The DOI matches its DataCite record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings
Open accessAbstract
The blind application of machine learning runs the risk of amplifying biases present in data. Such a danger is facing us with word embedding, a popular framework to represent text data as vectors which has been used in many machine learning and natural language processing tasks. We show that even word embeddings trained on Google News articles exhibit female/male gender stereotypes to a disturbing extent. This raises concerns because their widespread use, as we describe, often tends to amplify these biases. Geometrically, gender bias is first shown to be captured by a direction in the word embedding. Second, gender neutral words are shown to be linearly separable from gender definition words in the word embedding. Using these properties, we provide a methodology for modifying an embedding to remove gender stereotypes, such as the association between between the words receptionist and female, while maintaining desired associations such as between the words queen and female. We define metrics to quantify both direct and indirect gender biases in embeddings, and develop algorithms to "debias" the embedding. Using crowd-worker evaluation as well as standard benchmarks, we empirically demonstrate that our algorithms significantly reduce gender bias in embeddings while preserving the its useful properties such as the ability to cluster related concepts and to solve analogy tasks. The resulting embeddings can be used in applications without amplifying gender bias.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“'Clean' text additionally has been misrepresented as being 'unbiased' against any community-a notion that has been strongly contested [22, 73, 130].”
From Data Governance in the Age of Large-Scale Data-Driven Language Technology (2022) · cites this paper as [22]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“temporality has been flagged as a potential source of difficulty in textual data, where models trained on historical text corpora, such as Google News articles, have been found to reproduce past social stereotypes (e.g. the word”
From A Survey of Data Quality Requirements That Matter in ML Development Pipelines (2023) · cites this paper as [14]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Generative AI outputs tend to reproduce normative views and mirror societal biases for marginalized groups [15, 21, 36, 41, 42, 45, 53, 66, 72, 91], including PwD [10, 12, 39, 48, 54, 62, 77, 113].”
From Engaging Communities Meaningfully in Defining Disability Representation for AI Image Generation (2026) · cites this paper as [15]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“natural language processing (NLP) algorithms for textual analysis can display recurrent gender biases (Bolukbasi et al. 2016), for instance, associating the word “doctor” with “father” and “nurse” with “mother””
From Accountable Artificial Intelligence: Holding Algorithms to Account (2021) · cites this paper as Bolukbasi et al. 2016
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Some solutions even allow for the dataset to remain unchanged while the ML algorithm is tuned to produce more robust or socially equitable outcomes [14,29].”
From A Survey of Data Quality Requirements That Matter in ML Development Pipelines (2023) · cites this paper as [14]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The seminal works of Bolukbasi et al. (2016) and Caliskan et al. (2017) show that word embeddings such as word2vec (Mikolov et al., 2013) and GloVe (Pennington et al., 2014) contain stereotypical biases using diagnostic methods like word analogies and association tests.”
From StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language models (2021) · cites this paper as Bolukbasi et al. (2016)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Glove: Global Vectors for Word Representation
Pennington, J., Socher, R., & Manning, C. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1162 · Cited by 34,071
Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space
Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1301.3781 · Cited by 26,568
Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality
Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1310.4546 · Cited by 24,533
Kilgarriff, A. (2000) · Language · doi:10.2307/417141 · Cited by 11,529
Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464 · Cited by 9,210
Dwork, C., Hardt, M., Pitassi, T., Reingold, O., & Zemel, R. (2012) · Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference · doi:10.1145/2090236.2090255 · Cited by 3,501
Barocas, S., & Selbst, A. D. (2014) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2477899 · Cited by 3,048
Linguistic Regularities in Continuous Space Word Representations
Mikolov, T., Yih, W.-T., & Zweig, G. (2013) · Cited by 2,913
Torralba, A., & Efros, A. A. (2011) · CVPR 2011 · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2011.5995347 · Cited by 2,440
Certifying and Removing Disparate Impact
Feldman, M., Friedler, S. A., Moeller, J., Scheidegger, C., & Venkatasubramanian, S. (2015) · Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2783258.2783311 · Cited by 1,827
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- [5][5] A. J. Cuddy, E. B. Wolf, P. Glick, S. Crotty, J. Chong, and M. I. Norton. Men as cultural ideals: Cultural values moderate gender stereotype content. Journal of personality and social psychology , 109(4):622, 2015. -
- [6][6] A. Datta, M. C. Tschantz, and A. Datta. Automated experiments on ad privacy settings. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies , 2015. -
- [11][11] C. Fellbaum, editor. Wordnet: An Electronic Lexical Database . The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998. -
- [13][13] P. Glick and S. T. Fiske. The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of personality and social psychology , 70(3):491, 1996. -
- [16][16] C. Hansen, M. Tosik, G. Goossen, C. Li, L. Bayeva, F. Berbain, and M. Rotaru. How to get the best word vectors for resume parsing. In SNN Adaptive Intelligence / Symposium: Machine Learning 2015, Nijmegen. -
- [20][20] J. T. Jost and A. C. Kay. Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of personality and social psychology , 88(3):498, 2005. -
- [35][35] J. P. Stanley. Paradigmatic woman: The prostitute. Papers in language variation , pages 303-321, 1977. -
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision
Radford, A., Kim, J. W., Hallacy, C., Ramesh, A., Goh, G., Agarwal, S., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Mishkin, P., Clark, J., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.00020 · Cited by 15,293
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2 · Cited by 6,220
A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning
Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3457607 · Cited by 5,812
The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals
Vinuesa, R., Azizpour, H., Leite, I., Balaam, M., Dignum, V., Domisch, S., Felländer, A., Langhans, S. D., Tegmark, M., & Fuso Nerini, F. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-14108-y · Cited by 3,294
Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases
Caliskan, A., Bryson, J. J., & Narayanan, A. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aal4230 · Cited by 2,887
Explainable AI: a review of machine learning interpretability methods
Linardatos, P., Papastefanopoulos, V., & Kotsiantis, S. (2020) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e23010018 · Cited by 2,922
On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models
Bommasani, R., Hudson, D. A., Adeli, E., Altman, R., Arora, S., von Arx, S., Bernstein, M. S., Bohg, J., Bosselut, A., Brunskill, E., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.07258 · Cited by 2,676
Gebru, T., Morgenstern, J., Vecchione, B., Vaughan, J. W., Wallach, H., Daumé, H., & Crawford, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1803.09010 · Cited by 2,474
Ray, P. P. (2023) · Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems · doi:10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003 · Cited by 2,463
Gebru, T., Morgenstern, J., Vecchione, B., Vaughan, J. W., Wallach, H., III, H. D., & Crawford, K. (2021) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3458723 · Cited by 2,469
“Of particular concern are recent examples showing that machine learning models can reproduce or amplify unwanted societal biases reflected in training data [4, 5, 9].”
BackgroundMitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learning
Zhang, B. H., Lemoine, B., & Mitchell, M. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1145/3278721.3278779 · Cited by 1,387
Artificial Intelligence and the Public Sector—Applications and Challenges
Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., & Geyer, C. (2019) · International Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1080/01900692.2018.1498103 · Cited by 1,341
Explainable artificial intelligence: A survey
Dosilovic, F. K., Brcic, M., & Hlupic, N. (2018) · 2018 41st International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO) · doi:10.23919/mipro.2018.8400040 · Cited by 1,147
The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Survey
Xi, Z., Chen, W., Guo, X., He, W., Ding, Y., Hong, B., Zhang, M., Wang, J., Jin, S., Zhou, E., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.07864 · Cited by 972
The rise and potential of large language model based agents: a survey
Xi, Z., Chen, W., Guo, X., He, W., Ding, Y., Hong, B., Zhang, M., Wang, J., Jin, S., Zhou, E., et al. (2025) · Science China Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11432-024-4222-0 · Cited by 970
Bender, E. M., & Friedman, B. (2018) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00041 · Cited by 854
Ferrara, E. (2023) · Sci · doi:10.3390/sci6010003 · Cited by 875
The Real-World-Weight Cross-Entropy Loss Function: Modeling the Costs of Mislabeling
Ho, Y., & Wookey, S. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2962617 · Cited by 883
SemEval-2018 Task 1: Affect in Tweets
Mohammad, S., Bravo-Marquez, F., Salameh, M., & Kiritchenko, S. (2018) · Proceedings of The 12th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation · doi:10.18653/v1/s18-1001 · Cited by 746
Larrazabal, A. J., Nieto, N., Peterson, V., Milone, D. H., & Ferrante, E. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1919012117 · Cited by 685
Measuring and Mitigating Unintended Bias in Text Classification
Dixon, L., Li, J., Sorensen, J., Thain, N., & Vasserman, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1145/3278721.3278729 · Cited by 674
Gender bias in coreference resolution: Evaluation and debiasing methods
Zhao, J., Wang, T., Yatskar, M., Ordonez, V., & Chang, K.-W. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 2 (Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-2003 · Cited by 684
Self-citationBias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey
Gallegos, I. O., Rossi, R. A., Barrow, J., Tanjim, M. M., Kim, S., Dernoncourt, F., Yu, T., Zhang, R., & Ahmed, N. K. (2024) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00524 · Cited by 1,245
StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language models
Nadeem, M., Bethke, A., & Reddy, S. (2021) · Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.416 · Cited by 643
Accountable Artificial Intelligence: Holding Algorithms to Account
Busuioc, M. (2021) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13293 · Cited by 652
“2016); natural language processing (NLP) algorithms for textual analysis can display recurrent gender biases (Bolukbasi et al. 2016), for instance, associating the word “doctor” with “father” and “nurse” with “mother”; facial recognition algorithms have persistently been found to display much higher error rates for mi…”
BackgroundConceptual 12M: Pushing Web-Scale Image-Text Pre-Training To Recognize Long-Tail Visual Concepts
Changpinyo, S., Sharma, P. K., Ding, N., & Soricut, R. (2021) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00356 · Cited by 701
Sex and gender analysis improves science and engineering
Tannenbaum, C., Ellis, R. P., Eyssel, F., Zou, J., & Schiebinger, L. L. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1657-6 · Cited by 625
Self-citationFairness in machine learning: A survey
Caton, S., & Haas, C. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3616865 · Cited by 646
Sharma, A., Lin, I. W., Miner, A. S., Atkins, D. C., & Althoff, T. (2023) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-022-00593-2 · Cited by 500
Mitigating Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing: Literature Review
Sun, T., Gaut, A., Tang, S., Huang, Y., ElSherief, M., Zhao, J., Mirza, D., Belding, E., Chang, K.-W., & Wang, W. Y. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1159 · Cited by 492
Self-citationOn Measuring Social Biases in Sentence Encoders
May, C., Wang, A., Bordia, S., Bowman, S. R., & Rudinger, R. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1063 · Cited by 461
Artificial intelligence in clinical and genomic diagnostics
Dias, R., & Torkamani, A. (2019) · Genome Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13073-019-0689-8 · Cited by 499
CrowS-Pairs: A Challenge Dataset for Measuring Social Biases in Masked Language Models
Nangia, N., Vania, C., Bhalerao, R., & Bowman, S. R. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.154 · Cited by 446
The Woman Worked as a Babysitter: On Biases in Language Generation
Sheng, E., Chang, K.-W., Natarajan, P., & Peng, N. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1339 · Cited by 537
“We analyze these two bias contexts because the occupation context has been well-studied in other tasks (Bolukbasi et al., 2016; Rudinger et al., 2018; Zhao et al., 2018; Zhou et al., 2019), and the more descriptive language in respect contexts are a good contrast for the more subtle occupation…”
MethodSelf-citationRacial Bias in Hate Speech and Abusive Language Detection Datasets
Davidson, T., Bhattacharya, D., & Weber, I. (2019) · Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Abusive Language Online · doi:10.18653/v1/w19-3504 · Cited by 414
Examining Gender and Race Bias in Two Hundred Sentiment Analysis Systems
Kiritchenko, S., & Mohammad, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the Seventh Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics · doi:10.18653/v1/s18-2005 · Cited by 384
Underspecification Presents Challenges for Credibility in Modern Machine Learning
D'Amour, A., Heller, K., Moldovan, D., Adlam, B., Alipanahi, B., Beutel, A., Chen, C., Deaton, J., Eisenstein, J., Hoffman, M. D., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.03395 · Cited by 398
Fairness-Aware Ranking in Search & Recommendation Systems with Application to LinkedIn Talent Search
Geyik, S. C., Ambler, S., & Kenthapadi, K. (2019) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3292500.3330691 · Cited by 428
Baeza-Yates, R. (2018) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3209581 · Cited by 432
Gender bias and stereotypes in Large Language Models
Kotek, H., Dockum, R., & Sun, D. (2023) · Proceedings of The ACM Collective Intelligence Conference · doi:10.1145/3582269.3615599 · Cited by 381
Xu, W., Dainoff, M. J., Ge, L., & Gao, Z. (2023) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2041900 · Cited by 363
Learning Gender-Neutral Word Embeddings
Zhao, J., Zhou, Y., Li, Z., Wang, W. W., & Chang, K.-W. (2018) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1521 · Cited by 426
Self-citationA snapshot of the frontiers of fairness in machine learning
Chouldechova, A., & Roth, A. (2020) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3376898 · Cited by 398
Measuring Bias in Contextualized Word Representations
Kurita, K., Vyas, N., Pareek, A., Black, A. W., & Tsvetkov, Y. (2019) · Proceedings of the First Workshop on Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/w19-3823 · Cited by 348
Analysis of Explainers of Black Box Deep Neural Networks for Computer Vision: A Survey
Buhrmester, V., Münch, D., & Arens, M. (2021) · Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction · doi:10.3390/make3040048 · Cited by 403
Gender Bias in Contextualized Word Embeddings
Zhao, J., Wang, T., Yatskar, M., Cotterell, R., Ordóñez, V., & Chang, K.-W. (2019) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1064 · Cited by 367
Self-citationBeneath the Tip of the Iceberg: Current Challenges and New Directions in Sentiment Analysis Research
Poria, S., Hazarika, D., Majumder, N., & Mihalcea, R. F. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/taffc.2020.3038167 · Cited by 362
Directions in abusive language training data, a systematic review: Garbage in, garbage out
Vidgen, B., & Derczynski, L. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0243300 · Cited by 369
Bias and Discrimination in AI: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective
Ferrer, X., Nuenen, T. V., Such, J. M., Cote, M., & Criado, N. (2021) · IEEE Technology and Society Magazine · doi:10.1109/mts.2021.3056293 · Cited by 308
“Approaches that intervene on problematic biases focus on: 1) removing protected attributes from the data, as an attempt to impede the algorithm from using these protected attributes to make discriminatory decisions (fairness through blindness [12], [17]), or on 2) debiasing algorithms’ outputs [19].”
BackgroundEvaluating Gender Bias in Machine Translation
Stanovsky, G., Smith, N. A., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2019) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1164 · Cited by 492
Algorithmic fairness in education
Kizilcec, R. F., & Lee, H. (2022) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429329067-10 · Cited by 339
The ML test score: A rubric for ML production readiness and technical debt reduction
Breck, E., Cai, S., Nielsen, E., Salib, M., & Sculley, D. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) · doi:10.1109/bigdata.2017.8258038 · Cited by 310
Five sources of bias in natural language processing
Hovy, D., & Prabhumoye, S. (2021) · Language and Linguistics Compass · doi:10.1111/lnc3.12432 · Cited by 298
Gender bias in artificial intelligence
Leavy, S. (2018) · doi:10.1145/3195570.3195580 · Cited by 285
Towards Fairness in Visual Recognition: Effective Strategies for Bias Mitigation
Wang, Z., Qinami, K., Karakozis, I. C., Genova, K., Nair, P., Hata, K., & Russakovsky, O. (2020) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00894 · Cited by 296
Chou, Y.-L., Moreira, C., Bruza, P., Ouyang, C., & Jorge, J. (2022) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2021.11.003 · Cited by 302
Should ChatGPT be biased? Challenges and risks of bias in large language models
Ferrara, E. (2023) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v28i11.13346 · Cited by 282
Should ChatGPT be Biased? Challenges and Risks of Bias in Large Language Models
Ferrara, E. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.03738 · Cited by 282
The Contribution of Data-Driven Technologies in Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals
Bachmann, N., Tripathi, S., Manuel, B., & Jodlbauer, H. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14052497 · Cited by 342
Discrimination through Optimization
Ali, M., Sapiezynski, P., Bogen, M., Korolova, A., Mislove, A., & Rieke, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3359301 · Cited by 268
Social Biases in NLP Models as Barriers for Persons with Disabilities
Hutchinson, B., Prabhakaran, V., Denton, E., Webster, K., Zhong, Y., & Denuyl, S. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.487 · Cited by 274
Participation Is not a Design Fix for Machine Learning
Sloane, M., Moss, E., Awomolo, O., & Forlano, L. (2022) · Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization · doi:10.1145/3551624.3555285 · Cited by 267
Gender Bias in Neural Natural Language Processing
Lu, K., Mardziel, P., Wu, F., Amancharla, P., & Datta, A. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-62077-6_14 · Cited by 284
How human–AI feedback loops alter human perceptual, emotional and social judgements
Glickman, M., & Sharot, T. (2024) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-024-02077-2 · Cited by 289
Digital governance: A conceptual framework and research agenda
Hanisch, M., Goldsby, C. M., Fabian, N. E., & Oehmichen, J. (2023) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113777 · Cited by 267
Timmons, A. C., Duong, J. B., Simo Fiallo, N., Lee, T., Vo, H. P. Q., Ahle, M. W., Comer, J. S., Brewer, L. C., Frazier, S. L., & Chaspari, T. (2023) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916221134490 · Cited by 263
Higher-Order Explanations of Graph Neural Networks via Relevant Walks
Schnake, T., Eberle, O., Lederer, J., Nakajima, S., Schütt, K. T., Müller, K., & Montavon, G. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2021.3115452 · Cited by 322
Adversarial Removal of Demographic Attributes from Text Data
Elazar, Y., & Goldberg, Y. (2018) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1002 · Cited by 307
Gonen, H., & Goldberg, Y. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1903.03862 · Cited by 242
Predictive biases in natural language processing models: A conceptual framework and overview
Shah, D. S., Schwartz, H. A., & Hovy, D. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.468 · Cited by 241
Ranking with Fairness ConstraintsPreprint
Celis, L. E., Straszak, D., & Vishnoi, N. K. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.4230/lipics.icalp.2018.28 · Cited by 344
Re-imagining Algorithmic Fairness in India and Beyond
Sambasivan, N., Arnesen, E., Hutchinson, B., Doshi, T., & Prabhakaran, V. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445896 · Cited by 228
“, [42, 218]), alongside testing strategies, e.”
REPAIR: Removing Representation Bias by Dataset Resampling
Li, Y., & Vasconcelos, N. M. (2019) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00980 · Cited by 245
Self-Diagnosis and Self-Debiasing: A Proposal for Reducing Corpus-Based Bias in NLP
Schick, T., Udupa, S., & Schütze, H. (2021) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00434 · Cited by 227
On the genealogy of machine learning datasets: A critical history of ImageNet
Denton, E., Hanna, A., Amironesei, R., Smart, A., & Nicole, H. (2021) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517211035955 · Cited by 221
Evaluating the Stability of Embedding-based Word Similarities
Antoniak, M., & Mimno, D. (2018) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00008 · Cited by 221
Counterfactual Data Augmentation for Mitigating Gender Stereotypes in Languages with Rich Morphology
Zmigrod, R., Mielke, S. J., Wallach, H., & Cotterell, R. (2019) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1161 · Cited by 290
A Survey of Text Representation and Embedding Techniques in NLP
Patil, R., Boit, S., Gudivada, V. N., & Nandigam, J. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3266377 · Cited by 276
Automated identification of media bias in news articles: an interdisciplinary literature review
Hamborg, F., Donnay, K., & Gipp, B. (2018) · International Journal on Digital Libraries · doi:10.1007/s00799-018-0261-y · Cited by 259
Roselli, D., Matthews, J., & Talagala, N. (2019) · Companion Proceedings of The 2019 World Wide Web Conference · doi:10.1145/3308560.3317590 · Cited by 237
Mind the GAP: A balanced corpus of gendered ambiguous pronouns
Webster, K., Recasens, M., Axelrod, V., & Baldridge, J. (2018) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00240 · Cited by 223
Post-hoc Interpretability for Neural NLP: A Survey
Madsen, A., Reddy, S., & Chandar, S. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3546577 · Cited by 283
Gender Diversity in STEM Disciplines: A Multiple Factor Problem
Botella, C., Rueda, S., López-Iñesta, E., & Marzal, P. (2019) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e21010030 · Cited by 242
Uncovering and Mitigating Algorithmic Bias through Learned Latent Structure
Amini, A., Soleimany, A. P., Schwarting, W., Bhatia, S. N., & Rus, D. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1145/3306618.3314243 · Cited by 206
Towards generalisable hate speech detection: a review on obstacles and solutions
Yin, W., & Zubiaga, A. (2021) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.598 · Cited by 238
Safe Latent Diffusion: Mitigating Inappropriate Degeneration in Diffusion Models
Schramowski, P., Brack, M., Deiseroth, B., & Kersting, K. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.02157 · Cited by 219
An Intersectional Definition of Fairness
Foulds, J. R., Islam, R., Keya, K. N., & Pan, S. (2020) · 2020 IEEE 36th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE) · doi:10.1109/icde48307.2020.00203 · Cited by 233
“A number of studies have subsequently demonstrated that bias and fairness issues in AI are both harmful and pervasive [1], [4], [5].”
BackgroundJW300: A Wide-Coverage Parallel Corpus for Low-Resource Languages
Agić, Ż., & Vulić, I. (2019) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1310 · Cited by 208
Trustworthy ai: A computational perspective
Liu, H., Wang, Y., Fan, W., Liu, X., Li, Y., Jain, S., Liu, Y., Jain, A., & Tang, J. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3546872 · Cited by 261
Chan, B., Schweter, S., & Möller, T. (2020) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.598 · Cited by 249
Naseem, U., Razzak, I., Khan, S. K., & Prasad, M. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing · doi:10.1145/3434237 · Cited by 194
Privacy Risks of General-Purpose Language Models
Pan, X., Zhang, M., Ji, S., & Yang, M. (2020) · 2020 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) · doi:10.1109/sp40000.2020.00095 · Cited by 188
The ethical implications of using generative chatbots in higher education
Williams, R. T. (2024) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2023.1331607 · Cited by 183
Integrating Ethics within Machine Learning Courses
Saltz, J., Skirpan, M. W., Fiesler, C. L., Gorelick, M., YEH, T. P., Heckman, R., Dewar, N., & Beard, N. (2019) · ACM Transactions on Computing Education · doi:10.1145/3341164 · Cited by 209
Explanation in AI and law: Past, present and future
Atkinson, K. M., Bench-Capon, T. J. M., & Bollegala, D. (2020) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2020.103387 · Cited by 214
Research Frontiers in Information Retrieval
Culpepper, J. S., Díaz, F., & Smucker, M. D. (2018) · ACM SIGIR Forum · doi:10.1145/3274784.3274788 · Cited by 191
Fisher, S., & Rosella, L. C. (2022) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-022-14422-z · Cited by 190
Evaluating the Underlying Gender Bias in Contextualized Word Embeddings
Basta, C., Costa-jussà, M. R., & Casas, N. (2019) · Proceedings of the First Workshop on Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/w19-3805 · Cited by 189
Causal Attention for Vision-Language Tasks
Yang, X., Zhang, H., Qi, G., & Cai, J. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00972 · Cited by 175
Metadata
- Authors
- Bolukbasi, T., Chang, K.-W., Zou, J., Saligrama, V., & Kalai, A.
- Affiliations
- Boston University (US)
- Microsoft Research New England (United States) (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2016
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1607.06520
- OpenAlex
- W2483215953
- Cited by
- 1,615
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 136 · 2024: 201 · 2023: 240 · 2022: 154 · 2021: 313 · 2020: 253 · 2019: 204 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- OpenBU (Boston University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Keywords
- gender bias, word embeddings, bias mitigation, gender stereotypes, gender neutrality, analogy tasks, concept clustering, Google News, crowdsourced evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
