The DOI matches its DataCite record; 12 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Solving General Arithmetic Word Problems
Open accessAbstract
This paper presents a novel approach to automatically solving arithmetic word problems. This is the first algorithmic approach that can handle arithmetic problems with multiple steps and operations, without depending on additional annotations or predefined templates. We develop a theory for expression trees that can be used to represent and evaluate the target arithmetic expressions; we use it to uniquely decompose the target arithmetic problem to multiple classification problems; we then compose an expression tree, combining these with world knowledge through a constrained inference framework. Our classifiers gain from the use of {\em quantity schemas} that supports better extraction of features. Experimental results show that our method outperforms existing systems, achieving state of the art performance on benchmark datasets of arithmetic word problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Table 6 shows that our optimized prompts also outperform baseline prompts with different scorer LLMs on these two benchmarks.”
From Large Language Models as Optimizers (2023) · cites this paper as Roy & Roth, 2016
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Learning to Automatically Solve Algebra Word Problems
Kushman, N., Zettlemoyer, L., Barzilay, R., & Artzi, Y. (2014) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.3115/v1/p14-1026 · Cited by 400 · cited 6×
“(Hos-seini et al., 2014) mentions the result of running the system of (Kushman et al., 2014) on AI2 dataset, and we report their result here.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe Importance of Syntactic Parsing and Inference in Semantic Role Labeling
Punyakanok, V., Roth, D., & Yih, W.-T. (2008) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli.2008.34.2.257 · Cited by 399 · cited 1×
“This has been successfully used to incorporate world knowledge at inference time, as well as getting around the need for large amounts of jointly annotated data for structured prediction (Roth and Yih, 2005; Punyakanok et al., 2005; Punyakanok et al., 2008; Clarke and Lapata, 2006; Barzilay and Lapata, 2006; Roy et al…”
MethodSelf-citationLearning to Solve Arithmetic Word Problems with Verb Categorization
Hosseini, M. J., Hajishirzi, H., Etzioni, O., & Kushman, N. (2014) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1058 · Cited by 324 · cited 8×
“(Hosseini et al., 2014) mentions the result of running the system of (Kushman et al.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialInteger linear programming inference for conditional random fields
Roth, D., & Yih, W.-T. (2005) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.1145/1102351.1102444 · Cited by 214 · cited 2×
“This has been successfully used to incorporate world knowledge at inference time, as well as getting around the need for large amounts of jointly annotated data for structured prediction (Roth and Yih, 2005; Punyakanok et al., 2005; Punyakanok et al., 2008; Clarke and Lapata, 2006; Barzilay and Lapata, 2006; Roy et al…”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationModeling Biological Processes for Reading Comprehension
Berant, J., Srikumar, V., Chen, P., Linden, A. V., Harding, B., Huang, B., Clark, P. E., & Manning, C. D. (2014) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1159 · Cited by 205 · cited 1×
“The system described in (Berant et al., 2014) attempts to automatically answer biology questions, by extracting the structure of biological processes from text.”
BackgroundReasoning about Quantities in Natural Language
Roy, S., Vieira, T., & Roth, D. (2015) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00118 · Cited by 133 · cited 6×
“For the IL dataset, we acquired the system of (Roy et al., 2015) from the authors, and ran it with the same fold information.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationStructured learning with constrained conditional models
Chang, M.-W., Ratinov, L., & Roth, D. (2012) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-012-5296-5 · Cited by 117 · cited 4×
“In particular, we use the L + I scheme of CCMs, which predicts structured output by independently learning several simple components, combining them at inference time.”
MethodInfluentialSelf-citationDiagram Understanding in Geometry Questions
Seo, M. J., Hajishirzi, H., Farhadi, A., & Etzioni, O. (2014) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v28i1.9146 · Cited by 105 · cited 1×
“There has also been efforts to solve geometry questions by jointly understanding diagrams and associated text (Seo et al., 2014).”
BackgroundElementary School Science and Math Tests as a Driver for AI: Take the Aristo Challenge!
Clark, P. (2015) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v29i2.19066 · Cited by 99 · cited 1×
“Our approach is related to work in understanding and solving elementary school standardized tests (Clark, 2015).”
MethodAggregation via Set Partitioning for Natural Language Generation
Barzilay, R., & Lapata, M. (2006) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.3115/1220835.1220881 · Cited by 94
Flagged first, then by citations
6 of the 18 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Y. Goldberg and M. Elhadad. 2010. An efficient algo- rithm for easy-first non-directional dependency pars- ing. In Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chap- ter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 742-750, Los Angeles, California, June.
- V. Punyakanok, D. Roth, and W. Yih. 2005. The ne- cessity of syntactic parsing for semantic role label- ing. In Proc. of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pages 1117-1123.
- D. Roth and W. Yih. 2004. A linear programming formulation for global inference in natural language tasks. In Hwee Tou Ng and Ellen Riloff, editors, Proc. of the Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL), pages 1-8. Associa- tion for Computational Linguistics.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 658
Towards Reasoning in Large Language Models via Multi-Agent Peer Review CollaborationPreprint
Xu, Z., Shi, S., Hu, B., Yu, J., Li, D., Zhang, M., & Wu, Y. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.08152 · Cited by 66
“• MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015): A set of math word problems requiring multiple reasoning steps and operations.”
BackgroundWhen do you need Chain-of-Thought Prompting for ChatGPT?Preprint
Chen, J., Chen, L., Huang, H., & Zhou, T. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.03262 · Cited by 88
“For example, a widely-used instruction for reasoning tasks is chain-of-thoughts (CoT) prompting (Kojima et al., 2022), which can improve GPT-3’s math reasoning accuracy from 17.7% to 78.7% (on MultiArith dataset (Roy and Roth, 2016)) by simply appending the instruction “Let’s think step-by-step” to each query.”
MethodInfluentialAnnotating Derivations: A New Evaluation Strategy and Dataset for Algebra Word Problems
Upadhyay, S., & Chang, M.-W. (2016) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/e17-1047 · Cited by 65
“For instance, certain solvers, like the one in (Roy and Roth, 2015), train a relevance classifier to identify which textual numbers are relevant to solving the word problem.”
BackgroundMath Word Problem Solving with Explicit Numerical Values
Wu, Q., Zhang, Q., Wei, Z., & Huang, X. (2021) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.455 · Cited by 48
“With the advancements in natural language processing, math word problem solving has received growing attention in recent years (Roy and Roth, 2015; Mitra and Baral, 2016; Ling et al., 2017; Huang et al., 2018).”
BackgroundMaking Language Models Better Reasoners with Step-Aware Verifier
Li, Y., Lin, Z., Zhang, S., Fu, Q., Chen, B., Lou, J.-G., & Chen, W. (2023) · Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.291 · Cited by 69
“7% ), MultiArith ( 99 .”
BackgroundMethodARB: Advanced Reasoning Benchmark for Large Language Models
Sawada, T., Paleka, D., Havrilla, A., Tadepalli, P., Vidas, P., Kranias, A., Nay, J. J., Gupta, K., & Komatsuzaki, A. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.13692 · Cited by 92
“…et al., 2021], SVAMP [Patel et al., 2021], ASDiv [Miao et al., 2020], AQuA [Ling et al., 2017], MAWPS [Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2016], MultiArith [Roy and Roth, 2016]) and commonsense reasoning tasks (e.g., CSQA [Talmor et al., 2018], StrategyQA [Geva et al., 2021], HotpotQA [Yang et al., 2018]).”
BackgroundRCOT: Detecting and Rectifying Factual Inconsistency in Reasoning by Reversing Chain-of-ThoughtPreprint
Xue, T., Wang, Z., Wang, Z., Han, C., Yu, P., & Ji, H. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.11499 · Cited by 25
“…Model for Reasoning Reasoning ability is a critical skill to solve complex problems, such as arithmetic reasoning (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2016; Roy & Roth, 2016; Miao et al., 2020; Cobbe et al., 2021b; Dua et al., 2019), logical reasoning (Yu et al., 2020), commonsense reasoning (Bhagavatula…”
BackgroundKnowledgeMath: Knowledge-Intensive Math Word Problem Solving in Finance Domains
Zhao, Y., Liu, H.-J., Long, Y.-T., Zhang, R., Zhao, C., & Cohan, A. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.09797 · Cited by 6
Let GPT be a Math Tutor: Teaching Math Word Problem Solvers with Customized Exercise GenerationPreprint
Liang, Z., Yu, W., Rajpurohit, T., Clark, P., Zhang, X., & Kalyan, A. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.14386 · Cited by 59
“(Roy et al., 2015), MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015), SingleEq (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015), and SimulEq (Kushman et al., 2014).”
BackgroundOut-of-Distribution Detection: A Task-Oriented Survey of Recent Advances
Lu, S., Wang, Y., Sheng, L., He, L., Zheng, A., & Liang, J. (2025) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3760390 · Cited by 50
“CIFAR-10 and Tiny ImageNet are standard datasets for in-distribution and OOD evaluation in this context.”
A Bottom-Up DAG Structure Extraction Model for Math Word Problems
Cao, Y., Hong, F., Li, H., & Luo, P. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i1.16075 · Cited by 54
“There are two categories of word problems (Roy and Roth 2015).”
BackgroundChain of Thought Prompting Elicits Knowledge Augmentation
Wu, D., Zhang, J., & Huang, X. (2023) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.01640 · Cited by 57
“We evaluate models’ performance using eleven benchmarks, including (i) commonsense reasoning (CSQA (Talmor et al., 2019), StrategyQA (Geva et al., 2021), Date Understanding, Sports Understanding (Srivastava et al., 2022)); (ii) arithmetic reasoning (AQUA-RAT (Ling et al., 2017), GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), SVAMP (Pate…”
MethodInfluentialGRACE: Discriminator-Guided Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
Khalifa, M., Logeswaran, L., Lee, M., Lee, H., & Wang, L. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.1022 · Cited by 31
“Table 10: The few-shot prompt used with LLaMA 7B for MultiArith.”
InfluentialWang, R., Li, H., Han, X., Zhang, Y.-X., & Baldwin, T. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.11651 · Cited by 56
LLM Harmony: Multi-Agent Communication for Problem SolvingPreprint
Rasal, S. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.01312 · Cited by 53
“Addressing such limitations necessitates an approach that goes beyond conventional methodologies [Rajani et al., 2019] [Ling et al., 2017] [Cobbe et al., 2021a] [Chiang and Chen, 2018] [Amini et al., 2019] [Chen et al., 2019] [Roy and Roth, 2016] [Lu et al., 2023] [Yao et al., 2022].”
MethodGetting MoRE out of Mixture of Language Model Reasoning Experts
Si, C., Shi, W., Zhao, C., Zettlemoyer, L., & Boyd-Graber, J. L. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.552 · Cited by 32
“…reasoning; HotpotQA (Yang et al., 2018), BeerQA (Qi et al., 2020), 4 and MuSiQue (Trivedi et al., 2021) for multihop reasoning; GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), and MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015) for mathematical reasoning; CommonsenseQA (CSQA) (Talmor et al., 2019), CSQA2.”
BackgroundInfluentialLearning to Solve Geometry Problems from Natural Language Demonstrations in Textbooks
Sachan, M., & Xing, E. P. (2017) · Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics · doi:10.18653/v1/s17-1029 · Cited by 37
Learning from Explicit and Implicit Supervision Jointly For Algebra Word Problems
Upadhyay, S., Chang, M.-W., Chang, K.-W., & Yih, W.-T. (2016) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1029 · Cited by 52
“Recently, Kushman et al. (2014) and Roth (2015) focused on how to solve arithmetic problems without using any pre-defined template.”
BackgroundQuery-Dependent Prompt Evaluation and Optimization with Offline Inverse RLPreprint
Sun, H., Hüyük, A., & van der Schaar, M. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.06553 · Cited by 37
“5-turbo, LLaMA-2-7B-Chat, and TigerBot-13B-Chat, across 3 arithmetic datasets: GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021a), MAWPS (Roy & Roth, 2016), and SVAMP(Patel et al., 2021) 2 T HE Q UERY -”
BackgroundMethodGenerate & Rank: A Multi-task Framework for Math Word Problems
Shen, J., Yin, Y., Li, L., Shang, L., Jiang, X., Zhang, M., & Liu, Q. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2021 · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.195 · Cited by 88
“Roy et al. (2015) proposes three types of classifiers to identify different elements of problems.”
Implicit Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Comprehensive SurveyPreprint
Li, J., Fu, Y., Li, F., Liu, J., Shu, Y., Qin, C., Yang, M., King, I., & Ying, R. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.02350 · Cited by 58
“…reasoning, out-of-distribution (OOD) evaluation GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), GSM-Hard (Gao et al., 2023), Multi-Arith (Roy & Roth, 2015), CommonsenseQA (Tal-mor et al., 2019) GitHub SynAdapt (Wang et al., 2025a) Adaptive reasoning, synthetic continuous CoT,…”
InfluentialDeep Reinforcement Learning Techniques in Diversified Domains: A Survey
Gupta, S., Singal, G., & Garg, D. (2021) · Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11831-021-09552-3 · Cited by 58
Equation Parsing : Mapping Sentences to Grounded Equations
Roy, S., Upadhyay, S., & Roth, D. (2016) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1117 · Cited by 50
“There has been a lot of recent work in automatic math word problem solving (Kushman et al., 2014; Roy et al., 2015; Hosseini et al., 2014; Roy and Roth, 2015).”
BackgroundSelf-citationYin, Z., Sun, Q., Guo, Q.-P., Zeng, Z.-Y., Li, X., Dai, J., Cheng, Q., Huang, X.-J., & Qiu, X.-P. (2024) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.131 · Cited by 50
“…a comprehensive analysis of UAG’s versatility and effectiveness: • Arithmetic Reasoning: This category includes GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015), SingleEq (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2016), AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), and AQUA (Ling et al.,…”
BackgroundPlan, Verify and Switch: Integrated Reasoning with Diverse X-of-Thoughts
Liu, T., Guo, Q., Yang, Y., Hu, X.-K., Zhang, Y., Qiu, X., & Zhang, Z. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.14628 · Cited by 49
“…≥ 2 ⋆ GSM-hard (Gao et al., 2022) 1,313 3.25 MATH (Hendrycks et al., 2021) 5,000 ≥ 3 ⋆ AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014) 395 1 SingleOP (Roy et al., 2015) 562 1 SingleEQ (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015) 508 1.31 MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015) 600 2 results in a failure in the verification process.”
InfluentialTang, X.-Y., Wang, X., Zhao, W., Lu, S., Li, Y.-L., & Wen, J.-R. (2024) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.17564 · Cited by 48
NumNet: Machine Reading Comprehension with Numerical Reasoning
Ran, Q., Lin, Y., Li, P., Zhou, J., & Liu, Z. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1251 · Cited by 108
“After that, Roy and Roth (2015) proposed an algorithmic approach which could handle arithmetic word problems with multiple steps and operations.”
Learning to Reason and Memorize with Self-Notes
Lanchantin, J., Toshniwal, S., Weston, J., Szlam, A., & Sukhbaatar, S. (2023) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.00833 · Cited by 47
“For the few-shot prompting, we consider two real-world math tasks that require solving multi-step elementary-level arithmetic word problems: MultiArith [18] and GSM8K [19].”
MethodMCC-KD: Multi-CoT Consistent Knowledge Distillation
Chen, H., Wu, S., Quan, X., Wang, R., Yan, M., & Zhang, J. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.14747 · Cited by 45
“…out-of-distribution (OOD) mathematical reasoning benchmarks to assess the OOD generalization capability, including SingleEq (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015), AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014), and Multi-Arith (Roy and Roth, 2015) from the Math World Problem Repository (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2016).”
BackgroundMethodKim, B., Ki, K. S., Lee, D., & Gweon, G. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.308 · Cited by 45
“…of an operand token, researchers built hand-crafted features that capture the semantic content of a word, such as the unit of a given number (Roy and Roth, 2015; Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015; Zhou et al., 2015; Upadhyay et al., 2016; Roy and Roth, 2017) or dependency relationship between…”
BackgroundMethodMathAttack: Attacking Large Language Models Towards Math Solving Ability
Zhou, Z., Wang, Q., Jin, M., Yao, J., Ye, J.-N., Liu, W., Wang, W., Huang, X.-W., & Huang, K. (2023) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.01686 · Cited by 44
“Datasets Two math word problems benchmark datasets GSM8K (Cobbe et al. 2021) and MultiArith (Roy and Roth 2015) are adopted in the experiments.”
MethodInfluentialAn Empirical Investigation of Contextualized Number Prediction
Berg-Kirkpatrick, T., & Spokoyny, D. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.385 · Cited by 38
“algebraic word problems (Ling et al., 2017; Roy and Roth, 2016; Zhang et al., 2019), building novel neural modules to directly learn numerical oper-”
BackgroundSelf-Refine Instruction-Tuning for Aligning Reasoning in Language Models
Ranaldi, L., & Freitas, A. (2024) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.139 · Cited by 43
“MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015) covers a set of multi-step arithmetic reasoning tasks, while GSM8k (Cobbe et al., 2021) covers primary school-level mathematical problems.”
BackgroundEnhancing Chain of Thought Prompting in Large Language Models via Reasoning Patterns
Zhang, Y., Wang, X., Wu, L.-X., & Wang, J. (2024) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v39i24.34793 · Cited by 43
“For tasks MultiArith, AddSub, SingleEq, and SVAMP, we define the set of operation tokens based on a glossary from Wikipedia, as the operations involved are relatively straight-forward.”
InfluentialSciInstruct: a Self-Reflective Instruction Annotated Dataset for Training Scientific Language Models
Zhang, D., Du, Z., Zhoubian, S., Du, Z., Yang, K., Wang, Z., Yue, Y., Dong, Y., & Tang, J. (2024) · neural information processing systems · doi:10.52202/079017-0046 · Cited by 60
“In the past, the emphasis in mathematical reasoning tasks was primarily on fundamental arithmetic reasoning datasets [44; 45; 46], addressing basic mathematical problems such as AddSub [47].”
Improving Math Word Problems with Pre-trained Knowledge and Hierarchical Reasoning
Yu, W., Wen, Y., Zheng, F., & Xiao, N. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.272 · Cited by 37
“…learning methods (Kushman et al., 2014; Mitra and Baral, 2016; Roy and Roth, 2018; Zou and Lu, 2019), semantic parsing meth-ods (Shi et al., 2015; Roy and Roth, 2015; Huang et al., 2017) and deep learning methods (Ling et al., 2017a; Wang et al., 2018b; Liu et al., 2019b; Wang et al., 2017;…”
MethodPersonality Alignment of Large Language ModelsPreprint
Zhu, M., Weng, Y., Yang, L., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.11779 · Cited by 44
“…across eight datasets: GSM8K, CommonSenseQA, AddSub, MultiArith, SVAMP, BigBench-Date, StrategyQA, and Coin Flip (Hosseini et al., 2014; Talmor et al., 2018; Arkil et al., 2021; Cobbe et al., 2021; Suzgun et al., 2022; Roy & Roth, 2016; Wei et al., 2022b; Kojima et al., 2022; Weng et al., 2024b).”
Self-Training with Direct Preference Optimization Improves Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
Wang, T., Li, S., & Lu, W. (2024) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.18248 · Cited by 41
“We select Flan-T5 over the original T5 models (Raffel et al., 2019) as our backbone models based on the evidence from previous research (Chung et al., 2024; Fu et al., 2023), which demonstrates that instruction-tuned models like Flan-T5 outperform their pre-trained counterparts in mathematical…”
MethodText2Math: End-to-end Parsing Text into Math Expressions
Zou, Y., & Lu, W. (2019) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1536 · Cited by 25
“Following prior works (Roy and Roth, 2015; Liang et al., 2018), we focus on two commonly-used benchmark datasets for arithmetic word problems, AI2 (Hosseini et al.”
MethodInfluentialSTITCH: Simultaneous Thinking and Talking with Chunked Reasoning for Spoken Language Models
Chiang, C.-H., Wang, X., Li, L., Lin, C.-C., Lin, K., Liu, S., Wang, Z.-D., Yang, Z.-Y., Lee, H.-Y., & Wang, L. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.15375 · Cited by 39
“We include five math reasoning datasets: AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014), Sin-glEq (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015), MultiArith (Roy & Roth, 2015), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), and GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), which are commonly used to evaluate the math reasoning ability of LLMs (Wei et al., 2022;…”
Mitigating reasoning hallucination through Multi-agent Collaborative Filtering
Shi, J., Zhao, J., Wu, X., Xu, R., Jiang, Y.-H., & He, L. (2024) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125723 · Cited by 34
Pternea, M., Singh, P., Chakraborty, A., Oruganti, Y. D., Milletari, M., Bapat, S., & Jiang, K. (2024) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.15960 · Cited by 44
“Sun [115] Arithmetic reasoning (MultiArith [108], GSM8K [33], SVAM [93]) Perez et al. [96] Question-Answering 1.”
Zhu, X., Qi, B., Zhang, K., Long, X., Lin, Z., & Zhou, B. (2024) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.naacl-long.142 · Cited by 45
Boosting Large Language Models with Socratic Method for Conversational Mathematics Teaching
Ding, Y., Hu, H., Zhou, J., Chen, Q., Jiang, B., & He, L. (2024) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3627673.3679881 · Cited by 29
“The studies about mathematical AI (math word problems) are divided into three parts: statistical learning-based methodologies [34, 56], traditional machine learning techniques [23, 41, 42] and deep learning-based methods [14, 47].”
Background(2021) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.53 · Cited by 78
“There exist several NLP datasets on math word problems (Amini et al., 2019; Saxton et al., 2019; Roy and Roth, 2015; Hendrycks et al., 2021).”
Background“Math word problem generation with mathematical consistency and problem context constraints,”
Wang, Z., Lan, A., & Baraniuk, R. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.484 · Cited by 39
“Most prior works focus on automatically answering MWPs, e.g., (Li et al., 2019, 2020; Qin et al., 2020; Shi et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2018a; Roy and Roth, 2015; Wu et al., 2020a) instead of generating them (Nandhini and Balasundaram, 2011; Williams, 2011; Polozov et al., 2015; Deane and Sheehan,…”
BackgroundInvestigating Math Word Problems using Pretrained Multilingual Language Models
Tan, M., Wang, L., Jiang, L., & Jiang, J. (2022) · Workshop on Mathematical Natural Language Processing (MathNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.mathnlp-1.2 · Cited by 33
“MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015) includes problems with multiple steps which we listed all the seven types in Table 1.”
BackgroundA Tree-of-Thoughts to Broaden Multi-step Reasoning across Languages
Ranaldi, L., Pucci, G., Ranaldi, F., Ruzzetti, E. S., & Zanzotto, F. M. (2024) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-naacl.78 · Cited by 4
“…learning abilities (Brown et al., 2020; Wei et al., 2022; Min et al., 2022) to guide LLMs to generate desired task responses, marking the advent of the prompting era and surpassing the age of the intermediate steps in algorithmic and structured reasoning (Roy and Roth, 2015; Ling et al., 2017).”
BackgroundBreak the Chain: Large Language Models Can be Shortcut ReasonersPreprint
Ding, M., Liu, H., Fu, Z., Song, J., Xie, W., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.06580 · Cited by 28
“SingleEq and AddSub feature relatively straightforward problems that can be solved without multi-step reasoning, whereas MultiArith, AQUA-RAT, GSM8K, and SVAMP require more intricate, sequential problem-solving.”
MethodInfluentialA Framework for Solving Explicit Arithmetic Word Problems and Proving Plane Geometry Theorems
Yu, X., Wang, M.-S., Gan, W.-B., He, B., & Ye, N. (2019) · International journal of pattern recognition and artificial intelligence · doi:10.1142/s0218001419400056 · Cited by 35
SemEval-2019 Task 10: Math Question Answering
Hopkins, M., Bras, R. J. L., Petrescu-Prahova, C., Stanovsky, G., Hajishirzi, H., & Koncel-Kedziorski, R. (2019) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/s19-2153 · Cited by 26
“Existing datasets are either scraped from the web and filtered (Kushman et al., 2014; Hosseini et al., 2014; Roy and Roth, 2015; Shi et al., 2015) or crowdsourced (Ling et al., 2017).”
BackgroundMethodHuman-in-the-Loop through Chain-of-ThoughtPreprint
Cai, Z., Chang, B., & Han, W. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.07932 · Cited by 42
“, 2014], MultiArith [Roy and Roth, 2016], SingleEq [Koncel-Kedziorski et al.”
Distilling mathematical reasoning capabilities into Small Language Models
Zhu, X., Li, J., Liu, Y., Ma, C., & Wang, W. (2024) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2024.106594 · Cited by 29
“The reasoning performance of these SLMs is assessed on the GSM8K test dataset, as well as ASDiv, SVAMP, and MultiArith.”
Method“A theme-rewriting approach for generating algebra word problems,”
Koncel-Kedziorski, R., Konstas, I., Zettlemoyer, L., & Hajishirzi, H. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1168 · Cited by 30
“tomatically solving math word problems. Specific topics include number word problems (Shi et al., 2015), logic puzzle problems (Mitra and Baral, 2015), arithmetic word problems (Hosseini et al., 2014; Roy and Roth, 2015), algebra word problems (Kushman et al., 2014; Zhou et al., 2015; Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015a; R…”
BackgroundAdaptive-Solver Framework for Dynamic Strategy Selection in Large Language Model Reasoning
Zhou, J., Zhong, W.-J., Wang, Y., & Wang, J. (2023) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.01446 · Cited by 32
“Arithmetic Reasoning : GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021a), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), AQuA (Ling et al., 2017), AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014), SingleEq (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015) and Multi-Arith (Roy & Roth, 2015); Commonsense Reasoning : CSQA (Talmor et al., 2019); Symbolic Reasoning : Last Letter Concatenation (LLC…”
RODA: Reverse Operation Based Data Augmentation for Solving Math Word Problems
Liu, Q., Guan, W., Li, S., Cheng, F., Kawahara, D., & Kurohashi, S. (2021) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2021.3126932 · Cited by 21
“2) Datasets: Early datasets of MWP solving were designed for rule-based methods and are relatively small [11], [26], [27].”
BackgroundPromptbreeder: Self-Referential Self-Improvement via Prompt Evolution
Fernando, C., Banarse, D., Michalewski, H., Osindero, S., & Rocktäschel, T. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.16797 · Cited by 31
LogicAsker: Evaluating and Improving the Logical Reasoning Ability of Large Language Models
Wan, Y., Wang, W., Yang, Y., Yuan, Y., Huang, J.-T., He, P.-J., Jiao, W., & Lyu, M. R. (2024) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.128 · Cited by 31
“These include arithmetic (Cobbe et al., 2021; Hendrycks et al., 2021; Amini et al., 2019; Patel et al., 2021; Miao et al., 2020; Ling et al., 2017; Roy and Roth, 2016), common-sense (Talmor et al., 2019; Geva et al., 2021; Clark et al., 2018), symbolic (Wei et al., 2022b), and table reasoning (Nan…”
BackgroundNudging: Inference-time Alignment of LLMs via Guided Decoding
Fei, Y., Razeghi, Y., & Singh, S. (2025) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.623 · Cited by 1
“• Math reasoning (GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015)): Arithmetic or word-problem solving.”
ChatGPT Rates Natural Language Explanation Quality like Humans: But on Which Scales?
Huang, F., Kwak, H., Park, K., & An, J.-S. (2024) · International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.17368 · Cited by 30
Jiang, C., Nian, Z., Guo, K., Chu, S., Zhao, Y., Shen, L., & Tu, K. (2020) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.235 · Cited by 27
“…of research has been done trying to solve math problems, using either manually designed features and rules (Roy et al., 2015; Mitra & Baral, 2016; Roy & Roth, 2016; Upadhyay et al., 2016) or sequence-to-sequence neural networks Wang et al. (2017), but the quantity of numerals is not important in…”
MethodAdaptive Graph Pruning for Multi-Agent Communication
Li, B., Zhao, Z., Lee, D.-H., & Wang, G. (2025) · European Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.02951 · Cited by 29
“We also select Multi-Arith [30], SVAMP [26], and AQuA [24], which are diverse in terms of language patterns and problem types, and is used to evaluate the model’s ability to solve mathematical word problems; (3) For code generation , we evaluate on HumanEval [6], which consists of 164 original…”
Back Attention: Understanding and Enhancing Multi-Hop Reasoning in Large Language Models
Yu, Z., Belinkov, Y., & Ananiadou, S. (2025) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.10835 · Cited by 29
“Then we do experiments on 5 reasoning datasets 1-Digit-Composite (1DC, 1,640 cases) (Brown, 2020), SVAMP (1,000 cases) (Patel et al., 2021), MultiArith (MA, 600 cases) (Roy and Roth, 2016), TwoHop (3,484 cases) (Biran et al., 2024), and StrategyQA (SQA, 2,290 cases) (Geva et al., 2021).”
Zhong, Q., Wang, K., Xu, Z., Ding, L., Liu, J., & Du, B. (2025) · Frontiers of Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s11704-025-41102-z · Cited by 17
“…we also evaluate it on several reasoning tasks in the other domains, Dataset Domain # Samples Answer Type GSM8K [12] Math 1319 Number MultiArith [44] Math 600 Number AddSub [31] Math 395 Number SVAMP [29] Math 1000 Number SingleEq [45] Math 508 Number AQuA [30] Math 254 Option Last Letters [7]…”
Mathematical Language Models: A Survey
Liu, W., Hu, H., Zhou, J., Ding, Y., Li, J., Zeng, J., He, M., Chen, Q., Jiang, B., Zhou, A., et al. (2025) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3773985 · Cited by 47
“− → − so L.H.S not equal to R.H.S with option B. p ( a ) = a/ 2 and p ( b ) = b/ 2 L.H.S = a/ 2 b/ 2 1 / 2( a b ) Each document in this dataset contains multiple tables and longer unstructured by fine-grained annotations of reasoning processes and supporting facts numerical reasoning.”
InfluentialWhen Do Program-of-Thoughts Work for Reasoning?Preprint
Bi, Z., Zhang, N.-Y., Jiang, Y.-N., Deng, S.-M., Zheng, G.-Z., & Chen, H.-J. (2023) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.15452 · Cited by 29
“The evaluation is performed on AsDiv (Miao, Liang, and Su 2020), GSM8K (Cobbe et al. 2021), MultiArith (Roy and Roth 2015) and SVAMP (Patel, Bhattamishra, and Goyal 2021), with a selection of 500 instances randomly chosen from each original testset to form the new testsets.”
MethodLi, W., Hacid, H., Almazrouei, E., & Debbah, M. A. (2023) · AI · doi:10.3390/ai4030039 · Cited by 37
Neural Mathematical Solver with Enhanced Formula Structure
Huang, Z.-Y., Liu, Q., Gao, W., Wu, J., Yin, Y., Wang, H., & Chen, E.-H. (2020) · Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3397271.3401227 · Cited by 29
“Along this line, research works have attempted many methods, such as statistical learning [7], and deep learning models [13].”
MethodUsing Intermediate Representations to Solve Math Word Problems
Huang, D., Yao, J.-G., Lin, C.-Y., Zhou, Q. S., & Yin, J. P. (2018) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-1039 · Cited by 26
“Roy and Roth (2015); Roy et al. (2016) leverage the tree structure of equations.”
BackgroundPaD: Program-aided Distillation Specializes Large Models in ReasoningPreprint
Zhu, X., Qi, B., Zhang, K., Long, X.-W., & Zhou, B.-W. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.13888 · Cited by 29
Locking Down the Finetuned LLMs Safety
Zhu, M.-J., Yang, L.-Y., Wei, Y., Zhang, N.-Y., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.10343 · Cited by 28
“…include a diverse set of benchmarks (Hosseini et al., 2014; Talmor et al., 2018; Arkil et al., 2021; Cobbe et al., 2021; Suzgun et al., 2022; Roy & Roth, 2016; Wei et al., 2022b; Kojima et al., 2022; Weng et al., 2024; Zheng et al., 2023; Dubois et al., 2023): AddSub, AQUA, CommonSenseQA,…”
BackgroundDeductive Beam Search: Decoding Deducible Rationale for Chain-of-Thought ReasoningPreprint
Zhu, T., Zhang, K., Xie, J., & Su, Y. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.17686 · Cited by 22
“Following Li et al. (2023) and Ling et al. (2023), we choose GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), AQuA (Ling et al., 2017), Sin-gleEq (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015), and MultiArith (Roy & Roth, 2016) for evaluation.”
MethodReasoning on a Spectrum: Aligning LLMs to System 1 and System 2 ThinkingPreprint
Ziabari, A. S., Ghazizadeh, N., Sourati, Z., Karimi-Malekabadi, F., Piray, P., & Dehghani, M. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.12470 · Cited by 24
“We evaluate our models on 13 reasoning benchmarks across three different categories: (1) arithmetic reasoning: MultiArith (Roy & Roth, 2015), GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014), AQUA-RAT (Ling et al., 2017), SingleEq (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015), and SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021); (2) commonse…”
InfluentialData-Driven Methods for Solving Algebra Word ProblemsPreprint
Robaidek, B., Koncel-Kedziorski, R., & Hajishirzi, H. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1804.10718 · Cited by 27
“Works such has Roy and Roth (2015) and Koncel-Kedziorski et al. (2015) treat arithmetic word problem templates as equation trees and perform efficient tree-search by learning how to combine quantities using textual information.”
BackgroundGeoSense: Evaluating Identification and Application of Geometric Principles in Multimodal ReasoningPreprint
Xu, L., Zhao, Y., Wang, J., Wang, Y., Bu, P., Chen, W., Zhang, M., Gu, J., Li, X., Zhu, X., et al. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.12597 · Cited by 29
“Mathematical reasoning has become a pivotal area within contemporary AI research, posing significant challenges for LLMs and MLLMs. Initially, datasets in this domain targeted elementary algebra[15] and arithmetic word problems[33], which were relatively limited in scope and number.”
Distilling Reasoning Ability From Large Language Models With Adaptive Thinking
Chen, X., Zhou, S., Liang, K., & Liu, X. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2025.3591266 · Cited by 20
“…complex reasoning datasets divided into four classes are used to evaluate the proposed method: arithmetic (SingleEq [63], AddSub [64], MultiArith [65], GSM8K [31], Aqua [66], Svamp [67]), symbolic [68] (Last Letter Concatenation, Coin Flip), common sense (Common-SenseQA [69], StrategyQA [70]),…”
Elazar, Y., & Goldberg, Y. (2019) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00280 · Cited by 20
“Numeric expressions play an important role in various tasks, including textual entailment (Lev et al., 2004; Dagan et al., 2013), solving arithmetic problems (Roy and Roth, 2015), numeric reasoning (Roy et al., 2015; Trask et al., 2018) and language modeling (Spithourakis and Riedel, 2018).”
BackgroundA Meaning-Based Statistical English Math Word Problem Solver
Liang, C.-C., Wong, Y.-S., Lin, Y., & Su, K. (2018) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1060 · Cited by 23
“This category can be further divided into two subtypes: (a) Without understanding (Roy and Roth, 2015; Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015; Huang et al., 2017; Shrivastava et al., 2017), which does not check the entity-attribute consistency between each quantity and the target of the given question; and (b) With understand…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSolving Math Word Problem via Cooperative Reasoning induced Language Models
Zhu, X., Wang, J., Zhang, L., Zhang, Y., Gan, R., Zhang, J., & Yang, Y. (2022) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.16257 · Cited by 26
“, 2016), c: UNITDEP (Roy and Roth, 2017), d: Relevance and LCA operation classifier (Roy and Roth, 2015).”
BackgroundSolving Arithmetic Mathematical Word Problems: A Review and Recent Advancements
Mandal, S., & Naskar, S. (2017) · International Conference on Information Technology and Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-7590-2_7 · Cited by 26
de Araujo, P. H. L., Röttger, P., Hovy, D., & Roth, B. (2025) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.1364 · Cited by 27
Zhang, Y., Chen, Q.-G., Zhou, J.-X., Wang, P., Si, J.-S., Wang, J., Lu, W., & Qin, L.-B. (2024) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.04463 · Cited by 25
“…used comprehensive datasets, including GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), GSM-Hard (Gao et al., 2023), Al-gebra (He-Yueya et al., 2023), MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015), SingleEQ (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015), SingleOP (Roy et al., 2015), AddSub (Hos-seini et al., 2014), and SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021).”
Polymath: A Challenging Multi-modal Mathematical Reasoning BenchmarkPreprint
Gupta, H., Verma, S., Anantheswaran, U., Scaria, K. J., Parmar, M., Mishra, S. R., & Baral, C. R. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.14702 · Cited by 25
“Initial datasets addressed basic algebraic (Hendrycks et al., 2021b) and arithmetic (Roy & Roth, 2016) word problems with limited scope.”
Yu, X., Lyu, X., Peng, R., & Shen, J. (2022) · Complex & Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1007/s40747-022-00828-0 · Cited by 25
“RoyAlg is reported in [23], being a representative algorithm among the multiple algorithms in this approach [20–23].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMini-Omni-Reasoner: Token-Level Thinking-in-Speaking in Large Speech Models
Xie, Z., Ma, Z.-Y., Liu, Z., Pang, K., Li, H.-Y., Zhang, J., Liao, Y., Ye, D., Miao, C.-Y., & Yan, S.-C. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.15827 · Cited by 24
“The Contextual Reasoning category contains everyday word problems requiring interpretation of short narratives and arithmetic reasoning, further divided into single-step problems from AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014; Mishra et al., 2022) and Sin-gleOp (Roy & Roth, 2016) datasets and multi-step problems from GSM8K (Cobbe…”
Chen, X., Zhou, S.-H., Liang, K., Sun, X., & Liu, X.-W. (2025) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.18642 · Cited by 24
“For this point, strategies such as simulated annealing can be employed to avoid local optima (see Appendix H). metic (SingleEq (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015), AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014), MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015), Svamp (Patel et al., 2021)), Symbolic (Last Letter Concatenation (Kojima et al., 2022)), Comm…”
Step-by-Step Reasoning for Math Problems via Twisted Sequential Monte CarloPreprint
Feng, S., Kong, X., Ma, S., Zhang, A., Yin, D., Wang, C., Pang, R., & Yang, Y. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.01920 · Cited by 9
“Since the answer format of Multiarith is identical to that of GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), consisting of integer numbers, we directly utilize the generators and reward/value models trained on GSM8K to evaluate this dataset.”
Auto-ICL: In-Context Learning without Human Supervision
Yang, J., Ma, S.-M., & Wei, F.-R. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.09263 · Cited by 24
“No Task Zero-Shot Others 1 TOMI1 Among A through C, the answer is Therefore, among A through C, the answer is 2 TOMI2 Among A through C, the answer is Therefore, among A through C, the answer is 3 SocialIQA Among A through C, the answer is Therefore, among A through C, the answer is 4 Coin Flip The answer (Yes or No)…”
MethodInfluentialLin, L., Fu, J., Liu, P., Li, Q., Gong, Y., Wan, J., Zhang, F., Wang, Z., Zhang, D., & Gai, K. (2024) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.230 · Cited by 15
“…finetuing SOTA baselines are obtained from: a : GPT-3 175B finetuned plus an additional 175B verifier (Cobbe et al., 2021), b : Relevance and LCA operation classifier (Roy and Roth, 2015), c : (Pi et al., 2022), d : DeBERTaV3-large + KEAR (Xu et al., 2021), e : UnifiedQA-FT (Khashabi et al., 2020).”
MethodTong, Y.-Q., Wang, Y.-F., Li, D., Wang, S.-Z., Lin, Z., Han, S.-M., & Shang, J. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.12342 · Cited by 24
“Prominent benchmarks in mathematical reasoning include the grade school math problem GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), math word problems SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), and two algebraic word problems AQuA (Ling et al., 2017), MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2016 Commonsense reasoning emerges as a pivotal area.”
BackgroundLearning a Structural Causal Model for Intuition Reasoning in Conversation
Chen, H., Liao, B., Luo, J., Zhu, W., & Yang, X. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2024.3352575 · Cited by 19
“A question example from an arithmetic reasoning dataset [9] can illustrate this: Q : A chef needs to cook 15 potatoes.”
BackgroundChen, Y.-C., Arkin, J., Hao, Y.-L., Zhang, Y., Roy, N., & Fan, C.-C. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.08702 · Cited by 25
“These approaches have been evaluated on relatively simple one-step tasks, such as mathematical calculations (Roy & Roth, 2016; Cobbe et al., 2021), instruction induction (Honovich et al., 2022), and factual analysis (Wu et al., 2023b).”
MethodXu, M., Niyato, D. T., & Brinton, C. G. (2025) · Globecom · doi:10.1109/globecom59602.2025.11432543 · Cited by 7
Embedding Trajectory for Out-of-Distribution Detection in Mathematical Reasoning
Wang, Y., Zhang, P., Yang, B., Wong, D. F., Zhang, P., & Wang, R. (2024) · neural information processing systems · doi:10.52202/079017-1360 · Cited by 4
“For the ID dataset, we use the MultiArith [44], which consists of Math Word Problems on arithmetic reasoning.”
MethodNumGPT: Improving Numeracy Ability of Generative Pre-trained ModelsPreprint
Jin, Z., Jiang, X., Wang, X., Liu, Q., Wang, Y., Ren, X., & Qu, H. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.03137 · Cited by 21
“Besides, we adopt Byte-Pair Encoding (BPE) (Sennrich, Haddow, and Birch 2016) to tokenize the regular text.”
MethodSemantic Parsing of Pre-university Math Problems
Matsuzaki, T., Ito, T., Iwane, H., Anai, H., & Arai, N. (2017) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p17-1195 · Cited by 23
“Past studies have mainly targeted at primary school level arithmetic word problems (Bobrow, 1964; Charniak, 1969; Kushman et al., 2014; Hos-seini et al., 2014; Shi et al., 2015; Roy and Roth, 2015; Zhou et al., 2015; Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015; Mitra and Baral, 2016; Upadhyay et al., 2016).”
BackgroundDeductive Verification of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
Ling, Z., Fang, Y., Li, X., Huang, Z., Lee, M., Memisevic, R., & Su, H. (2023) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 · doi:10.52202/075280-1580 · Cited by 44
“Using language models to evaluate model generations has been a long standing idea [22, 36, 40, 4].”
BackgroundRender-of-Thought: Rendering Textual Chain-of-Thought as Images for Visual Latent Reasoning
Wang, Y., Li, S., Li, P., Yang, X.-C., Tang, Y., & Wei, Z. (2026) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.14750 · Cited by 22
“…the robustness of our model on three Out-of-Distribution (OOD) datasets: (1) GSM-Hard (Gao et al., 2023), which is a difficult variant of GSM8k with more than 1k test samples, as well as (2) SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021) and (3) MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015), which are simpler reasoning datasets.”
InfluentialFailure-Driven Workflow Refinement
Zhang, J., Cai, K., Zeng, Q., Liu, N., Fan, S., Chen, Z., & Wang, K.-Z. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.10035 · Cited by 22
“We evaluate CE-Graph on six public benchmarks across three domains: (1) math reasoning (GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), MATH (Hendrycks et al., 2021), Multi-Arith (Roy & Roth, 2015)); (2) code generation (HumanEval, MBPP) (Chen et al., 2021; Austin et al., 2021); and (3) tool use (GAIA) (Mialon et al., 2023).”
Zhang, X., Zhao, J., Yang, Z., Zhong, Y., Guan, S., Cao, L., & Wang, Y. (2025) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.20154 · Cited by 22
“…arithmetic word problems that require multiple operation steps like addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division to reach the solution (Roy and Roth, 2015); 3) the SVAMP dataset consists of arithmetic word problems up to grade 4 level, which is obtained by modifying existing datasets…”
Metadata
- Authors
- Roy, S., & Roth, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Corresponding author
- Roth, Dan
- ORCID
- Roth, Dan
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2016
- Pages
- 1743-1752
- arXiv
- 1608.01413
- OpenAlex
- W2251935656
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12
- FWCI
- 9.02
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (FA8750-13-2-0008, FA8750)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
- Keywords
- arithmetic word problems, automated problem solving, expression trees, constrained inference, world knowledge, feature extraction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review