The DOI matches its DataCite record; 12 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Solving General Arithmetic Word Problems
Open accessAbstract
This paper presents a novel approach to automatically solving arithmetic word problems. This is the first algorithmic approach that can handle arithmetic problems with multiple steps and operations, without depending on additional annotations or predefined templates. We develop a theory for expression trees that can be used to represent and evaluate the target arithmetic expressions; we use it to uniquely decompose the target arithmetic problem to multiple classification problems; we then compose an expression tree, combining these with world knowledge through a constrained inference framework. Our classifiers gain from the use of {\em quantity schemas} that supports better extraction of features. Experimental results show that our method outperforms existing systems, achieving state of the art performance on benchmark datasets of arithmetic word problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Table 6 shows that our optimized prompts also outperform baseline prompts with different scorer LLMs on these two benchmarks.”
From Large Language Models as Optimizers (2023) · cites this paper as Roy & Roth, 2016
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Learning to Automatically Solve Algebra Word Problems
Kushman, N., Zettlemoyer, L., Barzilay, R., & Artzi, Y. (2014) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.3115/v1/p14-1026 · Cited by 400 · cited 6×
“(Hos-seini et al., 2014) mentions the result of running the system of (Kushman et al., 2014) on AI2 dataset, and we report their result here.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe Importance of Syntactic Parsing and Inference in Semantic Role Labeling
Punyakanok, V., Roth, D., & Yih, W.-T. (2008) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli.2008.34.2.257 · Cited by 399 · cited 1×
“This has been successfully used to incorporate world knowledge at inference time, as well as getting around the need for large amounts of jointly annotated data for structured prediction (Roth and Yih, 2005; Punyakanok et al., 2005; Punyakanok et al., 2008; Clarke and Lapata, 2006; Barzilay and Lapata, 2006; Roy et al…”
MethodSelf-citationLearning to Solve Arithmetic Word Problems with Verb Categorization
Hosseini, M. J., Hajishirzi, H., Etzioni, O., & Kushman, N. (2014) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1058 · Cited by 324 · cited 8×
“(Hosseini et al., 2014) mentions the result of running the system of (Kushman et al.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialInteger linear programming inference for conditional random fields
Roth, D., & Yih, W.-T. (2005) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.1145/1102351.1102444 · Cited by 214 · cited 2×
“This has been successfully used to incorporate world knowledge at inference time, as well as getting around the need for large amounts of jointly annotated data for structured prediction (Roth and Yih, 2005; Punyakanok et al., 2005; Punyakanok et al., 2008; Clarke and Lapata, 2006; Barzilay and Lapata, 2006; Roy et al…”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationModeling Biological Processes for Reading Comprehension
Berant, J., Srikumar, V., Chen, P., Linden, A. V., Harding, B., Huang, B., Clark, P. E., & Manning, C. D. (2014) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1159 · Cited by 205 · cited 1×
“The system described in (Berant et al., 2014) attempts to automatically answer biology questions, by extracting the structure of biological processes from text.”
BackgroundReasoning about Quantities in Natural Language
Roy, S., Vieira, T., & Roth, D. (2015) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00118 · Cited by 133 · cited 6×
“For the IL dataset, we acquired the system of (Roy et al., 2015) from the authors, and ran it with the same fold information.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationStructured learning with constrained conditional models
Chang, M.-W., Ratinov, L., & Roth, D. (2012) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-012-5296-5 · Cited by 117 · cited 4×
“In particular, we use the L + I scheme of CCMs, which predicts structured output by independently learning several simple components, combining them at inference time.”
MethodInfluentialSelf-citationDiagram Understanding in Geometry Questions
Seo, M. J., Hajishirzi, H., Farhadi, A., & Etzioni, O. (2014) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v28i1.9146 · Cited by 105 · cited 1×
“There has also been efforts to solve geometry questions by jointly understanding diagrams and associated text (Seo et al., 2014).”
BackgroundElementary School Science and Math Tests as a Driver for AI: Take the Aristo Challenge!
Clark, P. (2015) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v29i2.19066 · Cited by 99 · cited 1×
“Our approach is related to work in understanding and solving elementary school standardized tests (Clark, 2015).”
MethodAggregation via Set Partitioning for Natural Language Generation
Barzilay, R., & Lapata, M. (2006) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.3115/1220835.1220881 · Cited by 94
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Y. Goldberg and M. Elhadad. 2010. An efficient algo- rithm for easy-first non-directional dependency pars- ing. In Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chap- ter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 742-750, Los Angeles, California, June.
- V. Punyakanok, D. Roth, and W. Yih. 2005. The ne- cessity of syntactic parsing for semantic role label- ing. In Proc. of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pages 1117-1123.
- D. Roth and W. Yih. 2004. A linear programming formulation for global inference in natural language tasks. In Hwee Tou Ng and Ellen Riloff, editors, Proc. of the Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL), pages 1-8. Associa- tion for Computational Linguistics.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 658
Madmoni, L., Zait, A., Labzovsky, I., & Karmon, D. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.14371 · Cited by 1
“For instance, (Cobbe et al., 2021; Patel et al., 2021; Roy & Roth, 2016) test arithmetic reasoning, (Rajpurkar, 2016; Joshi et al., 2017) test question-answering, (Hendrycks et al., 2020) tests multi-level knowledge in a diverse set of fields, and (Thakur et al., 2021) test information-retrieval.”
BackgroundGLaPE: Gold Label-agnostic Prompt Evaluation for Large Language Models
Zhang, X.-C., Zhang, Z., & Zhao, H. (2024) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.02408 · Cited by 4
“We focused on arithmetic reasoning tasks, specifically AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014), AQuA (Ling et al., 2017), GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015), and SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021).”
MethodA Review and Roadmap of Deep Causal Model from Different Causal Structures and RepresentationsPreprint
Chen, H., Du, K., Li, C., & Yang, X. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.00923 · Cited by 3
“[110] text CI,CoT A text datasets for large language model with causal labels MultiArith [193] text QA,AR,CoT an arithmetic datasets with multiple steps and operations CSQA [233] text QA,CR,CoT A commonsense datasets answering with piror knowledge Coin Flip [254] text QA,SR,CoT A symbolic reasoning…”
BackgroundArithmetic Problem Solver Based on BERT Model and Mathematical Cognitive Pattern
Peng, R., Lyu, X., & Yu, X. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering · doi:10.1109/tale52509.2021.9678839 · Cited by 5
“Roy [11,12] defined the valid expression: a read-once arithmetic expression as one that makes use of each quantity at most once.”
BackgroundAdaptasi Test of Mathematical Ability (TOMA-3)
Siregar, N. R., Wimbarti, S., Kusrohmaniah, S., & Sunardi, Y. (2020) · JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika) · doi:10.33603/jnpm.v4i2.3218 · Cited by 3
“Soal cerita dalam matematika merepresentasikan pemecahan masalah (Johnson & Clohessy, 2014) yang memerlukan berpikir tingkat tinggi atau higher order thinking skills (HOTS) (Roy & Roth, 2016).”
BackgroundSachan, M., & Xing, E. P. (2018) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3219819.3219972
“Example mechine comprehension tasks include reading comprehensions [11, 44, 46, 50, 52–54, inter alia], science question answering [12, 49, 55, inter alia], algebra word problems [36, 48, inter alia], geometry problems [51, 57] and pre-university entrance exams [5, 23].”
BackgroundMatsuzaki, T., Iwane, H., Kobayashi, M., Zhan, Y.-Y., Fukasaku, R., Kudo, J., Anai, H., & Arai, N. (2018) · AI Communications · doi:10.3233/aic-180762 · Cited by 4
“It at-tracts much attention recently in the field of natural language processing [21,28,29,36,39,40,47].”
Liang, C.-C., Wong, Y.-S., Lin, Y.-C., & Su, K.-Y. (2017) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2017/775 · Cited by 4
Learning to Generate Textual Data
Bouchard, G., Stenetorp, P., & Riedel, S. (2016) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1167 · Cited by 4
“For AI2 and CC, we simply split the data randomly and for IL we opted to maintain the clusters described in Roy and Roth (2015).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialChen, Y., Li, S., & Yan, R. (2024) · Findings · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-eacl.4 · Cited by 4
“Recently, utilizing LLMs as evaluators becomes a natural idea for their remarkable performance across various tasks (Kushman et al., 2014; Roy and Roth, 2016; Bubeck et al., 2023).”
BackgroundExploring Reversal Mathematical Reasoning Ability for Large Language Models
Guo, P., You, W.-J., Li, J.-T., Yan, B.-W., & Zhang, M. (2024) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.811 · Cited by 4
“To evaluate LLMs’ reasoning ability and general ability, we utilize four mathematical datasets, namely GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), Multi-Arith (Roy and Roth, 2015), ASDiv (Miao et al., 2020), and SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021).”
MethodSequent-Prover: Training Agents for Formal, Checkable SMT-based Reasoning
Ganguly, D., Chen, W.-C., Hariri, M., Singh, V., Sankar, S., Wang, S., Yang, W., Zhang, B.-Y., Song, C.-D., Nemecek, A., et al. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.15258 · Cited by 4
“…et al., 2021; Han et al., 2024; Zhong et al., 2024; Lin et al., 2025a; Yu et al., 2020; Clark et al., 2020; Cobbe et al., 2021; Patel et al., 2021; Roy and Roth, 2015; Miao et al., 2020; Ling et al., 2017; Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2016; Dua et al., 2019; Mirzaee et al., 2021; Shi et al., 2022;…”
Latent Thought Flow: Efficient Latent Reasoning in Large Language ModelsPreprint
Zou, X., Huang, J., Li, J.-S., & Zhou, P. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.16222 · Cited by 4
“To test generalization and difficulty scalability, we further evaluate on out-of-domain math datasets, including GSM-Hard [6], SVAMP [53], MultiArith [54], AQUA-RAT [55], and MATH [56].”
Less is MoE: Trimming Experts in Domain-Specialist Language Models
He, H., Zou, X., Jiang, X., Ding, X., Qu, A., Li, J. B., & Miller, H. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.05538 · Cited by 3
NaRA: Noise-Aware LoRA for Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning of Diffusion LLMs
Wang, S., Zhuang, Z., Huang, R., & Zhang, Y. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.29716 · Cited by 3
“45% ), and also leads on GSM8K and MultiArith.”
MUX: Continuous Reasoning via Multiplexed TokensPreprint
Suleymanzade, A., Gozeten, H. A., Bronstein, M. M., Ceylan, İ. İ., & Kim, J. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.18264 · Cited by 2
“We use four test sets: GSM8K test split which is in-domain, and out-of-domain arithmetic datasets SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), GSM-Hard (Gao et al., 2023), and MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015) to test for transferability under distribution shift.”
Step-Level Sparse Autoencoder for Reasoning Process Interpretation
Yang, X., Liu, J.-Y., Lai, Y., Xu, H.-M., Huang, Z.-Y., & Miao, N. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.03031 · Cited by 3
“( 3) MultiArith(Roy & Roth, 2016): A collection of 600 problems for multi-step arithmetic math word problems designed to evaluate a model’s ability to perform compositional numerical reasoning over natural language.”
Eliciting Chain-of-Thought in Base LLMs via Gradient-Based Representation OptimizationPreprint
Wang, Z., Ma, Y., & Xu, C. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.19131 · Cited by 1
DAGP: Difficulty-Aware Graph Pruning for LLM-Based Multi-Agent System
Wang, S., & Tong, G. (2025) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3746252.3760954 · Cited by 1
“We evaluate across multiple task domains: general reasoning using MMLU [7]; mathematical reasoning using GSM8k [5], MultiArith [17], AQuA [13], and SVAMP [15]; and code generation using HumanEval [4].”
ThoughtProbe: Classifier-Guided LLM Thought Space Exploration via Probing Representations
Wang, Z., & Xu, C. (2025) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.307 · Cited by 1
“…popular mathematical reasoning benchmarks: (1) GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), a challenging dataset of grade school math problems; (2) MultiArith (MA) (Roy and Roth, 2016); (3) SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021); (4) MAWPS (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2016); and a logical reasoning benchmark: (5) CoinFlips…”
SliceFine: The Universal Winning-Slice Hypothesis for Pretrained NetworksPreprint
Kowsher, M., Polat, A. O., Ardehaly, E. M., Salehi, M., Ghiasi, Z., Murali, P., & Chen, C. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.08513 · Cited by 3
A Comparative Analysis of Sparse Autoencoder and Activation Difference in Language Model SteeringPreprint
Xie, J. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.01246
Reinforcement Learning-based Copyright Protection Watermarking for Large Language Model
Guo, S., Pang, K., Yang, Z., Li, Y., Qing, Y., & Huang, Y. (2025) · ACM Workshop on Information Hiding and Multimedia Security (IH&MMSec) · doi:10.1145/3733102.3733135 · Cited by 3
“At the same time, we used the MultiArith dataset [22] as the test set to systematically verify the effectiveness and generalization performance of the proposed method.”
MoA: Heterogeneous Mixture of Adapters for Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning of Large Language Models
Cao, J., Lin, T., Yuan, B., Yan, R., He, H., Zhang, W.-Q., Li, J.-C., Zhang, D., Tang, S.-L., & Zhuang, Y.-T. (2025) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.05928 · Cited by 3
“For mathematical reasoning, we evaluate performance on six test datasets: GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), Multi-Arith (Roy and Roth, 2016), AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014), AQuA (Ling et al., 2017), and Sin-gleEq (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015).”
Robustness of Prompting: Enhancing Robustness of Large Language Models Against Prompt Attacks
Mu, L., Chu, G., Li, N., Sang, L., & Zhang, Y. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tai.2026.3697684 · Cited by 2
“It contains a total of 1000 test questions. e) MultiArith [22] is a dataset that includes a collection of polynomial arithmetic problems, consisting of a series of questions and corresponding answers.”
FedGPL: Gradient Priority-based Federated Learning Enhancement for In-Vehicle Language Models
Yang, H., Xue, D., Wang, T., Kwak, J., & Kim, H. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems · doi:10.1145/3717835 · Cited by 3
“In the experimental section, we assessed the training efficacy using four reasoning datasets: SVAMP[18], GSM8K[6], MultiArith[38], and MATH[22].”
Tan, W., Chen, D., Xue, J., Wang, Z., & Chen, T. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.08068 · Cited by 3
“Our method is evaluated on six English mathematical reasoning benchmarks: AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014), SingleEQ (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015), GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), AQuA (Ling et al., 2017), one Chinese math reasoning benchmark, Math23K (Wang et…”
InfluentialConcept Distillation from Strong to Weak Models via Hypotheses-to-Theories PromptingPreprint
Boateng, E. A., Becker, C. O., Asghar, N., Walia, K., Srinivasan, A., Nosakhare, E., Srinivasan, S., & Dibia, V. C. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.09365
“We focus on three benchmark datasets: converting natural language to structure queries (NL2Code) – HumanEval (Chen et al., 2021), and reasoning over mathematical problems – Multi-Arith (Roy and Roth, 2015) and GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021).”
BackgroundInfluentialZou, A.-N., Zhang, Z., & Zhao, H. (2024) · International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.63317/4sc3hbwvccwn · Cited by 3
“To validate the effectiveness of our system, we conduct experiments on six datasets including two arithmetic reasoning tasks (MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015), SingleEq (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015)), two commonsense reasoning tasks (CSQA (Talmor et al., 2019), StrategyQA (Geva et al., 2021)),and…”
MethodHAWP: a Dataset for Hindi Arithmetic Word Problem Solving
Sharma, H., Mishra, P., & Sharma, D. (2022) · International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.63317/58ngt2uttek7 · Cited by 3
“( Roy and Roth, 2016) used expression trees to solve word problems where the whole solving process is decomposed into multiple classification tasks involving quantities and operations.”
MethodWARM: A Weakly (+Semi) Supervised Math Word Problem Solver
Chatterjee, O., Pandey, I., Waikar, A., Kumar, V., & Ramakrishnan, G. (2021) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.06722 · Cited by 3
“Tree-based meth-ods (Roy and Roth, 2015; Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015; Roy et al., 2016; Roy and Roth, 2017, 2018) replaced the process of deriving an equation by constructing an equivalent tree structure, step by step, in a bottom-up manner.”
BackgroundMethodAre middle school mathematics teachers able to solve word problems without using variable?
Özdemir, B. G., Erdem, E., Örnek, T., & Soylu, Y. (2018) · doi:10.1080/0020739x.2017.1349942 · Cited by 3
“Roy and Roth [35] developed a theory for expression trees that can be used to represent and evaluate the target arithmetic expressions; they use it to uniquely decompose the target arithmetic problem to multiple classification problems; they then compose an expression tree, combining these with world knowledge through…”
MethodEvoHyper: Evolving Hypergraph Topologies for Unified Collaboration in Multi-Agent Communication
Zhang, H., Zhong, Y.-H., Gan, L., Chen, Z., Wu, J., Shi, Y.-L., Gu, X.-D., Zhang, H., You, H., & Huang, J. (2026) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.1258 · Cited by 3
“We evaluate EvoHyper on three categories of benchmarks: general reasoning (MMLU (Hendrycks et al., 2021)), mathematical reasoning (GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2016), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), AQuA (Ling et al., 2017)), and code generation (HumanEval (Chen et al., 2021)).”
Benchmarking AI Models in Software Engineering: A Review, Search Tool, and Enhancement Protocol
Koohestani, R., de Bekker, P., & Izadi, M. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.05860 · Cited by 3
A Multilingual Dataset (MultiMWP) and Benchmark for Math Word Problem Generation
Gamage, O., Ranathunga, S., Lee, A., Sun, X. N., Singh, A., Skënduli, M. P., Alam, M., Nayak, A. K., Gao, H., Deori, B., et al. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslpro.2025.3552936
“Here, the MAWPS dataset [21] is an extension of [22], [23], [24], [25].”
WEDA: Exploring Copyright Protection for Large Language Model Downstream Alignment
Wang, S., Dong, J., Wu, L., & Guan, Z. (2024) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2024.3487419 · Cited by 4
“Experiments are conducted using the MultiArith dataset [32] to assess challenging mathematical tasks and using the SST-2 test set to assess traditional sentiment analysis tasks.”
MethodDDPrompt: Differential Diversity Prompting in Large Language Models
Mu, L., Zhang, W.-H., Zhang, Y.-W., & Jin, P.-Q. (2024) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.acl-short.17 · Cited by 3
“In the datasets used in this paper, the first three arithmetic datasets, i.e. SingleEq, AddSub, and MultiArith, contain relatively simple problem(Chu et al., 2023).”
Mixture of Prompt Experts for Generalizable and Interpretable Question Answering
Si, C., Shi, W., Zhao, C., Zettlemoyer, L. S., & Boyd-Graber, J. L. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.14628 · Cited by 3
“…reasoning; HotpotQA (Yang et al., 2018), BeerQA (Qi et al., 2020), 4 and MuSiQue (Trivedi et al., 2021) for multihop reasoning; GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), and MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015) for mathematical reasoning; CommonsenseQA (CSQA) (Talmor et al., 2019), CSQA2.”
BackgroundInfluentialAn Artificial Intelligence Technology Based Algorithm for Solving Mechanics Problems
Zhang, J., Yuan, J., & Xu, J. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3203735 · Cited by 5
“Roy et al. [15] proposed the first tree based 50 algorithm for solving arithmetic word problem.”
MethodDataset for Evaluation of Mathematical Reasoning Abilities in Russian
Nefedov, M. (2020) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-59082-6_10 · Cited by 2
Inference-Time Graph Engineering for Multi-Agent LLM WorkflowsPreprint
Tieu, K., Fu, D., Xia, Y., Li, H., Yan, H., & He, J. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.05774 · Cited by 2
“…3 main task categories: (1) General Reasoning, using MMLU (Hendrycks et al., 2021); (2) Mathematical Reasoning, using GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2016), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), and AQuA (Ling et al., 2017); and (3) Code Generation, using HumanEval (Chen et al., 2021).”
Li, J., He, P., Ji, Q., Wang, W., Liu, L., & Sun, C. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.12921
Training Continuous Chain of Thought Models: A Tale of Two Regimes
Yerram, V., He, H., & Choi, E. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.16972 · Cited by 2
“On in-distribution tasks (GSM8k-Test, GSM-Hard), C-MTP’s advantage is partic-5 ularly clear, whereas on out-of-distribution tasks (SVAMP, MultiArith) the gap is smaller and more variable.”
Chang, S.-C., Liu, Q.-Y., Wang, S.-B., Gao, B.-J., Ma, Q., Zhao, H.-N., Miao, Y.-B., Sun, Y.-L., Peng, Z.-L., Li, J.-T., et al. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.29712 · Cited by 2
“For the base configuration, we evaluate zero-shot performance on four standard arithmetic benchmarks: GSM8K ( 1 , 319 ) [6], GSM-Hard ( 1 , 319 ) [12], SVAMP ( 1 , 000 ) [31], and MultiArith ( 600 ) [33].”
SIGMA: Skill-Incidence Graphs for Compositional Multi-Agent DesignPreprint
Zeng, K., Huo, Y., Zhang, S., Zhuo, Y., Lu, Y., Liu, H., Chen, S., & Tang, X. W. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.19758 · Cited by 2
Compress-Distill: Reasoning Trace Compression for Efficient Knowledge Distillation
Griot, M., Scotti, P. S., & Abraham, T. M. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.05988 · Cited by 2
TEMPER: Testing Emotional Perturbation in Quantitative Reasoning
Dokme, A., Reichman, B. Z., & Heck, L. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.07801 · Cited by 2
“Neutralization recovers 70% of emotion-broken problems over-all (MultiArith 81%, ARC 70%, GSM8K 66%).”
InfluentialST-EVO: Towards Generative Spatio-Temporal Evolution of Multi-Agent Communication Topologies
Wu, X., Liu, X., Lu, J.-K., Wang, S., Qiu, X., Shu, Y., Hu, J.-L., Guo, C.-J., & Yang, B. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.14681 · Cited by 2
“Benchmarks We evaluate ST-EVO on 9 benchmarks: MMLU (Hendrycks et al.) for general reasoning, GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), Mul-tiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), and AQuA (Ling et al., 2017) for math reasoning, HumanEval (Chen, 2021) and DS-1000 (Lai et al., 2023) for code…”
GTS: Inference-Time Scaling of Latent Reasoning with a Learnable Gaussian Thought Sampler
Wang, M.-H., Bai, Y., Vu, T.-T., Shareghi, E., & Haffari, G. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.14077 · Cited by 2
“Each head is implemented as a two-layer feed-forward network with hidden dimension D , SiLU activation, and output dimension D .”
Chen, X.-S., Zhou, S.-H., Liang, K., Zhou, T.-C., & Liu, X.-W. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.22730 · Cited by 2
“MetaMathQA is an augmented combination of the MATH and GSM datasets, and we therefore evaluate the resulting models on out-of-domain benchmarks, including Gaokao-Math-2023 (Liao et al., 2024), Svamp (Patel et al., 2021), MultiArith (Roy & Roth, 2015) and SingleEq(Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015).”
Large Language Models Are Multitask Chain-of-Thought Prompting Optimizers
Jin, F., & Tan, Y. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2025.3644134 · Cited by 2
“In the realm of arithmetic reasoning, we scrutinize six benchmarks: MultiArith [22], GSM8K [21], AddSub [25], AQuA [23], SingleEq [26], and SVAMP [27].”
CryptoQA: A Large-scale Question-answering Dataset for AI-assisted CryptographyPreprint
Elfares, M., Reisert, P., Dietz, T., Barman, M., Zaki, A. A., Küsters, R., & Bulling, A. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.02625 · Cited by 2
“Roy et al. contributed the IL dataset with 1,404 elementary-level arithmetic problems and the CommonCore dataset [92] containing 600 multi-step problems.”
Steering Information Utility in Key-Value Memory for Language Model Post-Training
Deng, C., Chang, R., & Chen, H. (2025) · neural information processing systems · doi:10.52202/085713-3414 · Cited by 1
“For OOD setting, we primarly trained GSM8K and eval on other arithmetic datasets, including AddSub [Hosseini et al., 2014], SingleEQ [Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015], MultiArith [Roy and Roth, 2016], AQuA [Ling et al., 2017], MAWPS [Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2016], and SVAMP [Patel et al., 2021].”
Predicting Through Generation: Why Generation Is Better for Prediction
Kowsher, M., Prottasha, N. J., Bhat, P., Yu, C.-N., Soltanalian, M., Garibay, I., Garibay, O. O., Chen, C., & Yousefi, N. (2025) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.17817 · Cited by 2
“Scheduled Sampling vs. Performance We analyze how different scheduled sampling strategies affect accuracy on the MultiArith dataset (Roy and Roth, 2016).”
SecPE: Secure Prompt Ensembling for Private and Robust Large Language Models
Zhang, J., Chen, K.-J., Feng, Z., Lou, J., Song, M.-G., Liu, J., & Yang, X.-H. (2025) · European Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3233/faia240958 · Cited by 2
Eliciting Causal Abilities in Large Language Models for Reasoning Tasks
Wang, Y., Luo, Z., Wang, J., Zhou, Z.-K., Chen, Y., & Han, B. (2024) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.15314 · Cited by 2
“MultiArith inherits the causal relationships extracted the LLM’s explanations as a class, and resulting accuracy is 94.3%, shown in Figure 5 (b).”
InfluentialMulti-tool Integration Application for Math Reasoning Using Large Language Model
Duan, Z., & Wang, J. (2024) · 2024 IEEE 10th International Conference on Edge Computing and Scalable Cloud (EdgeCom) · doi:10.1109/edgecom62867.2024.00024 · Cited by 2
“As shown in Table IV, Task 4 is a Fill in the blank dataset, which retrieves questions from an arithmetic question bank [9] [10] [11],and converts them into the format of fill in the blank questions.”
MethodTowards Causal Relationship in Indefinite Data: Baseline Model and New Datasets
Chen, H., Yang, X.-Y., & Du, K. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.08221 · Cited by 2
“For instance, in the arithmetic datasets [56]–[58], although much effort has been devoted to discover the relationships between different steps, the non-uniqueness of the reasoning process makes it difficult to transcribe the chains of thought (CoT) into a set of causal variables.”
BackgroundEntity Recognition in Arithmetic Word Problem Based on BERT and Boundary Detection
Peng, R., Li, C., Wu, Z.-B., & Yu, X. (2023) · 2023 International Conference on Intelligent Education and Intelligent Research (IEIR) · doi:10.1109/ieir59294.2023.10391210 · Cited by 2
Question Classification for Intelligent Question Answering: A Comprehensive Survey
Sun, H., Wang, S., Zhu, Y., Yuan, W., & Zou, Z. (2023) · ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information · doi:10.3390/ijgi12100415 · Cited by 3
The Integer Linear Programming Inference Cookbook
Srikumar, V., & Roth, D. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.00171 · Cited by 2
“, 2010), common sense reasoning (Roy and Roth, 2015; Goldwasser and Zhang, 2016), and many others.”
BackgroundSelf-citationChain-Of-Thought Prompting Under Streaming Batch: A Case StudyPreprint
Tang, Y. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.00550 · Cited by 1
“We choose multiple datasets across different tasks including arithmetic reasoning (GSM8K Cobbe et al. (2021), Multi-Arith Roy & Roth (2015)), commonsense reasoning (StrategyQA Geva et al. (2021)), and symbolic reasoning (Letter Wei et al. (2022b)).”
MethodSolving age-word problems using domain ontology and BERT
Gupta, A., Kumar, S., & Sreenivasa Kumar, P. (2023) · COMAD/CODS · doi:10.1145/3570991.3571058 · Cited by 2
“Approach [15] leverages expression trees for arithmetic word problem-solving.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialKLAUS-Tr: Knowledge & learning-based unit focused arithmetic word problem solver for transfer cases
Kumar, S., & Kumar, P. S. (2022) · Natural Language Engineering · doi:10.1017/s1351324922000511 · Cited by 2
“Roy and Roth (2015) develop a theory for expression trees to represent and evaluate the target arithmetic expressions of AWPs, and they use it to decompose the target AWP into multiple clas-sification problems uniquely.”
InfluentialKinRob: An ontology based robot for solving kinematic problems
Zhang, J., Yuan, J., Xu, J., Ban, S., Zan, X., & Zhang, J. (2023) · International Journal of Knowledge-based and Intelligent Engineering Systems · doi:10.3233/kes-218162 · Cited by 2
“Roy et al. [29] Proposed the first method using the expression tree structure.”
Learning with Coping Strategies in Solving Multi-step Arithmetic Problems Towards Numeracy Skills
Yosa, N., Amir, M. F., & Wardana, M. D. K. (2022) · Journal of Education Research and Evaluation · doi:10.23887/jere.v6i3.47036 · Cited by 2
“Multi-step arithmetic problems are usually addressed to primary students (Powell & Fuchs, 2018; Roy & Roth, 2015).”
BackgroundHeterogeneous Line Graph Transformer for Math Word Problems
Hu, Z.-J., & Jiang, M. (2022) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2208.05645 · Cited by 2
“In the second stage, semantic parsing [11, 18, 21, 29, 33] attracted a lot of research interest.”
BackgroundIntegrating deep learning with first order logic for solving kinematic problems
Zhang, J., Yuan, J., Guo, H., & Zan, X. (2022) · Applied Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s10489-021-03044-4 · Cited by 3
“[21] proposed the first method using a formula tree.”
MethodSolving TC-type AWPs using external knowledge & learning
Kumar, S., & Kumar, P. S. (2022) · COMAD/CODS · doi:10.1145/3493700.3493744 · Cited by 2
“Tree-based approaches[1, 2, 4, 7] leverage the idea of transforming an arithmetic expression to an equivalent tree-structure whereas template-based approach[6] focuses on predicting the appropriate template for the given AWP.”
BackgroundRecurrent Inference in Text Editing
Shi, N., Zeng, Z., Zhang, H., & Gong, Y. (2020) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.159 · Cited by 3
“in the domain of arithmetic problems (Hosseini et al., 2014; Roy and Roth, 2015; Ling et al., 2017) that can be treated as the test-beds for text editing.”
BackgroundTowards Literate Artificial Intelligence
Sachan, M. (2020) · doi:10.1184/r1/11898378.v1 · Cited by 2
“, 2017), solving algebra word problems (Hopkins et al., 2017; Hosseini et al., 2014; Kushman et al., 2014; Matsuzaki et al., 2017; Roy and Roth, 2015; Roy et al., 2015) and SAT style geometry problems (Seo et al.”
BackgroundNeural Sequence Modeling in Physical Language Understanding
Bleiweiss, A. (2019) · International Joint Conference on Computational Intelligence · doi:10.5220/0008071104640472
“Models proposed use both feature engineered machine learning (Hosseini et al., 2014; Kushman et al., 2014; Roy and Roth, 2015; Shi et al., 2015; Zhou et al., 2015; Huang et al., 2016; Huang et al., 2017; Matsuzaki et al., 2017) and deep learning (Ling et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2017; Huang et al.,…”
MethodIndividual differences in attitudes toward mathematics
Siregar, N., Wimbarti, S., & Ilham, M. (2019) · Journal of Physics, Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012005 · Cited by 2
Development of an Automatic Answering System to Arithmetic Questions
Win, K. C., & Wah, N. (2018) · International Conference on Interaction Sciences · doi:10.1109/icis.2018.8466459 · Cited by 2
“RELATED WORK Roy and Roth (2016) introduced a web based tool that solved math reasoning.”
BackgroundA Review and a Taxonomy of Edge Machine Learning: Requirements, Paradigms, and Techniques
Li, W., Hacid, H., Almazrouei, E., & Debbah, M. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.08571 · Cited by 2
Explicit Memory Learning with Expectation Maximization
Yin, Z., Sun, Q., Guo, Q., Zeng, Z., Cheng, Q., Qiu, X., & Huang, X. (2024) · Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.927 · Cited by 1
Refining Answer Distributions for Improved Large Language Model ReasoningPreprint
Pal, S., Chételat, D., Zhang, Y., & Coates, M. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.13292 · Cited by 2
“Four more challenging datasets require multi-step reasoning: MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015) (600 math problems), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021) (1000 varied math problems), GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021) (1319 grade-school level problems), and AQuA (Ling et al., 2017) (254 algebraic word problems).”
Token-Efficient Multi-Agent Collaboration via System One-Guided Computational Division of LaborPreprint
Zhou, Z.-H., Hu, X.-Z., Yang, H.-X., Wen, L.-J., & Kang, Z. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.08155 · Cited by 1
PRISM: PRIvileged Sibling-guided Multi-Agent Topology Design
Dat, P., Li, Q., & Wang, X.-C. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.20628 · Cited by 1
“Following Li et al. (2026b) we evaluate on MMLU (Hendrycks et al., 2021), GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), MultiArith (Roy & Roth, 2016), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), AQuA (Ling et al., 2017), and HumanEval (Chen et al., 2021), reporting Pass@1 / accuracy.”
Structural Process Supervision for Latent Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
Li, Y.-Q., Chen, X., Ju, C., Yao, J.-C., Li, Z.-Y., Lan, J.-S., Zhu, X.-Y., & Wang, Y. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.09928 · Cited by 1
“Table 1 presents the main results on one in-domain benchmark (GSM8K-Aug) and three out-of-domain benchmarks (GSM-Hard, SVAMP, MultiArith), with three backbone models from different model families: GPT-2, Qwen2.”
Assessing Adversarial Robustness of Latent Reasoning Models
Chen, S.-L., Li, A., Li, M.-J., & Wang, Y.-S. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.22228 · Cited by 1
“We evaluate five textual implicit reasoning models— CODI (Shen et al., 2025), SIM-CoT (Wei et al., 2025), PCCoT (Wu et al., 2025), CoLaR (Tan et al., 2025), and RoT (Wang et al., 2026)—across three mathematical reasoning datasets: GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2016), and SVAMP (Patel et al., 20…”
Codebook Agent: Amortized Topology Design for LLM Multi-Agent SystemsPreprint
Yu, J., Li, Y., Jiang, E. H., Zhang, Z., Liu, D., Zhao, W., Li, L., Chang, K.-W., & Wu, Y. N. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.02264
Global Optimization and Inference-Time Region Grafting for Agentic Workflows
Koh, D., Kim, G., Bak, J., Na, S.-H., Yang, T., Jang, H., & Park, C. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.02353 · Cited by 1
Li, X., Miao, J.-F., & Dhelim, S. (2026) · Expert systems with applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2026.132391 · Cited by 1
Super-Tuning: From Activation-Aware Pruning to Sparse Fine-Tuning
Ilin, I. D., Zmushko, P., & Richtárik, P. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.09287 · Cited by 1
“We evaluate on six arithmetic-reasoning benchmarks: AddSub [Hosseini et al., 2014], Multi-Arith [Roy and Roth, 2016], SingleEq [Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015], GSM8K [Cobbe et al., 2021], AQuA [Ling et al., 2017], and SVAMP [Patel et al., 2021].”
Dropout-GRPO: Variational Stochasticity for Continuous Latent Reasoning
Jung, W. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.10184 · Cited by 1
“Usage Vol. GSM8K-aug(SFT)[6] 385620 GSM8K-hard(GRPO)[10] 1319 SVAMP(GRPO)[19] 700 OpenMathInstruct-2(GRPO)[27] 69981 GSM8K(Testing) 1319 MultiArith(Testing)[20] 600 SVAMP(Testing) 300”
Raiyan, S. R., Kabir, M., Mahmud, H., Hasan, M. K., & Ananiadou, S. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.08728 · Cited by 4
“[105] built on [101] by introducing Unit De-pendency Graphs (UDGs) that capture relationships between the units of quantities.”
InfluentialTesting LLM Arithmetic Reasoning Generalization with Automatic Numeric-Remapping AttacksPreprint
Barker, M., Lakha, B., Serra, E., & Gullo, F. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.03606 · Cited by 1
“For targeted arithmetic capabilities, AddSub[14] and MultiArith [15] address multi-step arithmetic reasoning, ASDiv [16] emphasizes linguistic diversity across elementary problem types, and AQuA-RAT [17] extends to algebraic reasoning with over 100K problems paired with natural language rationales.”
Why Prompt Optimization Works, and Why It Sometimes Doesn't: A Causal-Inspired Edit-Level Analysis
Gong, S.-Z., & Wen, H. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.26655 · Cited by 1
“…(Suzgun et al., 2023), with a mean base accuracy 0.70), 2 Mathematical reasoning (including GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), MultiArith datasets (Roy and Roth, 2015), with a mean base accuracy 0.97), 3 Logical reasoning (including boolean expressions, coinflip (Suzgun et al., 2023) datasets,…”
InfluentialConflict-Aware Multi-Agent Reasoning via Signed Graph Modeling
He, L.-G., He, L.-Z., Peng, S.-H., He, D.-J., & Li, C.-Z. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.19418 · Cited by 1
“We evaluate SIGMA against single-agent and multi-agent baselines across six benchmarks: three general reasoning datasets ( MMLU , MMLU-Pro , and GPQA ) and three domain-specific datasets ( GSM8K , MultiArith , and HumanEval ), as shown in Section 4.1.”
InfluentialDifferentiable Mixture-of-Agents Incentivizes Swarm Intelligence of Large Language ModelsPreprint
Wu, X., Lu, J., Yan, S., Qiu, X., Hu, J., Guo, C., & Yang, B. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.15706 · Cited by 4
“Specifically, we use MMLU [Hendrycks et al.] to evaluate broad-domain reasoning; GSM8K [Cobbe et al., 2021], MultiArith [Roy and Roth, 2015], SVAMP [Patel et al., 2021], and AQuA [Ling et al., 2017] for mathematical reasoning; HumanEval [Chen, 2021] and DS-1000 [Lai et al., 2023] for coding…”
COLLATOR: Compositional Multi-Agent Orchestration with Counterfactual Reinforcement LearningPreprint
Chen, X., Liu, Y., Wei, H., & Ding, K. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.14483 · Cited by 7
Prasad, D., Gerschwitz, L., Li, T., Xiao, H., Liu, A.-J., Wu, C., Leontjeva, A., & Pizzato, L. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.14561 · Cited by 1
On LLM Prompting Techniques for Arabic Language Arithmetic Reasoning
Alenezi, R., & Salman, A. A. (2026) · Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC) · doi:10.63317/52s6fyvjghcs
“While MultiArith contains questions need more calculations.”
InfluentialMulti-Agent Collaborative Reasoning via Cloud-Edge Framework
Zeng, J., Liao, J., Sun, S., Zhang, G., Xu, C., Liu, H., & Li, Y. (2026) · IEEE Network · doi:10.1109/mnet.2026.3651036
“MultiArith [13] : comprising multiple-operation arithmetic problems emphasizing combinatorial numerical reasoning.”
Preserving Long-Tailed Expert Information in Mixture-of-Experts Tuning
He, H., Ding, X., Jiang, X., Zou, X., Cheng, A., Zhao, Y.-B., Li, J. B., & Miller, H. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.23036 · Cited by 1
Peer-Predictive Self-Training for Language Model ReasoningPreprint
Feng, S., Zhang, H., Nie, F., Kakade, S. M., & Chen, Y. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.13356 · Cited by 1
“• MultiArith Roy & Roth (2016), a dataset of multi-step arithmetic word problems requiring combination of basic operations such as addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division.”
Tian, K., Tang, Y., Jiang, G., Liu, B., Gao, Y., Su, X., Qiao, L., & Li, D. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.07808
“…with the math dataset collected by Hu et al. (2023), and subsequently evaluated on six arithmetic reasoning benchmarks, including Mul-tiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015), AddSub (Hos-seini et al., 2014), GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), AQuA (Ling et al., 2017), SingleEq (Koncel-Kedziorski et al.,…”
Thinking Wrong in Silence: Backdoor Attacks on Continuous Latent Reasoning
Parekh, S. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.00770 · Cited by 1
“OOD transfer benchmarks (evaluated on SimCoT without retraining): SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021): arithmetic word problems with varied structure (1K examples); MultiArith (Roy & Roth, 2015): multi-step arithmetic (180 examples); GSM-Hard (Gao et al., 2023): harder variants of GSM8K with larger numbers (1.3K examples).”
InfluentialHe, Y., Liu, J., Wen, W., Guo, Y., Chen, H., Ma, Y., Ke, W., & Wang, P. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tetci.2026.3654446 · Cited by 1
“We conduct experiments on seven datasets spanning diverse arithmetic, algebraic, and symbolic reasoning skills: SAT [38], MATH [39], GSM8K [40], MultiA [41], MMLU [42], MAWPS [43], and GPQA [44].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Roy, S., & Roth, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Corresponding author
- Roth, Dan
- ORCID
- Roth, Dan
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2016
- Pages
- 1743-1752
- arXiv
- 1608.01413
- OpenAlex
- W2251935656
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12
- FWCI
- 9.02
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (FA8750-13-2-0008, FA8750)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
- Keywords
- arithmetic word problems, automated problem solving, expression trees, constrained inference, world knowledge, feature extraction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review