CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 48EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningNeuroscience and Neural Engineering

Adversarial Domain Adaptation for Stable Brain-Machine Interfaces

Open access
Farshchian, Ali, Gallego, Juan A., Cohen, Joseph P., Bengio, Yoshua, Miller, Lee E., Solla, Sara A.·2018·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1810.00045arXiv 1810.00045
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Brain-Machine Interfaces (BMIs) have recently emerged as a clinically viable option to restore voluntary movements after paralysis. These devices are based on the ability to extract information about movement intent from neural signals recorded using multi-electrode arrays chronically implanted in the motor cortices of the brain. However, the inherent loss and turnover of recorded neurons requires repeated recalibrations of the interface, which can potentially alter the day-to-day user experience. The resulting need for continued user adaptation interferes with the natural, subconscious use of the BMI. Here, we introduce a new computational approach that decodes movement intent from a low-dimensional latent representation of the neural data. We implement various domain adaptation methods to stabilize the interface over significantly long times. This includes Canonical Correlation Analysis used to align the latent variables across days; this method requires prior point-to-point correspondence of the time series across domains. Alternatively, we match the empirical probability distributions of the latent variables across days through the minimization of their Kullback-Leibler divergence. These two methods provide a significant and comparable improvement in the performance of the interface. However, implementation of an Adversarial Domain Adaptation Network trained to match the empirical probability distribution of the residuals of the reconstructed neural signals outperforms the two methods based on latent variables, while requiring remarkably few data points to solve the domain adaptation problem.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1810.00045

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These results indicate that substantial gains in performance are probably still possible with further language model improvements and more robust decoding algorithms that generalize better to non-stationary data.

    “These results indicate that substantial gains in performance are probably still possible with further language model improvements and more robust decoding algorithms that generalize better to non-stationary data (for example, unsupervised methods that track non-stationarities without the requirement for new training data24–27).”

    From A high-performance speech neuroprosthesis (2023) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Methods (p. 5) describe an unsupervised approach to aligning neural recordings across days, supporting the example of a method that addresses non-stationarity. But the Results (p. 7) say domain adaptation with ADAN requires a small new training set—prediction accuracy saturates at about one minute of data—so this source does not support the claim that no new training data is required. It does not address language-model improvements. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Unsupervised algorithms for updating decoders to neural changes should be feasible.

    “Furthermore, we found that neural activity changed at a gradual rate over time, suggesting that unsupervised algorithms for updating decoders to neural changes should be feasible24–27 (Fig. 4d).”

    From A high-performance speech neuroprosthesis (2023) · cites this paper as [25]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Francis R Bach and Michael I Jordan. Kernel independent component analysis. Journal of Machine Learning Research , 3(Jul):1-48, 2002.
  2. William Bishop, Cynthia C Chestek, Vikash Gilja, Paul Nuyujukian, Justin D Foster, Stephen I Ryu, Krishna V Shenoy, and M Yu Byron. Self-recalibrating classifiers for intracortical braincomputer interfaces. Journal of Neural Engineering , 11(2):026001, 2014. ISSN 1741-2552.
  3. Ian Goodfellow, Jean Pouget-Abadie, Mehdi Mirza, Bing Xu, David Warde-Farley, Sherjil Ozair, Aaron Courville, and Yoshua Bengio. Generative adversarial nets. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pp. 2672-2680, 2014.
  4. Diederik P Kingma and Max Welling. Auto-encoding variational bayes. arXiv:1312.6114 , 2013. · arXiv
  5. Dawn M Taylor, Stephen I Helms Tillery, and Andrew B Schwartz. Direct cortical control of 3d neuroprosthetic devices. Science , 296(5574):1829-1832, 2002. ISSN 0036-8075.
  6. Yin Zhang and Steve M Chase. A stabilized dual kalman filter for adaptive tracking of braincomputer interface decoding parameters. In Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE , pp. 7100-7103. IEEE, 2013.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Farshchian, A., Gallego, J. A., Cohen, J. P., Bengio, Y., Miller, L. E., & Solla, S. A.
Affiliations
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
  • Northwestern University (US)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2018
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1810.00045
arXiv
1810.00045
OpenAlex
W2892541114
Cited by
48
References
32
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2018: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
Keywords
brain-computer interface, domain adaptation, adversarial domain adaptation, neural decoding, latent representations, canonical correlation analysis, Kullback-Leibler divergence, motor cortex, chronic neural recording

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review