The DOI matches its DataCite record; 12 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Solving General Arithmetic Word Problems
Open accessAbstract
This paper presents a novel approach to automatically solving arithmetic word problems. This is the first algorithmic approach that can handle arithmetic problems with multiple steps and operations, without depending on additional annotations or predefined templates. We develop a theory for expression trees that can be used to represent and evaluate the target arithmetic expressions; we use it to uniquely decompose the target arithmetic problem to multiple classification problems; we then compose an expression tree, combining these with world knowledge through a constrained inference framework. Our classifiers gain from the use of {\em quantity schemas} that supports better extraction of features. Experimental results show that our method outperforms existing systems, achieving state of the art performance on benchmark datasets of arithmetic word problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Table 6 shows that our optimized prompts also outperform baseline prompts with different scorer LLMs on these two benchmarks.”
From Large Language Models as Optimizers (2023) · cites this paper as Roy & Roth, 2016
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Learning to Automatically Solve Algebra Word Problems
Kushman, N., Zettlemoyer, L., Barzilay, R., & Artzi, Y. (2014) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.3115/v1/p14-1026 · Cited by 400 · cited 6×
“(Hos-seini et al., 2014) mentions the result of running the system of (Kushman et al., 2014) on AI2 dataset, and we report their result here.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe Importance of Syntactic Parsing and Inference in Semantic Role Labeling
Punyakanok, V., Roth, D., & Yih, W.-T. (2008) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli.2008.34.2.257 · Cited by 399 · cited 1×
“This has been successfully used to incorporate world knowledge at inference time, as well as getting around the need for large amounts of jointly annotated data for structured prediction (Roth and Yih, 2005; Punyakanok et al., 2005; Punyakanok et al., 2008; Clarke and Lapata, 2006; Barzilay and Lapata, 2006; Roy et al…”
MethodSelf-citationLearning to Solve Arithmetic Word Problems with Verb Categorization
Hosseini, M. J., Hajishirzi, H., Etzioni, O., & Kushman, N. (2014) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1058 · Cited by 324 · cited 8×
“(Hosseini et al., 2014) mentions the result of running the system of (Kushman et al.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialInteger linear programming inference for conditional random fields
Roth, D., & Yih, W.-T. (2005) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.1145/1102351.1102444 · Cited by 214 · cited 2×
“This has been successfully used to incorporate world knowledge at inference time, as well as getting around the need for large amounts of jointly annotated data for structured prediction (Roth and Yih, 2005; Punyakanok et al., 2005; Punyakanok et al., 2008; Clarke and Lapata, 2006; Barzilay and Lapata, 2006; Roy et al…”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationModeling Biological Processes for Reading Comprehension
Berant, J., Srikumar, V., Chen, P., Linden, A. V., Harding, B., Huang, B., Clark, P. E., & Manning, C. D. (2014) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1159 · Cited by 205 · cited 1×
“The system described in (Berant et al., 2014) attempts to automatically answer biology questions, by extracting the structure of biological processes from text.”
BackgroundReasoning about Quantities in Natural Language
Roy, S., Vieira, T., & Roth, D. (2015) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00118 · Cited by 133 · cited 6×
“For the IL dataset, we acquired the system of (Roy et al., 2015) from the authors, and ran it with the same fold information.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationStructured learning with constrained conditional models
Chang, M.-W., Ratinov, L., & Roth, D. (2012) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-012-5296-5 · Cited by 117 · cited 4×
“In particular, we use the L + I scheme of CCMs, which predicts structured output by independently learning several simple components, combining them at inference time.”
MethodInfluentialSelf-citationDiagram Understanding in Geometry Questions
Seo, M. J., Hajishirzi, H., Farhadi, A., & Etzioni, O. (2014) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v28i1.9146 · Cited by 105 · cited 1×
“There has also been efforts to solve geometry questions by jointly understanding diagrams and associated text (Seo et al., 2014).”
BackgroundElementary School Science and Math Tests as a Driver for AI: Take the Aristo Challenge!
Clark, P. (2015) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v29i2.19066 · Cited by 99 · cited 1×
“Our approach is related to work in understanding and solving elementary school standardized tests (Clark, 2015).”
MethodAggregation via Set Partitioning for Natural Language Generation
Barzilay, R., & Lapata, M. (2006) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.3115/1220835.1220881 · Cited by 94
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Y. Goldberg and M. Elhadad. 2010. An efficient algo- rithm for easy-first non-directional dependency pars- ing. In Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chap- ter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 742-750, Los Angeles, California, June.
- V. Punyakanok, D. Roth, and W. Yih. 2005. The ne- cessity of syntactic parsing for semantic role label- ing. In Proc. of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pages 1117-1123.
- D. Roth and W. Yih. 2004. A linear programming formulation for global inference in natural language tasks. In Hwee Tou Ng and Ellen Riloff, editors, Proc. of the Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL), pages 1-8. Associa- tion for Computational Linguistics.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 658
A Survey on Mathematical Reasoning and Optimization with Large Language Models
Forootani, A. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.17726 · Cited by 22
CoMAT: Chain of Mathematically Annotated Thought Improves Mathematical Reasoning
Leang, J. O. J., Gema, A. P., & Cohen, S. B. (2025) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.1024 · Cited by 12
Empowering Multi-step Reasoning across Languages via Program-Aided Language Models
Ranaldi, L., Pucci, G., Haddow, B., & Birch, A. (2024) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.678 · Cited by 2
“These approaches marked the beginning of the prompting era and were quickly followed by methods to elicit algorithmic and structured reasoning (Roy and Roth, 2015; Ling et al., 2017).”
MethodLatent Reasoning in LLMs as a Vocabulary-Space Superposition
Deng, J., Pang, L., Wei, Z., Xu, S., Duan, Z., Xu, K., Song, Y., Shen, H.-W., & Cheng, X.-Q. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.15522 · Cited by 21
“…model to a standard autoregressive attention mechanism. difficulty mathematical reasoning datasets (GSM8k-Aug (Deng et al., 2024), GSM-Hard (Gao et al., 2023), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), and MultiArith (Roy & Roth, 2015)) and high-difficulty datasets (Math500 (Hendrycks et al., 2021) and AIME24).”
Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Guided by Evolutionary Algorithms in Large Language Models
Jin, F.-H., Liu, Y., & Tan, Y. (2024) · Natural Language Processing and Chinese Computing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.05376 · Cited by 21
“For arithmetic reasoning tasks, we consider the following six arithmetic reasoning problem benchmarks: (1) Multi-Arith (Roy and Roth, 2015), (2) GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), (3) AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014), (4) AQuA (Ling et al., 2017), (5) SingleEq (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015), and (6) SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021…”
MethodMinT: Boosting Generalization in Mathematical Reasoning via Multi-view Fine-tuning
Liang, Z., Yu, D., Pan, X.-M., Yao, W., Zeng, Q., Zhang, X.-L., & Yu, D. (2023) · International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.07951 · Cited by 21
“It integrates several datasets (Hosseini et al., 2014; Kush-man et al., 2014; Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015; Roy and Roth, 2015) and thus serves as a comprehensive benchmark. increasing the number of datasets used in training with MinT boosts performance across all views.”
BackgroundMath Word Problem Solving by Generating Linguistic Variants of Problem StatementsPreprint
Raiyan, S. R., Faiyaz, M. N., Kabir, S., Kabir, M., Mahmud, H., & Hasan, M. K. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.13899
“Tree-based methods (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015; Roy and Roth, 2016; Roy et al., 2016; Roy and Roth, 2017) utilize the inherent binary tree-like structure of expressions/equations.”
MethodAre Language Models Worse than Humans at Following Prompts? It's Complicated
Webson, A., Loo, A., Yu, Q., & Pavlick, E. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.07085 · Cited by 21
“Indeed, Kojima et al. (2022) show various irrelevant and misleading base-lines perform poorly on an arithmetic dataset (Roy and Roth, 2015).”
BackgroundWeakly Supervised Neuro-Symbolic Module Networks for Numerical Reasoning over Text
Saha, A., Joty, S., & Hoi, S. C. H. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i10.21374 · Cited by 18
“Such discrete reasoning has indeed been incorporated for simpler, well-structured tasks like math word problems with a small context and few number entities like (Koncel-Kedziorski et al. 2016; Roy and Roth 2015) or QA over structured data (Knowledge Bases or Tables) (Zhong, Xiong, and Socher 2017; Liang et al.”
MethodEnhancing the Reasoning Capabilities of Small Language Models via Solution Guidance Fine-Tuning
Bi, J., Wu, Y., Xing, W., & Wei, Z. (2024) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.09906 · Cited by 20
“Inference Tasks: For mathematical application problems, we used GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), and MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2016).”
Code Prompting: a Neural Symbolic Method for Complex Reasoning in Large Language ModelsPreprint
Hu, Y., Yang, H.-T., Lin, Z.-C., & Zhang, M. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.18507 · Cited by 20
Dynamic Voting for Efficient Reasoning in Large Language Models
Xue, M., Liu, D., Lei, W., Ren, X., Yang, B., Xie, J., Zhang, Y., Peng, D., & Lv, J. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.203 · Cited by 10
“5 with self-consistency is capable of achieving close to 100% accuracy on certain tasks such as MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015), ARC (Clark et al., 2018), and CoinFlip (Wei et al., 2022).”
MethodGiving BERT a Calculator: Finding Operations and Arguments with Reading Comprehension
Andor, D., He, L., Lee, K., & Pitler, E. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1609 · Cited by 72
“The model can learn to predict new operations when appropriate in a math word problem setting (Roy and Roth, 2015) with very few training examples.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBoosting LLM Reasoning: Push the Limits of Few-shot Learning with Reinforced In-Context Pruning
Huang, X.-J., Zhang, L., Cheng, K.-T., & Yang, M. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.08901 · Cited by 19
“The evolution subset as the prompt candidates for evaluation are determined by searching the performance of math reasoning on 100 random examples.”
BackgroundWhen Does Verification Pay Off? A Closer Look at LLMs as Solution VerifiersPreprint
Lu, J., Teehan, R., Jin, J., & Ren, M. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.02304 · Cited by 17
Cost-Effective Communication: An Auction-based Method for Language Agent Interaction
Fan, Y.-J., Zhang, J., Cai, K., Yang, J., Tang, C., Wang, J., & Wang, K.-Z. (2025) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.13193 · Cited by 19
“For mathematical reasoning, we employ a diverse set of five benchmarks: GSM8K(Cobbe, Kosaraju, and Bavarian 2021), Mul-tiArith(Roy and Roth 2016), SVAMP(Patel, Bhattamishra, and Goyal 2021), AQuA(Ling et al. 2017), and the particularly challenging MATH-500(Hendrycks et al. 2021b) subset.”
SemCoT: Accelerating Chain-of-Thought Reasoning through Semantically-Aligned Implicit TokensPreprint
He, Y., Zheng, W., Zhu, Y., Zheng, Z., Su, L., Vasudevan, S., Guo, Q., Hong, L., & Li, J. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.24940
“For example, GSM8K [5], SVAMP [38], MultiArith [4] are for mathematical reasoning, they are in the same semantic domain.”
InfluentialLi, F., Fang, P., Shi, Z., Khan, A., Wang, F., Feng, D., Wang, W., Zhang, X., & Cui, Y. (2025) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.13534 · Cited by 19
“As shown in Figure 1, we input a mathematical problem from the MultiArith dataset (Roy and Roth, 2015) into GPT-4o mini 1 , where Zero-shot-CoT, PoT, and PS produced incorrect answers.”
World Models for Math Story ProblemsPreprint
Opedal, A., Stoehr, N., Saparov, A., & Sachan, M. (2023) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.04347 · Cited by 19
“While earlier models for solving MSPs (Hosseini et al., 2014; Kushman et al., 2014; Roy and Roth, 2015) focused on extracting various features from text to learn probabilistic models, recent efforts have used pre-trained large language models (LLMs) (Yang et al., 2021; Drori et al., 2022; Lewkowycz…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialWhy are NLP Models Fumbling at Elementary Math? A Survey of Deep Learning based Word Problem Solvers
Sundaram, S. S., Gurajada, S., Fisichella, M., Deepak, P., & Abraham, S. S. (2022) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.15683 · Cited by 19
“Some solvers (such as Roy and Roth (2015)) had a joint optimisation objective to identify relevant numbers and populating the expression tree.”
BackgroundClassifying and Solving Arithmetic Math Word Problems—An Intelligent Math Solver
Mandal, S., & Naskar, S. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2021.3057805 · Cited by 19
“Researchers [4], [35] at Illinois University developed an MWP solver which can solve diverse arithmetic word problems.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialA relation based algorithm for solving direct current circuit problems
He, B., Yu, X., Jian, P.-P., & Zhang, T. (2020) · Applied intelligence (Boston) · doi:10.1007/s10489-020-01667-7 · Cited by 19
“For example, Roy et al. [17] proposed a tree-based method to represent and evaluate the target arithmetic expressions for solving algorithmic problems.”
BackgroundMethodAsk Again, Then Fail: Large Language Models’ Vacillations in Judgment
Xie, Q., Wang, Z., Feng, Y., & Xia, R. (2024) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.577 · Cited by 18
“For Arithmetic Reasoning , we employ GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), and MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015).”
MethodInfluentialFewer is More: Boosting Math Reasoning with Reinforced Context Pruning
Huang, X., Zhang, L. L., Cheng, K.-T. T., Yang, F., & Yang, M. (2024) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.758 · Cited by 47
“The math datasets for evaluation include GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014), Multi-arith (Roy and Roth, 2015), Svamp (Patel et al., 2021), and Singleeq (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015).”
MethodMoS2: Mixture of Scale and Shift Experts for Text-Only Video Captioning
Jia, H., Xu, Y., Zhu, L., Chen, G., Wang, Y., & Yang, Y. (2024) · ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM) · doi:10.1145/3664647.3680686 · Cited by 9
“We further assess MoS 2 in text generation by fine-tuning LLaMA-7B [50] ontheMath10K[17]datasetandevaluatingitontheMultiArith[43] andAddSub[14]benchmarks,followingLLM-Adapters[17].”
COMET: “cone of experience” enhanced large multimodal model for mathematical problem generation
Liu, S., Feng, J., Yang, Z., Luo, Y.-W., Wan, Q., Shen, X.-X., & Sun, J.-W. (2024) · Science China Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11432-024-4242-0 · Cited by 18
“Roy et al. (Roy et al., 2015; Roy and Roth, 2016) mapped unstructured text to a more easily reasoned representation space to eliminate text ambiguity, which can reason multi-step arithmetic problems.”
BackgroundEmpowering Multi-step Reasoning across Languages via Tree-of-Thoughts
Ranaldi, L., Pucci, G., Ranaldi, F., Ruzzetti, E. S., & Zanzotto, F. M. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.08097 · Cited by 18
“…learning abilities (Brown et al., 2020; Wei et al., 2022; Min et al., 2022) to guide LLMs to generate desired task responses, marking the advent of the prompting era and surpassing the age of the intermediate steps in algorithmic and structured reasoning (Roy and Roth, 2015; Ling et al., 2017).”
BackgroundDemocratizing Reasoning Ability: Tailored Learning from Large Language Model
Wang, Z., Huang, S.-H., Liu, Y., Wang, J.-H., Song, M., Zhang, Z.-H., Huang, H.-Z., Wei, F.-R., Deng, W.-W., Sun, F., et al. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.13332 · Cited by 18
“However, excessive emphasis on self-reflection learning (i.e., a larger value of λ ) typically leads to poorer performance and instability, especially for the MultiArith dataset.”
BackgroundMethodDialCoT Meets PPO: Decomposing and Exploring Reasoning Paths in Smaller Language Models
Han, C., Du, X., Zhang, C., Lian, Y., Li, X., Gao, M., & Wang, B. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.05074 · Cited by 18
“In addition, to verify the model’s generalization capability on out-of-distribution tasks, we also test on the Multi-Arith (Roy and Roth, 2015), ASDiv (Miao et al., 2020) and SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021) datasets.”
MethodA Survey in Mathematical Language ProcessingPreprint
Meadows, J., & Freitas, A. (2022) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.15231 · Cited by 9
“Solving arithmetic (Roy and Roth, 2016) or algebra (Kushman et al., 2014) word problems.”
BackgroundAyuso, Á. M., Adamuz-Povedano, N., & López, R. B. (2020) · Aula Abierta · doi:10.17811/rifie.49.1.2020.83-90 · Cited by 19
Adaption-of-Thought: Learning Question Difficulty Improves Large Language Models for Reasoning
Xu, M., Li, Y., Sun, K., & Qian, T.-Y. (2024) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.313 · Cited by 18
“Arithmetic: AQUA (Ling et al., 2017), GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015), AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014), SingleEq (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015b).”
Li, S., Liu, Y., Zheng, Y., Li, M., Nguyen, Q. V. H., & Pan, S. (2026) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3774904.3792537 · Cited by 1
Tian, C.-H., Wang, Y., Liu, X.-B., Wang, Z., Ding, L., Zhang, M., & Zhang, M. (2025) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.19236 · Cited by 17
“The algorithmic procedure is provided in Appendix A.2, and Roth, 2015), AQuA (Patel et al., 2021), and SVAMP (Ling et al., 2017); and code generation with HumanEval (Chen et al., 2021).”
Wei, C., Wang, B., Kim, J., & Chen, N. F. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.15000 · Cited by 17
“Problems in Contextual Reasoning category are sourced from datasets AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014; Mishra et al., 2022), SingleOp (Roy and Roth, 2015; Mishra et al., 2022), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), and GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), with increasing difficulty.”
Assessing, Exploiting, and Mitigating Syntactic Robustness Failures in LLM-Based Code Generation
Sarker, L., Downing, M., Desai, A., & Bultan, T. (2024) · FORGE@ICSE · doi:10.1145/3793655.3793727 · Cited by 18
Meadows, J., & Freitas, A. (2023) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00594 · Cited by 30
“Solving arithmetic (Roy and Roth, 2016) or algebra (Kushman et al., 2014) word problems.”
BackgroundSolving arithmetic word problems by scoring equations with recursive neural networks
Zaporojets, K., Bekoulis, G., Deleu, J., Demeester, T., & Develder, C. (2021) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114704 · Cited by 24
Kim, J., Yang, N., & Jung, K. (2025) · International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing and Conference of the Asia-Pacific Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (IJCNLP-AACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.findings-ijcnlp.51 · Cited by 6
“We conduct our experiments across twelve datasets categorized in 4 categories: (1) Arithmetic , including MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015), GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), AddSub (Hos-seini et al., 2014), AQUA-RAT (Ling et al., 2017), SingleEq (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015), and SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021) (2) Commonsense…”
Automatic Prompt Selection for Large Language Models
Do, V.-T., Hoang, V.-K., Nguyen, D.-H., Sabahi, S., Yang, J., Hotta, H., Nguyen, M., & Le, H. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.02717 · Cited by 16
“MultiArith [18] is the subset of the Mawps repository [17].”
BackgroundHint-before-Solving Prompting: Guiding LLMs to Effectively Utilize Encoded Knowledge
Fu, J.-L., Huangfu, S., Yan, H., Ng, S.-K., & Qiu, X. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.14310 · Cited by 16
“Mathematical Reasoning We considered five popular mathematical reasoning datasets, namely GSM8K (G8K) (Cobbe et al., 2021), MultiArith (MArith) (Roy and Roth, 2016), AQuA (Ling et al., 2017), ASDiv (Miao et al., 2021), and MATH (Hendrycks et al., 2021a).”
MethodGet an A in Math: Progressive Rectification Prompting
Wu, Z.-Y., Jiang, M., & Shen, C. (2023) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.06867 · Cited by 16
“We conduct comprehensive experiments on eight math word problem datasets, including AddSub (Hosseini et al. 2014), SingleOp (Roy, Vieira, and Roth 2015), MultiArith (Roy and Roth 2015), SingleEq (Koncel-Kedziorski et al. 2015), SVAMP (Patel, Bhattamishra, and Goyal 2021), GSM8K (Cobbe et al. 2021), GSM-IC2-1K (Shi et…”
MethodInfluentialA Cognitive Solver with Autonomously Knowledge Learning for Reasoning Mathematical Answers
Liu, J., Huang, Z., Lin, X., Liu, Q., Ma, J., & Chen, E. (2022) · Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icdm54844.2022.00037 · Cited by 13
“Specifically, rule-based methods rely on manually crafted schemas and pattern matching [2], while statistic-based methods leverage traditional machine learning models like SVM to select and complete pre-defined templates [27].”
MethodKaVa: Latent Reasoning via Compressed KV-Cache Distillation
Kuzina, A., Pi'oro, M., Whatmough, P. N., & Bejnordi, B. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.02312 · Cited by 15
“We evaluate the model trained on MetaMathQA on in-distribution MATH500 (Hendrycks et al.) and out-of-distribution multiArith (Roy & Roth, 2015) and DeepMind-Mathematics (Saxton et al., 2019).”
Theorem Prover as a Judge for Synthetic Data Generation
Leang, J. O. J., Hong, G., Li, W.-D., & Cohen, S. B. (2025) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.1448 · Cited by 15
“We evaluate on a diverse set of mathematical benchmarks, including SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2016) GSMSymbolic-p1 (Mirzadeh et al., 2024), MATH-500 (Hendrycks et al., 2021), AQUA (Ling et al., 2017), AIME (2024), OlympiadBench (He et al., 2024) datasets.”
InfluentialPropulsion: Steering LLM with Tiny Fine-TuningPreprint
Kowsher, M., Prottasha, N. J., & Bhat, P. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.10927 · Cited by 11
“For arithmetic reasoning tasks, we also use several professional datasets, including MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2016), GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014), SingleEq (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015), and SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021) different arithmetic reasoning-related problems.”
MethodTaD: A Plug-and-Play Task-Aware Decoding Method to Better Adapt LLMs on Downstream Tasks
Xu, X., Chen, H., Lin, Z., Han, J., Gong, L., Wang, G., Bao, Y., & Ding, G. (2024) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2024/728 · Cited by 6
Deb, A., Oza, N., Singla, S., Khandelwal, D., Garg, D., & Singla, P. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.01991 · Cited by 15
“This problem has received significant attention in the recent literature (Lu et al., 2022), and specific datasets (Cobbe et al., 2021; Roy and Roth, 2015; Patel et al., 2021) have been proposed as a benchmark for this task.”
BackgroundImproving Compositional Generalization in Math Word Problem Solving
Lan, Y.-S., Wang, L., Jiang, J., & Lim, E.-P. (2022) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2209.01352 · Cited by 15
Solving Arithmetic Word Problems Automatically Using Transformer and Unambiguous Representations
Griffith, K., & Kalita, J. K. (2019) · International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI) · doi:10.1109/csci49370.2019.00101 · Cited by 11
“multiplication, and division word problems. 1) AI2 [3]. AI2 is a collection of 395 addition and subtraction problems, containing numeric values, where some may not be relevant to the question. 2) CC [20]. The Common Core dataset contains 600 2- step questions. The Cognitive Computation Group at the University of Penns…”
BackgroundAdvancing Collaborative Debates with Role Differentiation through Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
Li, H., Su, Z., Xue, Y., Tian, Z., Song, Y., & Huang, M. (2025) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.1105 · Cited by 12
“To evaluate the effectiveness of our approach, we conduct experiments using seven mathematical and reasoning datasets: AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014), SingleEQ (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015), Multi-Arith (Roy and Roth, 2016), GSM8k (Cobbe et al., 2021), ASDiv (Miao et al., 2021), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), and MATH…”
ArithmAttack: Evaluating Robustness of LLMs to Noisy Context in Math Problem SolvingPreprint
Abedin, Z. U., Qamar, S., Flek, L., & Karimi, A. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.08203 · Cited by 13
“Across all models except for Zephyr, the impact of noise was more pronounced in the GSM8K dataset than in MultiArith, with a larger drop in accuracy as the noise levels increased (Figure 3).”
InfluentialData for Mathematical Copilots: Better Ways of Presenting Proofs for Machine Learning
Frieder, S., Bayer, J., Looi, S., Loader, J., Berner, J., Collins, K. M., Juhász, A., Ruehle, F., Welleck, S., Poesia, G., et al. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.15184 · Cited by 14
Solving Arithmetic Word Problems with Transformers and Preprocessing of Problem Text
Griffith, K., & Kalita, J. (2021) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.00893 · Cited by 14
“CC (Roy and Roth, 2015).”
Solving arithmetic word problems: A deep learning based approach
Mandal, S., Sekh, A. A., & Naskar, S. (2020) · Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.3233/jifs-179911 · Cited by 14
“[27–29] proposed various methods to understand a word problem and developed algorithms to form expression tree (representing a word problem) with relevant quantities.”
InfluentialTowards Question Format Independent Numerical Reasoning: A Set of Prerequisite TasksPreprint
Mishra, S. R., Mitra, A., Varshney, N., Sachdeva, B., & Baral, C. R. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.08516 · Cited by 12
Beyond Sentential Semantic Parsing: Tackling the Math SAT with a Cascade of Tree Transducers
Hopkins, M., Petrescu-Prahova, C., Levin, R., Bras, R. L., Herrasti, A., & Joshi, V. (2017) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d17-1083 · Cited by 14
“A common property of these datasets is that they have been curated such that any given question can be solved by a limited-depth operator tree (AI2, Illinois, Commoncore) or a limited set of equation templates (Alg514 and DRAW).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialExplanation Selection Using Unlabeled Data for In-Context Learning
Ye, X., & Durrett, G. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.04813 · Cited by 14
“We choose this particular arithmetic reasoning dataset as it contains real-world math problems paired with diverse natural language texts as opposed to synthetically generated problems (Roy & Roth, 2015).”
HoT: Highlighted Chain of Thought for Referencing Supporting Facts from InputsPreprint
Nguyen, T. T., Bolton, L., Taesiri, M. R., Bui, T., & Nguyen, A. T. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.02003 · Cited by 13
Sun, Y., Yin, Z., Huang, X.-J., Qiu, X.-P., & Zhao, H. (2025) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.15581 · Cited by 13
S2FT: Efficient, Scalable and Generalizable LLM Fine-tuning by Structured Sparsity
Yang, X.-Y., Leng, J., Guo, G., Zhao, J.-W., Nakada, R., Zhang, L., Yao, H.-X., & Chen, B.-D. (2024) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.06289 · Cited by 13
“We followed Hu et al. [28] and evaluated S 2 FT on seven math reasoning tasks, including MultiArith [55], GSM8K [14], AddSub [25], AQuA [37], SingleEq [31], SVAMP [50] and MAWPS [32].”
When is the consistent prediction likely to be a correct prediction?
Nguyen, A., Mekala, D., Dong, C., & Shang, J.-B. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.05778 · Cited by 13
“We consider GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2016) datasets and Mixtral-8x7B, Llama-2 70B language models.”
MethodInfluentialCutting Through the Noise: Boosting LLM Performance on Math Word Problems
Anantheswaran, U., Gupta, H., Scaria, K., Verma, S., Baral, C., & Mishra, S. (2024) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.15444 · Cited by 13
“Building upon prior efforts in mathematical problem dataset curation, we leverages existing MWP datasets (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2016; Roy and Roth, 2016, 2018; Kushman et al., 2014).”
Illinois Math Solver: Math Reasoning on the Web
Roy, S., & Roth, D. (2016) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/n16-3011 · Cited by 13
“The second component of our system is the arithmetic word problem solver developed in our previous work (Roy and Roth, 2015).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationForward-Backward Reasoning in Large Language Models for VerificationPreprint
Jiang, W., Shi, H., Yu, L., Liu, Z., Zhang, Y., Li, Z., & Kwok, J. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.07758 · Cited by 13
“…are commonly used in evaluating CoT reasoning ability (Zheng et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2023): (i) AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014), (ii) Multi-Arith (Roy and Roth, 2015), (iii) SingleEQ (Kon-cel-Kedziorski et al., 2015), (iv) SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), (v) GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), (vi) AQuA…”
A Survey on Feedback-based Multi-step Reasoning for Large Language Models on MathematicsPreprint
Wei, T.-R., Liu, H., Wu, X., & Fang, Y. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.14333 · Cited by 10
“MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2016) consists of 600 multi-step arithmetic problems extracted from the commoncoresheets website.”
Rethinking Chain-of-Thought from the Perspective of Self-Training
Wu, Z.-Q., Xu, B., Cui, R., Zhan, M., Zhu, X., & Feng, L. (2024) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.10827 · Cited by 12
“We evaluate our CoT framework on 10 reasoning datasets, including six arithmetic datasets ( i.e., MultiArith (Roy & Roth, 2016), GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), SingleEq (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015), AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014), AQuA (Ling et al., 2017), and SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021)), two commonsense reasoning da…”
Towards Human-aligned Evaluation for Linear Programming Word Problems
Xing, L., Wang, X.-L., Feng, Y., Fan, Z.-N., Xiong, J., Guo, Z., Fu, X., Ramamonjison, R., Mostajabdaveh, M., Han, X.-W., et al. (2024) · International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.63317/3579utpgevib · Cited by 12
“Most prior research has focused on elementary arithmetic problems (Roy and Roth, 2015; Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2016; Patel et al., 2021; Cobbe et al., 2021) and algebra problems (Kushman et al., 2014; Huang et al., 2016) due to their straightforward solvability and evaluative convenience through…”
BackgroundWu, Y., Liu, J., Bu, X., Liu, J., Zhou, Z., Zhang, Y., Zhang, C., Bai, Z., Chen, H., Ge, T., et al. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.14660 · Cited by 15
“It is impor-6817 (Hendrycks et al., 2021c) EN 5000 TabMWP (Lu et al., 2023) EN 7686 Dolphin18K (Huang et al., 2016) EN 1504 Math23K (Wang et al., 2017) ZH 1000 ASDiv (Miao et al., 2020) EN 2305 SingleOp (Roy et al., 2015) EN 562 AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014) EN 395 MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015) EN 600 MMLU-Math (He…”
BackgroundInfluentialAsk Again, Then Fail: Large Language Models' Vacillations in Judgment
Xie, Q., Wang, Z., Feng, Y., & Xia, R. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.02174
“…al., 2021) for diverse grade school math problems, (2) SVAMP dataset (Patel et al., 2021) for challenging math problems, and (3) MultiArith dataset (Roy & Roth, 2016) for multi-step reasoning 4 LLMs Waver in Judgements As main results, we analyze ChatGPT’s judgement consistency in arithmetic (§…”
MethodInfluentialKoTAB: Korean Template-Based Arithmetic Solver with BERT
Ki, K. S., Lee, D. G., & Gweon, G. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data and Smart Computing (BigComp) · doi:10.1109/bigcomp48618.2020.00-61 · Cited by 12
“In the context of natural language understanding, recent studies on MWPS have been mainly conducted using machine learning techniques [2, 3].”
MethodJust Add Functions: A Neural-Symbolic Language Model
Demeter, D., & Downey, D. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v34i05.6264 · Cited by 1
“Other related work explores the use of language models to solve algebra word problems (Kushman et al. 2014; Roy and Roth 2015) or to evaluate nested arithmetic expressions (Hupkes and Zuidema 2018).”
BackgroundBenNumEval: A Benchmark to Assess LLMs’ Numerical Reasoning Capabilities in Bengali
Ahmed, K., Osama, M., Sharif, O., Hossain, E., & Hoque, M. M. (2025) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2025 · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.915 · Cited by 1
“Roy and Roth (2016) (2022b) introduced two benchmarks: NumGLUE, with 100K problems across eight tasks to assess arithmetic reasoning, and LILA (Mishra et al., 2022a), which combines 20 datasets for mathematical reasoning, categorized into 23 tasks.”
How Many Demonstrations Do You Need for In-context Learning?
Chen, J., Chen, L., Zhu, C., & Zhou, T. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023 · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.745 · Cited by 12
“We conduct a series of experiments on various reasoning benchmarks: arithmetic reasoning: GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2016), AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), AQuA (Ling et al., 2017) and SingleOp (Wei et al., 2022). common-sense reasoning: CSQA…”
MethodShen, X., Zhang, Q., Wang, S., Tan, Z., Zhao, X., Yao, L., Tadiparthi, V., Mahjoub, H. N., Moradi‐Pari, E., Lee, K., et al. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.14319 · Cited by 13
“To assess the end-to-end performance of our integrated framework, we evaluate it on six standard benchmarks spanning three domains: general reasoning ( MMLU (Hendrycks et al., 2021)), mathematical problem solving ( GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), AQuA (Ling et al., 2017), MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2016), and SVAMP (Patel…”
Zhu, X., Li, J., Yin, R., Ma, C., & Wang, W. (2025) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn64981.2025.11227853 · Cited by 15
“SVAMP [15] with 1,000 samples, and MultiArith [16] with 180 samples.”
CE-LoRA: Computation-Efficient LoRA Fine-Tuning for Language ModelsPreprint
Chen, G., He, Y., Hu, Y., Yuan, K., & Yuan, B. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.01378 · Cited by 6
“• Arithmetic Reasoning : This benchmark consists of seven subsets: MultiArith [25], GSM8K [26], AddSub [27], AQuA [28], SingleEq [29], SVAMP [30] and MAWPS [31].”
Toh, V., Ghosal, D., & Poria, S. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.12608 · Cited by 10
“We conducted evaluations across seven mathematical reasoning datasets, including GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), ASDIV (Miao et al., 2020), MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015), SingleEQ (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015), SingleOP (Roy et al., 2015), and AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialInjecting the score of the first-stage retriever as text improves BERT-based re-rankers
Askari, A., Abolghasemi, A., Pasi, G., Kraaij, W., & Verberne, S. (2024) · Discover Computing · doi:10.1007/s10791-024-09435-8 · Cited by 12
LLM can Achieve Self-Regulation via Hyperparameter Aware Generation
Wang, S., Li, S.-M., Sun, T., Fu, J.-L., Cheng, Q., Ye, J., Ye, J., Qiu, X.-P., & Huang, X.-J. (2024) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.11251 · Cited by 11
“The CoinFlip dataset is sourced from (Wei et al., 2022), the MultiArith dataset is acquired from (Roy and Roth, 2016), and the remaining datasets are derived from the Big-Bench dataset (bench authors, 2023).”
MethodZou, Y., & Lu, W. (2019) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1517 · Cited by 11
“Recent research (Hosseini et al., 2014; Kushman et al., 2014; Roy and Roth, 2015; Wang et al., 2017, 2018b,a) focused on designing algorithms to automatically solve arithmetic word problems.”
EPT-X: An Expression-Pointer Transformer model that generates eXplanations for numbers
Kim, B., Ki, K. S., Rhim, S., & Gweon, G. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.305 · Cited by 9
“Early attempts used hand-crafted features collected by experts to make a model understand a word problem (Kushman et al., 2014; Roy and Roth, 2015; Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015; Zhou et al., 2015; Upadhyay et al., 2016; Roy and Roth, 2017).”
BackgroundBanglaMATH : A Bangla benchmark dataset for testing LLM mathematical reasoning at grades 6, 7, and 8
Prama, T. T., Danforth, C., & Dodds, P. (2025) · Proceedings of The 3rd Workshop on Mathematical Natural Language Processing (MathNLP 2025) · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.mathnlp-main.10 · Cited by 10
“Traditional math word problem (MWP) datasets like AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014) and MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2016) are integrated into broader MWP repositories.”
Yan, J., Liu, L., Pan, Y., Chen, S., Xiang, Y., & Tang, B. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.23574 · Cited by 2
“Including StrategyQA (Geva et al., 2021) for commonsense reasoning, Addsub (Hosseini et al., 2014), Multiarith (Roy and Roth, 2015), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), SingleEq (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015) and GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021) for arithmetic math inference and Date Understanding (Srivastava…”
GEMMAS: Graph-based Evaluation Metrics for Multi Agent Systems
Lee, J., Chang, R., Kwon, D., Singh, H., & Verma, N. (2025) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.13190 · Cited by 10
“On MultiArith with Qwen2.”
Influential"Well, Keep Thinking": Enhancing LLM Reasoning with Adaptive Injection Decoding
Jin, H., Yeom, J., Bae, S., & Kim, T. (2025) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.10167 · Cited by 10
“(a) Arithmetic Reasoning: MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015) includes elementary school arithmetic questions.”
BMWP: the first Bengali math word problems dataset for operation prediction and solving
Mondal, S., Khatua, D., Mandal, S., Prasad, D. K., & Sekh, A. A. (2025) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-025-00243-7 · Cited by 7
“They produced CC_Ko and IL_Ko by translating the two English MWPS datasets, IL and CC [39].”
TAPO: Task-Referenced Adaptation for Prompt Optimization
Luo, W., Wang, W.-P., Li, X., Zhou, W., Jia, P., & Zhao, X. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp49660.2025.10888677 · Cited by 3
“To evaluate our method, we use a range of datasets focused on mathematical reasoning and multi-task problem solving, including AddSub [8], MultiArith [9], and Sin-gleEQ [10] for arithmetic reasoning, as well as SVAMP [11] and GSM8K [12] for multi-step problem solving.”
EXPLORA: Efficient Exemplar Subset Selection for Complex Reasoning
Purohit, K., Venktesh, V., Devalla, R., Yerragorla, K. M., Bhattacharya, S., & Anand, A. (2024) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.307 · Cited by 10
“Unlike fine-tuning task-specific models (Chiang and Chen, 2019; Ling et al., 2017; Roy and Roth, 2016; Cobbe et al., 2021), recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have paved the way for new approaches that employ in-context learning (ICL) (Wei et al., 2023) to solve complex reasoning…”
BackgroundEnhancing Adversarial Attacks through Chain of ThoughtPreprint
Su, J. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.21791 · Cited by 9
“This strategy can sometimes “fool” the LLMs into producing incorrect or irrelevant answers for certain tasks, such as arithmetic (Roy and Roth, 2016) and commonsense reasoning (Talmor et al., 2018).”
BackgroundSun, H., Wu, J.-Y., Cai, H., Wei, X., Feng, Y., Wang, B., Wang, S.-Q., Zhang, Y., & Yin, D. (2024) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.13181 · Cited by 10
“MultiArith is a multi-step arithmetic reasoning dataset (Roy and Roth, 2016).”
RoCoFT: Efficient Finetuning of Large Language Models with Row-Column Updates
Kowsher, M., Esmaeilbeig, T., Yu, C.-N., Chen, C., Soltanalian, M., & Yousefi, N. (2024) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.10075 · Cited by 10
“The RoCoFT 3-Row method achieves the best results on Boolean Questions (BoolQ, 65.92%), MultiArith (89.45%), and S.MP (56.79%), while the RoCoFT 3-Column method excels on SIQA (69.96”
InfluentialPath-Consistency with Prefix Enhancement for Efficient Inference in LLMsPreprint
Zhu, J., Huang, Y., Shen, Y., Zhao, J., & Zou, A. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.01281 · Cited by 16
Yin, Z., Sun, Q., Guo, Q., Zeng, Z.-Y., Li, X., Sun, T., Chang, C., Cheng, Q., Wang, D., Mou, X.-F., et al. (2024) · International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.12939 · Cited by 10
“(1) Mathematical reasoning incorporates six representative datasets, namely GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015), SingleEQ (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2016), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), AddSub (Hos-seini et al., 2014), and AQuA (Ling et al., 2017).”
BackgroundAdversarial Math Word Problem Generation
Xie, R., Huang, C., Wang, J., & Dhingra, B. (2024) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-emnlp.292 · Cited by 15
“Encouragingly, we find that 96.5% and 92.5% of the generated ASTs for GSM8K and MultiArith, respectively, are valid and free from these errors.”
InfluentialTian, Q., Zhu, H., Wang, L., Li, Y., & Lan, Y. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.16535 · Cited by 3
“On AddSub dataset, few-shot R 3 prompting method surpasses the SoTA results (Roy and Roth, 2016) which is obtained by training with full data ( 94 .”
MethodInfluentialExploring Equation as a Better Intermediate Meaning Representation for Numerical Reasoning
Wang, D., Dou, L.-X., Zhang, W., Zeng, J., & Che, W. (2023) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.10585 · Cited by 10
“A commonly used IMR is constant expressions (Roy and Roth 2015; Koncel-Kedziorski et al. 2016).”
MethodReGuLaR: Variational Latent Reasoning Guided by Rendered Chain-of-Thought
Wang, F., Liu, H., Zhao, G.-J., Xu, H.-T., & Gao, Z. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.23184 · Cited by 9
“…previous work (Tan et al., 2025), we primarily train and evaluate models on GSM8K-Aug (Deng et al., 2023), and additionally evaluate trained models using three out-of-domain math reasoning datasets: GSM-Hard (Gao et al., 2023), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), and MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015).”
MARCOS: Deep Thinking by Markov Chain of Continuous Thoughts
Liu, J.-Y., Huang, Z.-Y., Yang, X., Ji, T., Sims, A., Xu, H., Chen, E., Teh, Y. W., & Miao, N. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.25020 · Cited by 9
“Then, on three grade-school level mathematical benchmarks (GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), and MultiArith (Roy & Roth, 2015)), MarCos obtains performance on par with or even superior to transformer-based CoT reasoning , with a 4 .”
DART: Distilling Autoregressive Reasoning to Silent Thought
Jiang, N.-J., Wu, Z., Zhan, D.-C., Lai, F., & Lian, S. (2025) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.11752 · Cited by 9
“For out-of-distribution evaluation, we adopt GSM-HARD (Gao et al., 2023), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), and MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015) as robustness benchmarks.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Roy, S., & Roth, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Corresponding author
- Roth, Dan
- ORCID
- Roth, Dan
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2016
- Pages
- 1743-1752
- arXiv
- 1608.01413
- OpenAlex
- W2251935656
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12
- FWCI
- 9.02
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (FA8750-13-2-0008, FA8750)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
- Keywords
- arithmetic word problems, automated problem solving, expression trees, constrained inference, world knowledge, feature extraction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review