A. (2021) · Workshop on Online Abuse and Harms (WOAH) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.woah-1.11 · Cited by 27
An information theoretic approach to reducing algorithmic bias for machine learning
Kim, J.-Y., & Cho, S. (2022) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2021.09.081 · Cited by 31
Klumbytė, G., Draude, C., & Taylor, A. S. (2022) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533207 · Cited by 35
Poulsen, S. V. (2018) · Internet Histories · doi:10.1080/24701475.2018.1459350 · Cited by 27
The Authors Matter: Understanding and Mitigating Implicit Bias in Deep Text Classification
Liu, H., Jin, W., Karimi, H., Liu, Z., & Tang, J. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-acl.7 · Cited by 33
Ensuring Fairness Beyond the Training DataPreprint
Mandal, D., Deng, S., Jana, S., Wing, J. M., & Hsu, D. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.06029 · Cited by 27
Estimating the Personality of White-Box Language ModelsPreprint
Karra, S. R., Nguyen, S. T., & Tulabandhula, T. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4598766 · Cited by 77
Ageism in AI: new forms of age discrimination in the era of algorithms and artificial intelligence
Stypinska, J. (2021) · Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on AI for People: Towards Sustainable AI, CAIP 2021, 20-24 November 2021, Bologna, Italy · doi:10.4108/eai.20-11-2021.2314200 · Cited by 25
Sankar, B. S., Gilliland, D., Rincon, J., Hermjakob, H., Yan, Y., Adam, I., Lemaster, G., Wang, D., Watson, K., Bui, A., et al. (2024) · Bioengineering · doi:10.3390/bioengineering11100984 · Cited by 26
Gürel, E. (2025) · Service Industries Journal · doi:10.1080/02642069.2025.2542822 · Cited by 36
Qafari, M. S., & van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-33246-4_11 · Cited by 27
Towards Understanding Gender Bias in Relation Extraction
Gaut, A., Sun, T., Tang, S., Huang, Y., Qian, J., ElSherief, M., Zhao, J., Mirza, D., Belding, E., Chang, K.-W., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.265 · Cited by 26
Self-citationCompositional Demographic Word Embeddings
WELCH, C. A., Kummerfeld, J. K., Pérez‐Rosas, V., & Mihalcea, R. F. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.334 · Cited by 26
Black, E., & Fredrikson, M. (2021) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445894 · Cited by 26
AI in Africa : Framing AI through an African Lens
Wairegi, A., Omino, M., & Rutenberg, I. (2021) · Communication technologies et développement · doi:10.4000/ctd.4775 · Cited by 26
On learning and representing social meaning in NLP: a sociolinguistic perspective
Nguyen, D., Rosseel, L., & Grieve, J. (2021) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.50 · Cited by 28
Recognizing misogynous memes: Biased models and tricky archetypes
Rizzi, G., Gasparini, F., Saibene, A., Rosso, P., & Fersini, E. (2023) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103474 · Cited by 30
Centering health equity in large language model deployment
Singh, N. P., Lawrence, K. S., Richardson, S. I., & Mann, D. M. (2023) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000367 · Cited by 29
Fair Meta-Learning For Few-Shot Classification
Zhao, C., Li, C., Li, J., & Chen, F. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Knowledge Graph (ICKG) · doi:10.1109/icbk50248.2020.00047 · Cited by 26
Artificial imaginaries: Generative AIs as an advanced form of capitalism
Berlinski, É., Moralès, J., & Sponem, S. (2024) · Critical Perspectives on Accounting · doi:10.1016/j.cpa.2024.102723 · Cited by 31
Agyare, B. O., Asare, J., Kraishan, A., Nkrumah, I., & Adjekum, D. K. (2025) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100365 · Cited by 45
Evaluating gender bias in large language models in long-term care
Rickman, S. (2025) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-025-03118-0 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Bolukbasi, T., Chang, K.-W., Zou, J., Saligrama, V., & Kalai, A.
- Affiliations
- Boston University (US)
- Microsoft Research New England (United States) (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2016
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1607.06520
- OpenAlex
- W2483215953
- Cited by
- 1,615
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 136 · 2024: 201 · 2023: 240 · 2022: 154 · 2021: 313 · 2020: 253 · 2019: 204 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- OpenBU (Boston University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Keywords
- gender bias, word embeddings, bias mitigation, gender stereotypes, gender neutrality, analogy tasks, concept clustering, Google News, crowdsourced evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
