The DOI matches its DataCite record; 12 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Solving General Arithmetic Word Problems
Open accessAbstract
This paper presents a novel approach to automatically solving arithmetic word problems. This is the first algorithmic approach that can handle arithmetic problems with multiple steps and operations, without depending on additional annotations or predefined templates. We develop a theory for expression trees that can be used to represent and evaluate the target arithmetic expressions; we use it to uniquely decompose the target arithmetic problem to multiple classification problems; we then compose an expression tree, combining these with world knowledge through a constrained inference framework. Our classifiers gain from the use of {\em quantity schemas} that supports better extraction of features. Experimental results show that our method outperforms existing systems, achieving state of the art performance on benchmark datasets of arithmetic word problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Table 6 shows that our optimized prompts also outperform baseline prompts with different scorer LLMs on these two benchmarks.”
From Large Language Models as Optimizers (2023) · cites this paper as Roy & Roth, 2016
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Learning to Automatically Solve Algebra Word Problems
Kushman, N., Zettlemoyer, L., Barzilay, R., & Artzi, Y. (2014) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.3115/v1/p14-1026 · Cited by 400 · cited 6×
“(Hos-seini et al., 2014) mentions the result of running the system of (Kushman et al., 2014) on AI2 dataset, and we report their result here.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe Importance of Syntactic Parsing and Inference in Semantic Role Labeling
Punyakanok, V., Roth, D., & Yih, W.-T. (2008) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli.2008.34.2.257 · Cited by 399 · cited 1×
“This has been successfully used to incorporate world knowledge at inference time, as well as getting around the need for large amounts of jointly annotated data for structured prediction (Roth and Yih, 2005; Punyakanok et al., 2005; Punyakanok et al., 2008; Clarke and Lapata, 2006; Barzilay and Lapata, 2006; Roy et al…”
MethodSelf-citationLearning to Solve Arithmetic Word Problems with Verb Categorization
Hosseini, M. J., Hajishirzi, H., Etzioni, O., & Kushman, N. (2014) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1058 · Cited by 324 · cited 8×
“(Hosseini et al., 2014) mentions the result of running the system of (Kushman et al.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialInteger linear programming inference for conditional random fields
Roth, D., & Yih, W.-T. (2005) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.1145/1102351.1102444 · Cited by 214 · cited 2×
“This has been successfully used to incorporate world knowledge at inference time, as well as getting around the need for large amounts of jointly annotated data for structured prediction (Roth and Yih, 2005; Punyakanok et al., 2005; Punyakanok et al., 2008; Clarke and Lapata, 2006; Barzilay and Lapata, 2006; Roy et al…”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationModeling Biological Processes for Reading Comprehension
Berant, J., Srikumar, V., Chen, P., Linden, A. V., Harding, B., Huang, B., Clark, P. E., & Manning, C. D. (2014) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1159 · Cited by 205 · cited 1×
“The system described in (Berant et al., 2014) attempts to automatically answer biology questions, by extracting the structure of biological processes from text.”
BackgroundReasoning about Quantities in Natural Language
Roy, S., Vieira, T., & Roth, D. (2015) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00118 · Cited by 133 · cited 6×
“For the IL dataset, we acquired the system of (Roy et al., 2015) from the authors, and ran it with the same fold information.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationStructured learning with constrained conditional models
Chang, M.-W., Ratinov, L., & Roth, D. (2012) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-012-5296-5 · Cited by 117 · cited 4×
“In particular, we use the L + I scheme of CCMs, which predicts structured output by independently learning several simple components, combining them at inference time.”
MethodInfluentialSelf-citationDiagram Understanding in Geometry Questions
Seo, M. J., Hajishirzi, H., Farhadi, A., & Etzioni, O. (2014) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v28i1.9146 · Cited by 105 · cited 1×
“There has also been efforts to solve geometry questions by jointly understanding diagrams and associated text (Seo et al., 2014).”
BackgroundElementary School Science and Math Tests as a Driver for AI: Take the Aristo Challenge!
Clark, P. (2015) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v29i2.19066 · Cited by 99 · cited 1×
“Our approach is related to work in understanding and solving elementary school standardized tests (Clark, 2015).”
MethodAggregation via Set Partitioning for Natural Language Generation
Barzilay, R., & Lapata, M. (2006) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.3115/1220835.1220881 · Cited by 94
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Y. Goldberg and M. Elhadad. 2010. An efficient algo- rithm for easy-first non-directional dependency pars- ing. In Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chap- ter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 742-750, Los Angeles, California, June.
- V. Punyakanok, D. Roth, and W. Yih. 2005. The ne- cessity of syntactic parsing for semantic role label- ing. In Proc. of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pages 1117-1123.
- D. Roth and W. Yih. 2004. A linear programming formulation for global inference in natural language tasks. In Hwee Tou Ng and Ellen Riloff, editors, Proc. of the Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL), pages 1-8. Associa- tion for Computational Linguistics.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 658
Inference-Time Rethinking with Latent Thought Vectors for Math Reasoning
Kong, D.-Q., Zhao, M., Qin, A., Pang, B., Tao, C.-X., Hartmann, D., Honig, E., Xu, D., Kumar, A., Sarte, M., et al. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.06584 · Cited by 1
“The gains on SVAMP and MultiArith are particularly striking.”
InfluentialNonlinearity as Rank: Generative Low-Rank Adapter with Radial Basis Functions
Ouyang, Y., Li, S.-W., Wang, H.-Z., Luo, X.-D., Hu, Z.-Q., Song, Y.-T., Qin, Q., Li, Y.-C., & Li, R.-X. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.05709 · Cited by 1
Agent-GSPO: Communication-Efficient Multi-Agent Systems via Group Sequence Policy Optimization
Fan, Y.-J., Zhang, J., Yang, J., & Wang, K.-Z. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.22477 · Cited by 1
“Our evaluation spans seven challenging benchmarks: MMLU [20] for general reasoning; GSM8K [21], Multi-Arith [22], SVAMP [23], AQuA [24], and MATH-500 [25] for mathematical reasoning; and HumanEval [26] for code generation.”
Foundation of Intelligence: Review of Math Word Problems from Human Cognition Perspective
Huang, Z.-Y., Liu, J.-Y., Lin, X., Ma, Z.-Y., Xue, S., Xiao, T., Liu, Q., Teh, Y. W., & Chen, E. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.21999 · Cited by 1
“2) MAWPS [16] is an online repository that unifies datasets from several previous works [155], [157]– [159].”
AutoMaAS: Self-Evolving Multi-Agent Architecture Search for Large Language ModelsPreprint
Ma, B., Li, H., Hu, Z., Gui, X., Liu, L., & Liu, S. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.02669 · Cited by 2
“The dynamic operator selection enables efficient scaling: simple arithmetic problems [15] use lightweight single-operator solutions (O I/O only), while complex multi-step problems trigger sophisticated collaboration patterns inspired by program-aided reasoning [73], [74] Code Generation: HumanEval…”
R-Capsule: Compressing High-Level Plans for Efficient Large Language Model ReasoningPreprint
Shan, H., Song, M., Dai, C., Liang, D., & Chen, H. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.22131 · Cited by 5
Rethinking Reasoning in LLMs: Neuro-Symbolic Local RetoMaton Beyond ICL and CoTPreprint
Mamidala, R. S., Chhabra, A., & Mali, A. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.19271 · Cited by 1
“In language-based tasks, NeSy models have successfully mapped text to symbolic forms such as equations and expression trees (Roy and Roth, 2016; Chiang and Chen, 2018; Chen et al., 2019), allowing for structured, inter-pretable reasoning beyond shallow pattern matching.”
Deep Learning Models for Solving Financial Word Problems
Sasmal, S., Phadikar, S., & Das, B. (2025) · SN Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s42979-025-04159-y · Cited by 1
“Roy et al. [28] presented a pioneering algorithmic approach to automatically solve complex arithmetic word problems without annotations or templates, achieving state-of-the-art performance.”
SGEU: enhancing LLM reasoning via backward exemplar generation and verification
Wang, Z., Zhou, X., Yang, Y., Ma, B., Wang, L., & Dong, R. (2025) · Applied Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s10489-025-06529-8 · Cited by 1
“…[8, 9] showing their superior potential by conducting comprehensive evaluation on reasoning benchmarks, including arithmetic reasoning [10–12], commonsense reasoning [13–15], logical reasoning [16–18]), symbolic reasoning [1], event relation reasoning [19, 20], augmentation [21, 22], and…”
CRMR: A Collaborative Multistep Reasoning Framework for Solving Mathematical Problems
Zhang, Y., Tang, X., & Hao, K. (2025) · Machine Intelligence Research · doi:10.1007/s11633-024-1531-3 · Cited by 1
Integrating Arithmetic Learning Improves Mathematical Reasoning in Smaller Models
Gangwar, N., Bhat, S., & Kani, N. (2025) · International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.12855 · Cited by 1
“…2014), which is a collection of addition and subtraction problems, (2) SingleEq (Roy et al., 2015), which contains single equation problems, (3) SingleOp (Roy et al., 2015) with single operation arithmetic problems, and (4) SimulEq (Kushman et al., 2014) with multiple equation math word problems.”
InfluentialTuning Language Models by Mixture-of-Depths EnsemblePreprint
Luo, H., & Specia, L. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.13077 · Cited by 1
“A DD S UB AQ U A GSM8K MAWPS M ULTI A RITH S INGLE E Q SWAMP A VG .”
Targeted training for numerical reasoning with large language models
Xiao, L., Liu, S., Zhu, Y., & Gong, C. B. (2024) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-024-02216-1
“We conducted experiments on multiple widely used numerical reasoning datasets, includ-ingGSM8K[5],MultiArith[12],ASDiv[13],SVAMP[14],SingleOp[15],andAddSub[16], tovalidatetheeffectivenessofourapproach.”
Qonita, W. (2024) · Sains Data Jurnal Studi Matematika dan Teknologi · doi:10.52620/sainsdata.v2i1.44 · Cited by 1
“As explained by Roy & Roth [12] arithmetic word problems are usually directed towards elementary school students and can be solved by combining the numbers mentioned in the text with basic operations (addition, subtraction, multiplication, division).”
BackgroundKey-Point-Driven Mathematical Reasoning Distillation of Large Language Model
Zhu, X.-Y., Li, J., Ma, C., & Wang, W.-P. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.10167 · Cited by 1
“(Roy and Roth, 2015).”
NUMCoT: Numerals and Units of Measurement in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning using Large Language Models
Xu, A.-C., Tan, M., Wang, L., Yang, M., & Xu, R.-F. (2024) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.02864 · Cited by 1
“The bilingual MWPs dataset is compiled from AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014), Sin-gleOp (Roy et al., 2015) and MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015), containing 1557 elementary school math word problems.”
BackgroundMethodMathDivide: Improved mathematical reasoning by large language modelsPreprint
Srivastava, S. S., & Gandhi, A. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.13004 · Cited by 6
“Although, the Mathprompter technique was evaluated for MultiArith dataset[31] which is a subset of MATH dataset[32] and used 175B parameter LLM for few-shot and few-shot-CoT settings and 540B parameter LLM(PaLm 540B) for zero-shot and zero-shot-CoT settings but in order to have a fair and direct…”
MethodCan Language Models Learn Embeddings of Propositional Logic Assertions?
Ariyani, N. F., Bouraoui, Z., Booth, R., & Schockaert, S. (2024) · International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.63317/238pyai8g88j · Cited by 1
“Finally, there is also a large body of work that focuses on more specialised reasoning tasks, such as numerical reasoning (Roy and Roth, 2015; Cobbe et al., 2021; Amini et al., 2019).”
BackgroundCombining Transformers and Tree-based Decoders for Solving Math Word Problems
Wang, J.-H., & Chen, Y. (2023) · BigData Congress [Services Society] · doi:10.1109/bigdata59044.2023.10386340 · Cited by 1
“Conventional methods match answer equations with predefined rules [5, 6, 7] or simple semantic mapping models [8, 9, 10] and feature extraction in machine learning to generate answer equations [11-15].”
BackgroundMethodDiversiGATE: A Comprehensive Framework for Reliable Large Language ModelsPreprint
Imani, S., Beyram, A., & Shrivastava, H. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.13230
Lexicons of Song Used in Palawakya Dance
Suri, P., Budasi, I. G., & Dambayana, P. E. (2023) · Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Undiksha · doi:10.23887/jpbi.v10i2.57105 · Cited by 1
“There are eight type of word clasess (Faruq et al., 2021; Roy & Roth, 2015).”
BackgroundA Comparative Analysis of Math Word Problem Solving on Characterized Datasets
Chen, S., Wang, P., Zhou, M., Wang, Z., & He, B. (2022) · International Conference on Intelligent Education and Intelligent Research (IEIR) · doi:10.1109/ieir56323.2022.10050058 · Cited by 2
“expression tree [4] , equation tree [5] , so the Seq2Tree model was proposed [6] .”
MethodKumar, S., & Kumar, P. S. (2022) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.12164 · Cited by 1
Liu, Q., Guan, W.-Y., Shen, J., Cheng, F., & Kurohashi, S. (2022) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.07017 · Cited by 1
“We also show the results of considering removing brackets, where − / ÷ can not be the children node of + / ∗ , which is the compression considered in Roy and Roth (2015); and Commutative Law, which is the compression considered in Wang et al. (2018a).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAutomatic Extraction of Equations in Medieval Arabic Algebra
Djamel, H. M., & Bensaou, N. (2018) · ACS/IEEE International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications · doi:10.1109/aiccsa.2018.8612830 · Cited by 1
“The existing approaches [4], [5], [6], [7] is the task that takes as input a word problem in the natural language and represents it in a formal language, such as, that translate story problems to system of algebraic equations.”
BackgroundSolving Sinhala Language Arithmetic Problems using Neural Networks
Chathurika, W. M. T., Silva, K. C. E. D., Raddella, A. M., Ekanayake, E., Nugaliyadde, A., & Mallawarachchi, Y. (2018) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1809.04557 · Cited by 1
Answer Generation for Set Type Math Word Problems
Fernando, K., Ranathunga, S., & Dias, G. (2018) · International Conference on Advances in ICT for Emerging Regions · doi:10.1109/icter.2018.8615460 · Cited by 1
“[18] used expression trees to represent a problem, which is then converted to equations.”
MethodChen, D., Zhu, Y., Zhang, X., Zhou, W. H., & Li, L. (2026) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.1212
“Discriminative tasks encompass: factuality (TruthfulQA (Lin et al., 2022)), general knowledge and commonsense (MMLU (Hendrycks et al., 2020), ARC-Challenge (Clark et al., 2018), Com-monsenseQA (Talmor et al., 2019), HellaSwag (Zellers et al., 2019), GPQA (Rein et al., 2024 Generative tasks include: mathematical reason…”
Urbanski, R., & Peters, R. (2025) · International Conference on Computer Supported Education · doi:10.5220/0013206100003932 · Cited by 1
“The field of Arithmetic Reasoning involves more interference based on text-based math problems, known benchmarks like GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021) and MultiArith (Roy & Roth, 2016).”
Fast Thinking with Structured Prompts: Enabling LLM Reasoning Without Chain-of-Thought Generation
Morozov, K., Chubarova, L., & Piontkovskaya, I. (2025) · International conference Recent advances in natural language processing · doi:10.26615/978-954-452-098-4-087
“Mathematical skills are covered by GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), AQuA (Ling et al., 2017), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), TabMWP (Kang et al., 2024), MultiArith (Roy et al., 2015).”
Improving Small Language Models' Mathematical Reasoning via Equation-of-Thought Distillation
Zhu, X.-Y., Li, J., Liu, Y., Ma, C., & Wang, W.-P. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.11864 · Cited by 1
“The reasoning performance of these SLMs is assessed on the GSM8K test dataset, as well as ASDiv, SVAMP, and MultiArith.”
MethodTrajectory Volatility for Out-of-Distribution Detection in Mathematical Reasoning
Wang, Y., Zhang, P., Yang, B.-S., Wong, D. F., Zhang, Z.-S., & Wang, R. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.14039 · Cited by 1
“For the ID dataset, we use the MultiArith [44], which consists of Math Word Problems on arithmetic reasoning.”
MethodIntegrating Heterogeneous Graphs Using Graph Transformer Encoder for Solving Math Word Problems
Shin, S., Park, J., & Ryu, M. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3257571 · Cited by 2
“This dataset is constructed by merging several public datasets, such as AI2 [30], IL [31], and SingleEQ [32].”
MethodAsk One More Time: Self-Agreement Improves Reasoning of Language Models in (Almost) All Scenarios
Lin, L., Fu, J.-Y., Liu, P., Wan, J.-C., Zhang, F.-Z., Wang, Z., Zhang, D., & Gai, K. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.08154 · Cited by 1
“…finetuing SOTA baselines are obtained from: a : GPT-3 175B finetuned plus an additional 175B verifier (Cobbe et al., 2021), b : Relevance and LCA operation classifier (Roy and Roth, 2015), c : (Pi et al., 2022), d : DeBERTaV3-large + KEAR (Xu et al., 2021), e : UnifiedQA-FT (Khashabi et al., 2020).”
MethodHelp Transformer Improve Performance in Automatic Mathematics Word Problem-Solving
Liu, D., Wang, G., & Yang, J. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3220777 · Cited by 2
“Roy and Roth [21] solve arithmetic problems with multiple steps and operations by mapping quantities and words to candidate equation trees and selecting the highest probability tree.”
BackgroundMethodEvoFlow: Evolving Diverse Agentic Workflows On The Fly
Zhang, G., Chen, K., Wan, G., Chang, H., Cheng, H., Wang, K., Hu, S., & Bai, L. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.07373
“We evaluate EvoFlow on six public benchmarks covering four domains: (1) math reasoning , GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), MATH (Hendrycks et al., 2021b), and MultiArith (Roy & Roth, 2016); (2) code generation , HumanEval (Chen et al., 2021) and MBPP (Austin et al., 2021)); (3) embodied , ALFWorld (Shridhar et al., 2021).”
Multi-agent Architecture Search via Agentic Supernet
Zhang, G., Niu, L., Fang, J., Wang, K., Bai, L., & Wang, X. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.04180
LILA: A Unified Benchmark for Mathematical Reasoning
Mishra, S., Finlayson, M., Lu, P., Tang, L., Welleck, S., Baral, C., Rajpurohit, T., Tafjord, O., Sabharwal, A., Clark, P., et al. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.17517 · Cited by 179
Shen, X., Liu, Y., Dai, Y., Wang, Y., Miao, R., Tan, Y., Pan, S., & Wang, X. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.23352 · Cited by 6
“…benchmarks from three domains: general reasoning: MMLU (Hendrycks et al., 2021), mathematical reasoning: GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), Multi-Arith (Roy and Roth, 2015), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), and AQuA (Ling et al., 2017), and code generation: HumanEval (Chen et al., 2021), following the…”
Stop Overvaluing Multi-Agent Debate -- We Must Rethink Evaluation and Embrace Model Heterogeneity
Zhang, H., Cui, Z., Chen, J., Wang, X., Zhang, Q., Wang, Z., Wu, D., & Hu, S. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.08788 · Cited by 84
“Roy and Roth (2016) is composed of a diverse set of multi-step arithmetic word problems that require understanding complex relationships between quantities and performing multiple operations to arrive at the correct numerical answer.”
Learning to Check: Unleashing Potentials for Self-Correction in Large Language ModelsPreprint
Che, Z., Xiao, Z., Han, C., Lian, Y., & Fang, Y. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.13035 · Cited by 12
“The effectiveness of the checkpoints is evaluate on the GSM8K benchmark and additional three datasets: MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015), AS-Div (Miao et al., 2020), and SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021).”
MethodBeyond Dense States: Sparse Transcoders as Causally Testable Operators for LLM Latent Reasoning
Wang, Y.-D., Chen, H.-D., Tian, Y., Geng, C.-X., Liang, D., & Chen, X. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.01695
“To assess generalization across reasoning distributions, we additionally evaluate on three out-of-domain benchmarks: GSM-Hard (Gao et al., 2023), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), and MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2016).”
Salem, M. S., El-Regaily, S., Morsey, M., & Aref, M. (2026) · Egyptian Informatics Journal · doi:10.1016/j.eij.2026.101060
Parallelizable Probabilistic Latent Reasoning for Diverse Reasoning TrajectoriesPreprint
Lee, S., Lee, S., & Lee, C. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.29385
“For models trained on GSM8K-Aug-NL, we evaluate out-of-domain (OOD) generalization on three mathematical reasoning benchmarks: SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), GSM-Hard (Gao et al., 2023), and MultiArith (Roy & Roth, 2015).”
INTACT: Inducing Latent Reasoning on a Frozen Backbone
Tire, K., Tejaswi, A., Vikalo, H., & Sanghavi, S. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.19568
“It is trained separately for each of the four backbones and evaluated in domain on the GSM8K test set (Cobbe et al., 2021) and out of domain on SVAMP, GSM-Hard and MultiArith, over which we report an unweighted macro-average.”
Dynamic K-Head: Difficulty-Supervised Budget Selection for Continuous Latent Reasoning
Li, Y., Chen, Y.-Q., Li, S., & Cai, Y.-F. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.17679
Lu, Y.-Y., Geng, J.-X., & Luo, B. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.16635
“ACED-ALL improves over direct PoT on four benchmarks and matches the saturated result on MultiArith.”
Competence-Aware Orchestration for LLM-Based Multi-Agent SystemsPreprint
Wang, S., Wang, Y., Yu, C., Yang, H., & Li, M. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.13144
“We report the standard evaluation metric for each dataset, using accuracy for MMLU, GSM8K, MultiArith, SVAMP, and AQuA, and Pass@1 for HumanEval.”
What Matters for Latent Reasoning with Flow Matching
Ouali, Y., Bulat, A., & Tzimiropoulos, G. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.06666
“%) of models trained on GSM8K-Aug, on GSM8K (IID) and on GSM8K-Hard, SVAMP and MultiArith (OOD).”
InfluentialAdaptive Utilization of Low-Rank Adaptation via Conditioned Gating
Yang, G., Guan, C.-H., Huang, C., Chen, Y.-F., & Huang, K.-Y. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.05800
“Our evaluation suite includes MultiArith (Roy & Roth, 2015) and AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014) (multi-step arithmetic word problems with numeric answers), GSM8K (grade-school math word problems requiring multi-step reasoning), AQuA (multiple-choice algebraic word problems), SingleEq…”
InfluentialCALR: Continuous Anchored Latent Reasoning via Render-of-Thought CompressionPreprint
Wei, Z., Jiang, B., Hao, Y., Ding, W., Wei, Z., Wu, S., Han, Z., & Jiao, J. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.07175
Ladders of Thought: A Self-Evolving Curriculum of Progressively Simplified Reasoning Traces
Liu, M.-H., Magelinski, T., Yuan, D.-H., Yu, Q., & Huang, F.-R. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.25643
Xu, Y.-F., Li, Y.-X., Li, X.-Z., Gu, Y.-X., Shen, Y.-F., Yu, L.-J., & Wang, H.-H. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.23716 · Cited by 1
“On tasks such as MultiArith, where the initial prompt is already quite effective, the gains are more modest as there is less room for optimization.”
OpenMAS-GCom. A Diagnostic Benchmark for Graph-enhanced Multi-Agent SystemsPreprint
Yang, K., Li, X., Zhang, K., An, M., Chen, Z., Ba, Y., & Li, R.-H. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.21527
Voice of Reason: Reinforcement Learning for Spoken Math
Weisselberger, T., Graves, E., & Défossez, A. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.18677
“We investigate paraphrase-level overlap between the Orca-Math corpus (Mitra et al., 2024) used to construct our post-training data and four small arithmetic benchmarks initially considered for evaluation: AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014), MultiArith (Roy & Roth, 2015), SingleEQ (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015), and SVAM…”
Suwannapichat, P., Changaival, B., Wu, C., & Bouvry, P. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.20099
“We evaluate our method on the same six benchmarks (Cobbe et al., 2021; Ling et al., 2017; Roy and Roth, 2015; Patel et al., 2021; Hendrycks et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2021) used by ARG-Designer (Li et al., 2026), summarized in Table 1.”
Dynamic Positional Attention Modulation for Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning of Large Language Models
Pan, D., Wang, J., & Yu, X. (2026) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3770855.3817911
“Mathematical reasoning performance is evaluated on GSM8K [9], AQuA [27], MAWPS [23], AddSub [15], MultiArith [42], SingleEq [22], and SVAMP [37], while commonsense reasoning is evaluated on BoolQ [6], PIQA [4], Social IQA [44], ARC-Easy and ARC-Challenge [8], OpenBookQA [34], HellaSwag [57], and…”
Triplet Decomposition and Extensions: A General Framework for Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning
Du, Z., Min, Y., Zhang, D., Lü, K., Li, J., & Shen, H. T. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2026.3720458
“We use the pretrained model weights for both backbones and evaluate on 6 mathematical reasoning tasks: MultiArith [58], GSM8K [46], AddSub [59], AQuA [48], SingleEq [60], and SVAMP [50].”
Reasoning to Regulate: Chain-of-Thought for Traffic Rule Understanding
Luo, Y.-R., Yan, X., Zhou, C.-Q., Yang, Y.-M., Zhan, C., Mei, S., Zheng, C., & Li, Z. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.24199
“LLMs have demonstrated remarkable emergent capabilities in complex reasoning tasks Talmor et al. (2018); Roy & Roth (2016).”
Efficient Chain-of-Modality Reasoning via Progressive Compression for Spoken Language Models
Feng, P., Tan, C.-H., Chen, Q., Wang, W., Li, X.-G., & Chen, X. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.19932
“To this end, we consider four math reasoning datasets: AddSub [21], SingleEq [26], MultiArith [42], and SVAMP [40], which are widely used to assess the mathematical reasoning ability of LLMs.”
Farajidizaji, M., & Raina, V. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.19608
“The main exception is MultiArith, where IFFR rises again at 27B (Figure 4c), mirroring the non-monotonic pattern noted above and showing that scale reduces but does not eliminate reversion to the learned task prior.”
InfluentialThink in Latent, Explain in Language: Self-Explainable Latent Reasoning
Zhao, D., Cao, S.-C., Wang, Y.-X., & Gui, L. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.13570
“We perform in-domain evaluation on the GSM8k test set and out-of-distribution (OOD) evaluation on SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), MultiArith (Roy & Roth, 2015), and GSM-Hard (Gao et al., 2023).”
Geometric Latent Reasoning Induces Shorter Generations in LLMsPreprint
Kumar, S., Kaloga, Y., Motlíček, P., Kodrasi, I., & Cavallaro, A. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.02248
“[29] 300 Arithmetic Word Problems Foundational MultiArith [26] 180 Multi-step Arithmetic Foundational MATH500 [25] 500 Advanced Mathematics Hard AMC23 [27] 40 Competition Mathematics Very Hard OlympiadBench [28] 674 Olympiad-level Mathematics Extremely Hard Foundational Arithmetic.”
Lee, Y., Shen, Y., Park, J., Yang, H., & Park, J.-H. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.28292
“GSM8K, SVAMP, MultiArith, Coin Flip, and CommonsenseQA are used as in-domain tasks for supervised fine-tuning and evaluation, whereas MATH-500, BIG-Bench Hard, Strat-egyQA, and ScienceQA are used as out-of-domain benchmarks.”
InfluentialATOM: Instantiating Budget-Controllable Multi-Agent Collaboration via Nucleus-Electron Hierarchy
Zhao, X.-K., Liu, S.-D., Zhang, Y.-F., Ma, Q., Lin, Z.-W., Wang, N.-B., Cheng, G.-J., Liu, C., & Xu, Y.-S. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.26178
“Benchmarks: We evaluate ATOM on six benchmarks spanning three domains: General Reasoning (MMLU [10]), Mathematical Reasoning (GSM8K [6], MultiArith [25], SVAMP [22], AQuA [18]), and Code Generation (HumanEval [4]).”
Structured Synthetic Reasoning Data for Arithmetic Fine-Tuning of Small Language ModelsPreprint
O'Grady, J., & Ramlan, E. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.18266
“SVAMP [31] contains 1,000 word problems designed to test robustness to linguistic variation, while MultiArith [32] contains 180 compositional multi-step arithmetic problems.”
Amjad, H., Shahzad, R., Shahzad, A., & Fatima, M. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.19723
“Semantic parsing methods convert textual descriptions into executable expressions or formal logical structures, enabling equation construction and symbolic reasoning (Roy and Roth, 2015).”
CASE: structured collaboration of agents for problem solving in real-world scenarios
Zhou, Q., Cheng, Y., & Su, Y.-B. (2026) · International Conference on Telecommunications, Optics and Computer Science · doi:10.1117/12.3108974
“However, existing benchmarks for agent systems focus more on straightforward tasks that are designed for specific domains like arithmetic reasoning [8], tool-use [9], information retrieval in web navigation [10], etc.”
Luo, X., Wang, K., Zhan, Z.-F., Zhou, Y.-C., & Duan, X.-Y. (2026) · Expert systems with applications · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.09346
“• MultiArith : Contains 600 multi-step arithmetic problems aimed at assessing a model’s capacity for multi-step reasoning.”
InfluentialAgent-GSPO: Communication-Efficient Multi-Agent Systems Via Group Sequence Policy Optimization
Yang, J., Fan, Y., Zhang, J., & Wang, K. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp55912.2026.11462491
A DSL-Based Agent Framework for Reliable LLM Arithmetic using Model Context Protocol
C, R., & Jishnu, K. (2026) · 2026 International Conference on Data Science and Business Systems (ICDSBS) · doi:10.1109/icdsbs69077.2026.11634997
“• MultiArith [2]: 600 multi-step arithmetic word problems from the Math Word Problem Repository.”
Generating and Solving Complex Transfer Type Arithmetic Word Problems
Kumar, S., & Kumar, P. (2026) · Semantic Web · doi:10.1177/22104968261440709
2T-FT: Two-Token Fine-tuning improves zero-shot performance with minimal training
Neto, P. S., Dyonisio, J. D. S., Lemos, J. F. S. S., Kühne, F., Guerra, R. S., & Drews, P. (2026) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-026-12052-9
“For arithmetic reason - ing, we chose the GSM8K [5], MultiArith [25] and SVAMP [22] datasets.”
A Control Architecture for Training-Free Memory Use
Lu, Y., Jiang, M.-C., Qian, Z., & Zhou, X. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.18206
“Reasoning: SVAMP [Patel et al., 2021], ASDiv [Miao et al., 2020], and MultiArith [Roy and Roth, 2015] under a strict fit → test protocol with Qwen3-0.”
Agent-GWO: Collaborative Agents for Dynamic Prompt Optimization in Large Language ModelsPreprint
Wang, X., Zhang, C., Li, C., Chen, S., Sun, Q., Zhang, J., Puspitasari, F. D., Kim, T.-H., Wei, J., Zhang, M., et al. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.18612 · Cited by 1
“The mathematical reasoning set includes GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), MATH (Hendrycks et al., 2021), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015), and ASDiv (Miao et al., 2020).”
FourierMoE: Fourier Mixture-of-Experts Adaptation of Large Language Models
Jiang, J., Wang, F., Qi, H.-G., Kim, S., & Tang, J. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.01762
“5-14B (Yang et al., 2025) on Math10K (Hu et al., 2023), and evaluate them on GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), MultiArith (Roy & Roth, 2016), AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014), AQuA (Ling et al., 2017), and SingleEq (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015).”
ROM: Real-time Overthinking Mitigation via Streaming Detection and InterventionPreprint
Wang, X., Liu, X., Pei, M., & Xiao, C. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.22016 · Cited by 3
“We evaluate our method across two categories of tasks: Mathematical Reasoning Tasks: We use six benchmarks, including MATH500 (Hendrycks et al., 2021), GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), ASDiv (Miao et al., 2020), MAWPS (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2016), MultiArith (Roy & Roth, 2015), and SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), which tes…”
HyEvo: Self-Evolving Hybrid Agentic Workflows for Efficient ReasoningPreprint
Xu, B., Ye, Y., Shen, C., Zhou, Y., Chen, C., & Chen, M. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.19639 · Cited by 1
“…cover two primary domains: i) Mathematical Reasoning, including GSM8K [Cobbe et al. , 2021], MATH [Hendrycks et al. , 2021], and Multi-Arith [Roy and Roth, 2015], which require complex multi-step logical deduction; and ii) Code Generation, including HumanEval [Chen et al. , 2021] and MBPP…”
Sengupta, A., Dixit, S., Akhtar, M. S., & Chakraborty, T. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.10877
“…HellaSwag (Zellers et al., 2019), Wino-Grande (Sakaguchi et al., 2021), ARC-easy, ARC-challenge (Clark et al., 2018) and OpenBookQA (Mihaylov et al., 2018) and three mathematical reasoning tasks – MultiArith (Roy & Roth, 2016), SingleEq (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2016) and AQuA (Ling et al., 2017).”
AI-Enhanced Quality of Multimodal Physics Word Problems in Authentic Contexts Using the P-MAGIC App
Hwang, W., Sari, V. K. R., Purba, S. W. D., & Azhar, M. W. (2026) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/07356331261433399
“(Patel et al., 2021; Roy & Roth, 2015; Zhang et al., 2019).”
CoLT: Reasoning with Chain of Latent Tool Calls
Zhu, F., & Sui, Z.-F. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.04246
“We also introduce three additional out-of-domain math reasoning datasets as out-of-domain benchmarks: (1) GSM-Hard (Gao et al., 2022), a modified version of the GSM8k test split by using larger numbers to increase difficulty; (2) SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021) and (3) Multi-Arith (Roy and Roth, 2015) are two simpler grade…”
InfluentialDu, K., Zhang, X., Gao, C., Zhu, R., Liu, S., Li, T., & Jin, Z. (2026) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2025.115095
DiverSeed: Integrating Active Learning for Target Domain Data Generation in Instruction Tuning
Gao, J., Qi, M., Gao, X., Xiang, S., Ji, K., Ruan, J., Liu, T., & Fu, Y. (2025) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-025-06926-7
“Tasks and Datasets In mathematical reasoning, we consider the following six math prob - lem datasets following Hu et al. (2023): GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), MultiArith (Roy & Roth, 2016), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014 ), AQuA (Ling et al., 2017 ) and SingleEq (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015…”
Real-Time Adaptive Topic Modeling Framework for Identifying Social Engineering Attacks
Bhasin, M., Abri, F., Webb, J., & Andreopoulos, W. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata66926.2025.11402505
“This simple change in prompt engineering sky-rocketed the accuracy of GPT-3 on several key benchmarks, MultiArith [59]: 17.7% → 78.7%, GSM8K [60]: 10.4% → 40.7%, and AQUA-RAT [61]: 22.4% → 33.5%.”
InfluentialEvoRL: Evolution of Agentic Workflows Using Reinforcement Learning
Attota, D. C., & Xie, Y. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata66926.2025.11401641
“E XPERIMENTS AND E VALUATION A. Experiment Setup 1) Datasets : We assess the performance of EvoRL on five publicly available benchmarks across Mathematical Reasoning; GSM8K [38], MATH [39]and MultiArith [40], and Code Generation domains; HumanEval [41] and MBPP [42].”
Lightweight Dual-Process Reasoning for Edge and Data-Driven AI Systems
Chen, N., Mao, J., Li, T., & Zhang, X. (2025) · International Conference on Data Science and Edge Computing (ICDSEC) · doi:10.1109/icdsec67721.2025.11439183
“MultiArith [20] consists of elementary math problems with multiple steps.”
Enhancing Mathematical Reasoning Through Autonomously Learning Knowledge
Liu, J., Huang, Z., Chen, E., Liu, Q., Zhao, H., Lin, X., Sha, J. J., & Wang, S. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2025.3634507 · Cited by 1
“Specifically, rule-based methods rely on manually crafted schemas and pattern matching [31], while statistic-based methods leverage traditional machine learning models like SVM to select and complete pre-defined templates [32].”
More Agents Improve Math Problem Solving but Adversarial Robustness Gap Persists
Alavi, K., Yeltay, Z., Flek, L., & Karimi, A. (2026) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.2158 · Cited by 2
“Overall, easier datasets with simpler tasks (GSM8K, MultiArith) are less affected by noise, which is reflected in their lower ASR values.”
InfluentialHuman-like Mathematical Problem-Solving Brain for K-12 Education
Shen, Z., Yang, Y.-B., Zhu, F., & Huang, S. (2025) · 2025 International Conference on Intelligent Education and Intelligent Research (IEIR) · doi:10.1109/ieir67391.2025.11489544
“Seq2Seq models [6-8] pioneered end-to-end learning (58.3% accuracy), and the GTS architecture achieved 75.6% accuracy with graph-based decoding.”
InfluentialSolving Math Word Problems by Classifying Problem Text into Math Operators Permutation
Wang, M.-S., Huang, K.-B., Song, G., Ma, H., & Yang, L. (2025) · 2025 International Conference on Intelligent Education and Intelligent Research (IEIR) · doi:10.1109/ieir67391.2025.11491526
“This idea of tree-based approaches [15,16,17,18] is to convert the derivation of the math expression into constructing an equivalent tree step by step in a bottom-up manner.”
CHOIR: Collaborative Harmonization fOr Inference RobustnessPreprint
Dong, X., Wang, C., Teleki, M., Bismay, M., & Caverlee, J. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.22475
“We evaluate CHOIR on arithmetic reasoning tasks: GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), SingleEq (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015), and MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015), and the commonsense reasoning task: CSQA (Talmor et al., 2019).”
NeuroAda: Activating Each Neuron’s Potential for Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning
Zhang, Z., Shen, Y., Cao, C., & Shutova, E. (2025) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.555
“The included tasks are AddSub (Hos-seini et al., 2014), AQuA (Ling et al., 2017), GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), MAWPS (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2016), MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015), SingleEq (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015), and SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021).”
Abdaljalil, S., Serpedin, E., Qaraqe, K. A., & Kurban, H. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.10252
“Multi-Arith (Roy and Roth, 2015) consists of multi-step arithmetic word problems requiring compositional numerical reasoning, GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), which contains high school mathematical word problems, and SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), a dataset of mathematical problems of fourth grade level,…”
HyperAdapt: Simple High-Rank AdaptationPreprint
Gurung, A., & Campbell, J. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.18629 · Cited by 1
“AQuA (Ling et al., 2017) focuses on multiple-choice algebra questions, MultiArith(Roy and Roth, 2016) requires sequential arithmetic steps, and SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021) evaluates robustness through perturbed math problems.”
CCQA: Generating Question from Solution Can Improve Inference-Time Reasoning in SLMs
Kim, J., & Yoon, J. W. (2025) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.704
“For arithmetic reasoning, we utilized GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021) with its multi-step grade school math problems (train: 7.47K, test: 1.32K), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021) offering varied math word problems (train: 700, test: 300), and Multi-Arith (Roy and Roth, 2015) for problems requiring multiple operations (train: 420…”
Li, J.-P., Gao, Z.-Y., Qi, Y.-B., Dong, H.-D., Chen, W.-J., & Lin, Q. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.07676
Learning Temporal Abstractions via Variational Homomorphisms in Option-Induced Abstract MDPs
Li, C., Zhang, Y.-R., Lv, H.-R., Cao, Q., Xue, C., & He, X. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.16473
“• MultiArith [52]: A dataset composed of multi-step arithmetic word problems, requiring the model to sequence multiple calculations correctly.”
Zhu, R., Wang, B., Zhao, D., Liu, J., He, R., & Hou, Y. (2025) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3726302.3730170
“(1) Mathematical reasoning incorporates 6 representative datasets, namely MultiArith [15], AddSub [7], AQUA [11], SingleEQ [10], SVAMP [14], GSM8K [3].”
Exploring Capabilities Of Large Language Models In Solving Basic Algebraic Equations
Hasan, M. N., & Kumar, K. B. S. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Computing and Communication Technologies (CONECCT) · doi:10.1109/conecct65861.2025.11306350
Zhu, X., Li, J., Yin, R., Ma, C., & Wang, W. (2025) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn64981.2025.11228594
“These datasets include ASDiv, which contains diverse math word problems [18], SVAMP, which features math word problems with varying structures [19], and MultiArith, which consists of arithmetic word problems [20].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Roy, S., & Roth, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Corresponding author
- Roth, Dan
- ORCID
- Roth, Dan
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2016
- Pages
- 1743-1752
- arXiv
- 1608.01413
- OpenAlex
- W2251935656
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12
- FWCI
- 9.02
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (FA8750-13-2-0008, FA8750)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
- Keywords
- arithmetic word problems, automated problem solving, expression trees, constrained inference, world knowledge, feature extraction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review