The DOI matches its DataCite record; 12 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Solving General Arithmetic Word Problems
Open accessAbstract
This paper presents a novel approach to automatically solving arithmetic word problems. This is the first algorithmic approach that can handle arithmetic problems with multiple steps and operations, without depending on additional annotations or predefined templates. We develop a theory for expression trees that can be used to represent and evaluate the target arithmetic expressions; we use it to uniquely decompose the target arithmetic problem to multiple classification problems; we then compose an expression tree, combining these with world knowledge through a constrained inference framework. Our classifiers gain from the use of {\em quantity schemas} that supports better extraction of features. Experimental results show that our method outperforms existing systems, achieving state of the art performance on benchmark datasets of arithmetic word problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Table 6 shows that our optimized prompts also outperform baseline prompts with different scorer LLMs on these two benchmarks.”
From Large Language Models as Optimizers (2023) · cites this paper as Roy & Roth, 2016
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Learning to Automatically Solve Algebra Word Problems
Kushman, N., Zettlemoyer, L., Barzilay, R., & Artzi, Y. (2014) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.3115/v1/p14-1026 · Cited by 400 · cited 6×
“(Hos-seini et al., 2014) mentions the result of running the system of (Kushman et al., 2014) on AI2 dataset, and we report their result here.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe Importance of Syntactic Parsing and Inference in Semantic Role Labeling
Punyakanok, V., Roth, D., & Yih, W.-T. (2008) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli.2008.34.2.257 · Cited by 399 · cited 1×
“This has been successfully used to incorporate world knowledge at inference time, as well as getting around the need for large amounts of jointly annotated data for structured prediction (Roth and Yih, 2005; Punyakanok et al., 2005; Punyakanok et al., 2008; Clarke and Lapata, 2006; Barzilay and Lapata, 2006; Roy et al…”
MethodSelf-citationLearning to Solve Arithmetic Word Problems with Verb Categorization
Hosseini, M. J., Hajishirzi, H., Etzioni, O., & Kushman, N. (2014) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1058 · Cited by 324 · cited 8×
“(Hosseini et al., 2014) mentions the result of running the system of (Kushman et al.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialInteger linear programming inference for conditional random fields
Roth, D., & Yih, W.-T. (2005) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.1145/1102351.1102444 · Cited by 214 · cited 2×
“This has been successfully used to incorporate world knowledge at inference time, as well as getting around the need for large amounts of jointly annotated data for structured prediction (Roth and Yih, 2005; Punyakanok et al., 2005; Punyakanok et al., 2008; Clarke and Lapata, 2006; Barzilay and Lapata, 2006; Roy et al…”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationModeling Biological Processes for Reading Comprehension
Berant, J., Srikumar, V., Chen, P., Linden, A. V., Harding, B., Huang, B., Clark, P. E., & Manning, C. D. (2014) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1159 · Cited by 205 · cited 1×
“The system described in (Berant et al., 2014) attempts to automatically answer biology questions, by extracting the structure of biological processes from text.”
BackgroundReasoning about Quantities in Natural Language
Roy, S., Vieira, T., & Roth, D. (2015) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00118 · Cited by 133 · cited 6×
“For the IL dataset, we acquired the system of (Roy et al., 2015) from the authors, and ran it with the same fold information.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationStructured learning with constrained conditional models
Chang, M.-W., Ratinov, L., & Roth, D. (2012) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-012-5296-5 · Cited by 117 · cited 4×
“In particular, we use the L + I scheme of CCMs, which predicts structured output by independently learning several simple components, combining them at inference time.”
MethodInfluentialSelf-citationDiagram Understanding in Geometry Questions
Seo, M. J., Hajishirzi, H., Farhadi, A., & Etzioni, O. (2014) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v28i1.9146 · Cited by 105 · cited 1×
“There has also been efforts to solve geometry questions by jointly understanding diagrams and associated text (Seo et al., 2014).”
BackgroundElementary School Science and Math Tests as a Driver for AI: Take the Aristo Challenge!
Clark, P. (2015) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v29i2.19066 · Cited by 99 · cited 1×
“Our approach is related to work in understanding and solving elementary school standardized tests (Clark, 2015).”
MethodAggregation via Set Partitioning for Natural Language Generation
Barzilay, R., & Lapata, M. (2006) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.3115/1220835.1220881 · Cited by 94
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Y. Goldberg and M. Elhadad. 2010. An efficient algo- rithm for easy-first non-directional dependency pars- ing. In Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chap- ter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 742-750, Los Angeles, California, June.
- V. Punyakanok, D. Roth, and W. Yih. 2005. The ne- cessity of syntactic parsing for semantic role label- ing. In Proc. of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pages 1117-1123.
- D. Roth and W. Yih. 2004. A linear programming formulation for global inference in natural language tasks. In Hwee Tou Ng and Ellen Riloff, editors, Proc. of the Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL), pages 1-8. Associa- tion for Computational Linguistics.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–658 of 658
Exchange of Perspective Prompting Enhances Reasoning in Large Language Models
Sun, L., & Zhang, C. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.03573
“We evaluate the performance of EoP on 8 datasets: AddSub[34], MultiArith [35], SingleEQ [36], SVAMP [37], GSM8K [38], AQuA [39] and Math [40], OlympiadBench [52].”
Advancing Automatic Math Word Problem Solvers: The UMLC Dataset and Comprehensive Model Evaluation
Kurisappan, M. (2024) · Panamerican mathematical journal. · doi:10.52783/pmj.v35.i2s.2639
Enhanced Graph-Based Model with Mathematical Knowledge Embedding for Math Word Problem Solving
He, X. Y., & Sun, C. (2024) · International Conference on Intelligent Education and Intelligent Research (IEIR) · doi:10.1109/ieir62538.2024.10959951
“…in research have led to the gradual integration of semantic analysis techniques [3] [4], as well as statistical machine learning approaches [5] [6], aimed at more effectively tackling the challenges *Corresponding author associated with resolving MWPs.Table I illustrates a typical example of…”
Research on Development of LLMs and Manual Comparison of Applications
Liu, X., Li, J., Bai, T., Gao, J., Zhang, P., & Zhao, X. (2024) · International Conference on Big Data and Information Analytics (BigDIA) · doi:10.1109/bigdia63733.2024.10808821
Contextual Learning of Large Language Models Under Chain-of-Thought Optimization Strategy
Xia, Z., Gao, B., Liu, J., & Peng, Z. (2024) · International Conference on Big Data, Artificial Intelligence and Internet of Things Engineering (ICBAIE) · doi:10.1109/icbaie63306.2024.11116958
“∂ MultiArith: This dataset is a benchmark for evaluating mathematical reasoning abilities, specifically focusing on solving multi-step arithmetic problems [10].”
Weng, Y., Lynch, J., & Krueger, E. (2024) · International Conference on Machine Learning Technologies (ICMLT) · doi:10.1145/3674029.3674041
“A variety of techniques have been employed for solving visual math problems including programmed symbolic methods, large language models with and without tooling[1, 6], and specifically trained models including seq2seq[19], seq2tree[21], RNNs[20], and other deep learning methods[10, 14, 18].”
An Artificial Neuron for Enhanced Problem Solving in Large Language ModelsPreprint
Rasal, S. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.14222 · Cited by 5
“The introduction of an Artificial Neuron aims to revolutionize this landscape by providing a mechanism through which LLMs can enhance their reasoning skills [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24].”
BackgroundHe, J., & Sun, C. (2023) · International Conference on Intelligent Education and Intelligent Research (IEIR) · doi:10.1109/ieir59294.2023.10391242
“[2]; (3) End-to-end deep learning model-based: Wang et al. (2017) developed a technique that uses Sequence-to-Sequence (Seq2Seq) models to convert problems into answer expressions involving numbers *Corresponding author and operators for solving [3]; (4) Relation-set-based: Yu et al. (2017)…”
MethodSurana, D. A., Devika, K., Prema, S., Dhannaseth, N. H., Gopinath, N., & Tamilarasan, P. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing in Emerging Markets (CCEM) · doi:10.1109/ccem60455.2023.00037 · Cited by 1
Solving Arithmetic English Word Problems Using Intermediate Representation
Kotwal, H., & Patnaik, G. K. (2023) · International Conference on Computing Communication Control and automation · doi:10.1109/iccubea58933.2023.10391982 · Cited by 1
“In reference [10], the Expression Tree method was proposed, which dissects math problems into various classification problems and constructs a monotone expression tree.”
MethodComparative Analysis of Problem Representation Learning in Math Word Problem Solving
He, B., Liang, G., Chen, S., Pan, K., Miao, Z., & Huang, L. (2022) · 2022 International Conference on Intelligent Education and Intelligent Research (IEIR) · doi:10.1109/ieir56323.2022.10050067
“Roy et al. [20] proposed the first approach that leverages expression trees to represent expressions.”
BackgroundMethodValidasi Modul “FOPS” untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Soal Cerita Matematika
Siregar, N. R. (2022) · JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika) · doi:10.33603/jnpm.v6i1.4481 · Cited by 1
“Siswa sekolah dasar pada jenjang kelas © 2022 JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika) p-ISSN 2549-8495, e-ISSN 2549-4937 rendah umumnya masih berada pada tahap berpikir operasional konkrit sehingga pemecahan soal cerita diharapkan terampil pada jenjang ini (Ojose, 2008; Roy & Roth, 2016).”
BackgroundSolving Math Word Problems by Scoring Equations with Recursive Neural Networks
Zaporojets, K., Bekoulis, G., Deleu, J., Demeester, T., & Develder, C. (2020) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.05639
“BiLSTM over text This results in N hidden state representations In order to obtain the BiLSTM representation, we run two LSTMs in different directions and concatenate the respective hidden states.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSiregar, N., Wimbarti, S., & ., K. (2019) · KnE Social Sciences · doi:10.18502/kss.v3i15.4367
“Students in primary school strengthen the problem-solving skills of mathematical words as a basis for studying algebra in high school [3].”
BackgroundA Simple Arithmetic Calculator to Solve Single Sentence Mathematical Word Problems
Bhattacharjee, D., Hariom, Mandal, S., & Naskar, S. (2019) · International Conference on Information Technology and Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-34152-7_39
Arithmetic Word Problem Solver using Frame Identification
Mishra, P., Kurisinkel, L. J., & Sharma, D. (2018) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1808.03028
“If the problem could not be solved by the first module, the problem was solved by decomposition of the arithmetic problem into a series of classification problems [15].”
MethodCHOIR: Harmonizing Structured Persona Diversity for Robust Collaborative LLM Reasoning
Dong, X., Wang, C., Teleki, M., Bismay, M., Huang, R., & Caverlee, J. (2026) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.acl-long.2175
“On MultiArith with Llama-8B, where the Best-of-N persona baseline is already a high 83.98%.”
InfluentialXu, M., Niyato, D. T., & Brinton, C. G. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Networking · doi:10.1109/ton.2026.3669011 · Cited by 16
“5 illustrates the reasoning performance of the T2DRL algorithm tested on real-world datasets, including MultiArith [36], ARC [37], Strategy QA [38], Commonsense QA [39], SVAMP [40], ASDiv [41], and GSM8K [42], showing that as the number of reasoning paths increases from 5 to 20 in Fig.”
PMWP: A Benchmark for Math Word Problem Solving in Persian
Abdolmaleki, M., Shamsfard, M., Hoste, V., & Lefever, E. (2026) · The Proceedings of the First Workshop on NLP and LLMs for the Iranian Language Family · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.silkroadnlp-1.8
“A RITH (Roy and Roth, 2015).”
Reasoning based on symbolic and parametric knowledge bases: A survey
Xu, M., Ning, Y., Li, Y., Chen, J., Wen, J., Xiao, Y., Zhou, S., Pan, B., Bao, Z., Miao, X., et al. (2026) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2026.104880 · Cited by 4
Semantic-Driven Cross-Attention Fusion for Enhanced Geometric Problem Solving
Jian, P., Wu, L., Chen, F., & Sun, W. (2026) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2026.3721548
“Subsequently, statistical learning and feature engineering were gradually introduced in MWPs. Goldwasser and Roth proposed feedback-based learning algorithms to enhance nat-ural language interpretation [31].”
Martinez-Criado, I., Soroa, A., & Barnes, J. (2026) · International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.63317/48gd2ysjuh8s
“Early research in this area focused on mathematical word problems (MWPs), particularly on equation parsing and symbolic logic in arithmetic and algebraic contexts (Roy and Roth, 2015; Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015), laying the foundation for logic-based reasoning frameworks.”
G-LoRA: Global-Local Decoupled Low-Rank Adaptation
Xiong, J., Huang, Y.-H., Liu, Y., Hu, X.-M., Zhao, H.-B., & Zhang, K. (2026) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.1005
“MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2016) 600 Number GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021) 1319 Number AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014) 395 Number AQuA (Ling et al., 2017) 254 Option SingleEq (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015) 508 Number SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021) 1000 Number MAWPS (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2016) 238…”
Quantifying the Effects of Image Degradation on LVLM Benchmark Results Systematically
Urbanski, R., & Peters, R. (2025) · International Conference on Data Technologies and Applications · doi:10.5220/0013462800003967
“This is also related to the field of Arithmetic Reasoning, which is being explored for text-to-text models and is based on math word problems, mostly at grade school level, (Cobbe et al., 2021; Roy & Roth, 2016; Shen et al., 2021) or proofing theorems (Hendrycks et al., 2021).”
Exploring Backward Reasoning in Large Language Models
Ranaldi, L., & Pucci, G. (2025) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.findings-naacl.366
“Following Deb et al. (2024) we use GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015); and Jiang et al. (2024) we use AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014) AQuA (Ling et al., 2017), GAIA (Mialon et al., 2023).”
Robustness of Prompting: Enhancing Robustness of Large Language Models Against Prompting AttacksPreprint
Lin, M., Chu, G., Ni, L., Sang, L., & Zhang, Y. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.03627
“It contains a total of 1000 test questions. e) MultiArith [22] is a dataset that includes a collection of polynomial arithmetic problems, consisting of a series of questions and corresponding answers.”
Ji, X. (2024) · Poster Volume Ⅰ The 2024 Twentieth International Conference on Intelligent Computing August 5-8, 2024 Tianjin, China · doi:10.65286/icic.v20i2.95209
“…(2) GSM8K [6] dataset of high quality linguistically diverse grade school math word problems created by human problem writers, (3) Mul-tiArith [13] dataset consists high-quality question description and formulas, (4) SVAMP [11] a challenge set for elementary-level Math Word Problems and (5)…”
Chen, J.-H., Chen, L., Zhu, C., & Zhou, T.-Y. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.08119
“We conduct a series of experiments on various reasoning benchmarks: arithmetic reasoning: GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2016), AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), AQuA (Ling et al., 2017) and SingleOp (Wei et al., 2022). common-sense reasoning: CSQA…”
MethodBarbosa, S. D. J., Chen, P., Cuzzocrea, A., Du, X.-Y., Kara, O., Liu, T., Sivalingam, K., Ślȩzak, D., Washio, T., Yang, X.-K., et al. (2020) · Communications in Computer and Information Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-59082-6
Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems
Cobbe, K., Kosaraju, V., Bavarian, M., Chen, M., Jun, H., Kaiser, L., Plappert, M., Tworek, J., Hilton, J., Nakano, R., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.14168 · Cited by 575
“Early math word problem datasets (Kushman et al., 2014; Roy and Roth, 2015) are relatively small and are not well suited for testing the limits of modern language models.”
BackgroundSelf-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models
Wang, X., Wei, J., Schuurmans, D., Le, Q., Chi, E., Narang, S., Chowdhery, A., & Zhou, D. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.11171 · Cited by 829
“For these tasks, we used the Math Word Problem Repository (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2016), including AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014), MultiArith (Roy & Roth, 2015), and ASDiv (Miao et al., 2020).”
MethodChen, W., Ma, X., Wang, X., & Cohen, W. W. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.12588 · Cited by 125
“Earlier, there have been studies in understanding NLP models’ capabilities to solve arithmetic/algebraic questions (Hosseini et al., 2014; Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015; Roy and Roth, 2015; Ling et al., 2017; Roy and Roth, 2018).”
BackgroundEncouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debate
Liang, T., He, Z., Jiao, W., Wang, X., Wang, Y., Wang, R., Yang, Y., Shi, S., & Tu, Z. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.19118 · Cited by 320
“Compared to the commonly-used datasets, e.g., MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015), GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), our dataset presents two distinct challenges: • Resistance to Intuition.”
MethodAutomatic Chain of Thought Prompting in Large Language Models
Zhang, Z., Zhang, A., Li, M., & Smola, A. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.03493 · Cited by 274
“Figure 7 compares the accuracy on MultiArith at each batch (m = 30) in this streaming setting (extended version: Figure 11 in the Appendix).”
MethodInfluentialTowards Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Survey
Huang, J., & Chang, K. C.-C. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2212.10403 · Cited by 428
“Representative benchmarks for arithmetic reasoning include GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), Math (Hendrycks et al., 2021), MathQA (Amini et al., 2019), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), AS-Div (Miao et al., 2020), AQuA (Ling et al., 2017), and MAWPS (Roy and Roth, 2015).”
WizardMath: Empowering Mathematical Reasoning for Large Language Models via Reinforced Evol-Instruct
Luo, H., Sun, Q., Xu, C., Zhao, P., Lou, J., Tao, C., Geng, X., Lin, Q., Chen, S., Tang, Y., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.09583 · Cited by 33
“Models are tested on various MWP benchmarks (Roy & Roth, 2015; Hendrycks et al., 2021).”
MAmmoTH: Building Math Generalist Models through Hybrid Instruction Tuning
Yue, X., Qu, X., Zhang, G., Fu, Y., Huang, W., Sun, H., Su, Y., & Chen, W. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.05653 · Cited by 21
“Early on, mathematical reasoning is mostly focused on solving synthetic basic math problems like AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014) and other arithmetic reasoning datasets (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015; Roy & Roth, 2015; Patel et al., 2021).”
BackgroundLanguage Models can Solve Computer Tasks
Kim, G., Baldi, P., & McAleer, S. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.17491 · Cited by 101
“Notably, Zero-Shot + RCI outperforms Zero-Shot CoT and Few-Shot CoT without any CoT prompting in four tasks except MultiArith.”
MethodInfluentialTravelPlanner: A Benchmark for Real-World Planning with Language Agents
Xie, J., Zhang, K., Chen, J., Zhu, T., Lou, R., Tian, Y., Xiao, Y., & Su, Y. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.01622 · Cited by 22
“Previous studies typically assess LLM-powered language agents in focused domains: arithmetic reasoning targeting correct solutions (Roy & Roth, 2015; Cobbe et al., 2021; Patel et al., 2021); tool-use evaluating agents’ proficiency in employing tools and reporting results (Li et al., 2023; Xu et…”
Faithful Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
Lyu, Q., Havaldar, S., Stein, A., Zhang, L., Rao, D., Wong, E., Apidianaki, M., & Callison-Burch, C. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.13379 · Cited by 23
“We follow Wei et al. (2022) and consider the same five MWP benchmarks: GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015), ASDiv (Miao et al., 2020), and AQuA (Ling et al., 2017).”
MethodInfluentialHe, K., Mao, R., Lin, Q., Ruan, Y., Lan, X., Feng, M., & Cambria, E. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.05694 · Cited by 27
“The major drawback of MP and PP is the significant amount of communication time required between different devices, which can be regarded as memory-efficient but compute-inefficient methods.”
Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Without Prompting
Wang, X., & Zhou, D. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.10200 · Cited by 54
“For mathematical reasoning, we use the Grade-school math problems (GSM8K; Cobbe et al., 2021) and the multi-step arithmetic dataset from (MultiArith; Roy and Roth, 2015).”
CODI: Compressing Chain-of-Thought into Continuous Space via Self-Distillation
Shen, Z., Yan, H., Zhang, L., Hu, Z., Du, Y., & He, Y. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.21074 · Cited by 18
“Sur-5 prisingly, CODI surpasses CoT-SFT when using GPT-2 and achieves a higher relative score improvement on LLaMA1b compared to models trained on GSM8k-Aug.”
The Impact of Reasoning Step Length on Large Language Models
Jin, M., Yu, Q., Shu, D., Zhao, H., Hua, W., Meng, Y., Zhang, Y., & Du, M. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.04925 · Cited by 39
“So we have chosen two datasets and two CoT methods (auto-CoT and few-shot-CoT) for this investigation: MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015) and GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021) in GPT-3.”
MethodCut the Crap: An Economical Communication Pipeline for LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems
Zhang, G., Yue, Y., Li, Z., Yun, S., Wan, G., Wang, K., Cheng, D., Yu, J. X., & Chen, T. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.02506 · Cited by 4
“In our experiments, we test the performance of AgentPrune on three types of reasoning tasks and the corresponding logically challenging benchmarks: (1) General Reasoning : We opt for MMLU (Hendrycks et al., 2021) dataset; (2) Mathematical Reasoning : We select GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), MultiArith (Roy & Roth, 2016),…”
MethodExchange-of-Thought: Enhancing Large Language Model Capabilities through Cross-Model Communication
Yin, Z., Sun, Q., Chang, C., Guo, Q., Dai, J., Huang, X., & Qiu, X. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.01823 · Cited by 21
“In our experiments, we evaluated the performance of EoT across three complex reasoning tasks: (1) Mathematical Reasoning : This involves six datasets, which includes GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015), SingleEQ (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015), AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014), AQuA (Ling et al.…”
BackgroundMind's Eye: Grounded Language Model Reasoning through Simulation
Liu, R., Wei, J., Gu, S. S., Wu, T.-Y., Vosoughi, S., Cui, C., Zhou, D., & Dai, A. M. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.05359 · Cited by 24
“Large-scale pre-trained LMs have achieved revolutionary performance on many tasks, such as solving math word problems (Roy & Roth, 2015; Ling et al., 2017; Cobbe et al., 2021) and commonsense reasoning (Talmor et al., 2022; Geva et al., 2021).”
BackgroundWhen Large Language Models contradict humans? Large Language Models' Sycophantic Behaviour
Ranaldi, L., & Pucci, G. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.09410 · Cited by 11
“Math Word Problem: We select two similar benchmarks: GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), Multi-Arith (Roy and Roth, 2015).”
MethodLearning to Route LLMs with Confidence Tokens
Chuang, Y.-N., Sarma, P. K., Gopalan, P., Boccio, J., Bolouki, S., Hu, X., & Zhou, H. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.13284
“• GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021): GSM8K is a dataset containing graduate school math questions, where each question is collected from the Math World Problem Repository (Roy & Roth, 2015).”
Large Language Models are Better Reasoners with Self-Verification
Weng, Y., Zhu, M., Xia, F., Li, B., He, S., Liu, S., Sun, B., Liu, K., & Zhao, J. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2212.09561 · Cited by 110
“Table 7 – Continued from previous page Dataset Question Self-Verification MultiArith Q: Luke was organizing his baseball cards in a binder with 3 on each page.”
InfluentialLearning to Compress Prompt in Natural Language Formats
Chuang, Y.-N., Xing, T., Chang, C.-Y., Liu, Z., Chen, X., & Hu, X. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.18700 · Cited by 1
“Each question is collected from the Math World Problem Repository (Roy and Roth, 2015) with a numerical answer.”
MethodKim, J., Yang, N., & Jung, K. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.08631 · Cited by 2
“…twelve datasets used in prior research (Kong et al., 2024; Kojima et al., 2022) categorized in 4 categories: (1) Arithmetic , including MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015), GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014), AQUA-RAT (Ling et al., 2017), SingleEq (Koncel-Kedziorski et al.,…”
MethodAnyMAC: Cascading Flexible Multi-Agent Collaboration via Next-Agent Prediction
Wang, S., Tan, Z., Chen, Z., Zhou, S., Chen, T., & Li, J. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.17784
Using Large Language Model to Solve and Explain Physics Word Problems Approaching Human Level
Ding, J., Cen, Y., & Wei, X. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.08182 · Cited by 4
“As one of the most focused areas in natural language processing, automatic solution of Math word problem (MWP) reflects the capability of artificial intelligence (Roy and Roth, 2015; Zhang et al., 2019; Patel et al., 2021).”
BackgroundEchoPrompt: Instructing the Model to Rephrase Queries for Improved In-context Learning
Mekala, R. R., Razeghi, Y., & Singh, S. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.10687
“We evaluate numerical reasoning tasks from (Wei et al., 2023) for a fair comparison between the methods including, GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), AQUA-RAT (Ling et al., 2017), Sin-gleOp and MultiArith subsets from (Roy and Roth, 2016) .”
MethodCounterfactual Debating with Preset Stances for Hallucination Elimination of LLMs
Fang, Y., Li, M., Wang, W., Lin, H., & Feng, F. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.11514 · Cited by 2
“Specifically, we selected three mathematical reasoning datasets—SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), and Multi_Arith (Roy and Roth, 2016)—and one machine translation dataset, CommonMT (He et al., 2020).”
GroupGuard: A Framework for Modeling and Defending Collusive Attacks in Multi-Agent Systems
Tao, Y., Zheng, X., Yang, S., Tao, M., & Wang, X. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.13940
Distilling Reasoning Ability from Large Language Models with Adaptive Thinking
Chen, X., Zhou, S., Liang, K., & Liu, X. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.09170 · Cited by 2
“…complex reasoning datasets divided into four classes are used to evaluate the proposed method: arithmetic (SingleEq [63], AddSub [64], MultiArith [65], GSM8K [31], Aqua [66], Svamp [67]), symbolic [68] (Last Letter Concatenation, Coin Flip), common sense (Common-SenseQA [69], StrategyQA [70]),…”
Metadata
- Authors
- Roy, S., & Roth, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Corresponding author
- Roth, Dan
- ORCID
- Roth, Dan
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2016
- Pages
- 1743-1752
- arXiv
- 1608.01413
- OpenAlex
- W2251935656
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12
- FWCI
- 9.02
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (FA8750-13-2-0008, FA8750)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
- Keywords
- arithmetic word problems, automated problem solving, expression trees, constrained inference, world knowledge, feature extraction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review