PreprintCited by 118Topic ModelingMultimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsInformation Retrieval and Search Behavior

HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answering

Open access
Yang, Zhilin, Qi, Peng, Zhang, Saizheng, Bengio, Yoshua, Cohen, William W., Salakhutdinov, Ruslan, Manning, Christopher D.·2018·arXiv

Abstract

Existing question answering (QA) datasets fail to train QA systems to perform complex reasoning and provide explanations for answers. We introduce HotpotQA, a new dataset with 113k Wikipedia-based question-answer pairs with four key features: (1) the questions require finding and reasoning over multiple supporting documents to answer; (2) the questions are diverse and not constrained to any pre-existing knowledge bases or knowledge schemas; (3) we provide sentence-level supporting facts required for reasoning, allowing QA systems to reason with strong supervision and explain the predictions; (4) we offer a new type of factoid comparison questions to test QA systems' ability to extract relevant facts and perform necessary comparison. We show that HotpotQA is challenging for the latest QA systems, and the supporting facts enable models to improve performance and make explainable predictions.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1809.09600

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Modifying the DSPy framework for joint optimization lowers cost while maintaining accuracy on HotPotQA.

    “We modify the DSPy framework [24] for joint optimization, lowering cost while maintaining accuracy on HotPotQA [60].”

    From AI Agents That Matter (2024) · cites this paper as [60]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, Z., Qi, P., Zhang, S., Bengio, Y., Cohen, W. W., Salakhutdinov, R., & Manning, C. D.
Affiliations
Mila - Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute (CA)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2018
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2952862139
Cited by
97
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1514268)
  • Nvidia
  • Université de Montréal
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
  • Office of Naval Research (N000141812861)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
Keywords
multi-hop question answering, HotpotQA, explainable question answering, complex reasoning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review