CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 109Experimental Behavioral Economics StudiesEvolutionary Game Theory and CooperationGame Theory and Applications

A multi-agent reinforcement learning model of common-pool resource appropriation

Open access
Perolat, Julien, Leibo, Joel Z., Zambaldi, Vinicius, Beattie, Charles, Tuyls, Karl, Graepel, Thore·2017·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1707.06600arXiv 1707.06600
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Humanity faces numerous problems of common-pool resource appropriation. This class of multi-agent social dilemma includes the problems of ensuring sustainable use of fresh water, common fisheries, grazing pastures, and irrigation systems. Abstract models of common-pool resource appropriation based on non-cooperative game theory predict that self-interested agents will generally fail to find socially positive equilibria---a phenomenon called the tragedy of the commons. However, in reality, human societies are sometimes able to discover and implement stable cooperative solutions. Decades of behavioral game theory research have sought to uncover aspects of human behavior that make this possible. Most of that work was based on laboratory experiments where participants only make a single choice: how much to appropriate. Recognizing the importance of spatial and temporal resource dynamics, a recent trend has been toward experiments in more complex real-time video game-like environments. However, standard methods of non-cooperative game theory can no longer be used to generate predictions for this case. Here we show that deep reinforcement learning can be used instead. To that end, we study the emergent behavior of groups of independently learning agents in a partially observed Markov game modeling common-pool resource appropriation. Our experiments highlight the importance of trial-and-error learning in common-pool resource appropriation and shed light on the relationship between exclusion, sustainability, and inequality.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1707.06600

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent advents in deep reinforcement learning and neuroevolution have enabled the study of complex behaviors in simulations, such as foraging and tool-use.

    “Recent advents in deep reinforcement learning (DRL) and neuroevolution have enabled the study of complex behaviors in simulations, such as foraging and tool-use (Pérolat et al., 2017;Hamon et al., 2023;Baker et al., 2020).”

    From Dynamics of niche construction in adaptable populations evolving in diverse environments (2023) · cites this paper as Pérolat et al., 2017

    Section 2.2 (p. 4) says the simulated agents learn through deep reinforcement learning, and Section 3.2 (p. 5) describes their learned apple-harvesting behavior. This supports the DRL and foraging-like simulation example, but the paper does not support the sentence’s neuroevolution or tool-use examples. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. [9][9] Piotr J Gmytrasiewicz and Prashant Doshi. A framework for sequential planning in multi-agent settings. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research , 24:49-79, 2005. -
  2. [12][12] Garrett Hardin. The tragedy of the commons. Science , 162(3859):1243-1248, 1968. -
  3. [16][16] Marco Janssen, Robert Goldstone, Filippo Menczer, and Elinor Ostrom. Effect of rule choice in dynamic interactive spatial commons. International Journal of the Commons , 2(2), 2008. -
  4. [20][20] Guillaume J. Laurent, Laëtitia Matignon, and N. Le Fort-Piat. The world of independent learners is not Markovian. Int. J. Know.-Based Intell. Eng. Syst. , 15(1):55-64, 2011. -
  5. [21][21] Joel Z. Leibo, Vinicius Zambaldi, Marc Lanctot, Janusz Marecki, and Thore Graepel. Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning in Sequential Social Dilemmas. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AA-MAS 2017) , Sao Paulo, Brazil, 2017. -
  6. [23][23] Kent O Martin. Play by the rules or don't play at all: Space division and resource allocation in a rural newfoundland fishing community. North Atlantic maritime cultures , pages 277-98, 1979. -
  7. [30][30] Vincent Ostrom and Elinor Ostrom. Public goods and public choices. In Alternatives for Delivering Public Services: Toward Improved Performance , pages 7-49. Westview press, 1977. -
  8. [36][36] Rachel A Turner, Tim Gray, Nicholas VC Polunin, and Selina M Stead. Territoriality as a driver of fishers' spatial behavior in the northumberland lobster fishery. Society & Natural Resources , 26(5):491-505, 2013. -
  9. [37][37] Pradeep Varakantham, Jun-young Kwak, Matthew E Taylor, Janusz Marecki, Paul Scerri, and Milind Tambe. Exploiting coordination locales in distributed POMDPs via social model shaping. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, ICAPS , 2009. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Perolat, J., Leibo, J. Z., Zambaldi, V., Beattie, C., Tuyls, K., & Graepel, T.
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2017
Volume
30
Pages
3643-3652
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1707.06600
arXiv
1707.06600
OpenAlex
W2739364177
Cited by
109
References
30
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • neural information processing systems
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Game Theory and Applications
Keywords
common-pool resources, tragedy of the commons, multi-agent reinforcement learning, deep reinforcement learning, partially observable Markov games, social dilemmas, emergence of cooperation, trial-and-error learning, sustainability, inequality, exclusion, video game environments, behavioral game theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review