The DOI matches its DataCite record; 12 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Solving General Arithmetic Word Problems
Open accessAbstract
This paper presents a novel approach to automatically solving arithmetic word problems. This is the first algorithmic approach that can handle arithmetic problems with multiple steps and operations, without depending on additional annotations or predefined templates. We develop a theory for expression trees that can be used to represent and evaluate the target arithmetic expressions; we use it to uniquely decompose the target arithmetic problem to multiple classification problems; we then compose an expression tree, combining these with world knowledge through a constrained inference framework. Our classifiers gain from the use of {\em quantity schemas} that supports better extraction of features. Experimental results show that our method outperforms existing systems, achieving state of the art performance on benchmark datasets of arithmetic word problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Table 6 shows that our optimized prompts also outperform baseline prompts with different scorer LLMs on these two benchmarks.”
From Large Language Models as Optimizers (2023) · cites this paper as Roy & Roth, 2016
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Learning to Automatically Solve Algebra Word Problems
Kushman, N., Zettlemoyer, L., Barzilay, R., & Artzi, Y. (2014) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.3115/v1/p14-1026 · Cited by 400 · cited 6×
“(Hos-seini et al., 2014) mentions the result of running the system of (Kushman et al., 2014) on AI2 dataset, and we report their result here.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe Importance of Syntactic Parsing and Inference in Semantic Role Labeling
Punyakanok, V., Roth, D., & Yih, W.-T. (2008) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli.2008.34.2.257 · Cited by 399 · cited 1×
“This has been successfully used to incorporate world knowledge at inference time, as well as getting around the need for large amounts of jointly annotated data for structured prediction (Roth and Yih, 2005; Punyakanok et al., 2005; Punyakanok et al., 2008; Clarke and Lapata, 2006; Barzilay and Lapata, 2006; Roy et al…”
MethodSelf-citationLearning to Solve Arithmetic Word Problems with Verb Categorization
Hosseini, M. J., Hajishirzi, H., Etzioni, O., & Kushman, N. (2014) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1058 · Cited by 324 · cited 8×
“(Hosseini et al., 2014) mentions the result of running the system of (Kushman et al.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialInteger linear programming inference for conditional random fields
Roth, D., & Yih, W.-T. (2005) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.1145/1102351.1102444 · Cited by 214 · cited 2×
“This has been successfully used to incorporate world knowledge at inference time, as well as getting around the need for large amounts of jointly annotated data for structured prediction (Roth and Yih, 2005; Punyakanok et al., 2005; Punyakanok et al., 2008; Clarke and Lapata, 2006; Barzilay and Lapata, 2006; Roy et al…”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationModeling Biological Processes for Reading Comprehension
Berant, J., Srikumar, V., Chen, P., Linden, A. V., Harding, B., Huang, B., Clark, P. E., & Manning, C. D. (2014) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1159 · Cited by 205 · cited 1×
“The system described in (Berant et al., 2014) attempts to automatically answer biology questions, by extracting the structure of biological processes from text.”
BackgroundReasoning about Quantities in Natural Language
Roy, S., Vieira, T., & Roth, D. (2015) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00118 · Cited by 133 · cited 6×
“For the IL dataset, we acquired the system of (Roy et al., 2015) from the authors, and ran it with the same fold information.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationStructured learning with constrained conditional models
Chang, M.-W., Ratinov, L., & Roth, D. (2012) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-012-5296-5 · Cited by 117 · cited 4×
“In particular, we use the L + I scheme of CCMs, which predicts structured output by independently learning several simple components, combining them at inference time.”
MethodInfluentialSelf-citationDiagram Understanding in Geometry Questions
Seo, M. J., Hajishirzi, H., Farhadi, A., & Etzioni, O. (2014) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v28i1.9146 · Cited by 105 · cited 1×
“There has also been efforts to solve geometry questions by jointly understanding diagrams and associated text (Seo et al., 2014).”
BackgroundElementary School Science and Math Tests as a Driver for AI: Take the Aristo Challenge!
Clark, P. (2015) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v29i2.19066 · Cited by 99 · cited 1×
“Our approach is related to work in understanding and solving elementary school standardized tests (Clark, 2015).”
MethodAggregation via Set Partitioning for Natural Language Generation
Barzilay, R., & Lapata, M. (2006) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.3115/1220835.1220881 · Cited by 94
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Y. Goldberg and M. Elhadad. 2010. An efficient algo- rithm for easy-first non-directional dependency pars- ing. In Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chap- ter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 742-750, Los Angeles, California, June.
- V. Punyakanok, D. Roth, and W. Yih. 2005. The ne- cessity of syntactic parsing for semantic role label- ing. In Proc. of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pages 1117-1123.
- D. Roth and W. Yih. 2004. A linear programming formulation for global inference in natural language tasks. In Hwee Tou Ng and Ellen Riloff, editors, Proc. of the Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL), pages 1-8. Associa- tion for Computational Linguistics.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 658
Wang, J., Rutkiewicz, A., Wang, A. Y., & Sachan, M. (2025) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.03735 · Cited by 9
“Math Word Problems in NLP Math word problems have long been a focus of interest in the NLP community (Roy and Roth, 2015; Kushman et al., 2014; Huang et al., 2017; Amini et al., 2019; Xie and Sun, 2019; Drori et al., 2022), with research primarily aiming to improve computational models’ ability to…”
DAWN-ICL: Strategic Planning of Problem-solving Trajectories for Zero-Shot In-Context Learning
Tang, X.-Y., Wang, X., Zhao, W., & Wen, J.-R. (2024) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.20215 · Cited by 9
“Specifically, for the math reasoning problem, we use Multiarith (Roy and Roth, 2015) for evaluation.”
FLARE: Faithful Logic-Aided Reasoning and Exploration
Arakelyan, E., Minervini, P., Verga, P., Lewis, P., & Augenstein, I. (2024) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.11900 · Cited by 9
“For numerical and mathematical reasoning, we follow CoT (Wei et al., 2022) and include GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015), ASDiv (Miao et al., 2020), and AQuA (Ling et al., 2017).”
Self-Harmonized Chain of ThoughtPreprint
Jin, Z., & Lu, W. (2024) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.04057 · Cited by 9
“…10 reasoning datasets, including: (1) 6 arithmetic datasets: SingleEq (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015), AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014), Mul-tiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015), GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), AQUA-RAT (Ling et al., 2017), and SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021); (2) 2 commonsense reasoning datasets:…”
Kao, K.-C., Wang, R., & Hsieh, C.-J. (2024) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.05134 · Cited by 9
“Addressing whether the observed performance drop in LLMs is primar-135 Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015; Roy and Roth, 2016; Liang et al., 2016; Ling et al., 2017).”
UBench: Benchmarking Uncertainty in Large Language Models with Multiple Choice Questions
Wang, X.-Z., Zhang, Z.-W., Chen, G., Li, Q., Luo, B., Han, Z., Wang, H.-T., Li, Z.-Y., Gao, H., & Hu, M.-T. (2024) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.12784 · Cited by 9
Evaluating LLMs with Multiple Problems at oncePreprint
Wang, Z., Kodner, J., & Rambow, O. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.10786 · Cited by 10
“The lack of a positional bias supports the claim that LLMs can use information equally well across different positions under multiple homogeneous problems.”
Sparse Matrix in Large Language Model Fine-tuningPreprint
He, H., Li, J. B., Jiang, X., & Miller, H. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.15525 · Cited by 10
LoNAS: Elastic Low-Rank Adapters for Efficient Large Language Models
Muñoz, J., Yuan, J., Zheng, Y., & Jain, N. (2024) · International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.63317/24yt5xtkzpzs · Cited by 9
Improving Language Model Reasoning with Self-motivated Learning
ylfeng, Xu, Y., Qin, L.-B., Wang, Y., & Che, W.-X. (2024) · International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.07017 · Cited by 9
“…al., 2021b) numerical reasoning (Dua et al., 2019), multi-hop reasoning (Yang et al., 2018), arithmetic reasoning (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015b; Roy and Roth, 2015; Miao et al., 2020; Patel et al., 2021b; Cobbe et al., 2021), logical reasoning (Liu et al., 2020; Yu et al., 2020), inductive…”
BackgroundSundaram, S. S., Gurajada, S., Padmanabhan, D., Abraham, S. S., & Fisichella, M. (2024) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.1534 · Cited by 31
“Some solvers (such as Roy & Roth, 2015) had a joint optimization objective to identify relevant numbers and populating the expression tree.”
FineMath: A Fine-Grained Mathematical Evaluation Benchmark for Chinese Large Language Models
Liu, Y., Jin, R., Shi, L., Yao, Z., & Xiong, D. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing · doi:10.1145/3773083 · Cited by 14
“Traditional MWP datasets like AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014) and MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015) are integrated into a MWP repository.”
InfluentialZhang, L., Wu, J., Zhou, D.-Y., & Xu, G. (2024) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.01165 · Cited by 9
“…2023; Isik et al., 2024) have shown that further fine-tuning is still crucial for tasks involving complex reasoning such as arithmetic reasoning (Roy and Roth, 2016; Cobbe et al., 2021) and commonsense reasoning (Mihaylov et al., 2018; Clark et al., 2019), etc. Fine-tuning LLMs requires…”
BackgroundTowards A Unified View of Answer Calibration for Multi-Step Reasoning
Deng, S.-M., Zhang, N., Oo, N., & Hooi, B. (2023) · NLRSE · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.09101 · Cited by 9
“We evaluate on five benchmark datasets involving arithmetic and commonsense CoT reasoning: GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015), MathQA (Amini et al., 2019) and CSQA (Talmor et al., 2019).”
MethodMeta-Reasoning: Semantics-Symbol Deconstruction For Large Language Models
Wang, Y., Zhang, Z., Zhang, P., Yang, B.-S., & Wang, R. (2023) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.17820 · Cited by 9
“For the two arithmetic reasoning tasks (MultiArith and AddSub), the performance of PoT fluctuates wildly after removing the external interpreter.”
MethodInfluentialTextual Enhanced Contrastive Learning for Solving Math Word Problems
Shen, Y., Liu, Q., Mao, Z., Cheng, F., & Kurohashi, S. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.16022 · Cited by 9
“Statistical machine learning methods were developed to map math word problems to specific equation templates (Kushman et al., 2014; Roy and Roth, 2015; Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015; Roy and Roth, 2017).”
MethodGCoT-Decoding: Unlocking Deep Reasoning Paths for Universal Question Answering
Luo, G., Qiu, W.-T., Jian, Z.-Q., Wang, M., & Wu, Q.-Q. (2026) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.06794 · Cited by 8
“…on two categories of QA tasks: (1) Fixed QA , where the answer set or format is constrained, including GSM8K and Mul-tiArith (Cobbe et al., 2021; Roy and Roth, 2015) for multi-step arithmetic reasoning, and Sports understanding (Suzgun et al., 2022) from Big-Bench-Hard for binary reasoning over…”
Parameter-Efficient Routed Fine-Tuning: Mixture-of-Experts Demands Mixture of Adaptation Modules
Liu, Y.-L., Ma, Y., Lu, Y., Chen, S., Ding, Z., & Tresp, V. (2025) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.02587 · Cited by 8
On the Generalization vs Fidelity Paradox in Knowledge Distillation
Ramesh, S. K., Sengupta, A., & Chakraborty, T. (2025) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.15442 · Cited by 8
“These findings MultiArith SVAMP SingleEq Spearman rank -0.09 (0.6) 0.01 (1.0) 0.01 (0.9) -0.25 (0.1) -0.07 (0.7) -0.12 (0.5) (a) Mathematical reasoning tasks Test Type Dolly Self SNI UNI Vicuna Spearman rank 0.3 (0.2) -0.06 (0.8) -0.06 (0.8) -0.13 (0.6) 0.07 (0.8) (b) Instruction following tasks Table 5: Spearman rank…”
InfluentialSIKeD: Self-guided Iterative Knowledge Distillation for mathematical reasoning
Adarsh, S., Shridhar, K., Gulcehre, C., Monath, N., & Sachan, M. (2024) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.18574 · Cited by 8
“We evaluate our approach across various mathematical reasoning datasets and demonstrate that SIKeD improves the ability of smaller models to handle complex reasoning, achieving significant performance gains.”
SARA: Singular-Value Based Adaptive Low-Rank AdaptionPreprint
Gu, J., Chen, S., Wang, Z., Zhang, Y., & Gong, P. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.03290 · Cited by 5
“…we use include the mathematical reasoning dataset SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), AQuA (Ling et al., 2017), AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014), MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2016), the SingleEQ (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015), GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), and the commonsense inference dataset ARC (Clark et…”
MethodAnalyzing Chain-of-thought Prompting in Black-Box Large Language Models via Estimated V-information
Wang, Z., Li, C., Yang, Z., Liu, Q., Hao, Y., Chen, X., Chu, D., & Sui, D. (2024) · Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC) · doi:10.63317/56y48yrxazk3
“We conduct experiments with text-davinci-002 on the GSM8k, AQuA, and MultiArith datasets.”
MethodInfluentialQDMR-based Planning-and-Solving Prompting for Complex Reasoning Tasks
Huang, J.-F., She, Q., Jiang, W.-B., Wu, H., Hao, Y., Xu, T., & Wu, F. (2024) · International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.63317/4zj22fhw7n4a · Cited by 8
Exploring the Limitations of Large Language Models in Compositional Relation ReasoningPreprint
Zhao, J., & Zhang, X. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.02615 · Cited by 11
“Shanahan et al. (2023) illustrate LLM-based dialogue agents are not conscious beings with personal motives or a sense of self-preservation; their display of such traits is simply an act of role-play.”
BackgroundSemantic-Based Data Augmentation for Math Word Problems
Li, A., Xiao, Y., Liang, J., & Chen, Y. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-00129-1_3 · Cited by 7
“Early studies relying on hand-crafted features [14,19,20] and predefined patterns [21] have limitations in generalization.”
BackgroundMethodNAT: Enhancing Agent Tuning with Negative Samples
Wang, R., Han, X., Zhang, Y.-X., Baldwin, T., & Li, H.-N. (2025) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.naacl-long.378 · Cited by 8
“We use GSM8k (Cobbe et al., 2021) as seed data to collect trajectories and test the performance on four math testing sets, including GSM8k, ASDiv (Miao et al., 2020), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), and MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015).”
INFORM : Information eNtropy based multi-step reasoning FOR large language Models
Zhou, C., You, W., Li, J., Ye, J., Chen, K., & Zhang, M. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.216 · Cited by 4
“Datasets We evaluate our approach across seven benchmarks, covering three categories of reasoning tasks: (i) Arithmetic Reasoning: GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015), Addsub (Hosseini et al., 2014), AQuA (Ling et al., 2017) (ii) Commonsense Reasoning: Com-monsenseQA (Talmor et al., 2019) and S…”
BackgroundRecurTrace: Adaptive Latent Reasoning with Loop-Time Memory
Wang, Y.-X., Feng, K.-Y., Shen, Y.-D., Xu, H., Wang, J.-Y., & Wu, Z.-Z. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.03379 · Cited by 7
Liu, H., Wang, Z., Guo, Y., Shou, H., & Tang, X. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.06699
Towards Efficient Large Language Reasoning Models via Extreme-Ratio Chain-of-Thought CompressionPreprint
Tang, Y., Jia, B., Huang, W., Zhang, L., Xie, J., Li, W., Li, W., Hu, J., Ji, X. C. R., & Lin, S. X. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.08324 · Cited by 5
“Even on the simpler MultiArith benchmark, where the uncompressed Base Model approaches saturation, TokenSkip’s accuracy notably degrades at γ = 0 .”
Koohestani, R., de Bekker, P., Koç, B., & Izadi, M. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2025.3644183 · Cited by 13
CDW-CoT: Clustered Distance-Weighted Chain-of-Thoughts Reasoning
Fang, Y., Chao, G.-Q., Lei, W.-Q., Li, S., & Chu, D. (2025) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.12226 · Cited by 7
Towards robust automated math problem solving: a survey of statistical and deep learning approaches
Saraf, A., Kamat, P. V., Gite, S., Kumar, S., & Kotecha, K. V. (2024) · Evolutionary Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s12065-024-00957-0 · Cited by 6
“These datasets have been meticulously curated from various online sources [74, 75] The “Ape210k” dataset is a highly robust and comprehensive corpus of mathematical problem-solving, boast-ing 210,488-word problems and an impressive 56,000 unique equation templates.”
Nash CoT: Multi-Path Inference with Preference Equilibrium
Zhang, Z.-Q., Wang, C., Xiong, X.-L., Zhang, Y., & Wang, D. (2024) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.07099 · Cited by 7
Liu, Z., Xia, C., He, W., & Wang, C. (2024) · Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC) · doi:10.63317/4kqnu9hz3873
Chen, J., & Liu, J. (2024) · Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC) · doi:10.63317/4gzzr6hgzev5
“…the methods including, GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), AQUA-RAT (Ling et al., 2017), SingleOp and MultiArith subsets from (Roy and Roth, 2016) , which can measure the reasoning ability of LLM. Additionally, we examine the performance of S 3 Prompt on the high school…”
MethodTowards Goal-oriented Prompt Engineering for Large Language Models: A SurveyPreprint
Li, H., Leung, J., & Shen, Z. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.14043 · Cited by 22
First-Step Advantage: Importance of Starting Right in Multi-Step Math Reasoning
Jain, K., Miller, M., Tandon, N., & Shridhar, K. (2025) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.42
“Multi-Arith is a dataset of 180 test samples published with the algorithmic solver for mathematical word problems.”
FERMAT: An Alternative to Accuracy for Numerical Reasoning
Sivakumar, J., & Moosavi, N. (2023) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.17491 · Cited by 7
“, 2016), CommonCore (Roy and Roth, 2015) and Illinois (Roy and Roth, 2016).”
BackgroundMethodNakai, T., & Nishimoto, S. (2022) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1111/ejn.15925 · Cited by 7
“First, because we chose experimental stimuli from existing datasets (Roy & Roth, 2015; Roy et al., 2015), we could not perfectly balance the number of letters and digit sizes.”
MethodTM-generation model: a template-based method for automatically solving mathematical word problems
Lee, D., Ki, K. S., Kim, B., & Gweon, G. (2021) · The Journal of Supercomputing · doi:10.1007/s11227-021-03855-9 · Cited by 11
“Meanwhile, in the generation [7, 13] method, a model learns to generate the correct equation template directly using tokens as a unit.”
MethodTiny Budgets, Big Gains: Parameter Placement Strategy in Parameter Super-Efficient Fine-Tuning
Zhao, J.-M., Zhang, X., Li, J., Niu, J.-C., Hu, Y.-L., Min, E.-X., & Penn, G. (2025) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.321 · Cited by 7
“Benchmark Selection We evaluate our method on a diverse set of tasks spanning multiple domains, including natural language understanding with GLUE (Wang et al., 2018), natural language generation with E2E (Novikova et al., 2017), mathematical reasoning with GSM8k (Cobbe et al., 2021), SingleEq (Koncel-Kedziorski et al…”
Re-Reading Improves Reasoning in Language ModelsPreprint
Xu, X., Tao, C.-Y., Shen, T., Xu, C., Xu, H., Long, G., & Lou, J.-G. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.06275 · Cited by 7
“…(Cobbe et al., 2021), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), ASDiv (Miao et al., 2020), AQuA (Ling et al., 2017), AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014), Multi-Arith (Roy and Roth, 2015), SingelEQ (Roy et al., 2015), three commonsense reasoning benchmarks (CSQA (Talmor et al., 2019), StrategyQA (Geva et al., 2021),…”
BackgroundInfluentialMapping probability word problems to executable representations
Šuster, S., Fivez, P., Totis, P., Kimmig, A., Davis, J. J., Raedt, L. D., & Daelemans, W. M. P. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.294 · Cited by 5
“…in early (rule-based) research (Briars and Larkin, 1984; Fletcher, 1985; Bakman, 2007; Yuhui et al., 2010) to solving linear equations in later statistical-NLP approaches (Hosseini et al., 2014; Kushman et al., 2014; Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015; Roy and Roth, 2015; Upadhyay and Chang, 2015).”
RADAR: Redundancy-Aware Diffusion for Multi-Agent Communication Structure Generation
Zhang, Z., Zhou, W., Li, J., Fei, H., Wen, J., & Ji, W. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.09907 · Cited by 6
SinkTrack: Attention Sink based Context Anchoring for Large Language Models
Liu, X., Chen, G.-K., & Wang, W.-G. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.10027 · Cited by 6
“…2022; Ning et al., 2024), generating multiple candidate outputs with verification (Gou et al., 2024; Wang et al., 2023; Zhang et al., 2024b;a), and using non-linear reasoning structures to organize complex inference paths (Yao et al., 2023; Roy & Roth, 2015; Besta et al., 2024; Wei et al., 2022).”
Latent Chain-of-Thought as Planning: Decoupling Reasoning from VerbalizationPreprint
Wang, J.-C., Peng, H., Wang, Z.-Y., Liu, C.-Y., & Wu, G.-L. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.21358 · Cited by 6
“%) and MultiArith.”
TopoDIM: One-shot Topology Generation of Diverse Interaction Modes for Multi-Agent SystemsPreprint
Sun, R., Ding, J., Gong, C., Gu, T., Jiang, Y., Zhang, J., Pan, L., & Lü, L. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.10120 · Cited by 10
“…the performance of T OPO DIM on three types of reasoning datasets: ❶ General Reasoning: MMLU-Pro (Wang et al., 2024b); ❷ Mathematics: MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2016), GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021) , AIME (2023 − 2025) ; ❸ Coding: HumanEval (Hendrycks et al., 2020); LiveCodeBench (202305 − 202403)…”
HyperAgent: Leveraging Hypergraphs for Topology Optimization in Multi-Agent Communication
Zhang, H., Shi, Y., Gu, X., Zhang, Z., You, H., Gan, L., Yuan, Y., & Huang, J. (2026) · Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems · doi:10.65109/qtvf9552 · Cited by 4
“The mathematical reasoning category comprises GSM8K[15] for grade school math problems,MultiArith[44]for arithmeticwordproblems,SVAMP[38] for structurally diverse math questions, and AQuA[33] for algebraic reasoning.”
Jain, Y., & Chowdhary, V. (2025) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.20355 · Cited by 6
“Table 1: MultiArith prompts found by comparing traditional global optimization approach against our proposed local optimization.”
InfluentialIs Depth All You Need? An Exploration of Iterative Reasoning in LLMsPreprint
Wu, Z.-Q., Li, T., Xu, B., Yang, J., Zhan, M., Zhu, X., & Feng, L. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.10858 · Cited by 6
“We evaluate our method on ten reasoning datasets, including six arithmetic datasets ( i.e., MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2016), GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), SingleEq (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015), AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014), AQuA (Ling et al., 2017), and SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021)), two…”
CausalStock: Deep End-to-end Causal Discovery for News-driven Stock Movement PredictionPreprint
Li, S., Sun, Y., Lin, Y., Gao, X., Shang, S., & Yan, R. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.06391 · Cited by 6
“Besides, LLMs can identify meaningful information within noisy environments [29, 4].”
A Theoretical Review on Solving Algebra Problems
Yu, X., Cheng, W., Yang, C., & Zhang, T. (2024) · Expert systems with applications · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.00031 · Cited by 6
“Roy and Roth (2015) proposed Expression Tree ( S 03 ) as the first bridge state.”
OccamLLM: Fast and Exact Language Model Arithmetic in a Single Step
Dugan, O., Beneto, D. M. J., Loh, C., Chen, Z., Dangovski, R., & Soljačić, M. (2024) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.06576 · Cited by 6
“This sometimes poses a challenge on reasoning problems when the base language model generates compound expressions requiring more than one operation to evaluate, such as 3 + 5 + 7 = .”
InfluentialComparative study of typical neural solvers in solving math word problems
He, B., Yu, X., Huang, L., Meng, H., Liang, G., & Chen, S. (2024) · Complex & Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1007/s40747-024-01454-8 · Cited by 7
“Later, researchers pointed out that the output expression can be better described as a tree structure, e.g. expression tree [72], equation tree [25], so the Seq2Tree model was proposed.”
InfluentialLi, Z.-Q., Lin, H.-Y., Lu, Y., Xiang, H., Han, X.-P., & Sun, L. (2024) · International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.09750 · Cited by 6
“In terms of datasets, for mathematics, we select easy mathematical datasets such as GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021) and MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015), and hard mathematical dataset MATH (Hendrycks et al., 2021b)—of which we opt for levels 1, 2, and 3, excluding levels 4 and 5 due to their extreme complexity.”
MethodStepwise Self-Consistent Mathematical Reasoning with Large Language Models
Zhao, Z.-L., Rong, Y., Guo, D.-Y., Gözlüklü, E., Gülboy, E., & Kasneci, E. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.17786 · Cited by 6
“However, these models predominantly focus on simpler mathematical prob-1 lems (Cobbe et al., 2021; Ling et al., 2017; Roy & Roth, 2016; Patel et al., 2021).”
BackgroundIn-Context Ability Transfer for Question Decomposition in Complex QAPreprint
Venktesh, V., Bhattacharya, S., & Anand, A. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.18371 · Cited by 8
“The source of complexity in complex QA tasks can be due to a complex question structure [27, 49], the need to perform comparisons or aggregations [19, 29], mathematical operations [42], or having to extract from complex objects like tables and text [7].”
BackgroundZhou, F., Dong, H., Liu, Q., Cheng, Z., Shi, H., & Zhang, D. (2022) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.05075 · Cited by 11
“The subset AddSub features relatively easier numerical reasoning, whereas MultiArith necessitates multi-step numerical calculations.”
MethodInfluentialImproving a Graph-to-Tree Model for Solving Math Word Problems
Kim, H.-J., Hwang, J., Yoo, T., & Cheong, Y.-G. (2022) · International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication (IMCOM) · doi:10.1109/imcom53663.2022.9721720 · Cited by 5
“The MWP task includes number word problems [22], logic puzzle problems [23], arithmetic word problems [24], [25], algebra word problems [26]–[28], and geometry word problems [29], and have drawn interests from lots of researchers.”
BackgroundSolving Arithmetic Word Problems with a Templatebased Multi-Task Deep Neural Network (T-MTDNN)
Lee, D., & Gweon, G. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data and Smart Computing (BigComp) · doi:10.1109/bigcomp48618.2020.00-63 · Cited by 6
“The MAWPS dataset combines four datasets that were published previously by [5], [7], [8], and [9].”
MethodProblemSolver at SemEval-2019 Task 10: Sequence-to-Sequence Learning and Expression Trees
Luo, X., Baranova, A., & Biegert, J. (2019) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/s19-2227 · Cited by 3
“The features are identical to the ones that Roy and Roth (2015) describe.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialA Two-Phase Classifier for Automatic Answer Generation for Math Word Problems
Hevapathige, A., Wellappili, D., Kankanamge, G. U., Dewappriya, N., & Ranathunga, S. (2018) · International Conference on Advances in ICT for Emerging Regions · doi:10.1109/icter.2018.8615510 · Cited by 6
“Hosseini et al. [5], Kedziorski et al. [6] and Roy & Roth [7]-[9] have been working on graph based approaches by considering how quantities and units could be expressed as states/trees to generate arithmetic equations.”
BackgroundUnit Conflict Resolution for Automatic Math Word Problem Solving
Dewappriya, N., Kankanamge, G. U., Wellappili, D., Hevapathige, A., & Ranathunga, S. (2018) · Moratuwa Engineering Research Conference · doi:10.1109/mercon.2018.8421922 · Cited by 6
“Initial statistical based approaches including the works of Hosseini et al. [3] and Roy and Roth [4] mainly focus on simple arithmetic math word problems.”
BackgroundMethodEvaluating Numeracy of Language Models as a Natural Language Inference Task
Mahendra, R., Spina, D., Cavedon, L., & Verspoor, K. M. (2025) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.findings-naacl.467 · Cited by 1
“…answering (Xu et al., 2022; Hopkins et al., 2019), including reading comprehension (Dua et al., 2019) and math word problems (Hosseini et al., 2014; Roy and Roth, 2015; Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2016; Huang et al., 2016; Amini et al., 2019; Miao et al., 2020; Patel et al., 2021; Cobbe et al.,…”
InfluentialMastering Symbolic Operations: Augmenting Language Models with Compiled Neural NetworksPreprint
Weng, Y., Zhu, M., Xia, F., Li, B., He, S., Liu, K., & Zhao, J. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.01665 · Cited by 11
“Arithmetic Reasoning To evaluate the method’s generalization ability from symbolic operations to arithmetic reasoning in addition and subtraction tasks, we use five established arithmetic reasoning datasets: AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014), SingleEq (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015), MultiArith (Roy & Roth, 2016), GSM8K…”
MethodGraph-GRPO: Stabilizing Multi-Agent Topology Learning via Group Relative Policy Optimization
Cang, Y., Zhang, X.-T., Zhao, E.-L., Ji, Z.-Y., Liu, Y.-H., He, Y.-C., Ning, Z.-Y., Chen, Y.-J., Que, W.-G., & Shi, L. (2026) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.02701 · Cited by 5
“In the mathematical domain, we employed four widely-used datasets: GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), and AQUA (Ling et al., 2017).”
Latent Thoughts Tuning: Bridging Context and Reasoning with Fused Information in Latent TokensPreprint
Liu, W., Min, D.-H., & Cheng, L. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.10229 · Cited by 5
“All models are trained on the GSM8K training set (Cobbe et al., 2021) and evaluated on four mathematical reasoning benchmarks, including GSM8K-NL (Cobbe et al., 2021), ASDiv-Aug (Xu et al., 2025), MultiArith (Roy & Roth, 2015) and SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021).”
Chain-of-thought driven dynamic prompting and computation method
Che, X., Chu, M. H. S., Chen, Y., Gu, H., & Li, Q. (2025) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2025.114204 · Cited by 4
Yang, Q., Qu, F.-Y., Guo, T., Liu, Y., & Wen, Y. (2025) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.00740 · Cited by 5
“We evaluate BiRouter on six public benchmarks: MMLU (Hendrycks et al. 2021), GSM8K (Cobbe et al. 2021), MultiArith (Roy and Roth 2016), SVAMP (Pa-tel, Bhattamishra, and Goyal 2021), HumanEval (Chen et al. 2021) and MBPP (Austin et al. 2021).”
When Thinking Backfires: Mechanistic Insights Into Reasoning-Induced MisalignmentPreprint
Yan, H., Xu, H., Qi, S., Yang, S., & He, Y. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.00544 · Cited by 5
“As many models are already post-trained on mathematical reasoning data, the easier dataset shows only small performance differences, we therefore use two math datasets: MultiArith (Roy & Roth, 2015) (easy) and the combination of AIME’24’25 (math ai, 2025a;b) (hard).”
Systematic survey of various prompt optimization methods and their classifications
Jain, A. M., & Jindal, M. (2025) · International Conference on Computing and Artificial Intelligence (ICCAI) · doi:10.1109/iccai66501.2025.00085 · Cited by 3
“APE is tested on several datasets like 24 instruction induction tasks from [26], a curated subset of 21 tasks from BIG-Bench, MultiArith [34] and GSM8K [35] for zero-shot chain-of-thought reasoning, Truth-fulQA [36] for evaluating truthfulness and informativeness.”
DiPT: Enhancing LLM reasoning through diversified perspective-taking
Hoang, J. A., Dabas, M., Huang, L., Jin, M., & Jia, R. (2024) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.06241 · Cited by 5
“• MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2016) - a dataset focused on arithmetic word problems that require multiple steps to solve.”
Step-by-Step Unmasking for Parameter-Efficient Fine-tuning of Large Language Models
Agarwal, A., Ramesh, S. K., Sengupta, A., & Chakraborty, T. (2024) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.14470 · Cited by 5
“• MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015): This dataset consists of multi-step arithmetic word problems involving basic operations, such as addition followed by subtraction or subtraction followed by division.”
Generalizable Chain-of-Thought Prompting in Mixed-task Scenarios with Large Language ModelsPreprint
Zou, A., Zhang, Z., Zhao, H., & Tang, X. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.06692 · Cited by 4
“MultiArith, AddSub, and SingleEq come from the Math World Problem Repository (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2016), while the other three are from more contemporary benchmarks.”
MethodInfluentialProposing Algorithm Using YOLOV4 and VGG-16 for Smart-Education
Huu, P. N., & Xuan, K. D. (2021) · Applied Computational Intelligence and Soft Computing · doi:10.1155/2021/1682395 · Cited by 4
Distributed Representations for Arithmetic Word Problems
Sundaram, S. S., Deepak, P., & Abraham, S. S. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v34i05.6432 · Cited by 3
“Though there are quite a few public datasets for math word problem solving (Koncel-Kedziorski et al. 2016), the only dataset which comprises word problems attached with unique schemas is the SingleOp (Roy and Roth 2016) dataset with 562 word problems.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSemantic Representation for Age Word Problems with Schemas
Sundaram, S. S., & Abraham, S. S. (2019) · New generation computing · doi:10.1007/s00354-019-00069-9 · Cited by 5
Mandal, S., & Naskar, S. (2017) · International Conference on Applications of Natural Language to Data Bases · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-59569-6_26 · Cited by 5
Uncertainty-Aware Contrastive Decoding
Lee, H., Park, S., Kim, J., Lim, S., & Song, K. (2025) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.1352 · Cited by 2
“In Section 5.2, we evaluate on diverse reasoning tasks: mathematical reasoning (GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), Multi-Arith (Roy and Roth, 2015)), general knowledge (MMLU (Hendrycks et al., 2021)), and common-sense reasoning (Arc-challenge (Clark et al., 2018), CommonsenseQA (Talmor et al., 201…”
InfluentialFrom Bottom to Top: Extending the Potential of Parameter Efficient Fine-Tuning
Gu, J., Wang, Z., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Z., & Gong, P. (2024) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.204 · Cited by 6
“…we use include the mathematical reasoning dataset SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), AQuA (Ling et al., 2017), AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014), MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2016), the SingleEQ (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015), GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), and the commonsense inference dataset ARC (Clark et…”
MethodHe, H.-Y., Liu, J.-M., & Sanchez, V. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.01511 · Cited by 4
“Representative datasets include arithmetic word problem benchmarks based on verb categorization [18], algebraic equation parsing [20], rationale generation for algebraic reasoning [22], general arithmetic word problems [29], and robustness-oriented math word problem evaluation [28].”
Evolve as a Team: Collaborative Self-Evolution for LLM-based Multi-Agent SystemsPreprint
Hao, Z., Wang, T., Dong, H., Liu, Z., Wang, H., Lin, X., Lin, Q., Wang, C., Dong, H., & Chen, J. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.29790 · Cited by 17
“As shown in Table 4, a state-of-the-art model already achieves near-perfect performance on several widely used datasets, including HumanEval [13], MBPP [8], MultiArith [54], GSM8K [16], MATH [24], and MMLU [23].”
TextReg: Mitigating Prompt Distributional Overfitting via Regularized Text-Space OptimizationPreprint
傅卢成, Yu, Y., Wang, Y., Jin, Y., Jin, H., Prakash, B. A., & Wang, H. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.21318 · Cited by 4
“• MultiArith [46, 47].”
GoAgent: Group-of-Agents Communication Topology Generation for LLM-based Multi-Agent SystemsPreprint
Chen, H.-J., Zheng, X., Liu, Y.-X., Jiao, P.-F., Li, S.-Y., Liu, H., Zhao, Z.-D., Xu, Z., Khalil, I., & Pan, S.-R. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.19677 · Cited by 4
“Following (Zhang et al., 2025b), we evaluate our approach on general reasoning us-ing MMLU (Hendrycks et al., 2021), mathematical reasoning using GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), and AQuA (Ling et al., 2017), as well as code generation using HumanEval (Chen et al…”
Thinking in Latents: Adaptive Anchor Refinement for Implicit Reasoning in LLMs
Sheshanarayana, D., Pal, R., Sinha, M., & Dasgupta, T. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.15051 · Cited by 4
“Task Type Metric GSM8K(Cobbe et al., 2021) Grade-school mathematical word problems Accuracy SVAMP(Patel et al., 2021) Arithmetic word problems Accuracy MultiArith(Roy & Roth, 2015) Multi-step arithmetic word problems Accuracy”
Yu, J., Jia, J., Qin, S.-M., Jia, X.-J., Ma, S.-Q., Huang, Y.-H., Yuan, Y.-L., & Cheng, G. (2026) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v40i35.40231 · Cited by 4
“…a general reasoning dataset, MMLU (Hendrycks et al. 2021); (2) mathematical reasoning datasets, including GSM8k (Cobbe et al. 2021), Multi-Arith (Roy and Roth 2015), SVAMP (Patel, Bhattamishra, and Goyal 2021), AQuA (Ling et al. 2017); and (3) a code generation dataset, HumanEval (Chen et al.…”
CoMoL: Efficient Mixture of LoRA Experts via Dynamic Core Space Merging
Cao, J., Fan, Z.-X., Wang, Z.-N., Lin, T., Zhao, Z., Yan, R., Zhang, W.-Q., Shao, F.-F., Wang, H.-W., Xiao, J., et al. (2026) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.00573 · Cited by 4
“During the evaluation phase, we systematically benchmark our model across six diverse datasets: GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2016), AddSub (Hos-seini et al., 2014), AQuA (Ling et al., 2017), and SingleEq (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015).”
Explaining the Reasoning of Large Language Models Using Attribution GraphsPreprint
Walker, C., & Ewetz, R. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.15663 · Cited by 5
“Math follows Kojima et al. (2022) and is a combination of two datasets of multi-step math questions (MultiArith (Roy & Roth, 2016) + SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021)) which require chain-of-thought reasoning for answering.”
Calibrating and Rotating: A Unified Framework for Weight Conditioning in PEFT
Chang, D., Xue, P., Li, Y., Liu, Y.-X., Xu, P.-X., & Zhang, S.-X. (2025) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.00051 · Cited by 4
Syntactic Blind Spots: How Misalignment Leads to LLMs Mathematical Errors
Williamson, D., Ji, Y.-F., & Dwyer, M. B. (2025) · Proceedings of The 3rd Workshop on Mathematical Natural Language Processing (MathNLP 2025) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.01831 · Cited by 4
“…Models (LLMs) show strong performance on mathematical benchmarks like GSM8K, SVAMP, MultiArith, and ASDiv (Cobbe et al., 2021; Patel et al., 2021; Roy and Roth, 2015; Miao et al., 2020), yet they frequently make systematic errors, often reap-plying familiar solution strategies even when the…”
Alazraki, L., Chen, L.-H., Brassard, A., Stacey, J., Rahmani, H., & Rei, M. (2025) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.19988 · Cited by 4
“…benchmarks where both reasoning steps are of the same type—i.e., knowledge-based Bam-boogle (Press et al., 2023) and math-based Multi-Arith (Roy and Roth, 2015)—the compositionality gap is low or non-existent, and failure to reach the correct solution for a compositional question is mainly…”
InfluentialToo Easily Fooled? Prompt Injection Breaks LLMs on Frustratingly Simple Multiple-Choice Questions
Guo, X.-Y., Huang, Z.-K., Song, Z., & Zhang, J.-H. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.13214 · Cited by 4
“Early benchmarks mainly focus on fundamental arithmetic [RR15] and algebraic [LYDB17] problems.”
Learning Distribution-Wise Control in Representation Space for Language Models
Deng, C.-Y., Chang, R., & Chen, H. (2025) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.06686 · Cited by 4
Liu, P., Xu, F., & Li, Y. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.06008 · Cited by 4
“The benchmarks used are categorized as follows: • Mathematical : GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), Multi-Arith (Roy & Roth, 2016) • Symbolic : FOLIO (Han et al., 2022), Contex-tHub (Hua et al., 2024) • Knowledge : ARC (Clark et al., 2018), GPQA (Rein et al., 2023) • Soft Reasoning : MuSR (Sprague et al.,…”
InfluentialZhu, C., Xu, B., Yang, A., Lin, J.-Y., Wang, Q., Zhou, C., & Mao, Z.-D. (2025) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.24147 · Cited by 4
“MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015) is a collection of complicated arithmetic problems designed to test machine learning models.”
CoMoE: Contrastive Representation for Mixture-of-Experts in Parameter-Efficient Fine-tuning
Feng, J.-Y., Wei, C.-P., Qiu, T.-H., Hu, T., & Pu, Z.-Q. (2025) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.17553 · Cited by 4
ThoughtProbe: Classifier-Guided Thought Space Exploration Leveraging LLM Intrinsic ReasoningPreprint
Wang, Z., & Xu, C. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.06650 · Cited by 5
“Dataset and LLMs We evaluate our method on popular mathematical benchmarks: (1) the GSM8K benchmark of math word problems (Cobbe et al., 2021); (2) MultiArith (Roy & Roth, 2016); (3) the SVAMP dataset of math word problems with varying structures (Patel et al., 2021); (4) the MAWPS benchmark (Koncel-Kedziorski et al.,…”
InfluentialMultidimensional Consistency Improves Reasoning in Language Models
Lai, H., Zhang, X., & Nissim, M. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.02670 · Cited by 4
“Earlier work mainly focused on training reasoning models that would generate intermediate steps based on the given problem, expressed in formal language (Roy and Roth, 2015; Amini et al., 2019) and natural language (Ling et al., 2017; Cobbe et al., 2021a).”
Sketch to Adapt: Fine-Tunable Sketches for Efficient LLM AdaptationPreprint
Zhang, T., Su, J., Desai, A., Wu, O., Xu, Z., & Shrivastava, A. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.06364 · Cited by 1
“We performed evaluation on 7 math datasets: MultiArith (Roy & Roth, 2016), GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014), AQuA (Ling et al., 2017), SingleEQ (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), and MAWPS (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2016).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Roy, S., & Roth, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Corresponding author
- Roth, Dan
- ORCID
- Roth, Dan
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2016
- Pages
- 1743-1752
- arXiv
- 1608.01413
- OpenAlex
- W2251935656
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12
- FWCI
- 9.02
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (FA8750-13-2-0008, FA8750)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
- Keywords
- arithmetic word problems, automated problem solving, expression trees, constrained inference, world knowledge, feature extraction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review